home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Recommendation K.8
-
-
-
- Replace by the following:
-
-
-
- SEPARATION IN THE SOIL BETWEEN TELECOMMUNICATION CABLES
-
- AND EARTHING SYSTEM OF POWER FACILITIES
-
-
-
- Introduction
-
-
-
- If a buried telecommunication cable without an insulating layer around the metal sheath is located in
- the vicinity of a high voltage earthing system, part of the earth potential rise (EPR) in the event of an
- earth fault in the high voltage system can transfer to the telecommunication system through resistive
- coupling.
-
-
-
- According to CCITT and CIGRE documents, EPR from high voltage power installations is recognized
- as a source of dangerous disturbance to telecommunication systems and a hazard to service personnel.
-
-
-
- It is possible to calculate EPR near power installations following the methods given in the Directives
- (see Volumes II and III), and this is especially recommended for dealing with switchyards earthing sys-
- tems.
-
-
-
- The object of the present Recommendation is to give practical guidelines in determining safe dis-
- tance between buried telecommunication cables and earthing systems of power facilities in the absence
- of local measurements or calculated values of EPR.
-
-
-
- 1. Scope
-
-
-
- Earth fault in a power system causes earth currents which raise the earth potential where the fault
- current leaves and enters the earth. The magnitude and extension of the EPR depends on the fault cur-
- rent level, the earthing resistance, the soil resistivity and the layout of the earthing arrangement. The
- duration of an earth fault depends on the type of power network.
-
-
-
- This Recommendation gives information about:
-
-
-
- a) locations where EPR may occur;
-
-
-
- b) duration of EPR in different types of power networks;
-
-
-
- c) "safe distance" between telecommunication cables and power
-
- installations;
-
-
-
- d) measures to be taken if safe distance is not achieved.
-
-
-
- 2. General considerations
-
-
-
- The minimum separation in soil to be recommended between an earthing system of power installation
- and telecommunication cables depends on a number of factors:
-
-
-
- - type of power network;
-
-
-
- - fault current level;
-
-
-
- - power earthing system;
-
-
-
- - soil resistivity;
-
-
-
- - local conditions.
-
-
-
- 3. Type of power network
-
-
-
- Power networks are classified according to how the neutral point is connected to earth. The earthing
- system affects both the level and duration of the fault current, and hence the EPR.
-
-
-
- 3.1 Networks with the neutral point earthed directly or through a low impedance
-
-
-
- The level of an earth-fault current is high. A relay system will clear the fault in a short time.
-
-
-
- 3.2 Networks with the neutral point earthed through an arc suppression coil
-
- The level of an earth-fault current is small, usually not exceeding 100amperes for each coil. The dura-
- tion of an earth fault is relatively short.
-
-
-
- Such networks may be equipped with delayed tripping to clear permanent earth faults.
-
-
-
- 3.3 Networks with the neutral point isolated from earth
-
-
-
- The level of an earth-fault current is normally low, however, the fault duration might be very long. Net-
- works of large extent may give rise to large capacitive fault currents.
-
-
-
- If such networks are equipped with devices for automatic fault clearing, the fault duration is short to
- medium.
-
-
-
- 4. Locations where earth potential rise may occur
-
-
-
- 4.1 Power stations and sub-stations
-
-
-
- Power stations and sub-stations are most likely to experience EPR. The size of the station, the number
- and construction of power lines attached to the station, and the earthing arrangement are factors influenc-
- ing the level and zone of EPR. As given in Reference (4) the layout and structure of the earthing arrange-
- ment depends on regulations, size, age, purpose and location. If the power lines entering the station are
- provided with earth wires, they will be connected to the earthing system in the station.
-
-
-
- 4.2 Power line towers
-
-
-
- Power line towers with footing electrodes are subjected to EPR due to earth-fault current in the power
- system, and currents from lightning strokes. If the power line is equipped with earth wires, these will nor-
- mally be connected to the tower electrodes. The probability of high EPR decreases when a power line is
- equipped with earth wires.
-
- 5. Magnitude of earth potential rise
-
-
-
- The magnitude of the EPR depends on the power system voltage, the power line construction, the fault
- current level and the earthing resistance.
