home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- TELECOM Digest Sun, 14 Feb 93 19:31:15 CST Volume 13 : Issue 95
-
- Index To This Issue: Moderator: Patrick A. Townson
-
- 900 Numbers Tarnished Beyond Repair? (James Deibele)
- We Have it Good in California ... NOT (Rich Greenberg)
- GTE Payphone With Sprint LD: Who Makes Refunds? (Gerrold T. Sithe)
- RJ-11 Jack on French Modem (Lars Poulsen)
- How Does Video Phone Work? What Software is Used On-line? (Danial Ho)
- Handheld AMPS Cellular - Never Below Full Power (600mw)? (Lauren Weinstein)
- Looking For Cheap Used Dialogic Boards (John V. Jaskolski)
- Great Magazine Article About FAX (Jim Haynes)
- IXO.TAP.protocol in Archive (Brad S. Hicks)
- What Number do I Dial From My Phone to Get My Phone to Ring? (J. Jaskolski)
- DS0 Portion of a T1 (Fred R. Stearns)
- V & H to Latitude/Longitude? (Tom Libert)
- Does Anyone Know Tellab's Phone Number? (John V. Jaskolski)
- Bell Canada Charging for 411 (Tony Pelliccio)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- From: jamesd@techbook.com (James Deibele)
- Subject: 900 Numbers Tarnished Beyond Repair?
- Organization: TECHbooks --- Public Access UNIX --- (503) 220-0636
- Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1993 22:43:51 GMT
-
-
- I suppose that legally there may have been reasons for accepting
- anything and everything to put on a 900 number -- the big long-distance
- carriers had to do it to keep their "common carrier" status. But it
- seems to have been really short-sighted.
-
- I was talking to a developer friend, and he was interested in 900
- numbers as a way of selling his shareware: I'd set up a normal
- DOS-based BBS for him, and people could call up and download the
- program. He'd only make a few dollars per download, but he'd have the
- money without having to take phone orders or mail out floppies. Say
- he got a steady number of calls, five or ten a day at a profit of
- $5-10 each call. He'd be making a little over $1000 month after
- deducting the price of 900 setup charges and usage charges.
-
- He'd be happy with that, his customers would be looking at $15-$20 for
- his program, and the phone company would make its chunk, too. We
- figured that uncollectibles would be small -- it'd be hard to argue
- with a straight face that "I called that 900 number by mistake and
- stayed on for an hour. And then I called back the next day for
- another hour (to get some of his add-ons) by mistake too".
-
- So I've poked around a little bit, and it's been interesting: 900
- number service providers are not listed in the local directory, nor do
- any of the long distance carriers advertise that they do 900 service.
- They're not listed in the telecom archives, at least not under any
- obvious file name. Calling Sprint, I got a package of information
- showing page after page of restrictions on what could and could not be
- done.
-
- One of the restrictions was a maximum of $15 a call, which figures out
- to $.25/minute. Problem is, they charge .19, .24, or .22 cents a
- minute depending on how much you use -- starts low, jumps at 50,000
- minutes, drops a bit at 250,000 minutes. He'd almost certainly always
- be in the low end, so if someone could download all of his program in
- a few minutes (say they were using V.32bis), he'd be able to make more
- money than if somebody were to download at 2400. 1200 would be close
- to break-even, and 300 simply couldn't be supported.
-
- I'm glad to see that Sprint does some kinds of restrictions on 900
- numbers. I know that when I hear "900" I immediately start thinking
- "sleaze, sleaze". It's just too bad that with Sprint he can't charge
- $25 for a call, get the customer's name and address, and mail out a
- disk and printed manual. Or do whatever it is he'd like to in terms
- of charging X price for Y benefits.
-
- Locally, the State of Oregon uses a 976 number to give road
- conditions. But mostly I see this type of stuff subsidizing the local
- newspapers, which use 976 numbers for "personals", or on the cable
- channels in "psychic" ads. ("It's like a vacation for your mind."
- goes one ad.) This is really too bad -- there've been times that I've
- wanted a transcript of a show, but it's a pain to get out the
- checkbook and mail off a check and letter.
-
- Will 900/976 numbers ever be "cleaned up?" is my general,
- philosophical question? And more specifically, is there a 900 service
- provider aimed at people like my friend, who's selling a tangible
- product? One where he won't have to subsidize all the chargebacks
- from people pissed at being charged $4/minute for IQ tests (another ad
- that runs frequently)?
-
-
- jamesd@techbook.COM "2091 newsgroups & nothing on ..."
