home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
World of Shareware - Software Farm 2
/
wosw_2.zip
/
wosw_2
/
GENERAL
/
OPMSTRAT.ZIP
/
STRAT.DOC
Wrap
Text File
|
1991-04-17
|
58KB
|
1,601 lines
STRATEGIC PLAN FOR FEDERAL HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
This Strategic Plan for Federal Human Resources Management (HRM)
had its beginnings in discussions among the Directors of Personnel
of Federal agencies and the Director of the Office of Personnel
Management at a two-day conference in Charlottesville, Virginia, in
late August 1989. The Directors of Personnel presented their
recommendations to Director Newman in a Conference Report,
subtitled Developing a Strategic Plan for Federal Personnel
Management.
The Directors of Personnel then looked to the Office of Personnel
Management to develop a strategic plan for human resources
management (HRM) in the Federal Government based on recommendations
in the Conference Report. They asked that the plan:
- set out some basic objectives as the foundation for all projects
and initiatives;
- specify legislative and administrative actions required and
include timetables for implementation;
- define the roles and responsibilities of OPM and the agencies in
making the plan a reality; and
- define what the ideal human resources management system would
look like, given the diversity of agency missions.
The Directors of Personnel envisioned a responsive human resources
management system which would allow each agency to attract, develop
and retain a quality workforce needed to accomplish its unique
mission. But even beyond the accomplishment of agencies'
particular missions, this plan conveys a strategy for improving the
overall effectiveness of the public service.
The process of strategic planning should begin with gathering
information about the future from various sources. OPM has
completed significant information gathering as shown in the Hudson
Institute report, Civil Service 2000. That re port concluded that
"The pool of workers from whom new Federal employees will be drawn
will change significantly over the next 12 years."
The most important shifts are projected to include:
- slower growth in the national workforce and a decline in the
numbers of young workers;
- a rise in the average age of the workforce;
- more women entering the workforce;
- minorities as a larger share of the new entrants into the labor
force; and
- immigrants as the largest share of the increase in the
population and workforce since the First World War.
Other expected changes include:
- greatest growth in jobs that require the highest skill and
education levels, with a majority of all new jobs demanding
post-secondary education;
- by the year 2000, more than 60 percent of all working age women
in the workforce, thus continuing the increase in two-career
families;
- increased professionalism in a stable [Federal] workforce due to
the combined influences of Government involvement in areas of
growing professionalism on the one hand, and increased
contracting out of
commercial and industrial services on the other;
- one-third to one-fourth of the [Federal] workforce eligible to
retire during the next 5 years; and
- shifts in national public policy priorities will result in
redistribution in the Federal workforce, especially from defense
to non-defense agencies.
The need to train new workers who lack basic skills will, of
necessity, drive an increase in the average annual cost per
employee. This will further complicate an already austere budget
climate, forcing Government managers to concentrate limited
resources on their highest priorities and to seek cost-effective
approaches which yield the greatest return on investment.
The baby-boom generation now in the public service is ready to move
up and compete for advancement into middle management.
Organizations will need t o deal with this tide of rising
expectations if they expect to keep a quality workforce. The baby-
bust generation will arrive a short 7 or 8 years from now and,
given the public-private portability of the Federal Employees
Retirement System, will increase competition not only to recruit
but to retain good people.
Other developments are also likely to impact on the future of
public human resources management in significant ways. Agencies
are adopting Total Quality Management (TQM) approaches to improving
the quality of Government services. TQM incorporates employee
involvement, customer-defined expectations, and statistical process
control.
These new approaches call for new leadership styles as well as a
new relationship with Federal unions. Authors are describing these
emerging leadership styles as deemphasizing hierarchy, structure,
and traditional supervisor-subordinate relationships. These new
leadership approaches modify "chains of command" with empowered
work teams and networks of stakeholders. In a complementary
development, Federal unions and managers are finding opportunities
to forge partnerships and cooperative ventures.
Just as managers, employees and unions are changing roles, so too
are OPM and the agency personnel offices. OPM is changing the way
it exercises it s traditional leadership roles. The changeover,
already well underway, is a movement away from central operations,
regulation, and standardized processes. The changeover is a
movement toward optimal delegation of authorities and operating
responsibilities to agencies as well as deregulation of required
processes. OPM's emerging leadership style, while retaining
guidance, assistance and oversight, relies increasingly on
communication, research, flexibility and involvement.
Agency personnel offices are also changing the ways they exercise
their roles. Increasingly, they are scaling back agency
requirements, delegating authority to line managers, evaluating
their own effectiveness and developing innovative approaches which
are more efficient, which are more service-oriented and which "fit"
their agency's culture. Managing change of this magnitude within
an environment which is itself changing is an awesome task. It
requires strategic thinking. It requires a shared vision. It
requires a joint commitment to pursue complementary courses of
action.
THE VISION
The Office of Personnel Management and the agency Directors of
Personnel share the following vision of the Federal human resources
management system:
HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT THROUGHOUT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS SO
EFFECTIVE IN ENABLING AGENCIES TO RECRUIT, DEVELOP AND RETAIN A
QUALITY AND REPRESENTATIVE WORKFORCE THAT:
THE PUBLIC'S EXPECTATIONS ABOUT THE QUALITY OF GOVERNMENT SERVICES,
PROGRAMS AND OPERATIONS ARE MET AND OFTEN EXCEEDED AND THE PUBLIC
REGARDS
FEDERAL EMPLOYEES AS KNOWLEDGEABLE, HELPFUL, ETHICAL AND COMMITTED
TO QUALITY;
FEDERAL EMPLOYEES REGARD THE GOVERNMENT AS A GREAT PLACE TO WORK;
AGENCY MANAGERS CITE RESPONSIVE AND COST-EFFECTIVE HUMAN RESOURCES
MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AS A MAJOR SOURCE OF SUPPORT FOR THEIR
MISSIONS.
