<p>the <p chance="50"><xref id="object.type"/> </p>objects in space and time</p>
<p>the noumena</p>
<p>the phenomena</p>
</ref>
<ref id="Vst">
<p>is what first gives rise to</p>
<p>can thereby determine in its totality</p>
<p>has lying before it</p>
<p>constitutes the whole content for</p>
<p>may not contradict itself, but it is still possible that it may be in contradictions with</p>
<p>would thereby be made to contradict</p>
<p>teaches us nothing whatsoever regarding the content of</p>
<p>can not take account of</p>
<p>has nothing to do with</p>
<p>stands in need of</p>
<p>is the key to understanding</p>
<p>proves the validity of</p>
<p>is just as necessary as</p>
<p>is the clue to the discovery of</p>
<p>is a representation of</p>
<p>depends on</p>
<p>excludes the possibility of</p>
</ref>
<ref id="Vsi">
<p>is the mere result of the power of <xref id="Ns"/>, a blind but indispensable function of the soul</p>
<p>occupies part of the sphere of <xref id="Ns"/> concerning the existence of <xref id="Np"/> in general</p>
<p>is by its very nature contradictory</p>
<p>would be falsified</p>
<p>abstracts from all content of <p chance="50"><xref id="knowledge.type"/> </p>knowledge</p>
<p>is a body of demonstrated science, and <xref id="quantity"/> it must be known <xref id="knowledge.type"/></p>
<p>can never furnish a true and demonstrated science, because, like <xref id="Ns"/>, it <xref id="Vst"/> <xref id="judgement.type"/> principles</p>
<p>can be treated like <choice><p><xref id="Ns"/></p><p><xref id="Np"/></p></choice></p>
<p>exists in <choice><p><xref id="Ns"/></p><p><xref id="Np"/></p></choice></p>
</ref>
<ref id="Vpt">
<p>are what first give rise to</p>
<p>have lying before them</p>
<p>constitute the whole content of</p>
<p>would thereby be made to contradict</p>
<p>can not take account of</p>
<p>have nothing to do with</p>
<p>stand in need to</p>
<p>are the clue to the discovery of</p>
<p>prove the validity of</p>
<p>are just as necessary as</p>
<p>are a representation of</p>
<p>exclude the possibility of</p>
</ref>
<ref id="Vpi">
<p>are the mere results of the power of <xref id="Ns"/>, a blind but indispensable function of the soul</p>
<p>occupy part of the sphere of <xref id="Ns"/> concerning the existence of <xref id="Np"/> in general</p>
<p>are by their very nature contradictory</p>
<p>would be falsified</p>
<p>abstract from all content of <p chance="50"><xref id="knowledge.type"/> </p>knowledge</p>
<p>constitute a body of demonstrated doctrine, and <xref id="quantity"/> this body must be known <xref id="knowledge.type"/></p>
<p>can never, as a whole, furnish a true and demonstrated science, because, like <xref id="Ns"/>, they <xref id="Vpt"/> <xref id="judgement.type"/> principles</p>
<p>can be treated like <choice><p><xref id="Ns"/></p><p><xref id="Np"/></p></choice></p>
<p>should only be used as a canon for <choice><p><xref id="Ns"/></p><p><xref id="Np"/></p></choice></p>
<p>exist in <choice><p><xref id="Ns"/></p><p><xref id="Np"/></p></choice></p>
<p>Whence comes <xref id="Ns"/>, the solution of which involves the relation between <choice><p><xref id="Ns"/></p><p><xref id="Np"/></p></choice> and <choice><p><xref id="Ns"/></p><p><xref id="Np"/></p></choice>?</p>
<p class="sentence"><p chance="50"><xref id="intro.clause"/>, </p>is it <choice><p>true</p><p>the case</p></choice> that <xref id="Ns"/> <xref id="Vst"/> <choice><p><xref id="Ns"/></p><p><xref id="Np"/></p></choice>, or is the real question whether <xref id="Np"/> <xref id="Vpi"/>?</p>
<p>Has it ever been suggested that<p chance="50">, <xref id="proof"/>,</p> <xref id="certainty.clause"/> there is <choice><p>no relation</p><p>a causal connection</p></choice> bewteen <choice><p><xref id="Ns"/></p><p><xref id="Np"/></p></choice> and <choice><p><xref id="Ns"/></p><p><xref id="Np"/></p></choice>?</p>
<p>In which of our cognitive faculties are <choice><p><xref id="Ns"/></p><p><xref id="Np"/></p></choice> and <choice><p><xref id="Ns"/></p><p><xref id="Np"/></p></choice> connected together?</p>
<p class="sentence"><xref id="conjunction"/> can I entertain <xref id="Ns"/> in thought, or does it present itself to me?</p>
</ref>
<ref id="throwaway.sentence">
<p>But we have fallen short of the necessary interconnection that we have in mind when we speak of <choice><p><xref id="Ns"/></p><p><xref id="Np"/></p></choice>.</p>
<p>We thus have a pure synthesis of apprehension.</p>
<p>And similarly with all the others.</p>
<p>The question of this matter's relation to objects is not in any way under discussion.</p>
<p>This distinction must have some ground in the nature of <choice><p><xref id="Ns"/></p><p><xref id="Np"/></p></choice>.</p>
<p>The divisions are thus provided; all that is required is to fill them.</p>
<p>This could not be passed over in a complete system of transcendental philosophy, but in a merely critical essay the simple mention of the fact may suffice.</p>
<p>This is not something we are in a position to establish.</p>
<p>This is the sense in which it is to be understood in this work.</p>
<p>But this need not worry us.</p>
<p>Let us apply this to <xref id="Ns"/>.</p>
<p>But to this matter no answer is possible.</p>
<p>But the proof of this is a task from which we can here be absolved.</p>
<p>But at present we shall turn our attention to <xref id="Ns"/>.</p>
<p>This may be clear with an example.</p>
<p>I feel I have sufficiently shown this to be true.</p>
<p>This is what chiefly concerns us.</p>
<p>On this matter, what has been said already should in any case suffice by itself.</p>
<p>In my present remarks I am referring to <xref id="Ns"/> only in so far as it is founded on <xref id="judgement.type"/> principles.</p>
<p>But this is to be dismissed as random groping.</p>