- PDaXs gives free access to news & mail. (503) 220-0636 - 1200/2400, N81
- Full internet (ftp, telnet, irc) access available. Voice: (503) 223-4245
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: Even 900 sex lines are not necessarily bad. The
- good or bad comes from the way the operator of the service wishes to
- handle it. It is true there are far more ripoffs than there are good
- 900 services (sex or otherwise), but there are information providers
- giving value for the money via 900. There are premium lines charging
- as little as a dollar for a minute or two, and many people doing what
- your friend is doing; selling books, software, technical support and
- more over a 900 line. Done properly, it can be profitable without
- being a ripoff in the process. PAT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Sun 14 Feb 93 12:19:16 PST
- From: richg@hatch.socal.com (Rich Greenberg)
- Reply-To: richg@hatch.socal.com
- Subject: We Have it Good in California ... NOT
-
-
- From today's (2/12) {L A Times}, an item in the "Only In LA" column
- by Steve Harvey:
-
- Another Cellular Phone Scare Story:
-
- You've heard the reports that those trendy high-tech gadgets could be
- dangerous to your health. But what about to your pocketbook?
-
- During a federal drug trial in L.A., a rep for a cellular company
- produced the suspects' phone records -- including calls that didn't go
- through. She pointed out that the lucky prosecutors had unusually
- extensive records because users of such phones in the L.A. area are
- billed even for calls that aren't answered.
-
- Out of curiousity, Judge Dickran M. Tevrizian Jr. asked wether there
- were any areas where users are not charged for uncompleted calls.
-
- "Just about anywhere else," the rep answered.
-
-
- Rich Greenberg Work: rmg50@juts.ccc.amdahl.com 310-417-8999
- N6LRT Play: richg@hatch.socal.com 310-649-0238
- What? Me speak for Amdahl? Surely you jest....
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: cc935@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Gerrold T. Sithe)
- Subject: GTE Payphone With Sprint LD: Who Makes Refunds?
- Date: 14 Feb 1993 12:55:16 GMT
- Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
-
-
- I once called long distance on a GTE payphone with Sprint for
- its default carrier. The call was abnormally cut off as was a second
- attempt. I called the GTE operator about a refund.
-
- She said since Sprint was the long distance carrier, I had to
- call them for a refund. So I called the Sprint operator. She said it
- was a GTE payphone that took my coins, so only GTE could make the
- refund. I again called a GTE operator who again insisted Sprint was
- responsible. So I again called a Sprint operator who again insisted
- GTE was responsible.
-
- At this point I stomped away from the payphone, unable to make
- my call, unable to get a refund, and pretty damn mad. Anyone know
- which company was responsible for the refund in this case?
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: All telephone companies act as collection agents
- for all other telephone companies. That is, you deposit coins in the
- phone of one company and internally they pay the other companies
- involved. You use your calling card from one telco to originate a call
- via another telco and the second telco bills the first one who in turn
- bills your account. Whoever collected your money should refund your
- money and reverse any transactions generated as a result back to
- wherever they came from; then that telco accepts the chargeback and
- reverses it back to whoever originally got the credit from them, etc.
-
- Since you put coins in the coin box, the only mechanism for refunding
- coins collected in error is by either returning the coins in the mail
- to the customer or issuing credit to a telephone bill (with some telco
- somewhere). GTE would then bill the offsetting charge to the inter-
- telco account for Sprint -- to the same place they had previously
- billed the credit for the coins they had colleted from you. I doubt
- anyone would investigate to see *whose* facilities caused the abnormal
- termination of your call. I suppose Sprint could refuse to accept the
- chargeback saying it was GTE facilities at fault and reverse the
- chargeback to GTE, but even the $5 per hour clerk at either end
- handling the paperwork (no actual *money* ever changes hands between
- telcos -- just an unending series of IOUs passed back and forth every
- day) would soon realize there was a limited return for the time
- involved in handing IOUs back and forth and would find it within his
- authorization to write it off to customer goodwill. Prior to divesti-
- ture, AT&T had a department called "Separations and Settlements" which
- employed a few hundred people who handed IOU's back and forth between
- the various Bell companies, AT&T, GTE and all the independent telcos.
- Actual money would change hands between the bunch of them maybe once a
- year or so as needed to zero things out. The rest of the time all that
- they passed among themselves were slips of paper. PAT]
-
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Sun, 14 Feb 93 17:38:21 PST
- From: lars@CMC.COM (Lars Poulsen)
- Subject: RJ-11 Jack on French Modem
-
-
- A French built modem showed up on my desk today for evaluation of
- software compatibility. I need to see if I can get it to speak to the
- PBX in my lab (a KXT-30810).