This vision statement describes how personnel officials want to be
viewed by others. But, they also share an insider's vision of how
the "ideal" Federal hum an resources management system should
operate at peak effectiveness.
The ideal human resource management system is a seamless system,
supported by top leadership, in which line managers and budget and
personnel staff collaborate to attract, train and retain quality
people. It is an integral and cost effective part of each agency's
management system, focused primarily on mission accomplishment and
delivery of services to the public.
The ideal human resource management system balances legitimate
needs for uniformity and for flexibility. It gives individual
managers great
flexibility to manage their resources to achieve mission
accomplishment and agency objectives. The ideal system is
characterized by optimal delegation to the lowest organizational
levels.
It is consistent across agencies on matters related to individual
rights, entitlements, and records: including veterans' preference,
retention, formal dispute resolution, collective bargaining,
benefits and privacy. It adheres to common merit principles, such
as open competition and job-relatedness; and embraces the principle
of equal pay for substantially equal work.
The ideal human resource management system is anchored in a set of
positive assumptions about human nature and the importance of work
to the dignity of the individual. It assumes that people want to
do the best work they are capable of doing, that they are their own
best source of motivation and discipline, that they will eagerly
respond to overtures to take responsibility for continuously
improving the organization's performance and that they are willing
to be held accountable for t heir relative contributions. It also
constructively addresses those rare situations in which individuals
are unwilling or unable to perform their jobs. The ideal human re
source management system brings out the best in people, as
individuals and organizations. It encourages agencies to
collaborate on program development, to form consortia, to borrow
each others' technology and innovations, and to otherwise seek out
cost efficiencies through sharing and cooperation.
Lastly, the ideal human resource management system for the Federal
Government is one in which OPM and the agency personnel offices
have a high degree of mutual respect and a commitment to each
other's success in ensuring the success o f line managers. This
attitude manifests itself in many ways including delegation t o
agencies, deregulation and communication.
THE GOAL
The goal of the Federal human resources management system is to
create a responsive system that enables each agency to attract,
develop and retain a quality and representative workforce needed to
accomplish its unique mission. This goal statement compels us to
adopt the "quality" candidate an d the "quality" employee as our
primary points of perspective, though efficiency a nd quality
control of the human resources management system itself are also
very important. Who are "quality" candidates? What do they know
about job opportunities i n the Federal Government? What do they
know about the Federal Government as an employer? What is
important to them when they are deciding among competing job
offers?
Who are "quality" employees? What do they know about merit
promotion opportunities throughout the Federal Government? What do
they know about employee development/training opportunities? What
is important to them when deciding whether to stay with the Federal
Government or to accept job offers elsewhere?
Current research concerning the recruitment and retention of
employees including honors graduates, scientists and engineers, and
former members of the Senior Executive Service suggests that the
following factors weigh heavily for individuals deciding whether to
accept particular job offers:
- Opportunity to "belong" to a highly regarded work group, which
performs challenging and important work;
- Competitive and fair compensation;
- Opportunity for professional growth and development;
- Opportunity to influence work assignments and work processes, to
make an individual difference; and
- An environment which respects the individual, provides due
process and protects the individual from discrimination,
retaliation, harassment, partisan political pressures, and other
conflicts.
The Federal Government becomes more competitive as an employer by
improving how "quality" candidates and employees view its track
record on these factors.
THE COMPLEMENTARY STRATEGY AND THE JOINT COMMITMENT TO ACT
In order to reach this goal and realize their shared vision, the
Office of Personnel Management and the agency personnel offices
must pursue complementary strategies within the current and
proposed statutory framework. OPM's mission is to take the lead,
with support from departments and agencies, to improve the quality
and image of the Federal civil service through more effective
recruitment, training , retention, performance evaluation, and
compensation practices. Agency personnel offices' missions are to
support agency mission accomplishment through effective human
resources management.
Clearly efforts are needed over the next three to five years to:
- improve job information and recruitment and
- improve the Federal Government's competitiveness on each of the
five factors which generally influence individuals to accept job
offers.
Supporting efforts are needed to:
- improve the efficiency of personnel operations and
- improve quality control of the human resources management
system.
This part describes the efforts OPM and agencies will be
undertaking in each of the above areas.
IMPROVE JOB INFORMATION AND RECRUITMENT
In general, the strategy is:
a. to do a better job of planning for future workforce needs and of
expanding the pool of prospective workers;
b. to retain recruitment strategies and rating factors which are
proven predictors of job success and to expand their use
whenever appropriate to an occupation;
c. to improve the public's access to information about Federal
careers, specific job openings and hiring procedures;
d. to establish strong partnerships with schools and
e. to streamline hiring processes through delegation, deregulation,
automation and state-of-the-science testing methodologies.
IMPROVE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S COMPETITIVENESS ON EACH OF THE
FIVE FACTORS KNOWN TO INFLUENCE INDIVIDUALS TO ACCEPT PARTICULAR
JOB OFFERS
The strategies vary for each factor depending on the Federal
Government's current competitive standing vis-a-vis other
employers, as well as statutory constraints.
