home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- TELECOM Digest Tue, 16 Mar 93 03:01:00 CST Volume 13 : Issue 182
-
- Index To This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- Re: How Do I Get Rid of Line Noise? (Bill Blum)
- Blizzard Causes AT&T Network Congestion (Richard Pauls)
- Re: No 900 in Louisiana? (Paul Robinson)
- Re: Ohio Bell Making Your Life Easier (Steve Forrette)
- Re: Telecom in Brazil, BAD? (Jarom Hagen)
- Re: Modem Doesn't Answer But Line is Ringing (Dick Rawson)
- Re: The New Phone Books Are Here! (Robert L. Ullmann)
- Re: "457 Channels and Nothin' on..." (Robert L. Ullmann)
- Info on Data Superhighway (or Whatever) (William Eldridge)
- Re: Quebec Yellow Pages Controversy (gehringe@eos.ncsu.edu)
- My Case Against CLID - Rebuttal to John Higdon (Gordon Zaft)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 15 Mar 93 12:32:01 EDT
- From: Bill Blum <BASTILLE@GRIFFIN.UGA.EDU>
- Subject: Re: How Do I Get Rid of Line Noise?
-
-
- Richard Sherman asks:
-
- > The problem is I get quite a bit of line noise in the electrical
- > system from other things in the house (dishwashers, ovens, etc.). I
- > was wondering if something like a phone line noise or surge supressor
- > could be put between the phone line and the modem to eliminate this?
- > Any help would be appreciated.
-
- I hope the following helps ... snarfed from a local BBS, this filter
- does work (even tho it's rather dated) ... Pat ... text is long,
- don't know if this is worth archiving or not.
-
- ---------------- Noise Filter Instructions ----------------
-
- Modem Noise Killer (alpha version)
-
- With this circuit diagram, some basic tools including a soldering
- iron, and four or five components from Radio Shack, you should be able
- to cut the noise/garbage that appears on your computer's screen.
-
- I started this project out of frustration at using a US Robotics 2400
- baud modem and getting a fair amount of junk when connecting at that
- speed. Knowing that capacitors make good noise filters, I threw this
- together.
-
- This is very easy to build, however conditions may be different due to
- modem type, amount of line noise, old or new switching equipment
- (Bell's equipment), and on and on. So it may not work as well for you
- in every case. If it does work, or if you've managed to tweek it to
- your computer/modem setup I' d like to hear from you.
-
- I'd also appreciate any of you electronic wizards out there wanting to
- offer any improvements. Let's make this work for everyone!
-
- Please read this entire message and see if you understand it before
- you begin.
-
- OK, what you' ll need from Radio Shack:
-
- 1 #279-374 Modular line cord if you don't already have one. You won't need one
- if your phone has a modular plug in its base. $4.95
-
- 1 #279-420 Modular surface mount jack (4 or 6 conductor) $4.49
-
- 1 #271-1720 Potentiometer. This is a 5k audio taper variable resistor. $1.09
-
- 1 #272-1055 Capacitor. Any non-polarized 1.0 to 1.5 uf cap should do. Paper,
- Mylar, or metal film caps should be used, although #272-996 may work as well.
- (272-996 is a non-polarized electrolytic cap) $.79
-
- 1 100 ohm resistor - quarter or half watt. $.19
-
- 1 #279-357 Y-type or duplex modular connector. Don't buy this until you've read
- the section on connecting the Noise Killer below. (A, B,or C) $4.95
-
- First off, open the modular block. You normally just pry them open
- with a screwdriver. Inside you'll find up to six wires. Very carefully
- cut out all but the green and red wires. The ones you'll be removing
- should be black, yellow, white, and blue. These wires won't be needed
- and may be in the way. So cut them as close to where they enter the
- plug as possible. The other end of these wires have a spade lug
- connector that is screwed into the plastic. Unscrew and remove that
- end of the wires as well. Now, you should have two wires left. Green
- and red. Solder one end of the capacitor to the green wire. Solder the
- other end of the capacitor to the center lug of the potentiometer
- (there are three lugs on this critter). Solder one end of the resistor
- to the red wire. You may want to shorten the leads of the resistor
- first. Solder the other end of the resistor to either one of the
- remaining outside lugs of the potentiometer. Doesn't matter which.
-
- Now to wrap it up, make a hole in the lid of the mod block to stick
- the shaft of the potentiometer through. Don't make this hole dead
- center as the other parts may not fit into the body of the mod block
- if you do. See how things will fit in order to find where the hole
- will go. Well, now that you've got it built you'll need to test it.