-
- The modem came with an RJ-11 like jack on the back, and an interesting
- adapter cable with an RJ-11-like plug on one end, and a six-pin
- art-deco 25 mm wide by 50 mm high plug with a spade with six contact
- ribbons sticking out the back.
-
- My first hope was that I could just attach to the RJ-11, but no such
- luck. Visual inspection of the PCB reveals that if we number the pins
- 1 2 3 4 from left to right, pins 1 and 3 are connected together, and 4
- is connected separately, while 2 seems not to be connected.
-
- I connected tip and ring to 1 and 4, and managed to receive RING RING
- RING, but I do not get a "voice" path established. I also have failed
- to make outgoing calls.
-
- The PBX provides 26V of battery and 90V of ringing voltage. This has
- been enough for everything else that has been through here.
-
- Does anybody have specific information on French wiring habits?
-
-
- Lars Poulsen, SMTS Software Engineer Internet E-mail: lars@CMC.COM
- CMC Network Products / Rockwell Int'l Telephone: +1-805-968-4262
- Santa Barbara, CA 93117-3083 TeleFAX: +1-805-968-8256
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: danielh@hadar.fai.com (Danial Ho)
- Subject: How Does Video Phone Work? What Software is Used On-line?
- Organization: Fujitsu NTS
- Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1993 22:45:43 GMT
-
-
- I have basically two questions.
-
- 1) How does AT&T's video phone work?
-
- AT&T phone can transmit video signal and voice signal at the same
- time. Does the phone transmit two signal frequencies over the same
- phone line, or does it merge the two types of data into one byte
- stream down the phone line? Also, if I want to build a video phone
- that can talk to AT&T's phone, what standard or protocol should I
- follow?
-
- 2) If I want to provide on-line services, are there any software
- libraries that I can purchase to help me write the program? The
- libraries should provide high level functions so I can call them
- instead of setting bits and bytes directly in the program.
-
- If you know of the answers or can tell me where I can find the
- appropriate reference material, I would really appreciate it.
-
-
- Thank you,
-
- Daniel Ho
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Sun, 14 Feb 93 11:50 PST
- From: lauren@cv.vortex.com (Lauren Weinstein)
- Subject: Handheld AMPS Cellular -- Never Below Full Power (600mw)?
-
-
- Greetings. We've now seen a variety of conflicting reports regarding
- AMPS power control. I have messages from three different people
- working in the industry each describing contrary situations, and all
- of them claiming to base their information on power control message
- statistics. It's starting to look like geographic and administrative
- decisions may result in different use or non-use of AMPS power control
- in different areas.
-
- But ... we've now strayed from the original reason for this
- discussion. We were talking about radiation from handheld cellular
- phones. We've recently seen messages (including in this Digest) from
- cell folk saying that even in areas where AMPS car phones are power
- controlled, handheld phones are still being held at their full power
- of 600mw at all times. It would be interesting if somebody could
- address this issue directly. Are there systems where handheld AMPS
- phones are routinely being ordered down below their max of 600mw?
- Obviously, if power control isn't being *used* for handheld AMPS
- phones, it effectively doesn't exist for those users.
-
-
- --Lauren--
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: jasko@park.bu.edu (John V. Jaskolski)
- Subject: Looking For Cheap Used Dialogic Boards
- Date: 14 Feb 93 19:20:43 GMT
- Reply-To: jasko@park.bu.edu
- Organization: Boston University Dept. of Cognitive and Neural Systems
-
-
- I am looking for CHEAP USED (old) Dialogic boards. Specifically, I am
- interested in Dialogic's D121 Voice Boards (12-line voice processing
- board) older versions are fine; Dialogic's LSI120 Loop Start Interface
- (used to interface D121's with analog installations). I want at least
- two of each. Also of interest is the MSI baseboard and any other used
- boards. Anyone who has any of these USED and wants to get rid of them
- (or if you know of anyone who might have them) please let me know.
-
-
- Thank you very much,
-
- John V. Jaskolski
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: haynes@cats.UCSC.EDU (Jim Haynes)
- Date: Sun, 14 Feb 93 17:52:30 -0800
- Subject: Great Magazine Article About FAX
-
-
- The February, 1993 issue of {IEEE Spectrum}, page 46, has an article
- about Fax by Jonathan Coopersmith of Texas A&M. It's a summary of 150
- years of history. The author is writing a book on the history of the
- facsimile machine.