FACTOR 1: Opportunity to Belong to a Highly Regarded Work Group
Which Performs Challenging and Important Work
In general, the Federal Government is very competitive in its
ability to offer challenging and important work, though the public
may lack knowledge about the variety of critical functions
performed by Government agencies. Furthermore, certain agencies
are highly regarded for their missions and their achievements;
however, public opinion surveys indicate that the public has
relatively low regard for Government generally.
The general strategy to improve competitiveness on this particular
factor is:
a. to disseminate information to the public and to Federal
employees about the important work Government does and the
excellence with which individuals and teams perform that work,
and
b. to help the Government's "frontlines" reinforce the perception
of excellence.
FACTOR 2: Fair Compensation
Federal pay is least competitive on the dimension of external
equity and generally lags behind private sector pay by varying
degrees depending on the occupation and the geographic location.
Perceptions of individual equity are largely unknown, except that
managers express dissatisfaction with the Performance Management
and Recognition System (PMRS). Benefits are costly and do not meet
the needs of relatively new employees, especially those who are
family care providers and those who suffer injury or long term
illness. While the values underlying the position classification
system have not been revalidated for many years, Federal pay for
particular jobs is believed to be fair relative to other jobs
across the Government.
The general strategy to increase competitiveness on this particular
factor is:
a. to increase external equity by introducing pay variables that
are sensitive to differences and fluctuations in the labor
market and that provide managers with the flexibility to meet
specific recruitment and retention needs;
b. to improve individual equity by allowing agencies considerably
more flexibility to develop pay-for-performance systems,
performance management systems and incentive awards systems
which "fit" well with their missions, their organizational
cultures, with their related management initiatives, and with
the values of their employees;
c. to explore alternatives to the current position classification
system possibly leading to reform proposals; and
d. to improve the Federal benefits package by reforming the Federal
Employees Health Benefits Program, by considering changes to the
leave system, by exploring the feasibility of a more flexible
benefits package and by streamlining the operation of the
current retirement systems.
FACTOR 3: Opportunity for Professional Growth and Development
The Federal Government is fairly competitive on this factor in some
agencies, but not universally. There is room for improvement in
both quantity and quality, and in both planning and evaluation.
In general the strategy on this factor is:
a. to standardize and improve the quality of training offered by
OPM, especially in the following areas:
- supervisory, managerial and executive training
- frontline operations
- personnel management and equal employment opportunity
b. to improve the way agencies plan for training
c. to expand the application of technology to training
d. to evaluate the "bottom line" of training
e. to support legislation permitting tuition reimbursement for
academic degrees
f. to institute diagnostic testing in order to plan job-related
training
FACTOR 4: Opportunity to Influence Work Assignments and Work
Processes, to Make an Individual Difference
This factor finds the Government at a decided disadvantage. Most
people, including Federal employees and managers, believe that the
Government is saddled with red tape, excessive and overly
restrictive rules.
In general the strategy on this factor is:
a. to deregulate and delegate personnel authorities to the maximum
extent possible and
b. to apply Total Quality Management principles across Government.
FACTOR 5: An Environment Which Respects the Individual, Which
Provides Due Process and Which Protects the Individual
from Discrimination, Retaliation, Harassment, Partisan
Political Pressures and Other Conflicts
This factor may be a competitive advantage for the Federal
Government, but managers often perceive appellate processes as
impediments to addressing concerns expeditiously.
In general the strategy for this factor is:
a. to reduce and resolve conflict more quickly,
b. to expand and enhance labor management cooperation, and
c. to provide dispute resolution systems that are fair, timely and
efficient.
IMPROVE THE EFFICIENCY OF PERSONNEL OPERATIONS
In general the strategy is to increase the application of computer
technology to personnel operations, thereby reducing paperwork and
ultimately leading to the paperless personnel office.
IMPROVE QUALITY CONTROL OF THE HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
In general the strategy is:
a. to meet the expectations of different customers by:
- monitoring compliance,
- analyzing trends which impact on policy,
- transferring exemplary practices from one agency to others,
- ensuring that personnel systems enable agencies to be effective;
and
b. to introduce more measurement of bottom line outcomes or
results,
especially as OPM and the agencies deregulate personnel
practices and eliminate standard operating procedures [examples
appear in appendix A].
IMPLEMENTATION/ASSESSMENT/REVISION
A Strategic Plan is a prelude to action and a process for
continuing communication. For its part, OPM is using the Plan in
its internal, long-range program planning and budgeting process.
In that context, OPM will develop specific timetables for the
Government-wide initiatives: creating new systems, assembling task
forces, preparing legislative proposals, etc. In implementing
their portion of the plan, agencies will also build these
strategies into their regular planning/budgeting processes.
Ideally, each agency will develop its own strategic plan,
incorporating those action steps that the Government-wide plan
calls for along with other system improvement actions that are
specific to the agency, and setting timetables and priorities that
are appropriate for the agency's circumstances.
To ensure that this plan is effective, information will be
collected and progress assessed. Just as the plan calls for
information sharing among agencies and with OPM on useful
technology, so, too, the Federal personnel community needs to share
information on achievements that can be replicated by others. OPM
will take responsibility for preparing a report annually on
progress in implementing the plan and expects to include in those
reports information on agencies' achievements.