- First twist the shaft on the potentiometer until it stops. You won't
- know which way to turn it until later. It doesn't matter which way
- now. You also need to determine where to plug the Noise Killer onto
- the telephone line. It can be done by one of several ways:
-
- A. If your modem has two modular plugs in back, connect the Noise
- Killer into one of them using a line cord. (a line cord is a straight
- cord that connects a phone to the wall outlet. Usually silver in
- color)
-
- B. If your phone is modular, you can unplug the cord from the back of
- it after you're on-line and plug the cord into the Noise Killer.
-
- C. You may have to buy a Y-type modular adaptor. Plug the adaptor into
- a wall outlet, plug the modem into one side and the Noise Killer into
- the other. Call a BBS that has known noise problems. After you've
- connected and garbage begins to appear, plug the Noise Killer into the
- phone line as described above. If you have turned the shaft on the
- potentiometer the wrong way you'll find out now. You may get a lot of
- garbage or even disconnected. If this happens, turn the shaft the
- other way until it stops and try again. If you don't notice much
- difference when you plug the Noise Killer in, that may be a good sign.
- Type in a few commands and look for garbage characters on the screen.
- If there still is, turn the shaft slowly until most of it is gone. If
- nothing seems to happen at all, turn the shaft slowly from one side to
- the other. You should get plenty of garbage or disconnected at some
- point. If you don't, reread this message to make sure you've connected
- it right.
-
-
- ***END OF ORIGNAL FILE***
-
- ADDITION TO ORIGNAL FILE - 2/29/88 - Mike McCauley - CIS 71505,1173
-
- First, a personal recomendation. _THIS WORKS!!!_ I have been plagued with
- noise at 2400 for some time. A few pointers:
-
- 1) The pot need not be either 5K or audio taper. I used a 10K 15 turn trim pot.
- Suggest you use what is handy.
- 2) I used 2MFD's of capacitance (two 1MFD's in parallel) Two R.S. p/n 272-1055
- work fine. Remember that about 90 Volts will appear across red & green at
- ring, so the caps should be rated at 100VDC+.
- 3) I ended up with a final series resistance value (100 ohm + pot) of 2.75K.
- I speculate that one could probably use 2MFD and a fixed 2.7K resistor and
- do the job 90% of the time. The adjustment of the pot is not very critical.
- Changes of +/- 1K made little difference in the performance of the circuit.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Richard Pauls <pauls@ll.mit.edu>
- Subject: Blizzard Causes AT&T Network Congestion
- Organization: MIT Lincoln Lab
- Date: Mon, 15 Mar 93 13:46:26 -0500
-
-
- > [Moderator's Note: Thanks very much for taking the time and going to
- > the expense to send us a message from that phone. I hope your trip was
- > pleasant and not to someplace where the airport is shut down. By the
- > way can anyone give us any weather related telecom updates from the
- > eastern states? Are they even getting through at all? PAT]
-
- Well on Saturday I tried for about 15 minutes to place a call from MA
- (508) to PA (215) using AT&T but I kept getting the "we're sorry all
- circuits are busy" recording. I hung up and redialed using the MCI
- prefix and got a ring, but then I hung up (just wanted to see if it
- really worked). I tried AT&T several more times -- same message. Then
- I dialed the AT&T operator and told her I couldn't get through (I was
- wondering if she would give me a prefix code for another carrier if
- she couldn't connect me now). She tried twice and on the second
- attempt my call was connected via AT&T. Does she have some kind of
- controlled access to different long distance circuits that allowed her
- to avoid the "all circuits bussy" message that I kept getting? Will I
- have to pay for an operator assisted call this way?
-
-
- Thanks,
-
- Rich
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: Usually it is the operator's discretion in cases
- like this, but generally no you won't. You'll get direct dial rates
- since you explained the problem to the operator. PAT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1993 13:40:49 -0500 (EST)
- From: Paul Robinson <tdarcos@access.digex.com>
- Subject: Re: No 900 in Louisiana?
-
-
- phil@wubios.wustl.edu (J. Philip Miller) asks:
-
-
- > Having just seen an ad for NBC's weather line (1-900-WILLARD) it
- > stated it was not valid in Louisiana. Have they passed a law that
- > makes all 900 service illegal or only those that give their proceeds
- > to charity?
-
- 1. The service is run OUT OF Louisiana and the service is not tariffed
- for intrastate use.
- 2. There would be taxes imposed upon the service provider (not likely,
- but possible).
- 3. Louisiana does not allow value-added telephone call services, or has
- banned them, or there is a collectability problem.
-
- Louisiana has had a long history of problems with relations with other
- states because of its history of French Civil Law as opposed to the
- British Common Law which the other 49 states use. It's only been
- about a couple of years that the Louisana Legislature has approved the
- Uniform Commercial Code, which until it did made contracts hard to
- execute.