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: Readers should see an issue of the Digest issued
- earlier this weekend for a more detailed review of this article. PAT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: mc/G=Brad/S=Hicks/OU=0205925@mhs.attmail.com
- Date: 14 Feb 93 16:20:12 GMT
- Subject: IXO.TAP.protocol in Archives
-
-
- Apparently, the only way to get a copy of the IXO/TAP protocol
- specification is to own a paging company and read it out of your
- paging system's central computer's manual. Some companies' technical
- support staff will provide you with a copy, but most won't.
-
- This finally offended me enough to do something about it. Someone
- from Telebit faxed me a copy; I'm paying that debt forward by rekeying
- it into a plain ASCII document, which I've sent to Pat to include in
- the Telecom Archives as file IXO.TAP.protocol. Enjoy!
-
- DISCLAIMER: Rekeying this document may be bending the Fair Use
- doctrine; I'm not enough of a lawyer to know. The IXO.TAP.protocol
- document is closely adapted from chapter 7 of Glenayre Electronics'
- publication GLP-3000-180 issue 5, and is Copyright Jan 30, 1991 by
- them; I won't bother asserting copyright on my annotations at the end
- of it. Since it's a small portion of the overall work and I'm making
- zero dollars and zero cents off of it, and since I consider this
- distribution to be both educational and informal, I think my rekeying
- of it is legal. If you (or Glenayre) think otherwise, take it up with
- me, not with my employer.
-
-
- J. Brad Hicks Internet: mc!Brad_Hicks@mhs.attmail.com
- X.400: c=US admd=ATTMail prmd=MasterCard sn=Hicks gn=Brad
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: Brad's file will be available in the Archives as of
- Monday morning, to be grabbed using anonymous ftp cs.mit.edu. PAT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: jasko@park.bu.edu (John V. Jaskolski)
- Subject: What Number do I Dial From My Phone to Get My Phone to Ring?
- Date: 14 Feb 93 19:27:18 GMT
- Reply-To: jasko@park.bu.edu
- Organization: Boston University Dept. of Cognitive and Neural Systems
-
-
- I presently live in Boston. When I used to live in Milwaukee, WI, I
- could dial "97" and the last five digits of my telephone number, push
- down and release the hook, hear a tone come over the line, hang up,
- and my phone would ring. Does anyone know what I can dial from Boston
- to do the same thing? In other words What number do I dial from my
- phone to get my phone to ring? (From Boston)
-
-
- Thank You,
-
- John V. Jaskolski
-
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: Please reply direct to Mr. Jaskolski. PAT]
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: ddssuprs!fred@uunet.UU.NET (Fred R Stearns)
- Organization: Dickens Data Systems, Inc.
- Subject: DS0 Portion of a T1
- Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1993 19:40:15 GMT
- Organization: Dickens Data Systems, Inc.
-
-
- How is the A/D and D/A conversion performed to create the digital data
- from and analog voice circuit to the 1/24 digital circuits of a T1
- service? Is it CVSD, or seven-bit samples at 8KHz, or something else?
-
-
- Fred R. Stearns -- fred@dickens.com
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: Tom Libert <libert@citi.umich.edu>
- Date: Sun, 14 Feb 93 14:13:05 EST
- Subject: V & H to Latitude/Longitude?
-
-
- FCC Tariff 4 (available from Bellcore and NECA) provides "vertical and
- horizontal" (V & H) coordinates for all wire centers in the US. There
- is a simple way to determine the distance between wire centers using
- the V & H coordinates. Some sort of map projection must have been
- used to convert latitude and longitude to V & H; I'd like to invert
- that mapping (i.e. convert V & H to lat/long). Does anyone have
- details? As an incentive, I'll provide a free copy of the latest isue
- of NECA Tariff 4 to anyone who provides the anwer.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- From: jasko@park.bu.edu (John V. Jaskolski)
- Subject: Does Anyone Know Tellab's Phone Number?
- Date: 14 Feb 93 19:29:42 GMT
- Reply-To: jasko@park.bu.edu
- Organization: Boston University Dept. of Cognitive and Neural Systems
-
-
- Does anyone know Tellab's phone number?
-
-
- Thank you,
-
- John V. Jaskolski
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Sun, 14 Feb 93 15:21:46 EST
- From: Tony Pelliccio <PJJ125@URIACC.URI.EDU>
- Subject: Bell Canada Charging For 411
-
-
- In most parts of the US it's a fact of life. You're allowed roughly
- five free calls, and then after that it's around 25 cents a pop.
-
- Besides, that's why you get a directory every year ... so YOU can look
- it up. Now they've given you an incentive. :)
-
-
- Tony
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of TELECOM Digest V13 #95
- *****************************
-