From time to time at meetings or conferences of the IAG, OPM
together with the agency Directors of Personnel, can review these
progress assessments, reassess directions and provide for needed
improvement, and update the strategic plan to reflect new realities
and emerging opportunities.
The goal of Federal human resources management is to create a
responsive system that enables each agency to attract, develop and
retain a quality and representative workforce needed to accomplish
its unique mission. To that end, t he following bottom-line
results (with their specific sub-results) represent success vis-a-
vis this vision:
RESULT #1 -- THE PUBLIC'S EXPECTATIONS ABOUT THE QUALITY OF
GOVERNMENT SERVICES, PROGRAMS AND OPERATIONS ARE MET AND OFTEN
EXCEEDED, AND THE PUBLIC REGARDS FEDERAL EMPLOYEES AS
KNOWLEDGEABLE, HELPFUL, ETHICAL AND COMMITTED TO QUALITY.
Result 1A: Public service is a highly regarded profession.
Premise: Positive perceptions of public service result in higher
quality candidates for Federal jobs, and higher retention
of good performers.
Specific Outcomes:
a. Public perceptions about careers in the public service are
increasingly positive.
b. More and more relatively "high quality" candidates apply for
Federal jobs. c. There is greater retention/less turnover of high
performers.
d. Job satisfaction among Federal employees is increased.
Result 1B: Timely and accurate Federal job information is provided
to customers.
Premise: Responsive and correct job information results in better
customer satisfaction and recruitment of higher quality
candidates.
Specific Outcomes:
a. Potential applicants receive job information that is helpful
and correct. b. Potential applicants spend less time getting "the
answer."
c. Fewer complaints are received from customers.
d. Helpful attitudes are perceived by customers.
Result 1C: The Federal workforce is representative of the labor
force in general.
Premise: A representative workforce not only causes more
representative (i.e., democratic) public policy/decision
making, but also creates the perception of broad access
to Government by establishing role models that serve to
attract high quality candidates.
Specific Outcomes:
a. Percentages of targeted/disadvantaged groups in the workforce
are representative of percentages in the qualified labor force.
b. Percentages of targeted/disadvantaged groups in professional
occupations and grades are proportionate to their qualified
labor-force representation. c. Percentages of
targeted/disadvantaged groups in higher grades are
proportionate to their qualified labor-force representation.
Result 1D: Agencies comply with the Federal personnel law,
regulations and OPM policy.
Premise: Agency compliance with laws, regulations and OPM policy
results in public expectations of compliance with merit
principles and confidence in Government.
Specific Outcomes:
a. Progressively fewer "material violations" are occurring.
b. Agencies have internal review programs to prevent violations,
and identify and correct those which do occur.
RESULT #2 -- FEDERAL EMPLOYEES REGARD THE GOVERNMENT AS A GREAT
PLACE TO WORK.
Result 2A: The compensation system treats employees fairly while
enabling the Government to compete successfully in the
market place at a reasonable cost.
Premise: A fair and cost-effective compensation system causes the
Government to be able to compete for and retain high
quality employees.
Specific Outcomes:
a. Federal employees perceive that their compensation is fair.
b. Compensation in the Federal Government is competitive with
compensation in other sectors for similar positions at similar
levels of difficulty and responsibility.
c. Improved Government recruitment of quality candidates for jobs
where there is competition among various employers for such
candidates.
d. Increasing percentage of managers express satisfaction with the
compensation system.
Result 2B: The performance management system recognizes and
promotes motivation and quality performance, and is
generally accepted by management and employees.
Premise: A performance management system that motivates and
recognizes quality performance, promotes recruitment and
retention of high performers.
Specific Outcomes:
a. Employees perceive an increasingly greater link between
performance and reward.
b. Employees perceive that the performance management system is
administered fairly.
c. Managers perceive that the performance management system leads
to improved performance.
d. Employees perceive that their supervisor deals appropriately
with performance problems.
e. Distinctions in performance are being made, and these
distinctions are reflected in pay.
Result 2C: A constructive and participatory relationship exists
between management and employees/employee organizations.
Premise: A participatory and constructive relationship between
labor and management increases employee involvement, job
satisfaction, an d ultimately retention.
Specific Outcomes:
a. Employees and employee organizations are increasingly satisfied
with their access to management.
b. Employees have increased organizational commitment.
c. The substance of the contacts between management and
employees/employee organizations is increasingly satisfactory
to both parties.
d. The number of ULPs and other complaints decreases.
Result 2D: Federal employees are provided a safe and healthful
workplace with suitable working conditions.
Premise: A safe and healthful workplace confirms the value of
employees to the organization and improves productivity.
Specific Outcomes:
a. Sick leave use decreases.
b. Employees have an increasing sense that safety and health are
important "management issues."
c. Employees are increasingly satisfied with their working
conditions.
d. On-the-job injuries decrease.
Result 2E: Retiring employees are provided a smooth transition
from employee status to annuitant status.
Premise: Expeditious and trouble-free transition from employee to
annuitant status confirms the value of employees and
alleviates pre-retirement stress and anxiety.
Specific Outcomes:
a. The length of time between the last paycheck and the first
annuity payment is decreased.
b. Increasing numbers of retirees perceive the transition from
employee status to annuitant status as smooth.
c. The length of time between agencies' submission of retirement
records to OPM is decreased.
d. The accuracy of information sent to applicants is increased.
e. Annuitants perceive increased responsiveness on the part of the
servicing program.
