home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
HaCKeRz KrOnIcKLeZ 3
/
HaCKeRz_KrOnIcKLeZ.iso
/
drugs
/
defensive
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1996-05-06
|
2KB
|
64 lines
Newsgroups: alt.drugs,talk.politics.drugs
From: wickham@optilink.dsccc.com (Greg Wickham)
Subject: Fight the pee-sniffers!
Message-ID: <Cu8Etr.AyC@optilink.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 1994 19:44:15 GMT
Hi Y'all! I just pulled this off of alt.privacy, and this guy seems to have
a good approach to company drug testing. Even if you end up peeing for
them like a good boy or girl, this is a way you can make them THINK about
what they're doing, without appearing to be filthy lowlife drug-using scum.
If they're going to turn this once-great country into an armed camp full of
nosy, distrustful pee-sniffers, let's at least make 'em WORK for it!
> I'm a computer consultant and have successfully fought the drug test question
> by reverse intimidation. I start asking questions that "they" aren't prepared
> to answer.
>
> - What is the name and address of the lab that will perform the test ?
>
> - EXACTY what test or tests are to be used ?
>
> - For each test performed, list the type and quantity of specimens required ?
>
> - For each test performed, list the percentages for false positive and false
> negative results.
>
> - Provide statistical justification for these percentages.
>
> - In the case of a false positive, what are the established procedures for
> retesting ?
>
> - How many times will retesting be permitted ?
>
> - What is the established procedures for resolving consistant false positive
> results ?
>
> - What facility is going to extract the specimen(s) ?
>
> - How much of each type of specimen is going to be extracted ?
>
> - Are the lab and the blood extraction facility bonded ?
>
> - What company carries their malpractice insurance and what are their policy
> numbers ?
>
> - EXACTLY what information will be release from the lab to the employer ?
>
> - It is required that all results be forwarded to me.
>
> - The employer is required to pay all costs involved, including those if
> retesting is required.
>
> By this time, any reasonable person will be thinking that maybe drug testing
> isn't something in which they want to become involved.
>
> I've thought of having a lawyer (or myself) prepare a "Request for Drug Test"
> form in proper legalese. Along with a paragraph swearing, under penalty of
> perjury that all information is complete and correct. So far, that hasn't
> been necessary.