-
- If you're in Louisana, ask the local telephone company.
-
- Telephone services over 900 area code calls from outside that state
- are interstate in nature; if the state is hindering their operation,
- it is acting unconstitutionally. Probably nobody wants the trouble
- and expense of bothering with a court trial to force collection, so
- they just refuse to accept calls from there (or they plan to sue but
- until the telephone companies there will provide billing via a court
- decision authorizing it, they won't carry calls.) Or it could be that
- telcos there won't provide billing, the information provider must bill
- directly (which is too much trouble.)
-
- Did you try asking NBC?
-
-
- Paul Robinson -- TDARCOS@MCIMAIL.COM
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: stevef@wrq.com (Steve Forrette)
- Subject: Re: Ohio Bell Making Your Life Easier
- Date: 15 Mar 1993 21:50:43 GMT
- Organization: Walker Richer & Quinn, Inc., Seattle, WA
-
-
- @DATAPHONE@In article <telecom13.179.7@eecs.nwu.edu> henry@ads.com writes:
-
- > mtndew!friedl@uunet.UU.NET (Stephen Friedl) wrote:
-
- >> "These home office specialists can answer questions about
- >> installing a business line in your home or setting up a computer modem
- >> or fax machine."
-
- > Well, when Pacific Bell started to send similar sorts of notices, I
- > was similarly suspicious ... I learned that (at least for Pacific
- > Bell) they were not especially interested in pushing business-
- > tariffed services on me; they were interested in selling ordinary
- > home-tariffed services which would make doing occasional business at
- > home easier.
-
- I can put in a good word for the Pacific Bell office that handles the
- 'home office' orders. They never tried to push business
- class-of-service on me. I had had really poor luck with the regular
- residential office with any order more complicated than a single line
- with standard custom calling features. Any time I had a requirement
- for multiple lines, especially in combination with unusual custom
- calling features (no answer transfer, hunting, etc.), the order would
- never be set up properly the first time. The 'home office' people
- seemed to have an extra amount of training in all of these things, and
- were able to actually understand the order correctly the first time.
-
-
- Steve Forrette, stevef@wrq.com
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: jhagen@npri6.npri.com (Jarom Hagen)
- Subject: Re: Telecom in Brazil, BAD?
- Date: 15 Mar 93 18:00:23 GMT
- Organization: NPRI, Alexandria VA
-
-
- pedregal@unreal.cs.umass.edu (Cris Pedregal-Martin) writes:
-
- > The technology might not have been dazzling (e.g., pulse instead of
- > tone), but it worked (high call completion rates, good intercepts,
- > very few wrong numbers). And, also, rates were very cheap (compared
- > with other state-owned, third-world rates such as neighboring
- > Argentina's. Problems associated with wider-ranging (political,
- > economical) issues, of course, existed: sometimes bad customer service
- > (labor conflict), use of tokens instead of coins (inflation). And
- > there were some pearls too, like automated collect calls (even within
- > a city); I think one dialled 9+number and two synchronized recordings
- > would come on, opening a short window to say one's name (or whatever);
- > hanging up meaning non-acceptance of charges. There were also calling
- > cards (charge, like in the US); all these things at least since the
- > late 70s.
-
- It has been a few years since I was in Brazil. I remember a couple of
- things that weren't mentioned. One is the "Big-Ear" payphones that
- were not high quality in that sometimes shouting was needed to
- communicate and the second is that, at least in the northeast, you
- have to *buy* your telephone *line*. So, not only do you pay for the
- service, you have to buy the line (and number) that gets connected to
- your house. This tends to discourage telephones in homes. There also
- seems to be a problem in capacity in the northeast as people selling
- telephone numbers charged a lot for them. I also remember the cost of
- calling the U.S. from Brazil to be much higher that calling Brazil
- from the U.S.
-
- > My "comment" (more bordering on an essay, sorry) is not very current,
- > but I just felt I had to challenge a stereotype ...
-
- Yes, I don't know if service is worse than GTE, I never had to call
- the local phone company while I lived there.
-
- > com saudades do Brasil,
-
- Eu tambem.
-
-
- Jarom
- *Not paid for and/or endorsed by NPRI. 602 Cameron St, Alexandria VA 22314
- (UUCP: ...uunet!uupsi!npri6!jhagen) (Internet: jhagen@npri.com)
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 15 Mar 93 15:19:48 PST
- From: drawson@Tymnet.COM (Dick Rawson)
- Subject: Re: Modem Doesn't Answer But Line is Ringing
-
-
- Now that you mention distinctive ringing, I remember a similar problem
- with our fax machine. When we moved from Centrex service to a PBX, we
- started getting a "distinctive ring" for all calls from outside.