Result 2F: The health insurance system gives employees quality
care at reasonable cost.
Premise: A health insurance system that meets employees' needs at
a reasonable cost aids in recruiting and retention by
complementing a competitive pay system.
Specific Outcomes:
a. Employee premiums will track with the value of benefits
received.
b. The percentage of premium dollars spent on actual benefits is
maximized.
c. Benefits are tailored more to the particular needs of employees
as well as retirees, thus creating more desirable benefit
packages for both groups .
d. There are fewer and clearer choices; enrollee choices are based
more on the level of benefits available than on premium
differences.
Result 2G: A community of interest exists among SES members
through communication and involvement.
Premise: A community of interest among SES members results in
better informed and committed executives who feel a sense
of belonging to a highly-regarded organization.
Specific Outcomes:
a. SES members feel an increasing sense of positive "community"
with their fellow executives.
b. Increased numbers of SESers participate in SES-sponsored
activities.
RESULT #3 -- AGENCY MANAGERS CITE HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
PRACTICES AS A MAJOR SOURCE OF SUPPORT FOR THEIR
MISSIONS.
Result 3A: The human resources management system allows agencies
the
maximum flexibility to design and operate programs that
meet their needs.
Premise: A flexible human resources management system enables
Federal agencies to more effectively accomplish their
missions, and gives managers and employees more
opportunities to make improvements in processes.
Specific Outcomes:
a. Agency managers feel they are increasingly responsible and
accountable for their actions.
b. Agency personnelists perceive increasingly greater control over
their work (and OPM has increasingly less).
c. Agency management (including personnel managers) feel fewer and
fewer impediments related to personnel administration.
d. Agency managers perceive that the personnel system can be used
to meet their specific needs.
Result 3B: The classification system is as simple and flexible as
possible, and provides reasonably consistent
classification within and between agencies.
Premise: A flexible classification system that is relatively
simple to administer causes Federal agencies to more
effectively accomplish their missions, and promotes
employee satisfaction and retention through internal
equity.
Specific Outcomes:
a. Classifiers/managers perceive the classification standards as
increasingly easy to apply.
b. Managers indicate increasingly positive perceptions of
classifications' contribution to mission accomplishment.
c. Employees feel increasingly greater satisfaction with the
equity of their classification.
d. The average grade by occupation is similar between agencies
with similar missions.
e. Consistency studies/analyses indicate increasingly greater
consistency of classification among similar jobs.
Result 3C: The staffing system, both centralized examining as well
as agency-based staffing, provides quality candidates
(i.e., the right people for the right positions) in a
timely and cost effective manner.
Premise: An effective staffing system results in the Federal
Government being better able to accomplish its mission
through the timely and efficient recruitment and
selection of high quality candidates.
Specific Outcomes:
a. The time required to rate and rank candidates is reduced.
b. The time required to refer certificates is reduced.
c. The cost of referring certificates to managers is reduced.
d. The quality of candidates is improved.
e. Personnelists perceive the system as easy to administer.
f. Managers perceive an increasing degree of quality candidates.
Result 3D: Training/development programs are adequate in scope and
effectiveness to meet the needs of the Government, and
positively impact performance on the job.
Premise: Training/development programs that meet the needs of the
Government and its employees promote greater retention,
performance and quality in the Federal workforce.
Specific Outcomes:
a. Agency management perceives that training has a positive impact
on the ability of the organization to accomplish its mission.
b. Agency management supports training in agency budget decisions.
c. Resources invested in training are sufficient to meet
identified training needs.
d. Identification of training needs is carried out systematically,
through formal diagnostics (e.g., diagnostic tests).
e. Supervisors perceive an improvement in trained employees'
performance in their jobs.
f. Employees perceive that training has improved their ability to
do their jobs.
Result 3E: The personnel system attracts, develops, motivates and
retains high quality Government executives.
Premise: A personnel system that attracts, develops and retains
its high quality executives results in better decision-
making and public policies, as well as high retention
among employees who want to work for capable people.
Specific Outcomes:
a. Employees perceive executives to be effective leaders.
b. Executives have a sense that the training afforded them fosters
their growth as executives.
c. There is greater retention/less turnover of high-performing
executives.
d. The quality of SES candidates is improved.
e. Agencies have a working succession plan or candidate
development program. f. The time required to fill SES jobs is
reduced.
Result 3F: Accurate and timely data in CPDF and agency personnel
data files supports personnel processing and management
information needs.
Premise: Accurate CPDF and agency personnel data that is produced
in a timely manner permits accurate custody of vital
employee records, and enables workforce planning and
analysis of employment trends.
Specific Outcomes:
a. The error rate of data received and generated is lowered.
b. The response time from request for data to delivery of data is
lowered.
c. There is improved "client" satisfaction with data products.
Result 3G: Automated personnel data systems are utilized
throughout the Federal Government.
Premise: Increased automation of personnel data systems in the
Federal Government allows resources to be moved from
process-oriented activities to areas of greater import
vis-a-vis the recruitment and retention of a high-quality
workforce.
Specific Outcomes:
a. An increasing number of agencies are using automated personnel
data systems.
b. There is an increasing number of compatible systems among
agencies.
c. An increasing number of personnel processes are automated.
d. An increasing number of agencies using on-line agency
administered tests.
Result 3H: The personnel evaluation system serves to improve
agency performance and create a link between good
personnel policy and mission accomplishment.