-
-
-
- 6. Zone of earth potential rise
-
-
-
- EPR is measured as the earth potential referred to a distant neutral earth. The zone of EPR, near an
- earthing system, varies from some tens to some thousands of metres, depending on soil resistivity, the
- layout of the earth electrode,and other local conditions. Further information is found in Reference(5).
- The zones of EPR in urban areas are small compared to what can be expected in rural areas. Only EPR
- zones having potential higher than values given in Reference (1) are considered as dangerous. Measure-
- ments and calculation of the EPR zones are made by the power distribution authorities.
-
-
-
- 7. Duration of earth potential rise
-
-
-
- The duration of an earth fault and hence the EPR, depends on type of power network.
-
-
-
- 7.1 Networks with the neutral point earthed directly or through a low impedance
-
- The duration of an earth fault is generally less than 0.2 - 0.5 seconds.
-
-
-
- 7.2 Networks with the neutral point earthed through an arc suppression coil
-
-
-
- The duration of an earth fault is normally less than 0.8 second, but may in some cases last for several
- seconds. Such networks may be equipped with delayed (a few seconds) tripping to clear permanent earth
- faults.
-
-
-
- 7.3 Networks with an isolated neutral point
-
-
-
- The duration of an earth fault can be very long, and may last until another earth fault occurs.
-
-
-
- If such networks are equipped with automatic fault-clearing devices, the fault duration may be as short
- as in item 7.1.
-
-
-
- 8. Minimum separation in soil between buried telecommunication cables and power earthing systems
-
-
-
- The EPR near a high voltage earthing system can be estimated from calculations based on idealized
- earth electrodes and a homogeneous soil resistivity in the EPR zone. In practice it is not possible to make
- an exact calculation of the potential transferred from a high voltage earthing system to an adjacent tele-
- communication cable. However, by feeding a current into the high voltage earthing system from a suffi-
- ciently great distance, the voltage between the cable sheath and an auxiliary electrode in the area of
- neutral potential can be measured. The result must be corrected proportionately to the actual earth-
- fault current. (On armoured cables the correction factor is not linear, but depends on the magnetic charac-
- teristic of the ferromagnetic cable screen). In the absence of other experiences, local measurements or
- calculated values of EPR, the following minimum separation in soil between "ordinary" telecommunica-
- tion cable with a metal sheath in direct contact with the soil and a high voltage power earthing system
- should be observed:
-
-
-
-
-
- TABLE 1
-
-
-
- Separation in soil (in metres) between telecommunication
-
- cables and high voltage earthing systems beyond which no
-
- calculation nor measurement is necessary
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Note 1 - Those figures are normally referring to lines and installations of which nominal voltage is equal to
- or higher than 132 kV.
-
-
-
- Note 2 - The hazards due to lightning strokes on electric plants are not covered and may require to con-
- sider point 9 for high keraunic level areas.
-
-
-
- Note 3 - In the case of tower earthing, much shorter distances can be used if the power lines include earth
- wires.
-
-
-
- Note 4 - Hazard for people working on telecommunication lines inside the zone of EPR is not dealt with
- through such figures, and requires to consider additional measures or precautions.
-
-
-
- 9. Measures to be taken to avoid hazards from EPR
-
-
-
- The primary method to avoid dangerous influence from EPR is to increase the distance between tele-
- communication cables and power earthing systems. If local conditions do not permit sufficient separation
- to avoid dangerous EPR, the telecommunication cables should be provided with insulation, for example
- by placing the cables in insulating plastic tubes.
-
-
-
- When the magnitude of EPR is extremely high, or the zone of EPR is of extra great extension, optical
- fibre cables or a radio-relay systems may be used instead of metallic cables.
-
-
-
- REFERENCES
-
-
-
- 1. CCITT Directives - Concerning the protection of telecommunication lines against harmful effects
- from electrified power and electrified railway lines.
-
-
-
- 2. CCITT Study GROUP V - Contribution No. 61/1979.
-
-
-
- 3. CIGRE No. 36-04/1970 - Ground potential rise and telecommunication lines.
-
- 4. ELECTRA No. 71/1980 Station grounding - Safety and interference aspects.
-
-
-
- 5. ELECTRA No. 60/1978 - Zone of influence of ground potential rise.
-
-
-