home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Network Working Group Jerry Cole, UCLA
- Request for Comments: 32 February 5, 1970
-
- SOME THOUGHTS ON SRI'S PROPOSED REAL TIME CLOCK
-
- Re: NWG/RFC's #28 and 29.
-
- The addition of a clock in one or more of the network HOST's seems to be
- very desireable since it (or they) would allow user-oriented message
- delay measurements. Our present network measurement facilities do not
- include any internal HOST delays, and these delays may be an appreciable
- portion of the total delay encountered by a HOST-to-HOST message
- transmission. We may find that an extension of our "Trace" capabilities
- to include internal HOST delays would be an appropriate mechanism for
- utilizing such a clock. Such usage would require a clock at both the
- source and the destination of the message, although such clocks would
- not have to be particularly accurate nor synchronized. Other tests,
- such as the absolute overall message delay from HOST A to HOST B would
- require synchronization of the two clocks.
-
- A reasonable specification for the SRI real-time clock would seem to
- include a resolution of about 1 msec., an accuracy of about 1 part in
- 10E7 (so that two such clocks could maintain reasonable relative
- accuracies over periods of many hours), and a range of about 24 hours.
- A crystal controlled clock should easily meet these requirements at a
- moderate cost.
-
- The choice of the mechanism by which the HOST can read the clock appears
- to be of concern also. The 1 msec. resolution may require that the
- clock be entirely hardware (as opposed to a core location which would be
- incremented at each clock pulse), and therefore the clock may require
- some rather compli- cated interface circuitry.
-
- At UCLA, we presently have two clocks on the Sigma 7, and one of these
- has a resolution of about 2 msec. which might be usable for some
- internal HOST measurements. However, it does not have the long term
- accuracy for the absolute measurements mentioned above.
-
- [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ]
- [ into the online RFC archives by Richard Ames 1/98 ]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- [Page 1]
-
-