Premise: An effective personnel evaluation system results in
improved agency performance by promoting a high-quality
workforce through effective human resource management.
Specific Outcomes:
a. Agency personnelists perceive the personnel evaluation program
as something that helps agency performance.
b. Agency management implements an increasing number of
recommendations from the personnel evaluation program.
c. Agency management perceives the personnel evaluation function
to be increasingly important vis-a-vis mission accomplishment.
d. Agency management has an increasingly positive view of the role
of personnel management in mission accomplishment.
I. IMPROVE JOB INFORMATION AND RECRUITMENT
Specific examples of complementary OPM and agency actions include:
A. Workforce Planning and Expanding the Pool of Prospective Workers
OPM will:
1. Publish a new, consolidated FPM chapter on recruitment and
affirmative employment
2. Explore ways to attract annuitants and other seniors back to
the Federal workforce
3. Develop a "package of enablers" (e.g., day care, flexible work
scheduling) to attract new sources of talent to the workforce
(physically disabled, etc.)
4. Develop information on trends in SES selection and participate
with agencies to facilitate an increase in the representation
of women and minorities in the SES and in SES/management feeder
programs.
Agencies will:
1. Install workforce planning systems which are linked to their
program planning and budgeting systems
2. Analyze reasons why employees are leaving (and why others are
staying)
3. Try creative approaches to retaining older workers and hiring
retirees
4. Offer literacy and other remedial training to lure underskilled
candidates
5. Determine what initiatives can be taken to increase
representation of
women and minorities in the SES and in SES/management feeder
programs, such as through SES Candidate Development Programs
B. Defining "Quality" for Recruitment Strategies and for Rating
Factors
OPM will:
1. Develop Quality Employee Profiles (QEPs) for major occupations
and introduce these characteristics into recruitment strategies
and competitive examinations
2. Try innovative recruitment techniques aimed at a representative
workforce (e.g., pilot a cooperative education program for 14
year olds)
3. Critically evaluate the Individual Achievement Record as an
examination tool
Agencies will:
1. Use QEPs to develop recruitment plans, qualification
requirements and selective factors
C. Access to Job Information
OPM will:
1. Publish a recruiter's handbook and create a training course for
recruiters
2. Add general job information to the already existing college
hotline
3. Provide local State Employment Service Offices, through the
Labor Department, with information about Federal vacancies
nationwide
4. Publicize FOCIS, an automated system of job information
Agencies will:
1. Develop agency-specific recruitment literature which
complements Career America materials
2. Improve the quality of agency recruitment plans, develop
recruitment budgets, carefully select and train on-campus
recruiters
D. Partnerships with Schools
OPM will:
1. Seek legislation to authorize Public Service Fellowships and
recruitment bonuses
2. Explore flexibilities to allow Federal employees to devote time
to teaching/classroom activities
Agencies will:
1. Establish agency and occupation-specific intern programs
2. Expand use of cooperative education programs and the
Presidential Management Intern Program
3. Build positive and cooperative relationships with faculty of
colleges and secondary schools so as to influence student
attitudes about public service and to prepare students for
public service
E. Streamlined Hiring Processes
OPM will:
1. Delegate and decentralize examining and staffing authorities to
the maximum extent possible
2. Extend the Automated Applicant Referral System to other grade
levels and
to additional occupations, and continue to speed processing of
applicants and certificates
3. Decentralize scanning capability for the Individual Achievement
Record (IAR) and for the "ACWA" examinations in order to
process applications in one day
4. Develop the technology to enable agencies to use personal
computers to request and receive certificates and to administer
OPM tests
5. Provide agencies greater flexibility in merit promotion and
support them in their simultaneous use of merit promotion and
competitive examination
6. Evaluate the demonstrations of agency-based examining at the
National Institute of Standards and Technology and the US
Department of Agriculture
Agencies will:
1. Accept all possible delegations of examining authority and
redelegate to the lowest possible level within the agency
2. Experiment with alternative application forms, in lieu of the
SF 171
3. Streamline and expedite the merit promotion processes by such
actions as:
a. using touch screens for on-line information about open
vacancy announcements
b. seeking candidates simultaneously under both merit promotion
and open competitive examining processes
c. simplifying agency merit promotion plans and negotiating
simpler merit promotion procedures in union contracts
3. Use automation to expedite referrals and certificates
II. IMPROVE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S COMPETITIVENESS ON EACH OF
THE FIVE FACTORS KNOWN TO INFLUENCE INDIVIDUALS TO ACCEPT
PARTICULAR JOB OFFERS
Specific examples of complementary actions to be taken by OPM and
the agencies include:
FACTOR 1: Opportunity to Belong to a Highly Regarded Work Group
Which Performs Challenging and Important Work
A. Information Dissemination
OPM will:
1. Conduct cyclical events throughout each of the next five years
to raise public consciousness about the achievements of Federal
employees
2. Work with agencies to develop ongoing public service
announcements
to raise the public's consciousness about public service
3. Expand the role of the Federal Executive Boards in promoting a
positive image of Federal employees
4. Disseminate profiles of distinguished career executives
Agencies will:
1. Expand public (external) recognition of their employees through
news releases to hometown newspapers and to home district
Congressmen
B. Frontline Operations
OPM will:
1. Develop guidance for supporting the frontline through training
and recognition
2. Consider increasing the importance of frontline functions and
public contacts in both position classification and performance
management
Agencies will:
1. Support frontline functions through training, communication,
redesigned work processes, and recognition - usually through
