home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
- │ │
- │THE HYNEK RATING SYSTEM │
- │----------------------- │
- │As a tribute to Dr. Hynek, I have proposed that his matrix of │
- │Strangeness vs. Probability be effectuated and calibrated as outlined │
- │below, and named "the Hynek Scale" or "the Hynek Rating System" in his │
- │honor. │
- │. │
- │S: Strangeness │
- │The "Strangeness" factor of a case description shall be rated from 1 to │
- │5 as follows: │
- │. │
- │ 1 - Explained or Explainable │
- │ 2 - Probably Explainable, with more data │
- │ 3 - Possibly Explainable, but with elements of strangeness │
- │ 4 - Strange; Does not conform with known principles │
- │ 5 - Highly Strange; Definitely indicative of intelligent guidance │
- │. │
- │Examples: │
- │ S1 - Aircraft, meteor, etc. │
- │ S2 - Experimental aircraft; planet or star │
- │ S3 - Slow, low flying objects in formation │
- │ S4 - BOL (Ball of Light Phenomena); physical traces │
- │ S5 - Close Encounters, Abductions, etc. │
- │. │
- │P: Probability │
- │The "Probability" factor of a case relates to the credibility, number │
- │and separation of witnesses and/or the soundness of evidence gathered. │
- │It shall be rated from 1 to 5 as follows: │
- │. │
- │ 1 - Not Credible or Sound │
- │ 2 - Unreliable; Smacks of Hoax │
- │ 3 - Somewhat credible or indeterminate │
- │ 4 - Credible; Sound │
- │ 5 - Highly Credible, leaving almost no doubt │
- │. │
- │Examples: │
- │ P1 - Known Hoaxer or UFO "Flake"; Hoax Photo │
- │ P2 - Repeat Witness; Conflicting Testimony │
- │ P3 - Standard, first-time witness; slight radiation reading │
- │ P4 - Multiple witnesses; pilot; clear photo │
- │ P5 - National Figure; Multiple independent witnesses; videotape │
- │. │
- │The composite Hynek Rating of a case shall consist of the combined S & │
- │P factors, stated as Sn/Pn, e.g. S3/P5; except that cases with an S │
- │factor of 1 shall simply be stated as S1. │
- │. │
- │Examples using recent or famous cases: │
- │ S1 - Wickenburg, AZ, July 10 (explanation:Mars) │
- │ S5/P1 - Billy Meier │
- │ S2/P5 - X-shaped UFO, Petaluma, CA May 28 │
- │ S4/P5 - Brazilian "Ping Pong Balls" │
- │ S5/P4 - Betty & Barney Hill │
- │ S4/P4 - Lubbock Lights │
- │ S5/P5 - MedEvac Helicopter ("Coyne" Case) │
- │ S3/P2 - Delphos │
- │ S4/P2 - Anything published in SAUCER SMEAR │
- │. │
- │Discussion: │
- │I believe this rating system will be a useful tool to investigators who │
- │wish to narrow their focus to the most promising cases. It is not my │
- │intention that any one group "stake a claim" to this system; rather, │
- │I'd like to see several groups or investigators rate cases according to │
- │their own view, merely using this system as a standard. │
- │. │
- │The rating of a particular case may, indeed perhaps should, change from time │
- │time as new evidence is gathered. │
- │. │
- │Your comments are welcome. │
- │. │
- │Jim Speiser │
- └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
-