- Outside calls rang as short-long, while extension calls rang normally.
- The fax wouldn't answer until the PBX was made to give normal rings.
-
-
- Dick
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: ariel@world.std.com (Robert L Ullmann)
- Subject: Re: The New Phone Books Are Here!
- Organization: The World in Boston
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1993 01:54:46 GMT
-
-
- An observation I made while looking at the 93 NYNEX white pages (which
- I hadn't had any reason to crack open until reading this): people with
- combined business/residence listings, under the business name with a
- secondary entry starting with /res/, appear in both the residence and
- business parts of the directory.
-
- BTW, I like this directory format.
-
-
- Robert Ullmann Ariel@World.STD.COM +1 508 879 6994 x226
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: ariel@world.std.com (Robert L Ullmann)
- Subject: Re: "457 Channels and Nothin' on..."
- Organization: The World in Boston
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1993 02:15:12 GMT
-
-
- Paul Robinson writes a very interesting article on cable TV and the
- future of video distribution. (BTW: I subscribe to a system with 89
- active channels, out of a possible 104.)
-
- I and others in the data network protocol business are working very
- hard on building an internet technology that will allow any user to
- watch any "station" (video source) whenever desired. Ready for maybe
- 50,000 channels?
-
- Of course, just like best-selling books, some will be *very* popular.
-
- The flip side is even more interesting: with a *very* small
- investment, anyone can be a video source ...
-
-
- Robert Ullmann Ariel@World.STD.COM +1 508 879 6994 x226
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: bill@COGNET.UCLA.EDU (William Eldridge)
- Subject: Info on Data Superhighway (or Whatever)
- Organization: UCLA Cognitive Science Research Program
-
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1993 03:48:19 GMT
-
-
- I'm trying to research various pertinent questions and alternatives to
- the proposed data superhighway, and was hoping someone could refer me
- to or send me either interesting viewpoints on this or general
- overviews.
-
-
- Thanks,
-
- Bill Eldridge bill@cognet.ucla.edu
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Mon, 15 Mar 93 23:44:35 -0500
- From: gehringe@eos.ncsu.edu
- Subject: Re: Quebec Yellow Pages Controversy
-
-
- In article <telecom13.177.8@eecs.nwu.edu> Dave Liebold writes:
-
- > Perhaps an idea should be borrowed from the white page introductory
- > sections of many other countries (Australia is one such country, I
- > believe): a brief description of the phone service (emergency numbers,
- > how to dial, etc) is translated into many languages.
-
- I don't remember the phone books, but from when I was there last year,
- I recall that some public phones in Melbourne have instructions in
- English, Italian, Greek, and possibly Vietnamese; further north on the
- Gold Coast, it's English and Japanese (for tourists of the predominant
- nationality, no doubt).
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: suned1!zaft@elroy.Jpl.Nasa.Gov (Gordon C Zaft)
- Subject: My Case Against CLID - A Rebuttal to John Higdon
- Date: 16 Mar 93 06:02:59 GMT
- Organization: NSWSES, Port Hueneme, CA
-
-
- I finally figured out the response to John Higdon's persistent claims
- that Caller-ID should be enabled by default. It's this --
-
- Do you walk around with a nametag? Probably not. Similarly,
- if I walk up to your door and knock, it would be reasonable of you to
- ask who I am. I might give you my name, or I might not. In either
- case you might or might not wish to speak to me. You may have a
- policy saying "I don't open the door to anyway who won't identify
- themselves", and that's fine.
-
- The point being, just as I don't broadcast my identity when I
- go around town, I shouldn't have to broadcast my identity when I call,
- either. On the other hand, you should be able to ask my identity by
- means of a block, or a anonymous-call-rejection. In which case I can
- either identify myself, or not talk to you. It seems quite clear to
- me that the default should be no identification unless it's explicitly
- done (just like you looking through your peephole and making me hold
- up my ID so you can see it before opening the door).
-
-
- Gordon Zaft zaft@suned1.nswses.navy.mil
- PHD NWSC, Code 4Y33 suned1!zaft@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov
- Port Hueneme, CA 93043-5007 Phone: (805) 982-0684 FAX: 982-8768
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: This message was published specifically to provide
- a rebuttal to recent messages by John Higdon. However, to avoid the
- sort of email floods these things cause me and the slow, agonizing
- death from boredom it causes many readers, perhaps continued dis-
- cussion between interested parties can be moved to the privacy forum.
- Thanks. PAT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V13 #182
- ******************************
-