the institution of total quality management principles
FACTOR 2: Fair Compensation
Specific examples of complementary actions to be taken by OPM and
the agencies include:
A. Competitive Pay
OPM will:
1. Reform the General Schedule to align pay with appropriate
occupational and geographic labor markets, enhance pay-for-
performance models, introduce various allowances and
differentials to meet special needs, and provide separate pay
systems for Administrative Law Judges and other atypical
occupations
2. Phase-in pay reforms according to statutory timeframes
3. Conduct studies and analyze data to assess Government's success
in competing for well-qualified workers
4. Monitor use of new flexibilities
Agencies will:
1. Implement pay reform, including providing information to
employees, reprogramming agency personnel and payroll systems,
and developing agency policies where necessary, and monitoring
use of new flexibilities
2. Provide needed data, information and assistance to OPM in
assessing Government's ability to attract and retain a
qualified workforce
B. Pay-for-Performance
OPM will:
1. Deregulate performance management
2. Provide comprehensive, generic training and assistance to
agencies on
how to design and how to develop strategies to changeover to
performance management systems which "fit" with their missions
and cultures
3. Provide leadership and a clearinghouse of information to
agencies
on effective and innovative incentive awards programs
4. Provide guidance and models for agency SES recertification
systems
5. Issue guidance to agencies on dealing with poor performers
Agencies will:
1. Develop performance management systems which "fit" their
organizational cultures, develop well thought-out strategies
for implementing change, and train managers and employees
2. Preserve maximum flexibility to managers in incentive awards
policies
3. Support managers as they address instances of poor performance
C. Classification
OPM will:
1. Evaluate the application of an alternative supervisory grade
evaluation guide, which disregards numbers of employees
supervised, for extension Government-wide
2. Conduct research and evaluate demonstration project results in
order to determine what changes, if any, to recommend for the
position classification system
3. Improve the consistency of job classifications by automating
the process
of developing classification standards, by providing
statistical data on classification trends, and, ultimately, by
installing an "expert" system which fully automates the
classification process
Agencies will:
1. Improve the consistency of job classifications
a. by automating classification operations
b. by issuing agency-specific guides
c. by checking the accuracy of classification actions using
both on-
site and off-site sampling techniques
d. by training line managers to classify jobs
e. by opening the classification process - including standards
and evaluation statements - to all supervisors and employees
D. Benefits Reform
OPM will:
1. Reform the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program
2. Determine what changes, if any, to recommend for the Federal
employees' leave system, including whether to provide short-
term disability
3. Study the feasibility of flexible benefits (without pre-tax
provisions) to the Federal Government
4. Simplify retirement and benefits programs
5. Implement the FERS Automated Processing System
Agencies will:
1. Ensure that fully documented benefit packages are received in
OPM within 15 days of separation or death
2. Make effective use of retirement counselors
FACTOR 3: Opportunity for Professional Growth and Development
Specific examples of complementary actions to be taken by OPM and
the agencies include:
A. Standardized Quality of OPM Courses
OPM will:
1. Standardize core supervisory, personnel and EEO curricula,
using a
"lead training center" concept for each curriculum area
2. Complete installation of the new Federal Executive Institute
curriculum, which focuses on:
a. public service leadership in a democratic society
b. America's place in the world [develop an international focus
for all executives]
c. stakeholders
d. personal and interpersonal effectiveness
3. Establish the capacity at FEI-DC to reinforce executive
development
4. Recast the Executive Seminar Centers with a national identity
and standardize the curriculum
5. Deliver training especially designed to support agencies'
frontline operations
6. Conduct a public/private sector symposium on strategic planning
for
human resources development and deliver training on this topic
to Government managers
7. Work with agencies to integrate theme/strategies from the
Strategic Plan for Federal Human Resources Management into
existing training courses and/or seminars for managers
B. Better Planning for Training
OPM will:
1. Implement the Director's decisions on executive and managerial
development in such a way that such development is cumulative,
not episodic
2. Encourage agencies to conduct succession planning, especially
for supervisors, managers, and executives
3. Build Executive Resources Board competence [hold conferences,
issue handbook, conduct surveys]
4. Provide models for effective executive development - for both
incumbents and candidates
5. Provide guidance and leadership for personnel management career
development programs to enhance the professionalism of both
personnel generalists and personnel specialists
6. Provide interagency training for the Presidential Management
Intern Program in management skills and competencies
Agencies will:
1. Devote more resources to training and spend them wisely
2. Use succession planning techniques, especially for supervisors,
managers and executives
3. Plan for developing executive "bench strength" and select
"executives for the future" to attend FEI
4. Prepare executives to attend FEI and prepare the executives'
organizations to reinforce the executives' learning
5. Support executive mobility, especially the PCMI-led effort to
broker SES reassignments across agencies and OPM's efforts to
assist graduates of SES Candidate Development Programs who wish
to find positions in other agencies
6. Assure that Executive Resources Boards are carrying out their
responsibility for overall planning and management of executive
development programs for SES incumbents, candidates, and
managers
7. Make executive development a high priority, especially for
women and minority managers
8. Launch a personnel management career development program to
enhance
the professionalism of personnel generalists and personnel
specialists
9. Implement the technical track for the Presidential Management
