home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
- │*****************************************************************************│
- │ │
- │ │
- │ SPEISER SIGHTING REPORT CLASSIFICATIONS │
- │ ____________________________________________ │
- │ │
- │ │
- │This is likewise a two-part classification, with an escalating scale from one│
- │to five within each. The "Strangeness Factor", rather than ranking by │
- │distance or supporting evidence, rates cases as definitely, probably or │
- │possibly explainable as well as strange or highly strange. │
- │ │
- │The SPEISER "Probability Factor" concentrates on the creditability of the │
- │witness(es) as honest individuals and accurate observers, with ratings from │
- │"not credible" to "highly credible". See the April, 1987 issue of the │
- │Journal for Mr. Speiser's explanation of this grading method. │
- │ │
- │=============================================================================│
- │ │
- │SPEISER - __________ │
- │ │
- │ │
- │Strangeness Factor: Probability Factor: │
- │___________________ ___________________ │
- │ │
- │S1 - Explainable or explained P1 - Not credible or sound │
- │ │
- │S2 - Probably explainable with P2 - Unreliable witness: │
- │ more data possible hoax │
- │ │
- │S3 - Possibly explainable, but with P3 - Somewhat credible or │
- │ elements of strangeness indeterminate │
- │ │
- │S4 - Strange: does not conform to P4 - Credible and sound │
- │ known principles │
- │ P5 - Highly credible, leaving almost │
- │S5 - Highly strange: suggests no doubt. │
- │ intelligent guidance │
- │ │
- │ │
- │*****************************************************************************│
- └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
-