Intern program
10. Retrain to facilitate lateral mobility for the purpose of
individual development and redeployment of human resources in
downsizing situations
C. Training Technology
OPM will:
1. Download the administration of the Training Management
Assistance master contract to OPM Regions and set up a "trade
show" style clearinghouse to share training deliverables with
all interested parties
2. Experiment with the application of technology to upgrade
training delivery, including the use of interactive videos and
computer based instruction
Agencies will:
1. Make training technology applications and innovations available
to other agencies
2. Serve as test site for prototypes and research
D. Training Evaluation
OPM will:
1. Install, at FEI, value-added evaluation approaches which
measure:
a. how well agencies prepare their executives for FEI
b. what the executive learned
c. how the executive's values, attitudes and behaviors changed
d. any differences the training had on the agency's
effectiveness
Agencies will:
1. Assess return on investment and the degree to which learning is
transferred back to the job
FACTOR 4: Opportunity to Influence Work Assignments and Work
Processes, to
Make an Individual Difference
Specific examples of complementary actions to be taken by OPM and
the agencies include:
A. Deregulation and Delegation
OPM will:
1. Delegate virtually all examining at the mid and senior levels
2. Deregulate, especially in the area of performance management
Agencies will:
1. Redelegate authority to the lowest practical level
2. Empower managers, teams and individual employees to act as
autonomously as possible
3. Eliminate unnecessary policies, guidelines, standard operating
procedures and other requirements which inhibit creativity or
process improvement
B. Total Quality Management
OPM will:
1. Support Total Quality Management, especially employee
involvement, statistical process control, continuous process
improvement and customer-determined quality
2. Evaluate personnel demonstration projects and other experiments
with work teams and self-managed teams
3. Encourage agencies to revitalize their suggestion programs by
promptly implementing all viable suggestions and by blending
suggestion programs with continuous process improvement
4. Promote safety and health services for employees
Agencies will:
1. Implement Total Quality Management in cooperation with labor
unions
2. Train managers and employees in statistical process control, in
team development, in quantitative problem solving and in
communication skills
3. Revitalize suggestion programs by promptly implementing all
viable suggestions and by blending suggestion programs with
continuous process improvement
4. Support a safe and healthy workforce through health, safety and
assistance programs
FACTOR 5: An Environment Which Respects the Individual, Which
Provides Due Process and Which Protects the Individual
from Discrimination, Retaliation, Harassment, Partisan
Political Pressures, and Other Conflicts
Specific examples of complementary actions to be taken by OPM and
the agencies include:
A. Conflict Resolution
OPM will:
1. Support, but not lead, studies to examine ways to consolidate
processes
and agencies responsible for dispute resolution
2. Provide agencies with guidance, technical assistance and
training related to:
a. making effective use of appellate systems with regard to
employee discipline
b. achieving dispute resolution and prevention
Agencies will:
1. Deal effectively with problem employees, including prompt
attention to problems and skillful administration of discipline
where needed
2. Establish and administer systems for preventing and resolving
disputes with employees that are fair, timely and cost-
effective
B. Labor Management Cooperation
OPM will:
1. Encourage agencies to embark on bold ventures in labor
management cooperation on negotiable as well as non-negotiable
matters
2. Inform and consult with unions regarding OPM programs and
policies
which affect bargaining unit employees
Agencies will:
1. Pursue bold initiatives in labor management cooperation, on
negotiable
as well as non-negotiable matters, which contribute to employee
and agency effectiveness
III. IMPROVE THE EFFICIENCY OF PERSONNEL OPERATIONS
Specific examples of complementary actions to be taken by OPM and
the agencies include:
OPM will:
1. Provide leadership to Federal agencies for the application of
ADP technology to all facets of personnel operations,
information exchange and storage
2. Exploit opportunities to automate interfaces between OPM and
agencies, e.g., requests for certificates, distribution of FPM
issuances, comments on draft standards, reports, information
clearinghouses
3. Champion the use of electronically produced forms for all
personnel and payroll applications
4. Support additional agency access to Central Personnel Data File
(CPDF)
5. Determine the need for "next generation" improvements to CPDF
and
for additional data element standardization
6. Provide on-line agency-administered tests
7. Develop an integrated occupational data base that can be used
to build an automated human resource management system (MOSAIC)
Agencies will:
1. Share personnel software applications with OPM and other
agencies
2. Control the quality of CPDF data submissions
IV. IMPROVE QUALITY CONTROL OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
Specific examples of complementary actions to be taken by OPM and
the agencies include:
A. Balanced Approach
OPM will:
1. Distribute Governmentwide evaluation studies broadly and
agency-specific studies, as appropriate
2. Provide a clearinghouse on agency evaluation experiences and on
exemplary practices
3. Develop model evaluation systems and training for agency
evaluators
4. Help agencies strengthen their PME programs with an eye towards
reducing material errors, especially through participation in
agency-led evaluations
5. Take action to rescind authorities from agencies with a
documented
pattern of misuse of delegated authorities
Agencies will:
1. Provide greater evaluation coverage of delegations of authority
2. Identify the empirical benefits from delegations
3. Participate with OPM directly in improving evaluation
methodologies, systems and training
4. Apply continuous process improvement principles to the
evaluation
and redesign of all human resource management systems so as to
focus
them on mission accomplishment
B. Measuring Results
OPM will:
1. Communicate the results intended by the Federal personnel
system, along with optional measures
Agencies will:
1. Introduce results-oriented measures into agency evaluations