home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Wrap
Text File | 1991-12-13 | 92.4 KB | 6,120 lines
.rs .\" Troff code generated by TPS Convert from ITU Original Files .\" Not Copyright ( c) 1991 .\" .\" Assumes tbl, eqn, MS macros, and lots of luck. .TA 1c 2c 3c 4c 5c 6c 7c 8c .ds CH .ds CF .EQ delim @@ .EN .nr LL 40.5P .nr ll 40.5P .nr HM 3P .nr FM 6P .nr PO 4P .nr PD 9p .po 4P .rs \v | 5i' .sp 2P .LP \fBRecommendation\ Q.783\fR .RT .sp 2P .sp 1P .ce 1000 \fBTUP\ TEST\ SPECIFICATION\fR .EF '% Fascicle\ VI.9\ \(em\ Rec.\ Q.783'' .OF '''Fascicle\ VI.9\ \(em\ Rec.\ Q.783 %' .ce 0 .sp 1P .LP \fB1\fR \fBIntroduction\fR .sp 1P .RT .PP This Recommendation contains a set of detailed tests for the Signalling System\ No.\ 7 Telephony User Part (TUP). These tests are intended to validate the protocol specified in Q.721\(hyQ.724\ Recommendations. This Recommendation conforms to Q.780\ Recommendations which describes the basic rules of the test specification. .RT .sp 2P .LP \fB2\fR \fBGeneral principles of TUP tests\fR .sp 1P .RT .PP The TUP tests aim at testing TUP protocol conformance in a given implementation. The tests are described as \*QValidation\*U tests or \*QValidation\*U and \*QCompatibility\*U tests. Each test description indicates in the field \*Qtype of test\*U whether the test is \*QValidation\*U or \*QValidation\*U and \*QCompatibility\*U. As the TUP also describes the required call control actions resulting from TUP message transfer the TUP tester also checks the result of those call control actions, e.g.\ that speech/information transfer is possible. .RT .sp 2P .LP \fB3\fR \fBTest configuration\fR .sp 1P .RT .PP A stable signalling relation is required between \*QSP A\*U and \*QSP B\*U in order to effectively test the TUP. In addition telephony circuits are required for some of the tests. .RT .sp 2P .LP \fB4\fR \fBTUP test list\fR .sp 1P .RT .PP All tests may be validation tests. Tests marked \*Q*\*U are compatibility tests. Tests marked \*Qfs\*U are for further study. .RT .sp 2P .LP .sp 1 1 \fICircuit supervision\fR .sp 1P .RT .sp 1P .LP * 1.1 Non allocated circuits .sp 9p .RT .sp 1P .LP 1.2 Reset of circuits .sp 9p .RT .LP 1.2.1 RSC received on an idle circuit .LP 1.2.2 RSC sent on an idle circuit .LP 1.2.3 Group reset received .LP 1.2.4 Group reset sent .sp 1P .LP 1.3 Blocking of circuits .sp 9p .RT .LP 1.3.1 Group blocking/unblocking .LP 1.3.1.1 HGB received .LP 1.3.1.2 HGB sent .LP * 1.3.1.3 MGB received .LP * 1.3.1.4 MGB sent .LP 1.3.2 Circuit blocking/unblocking .LP * 1.3.2.1 BLO received .LP * 1.3.2.2 BLO sent .LP * 1.3.2.3 Circuit blocking from both ends; removal of blocking from one end .LP 1.3.2.4 Interruption for FDM circuits .bp .sp 1P .LP 1.4 Continuity check test call .sp 9p .RT .LP * 1.4.1 CCTC received: successful .LP * 1.4.2 CCTC sent: successful .LP 1.4.3 CCTC received: unsuccessful .LP 1.4.4 CCTC sent: unsuccessful .sp 1P .LP 1.5 Receipt of unreasonable signalling information .sp 9p .RT .LP 1.5.1 Received .sp 2P .LP 2 \fINormal call set\(hyup\fR .sp 1P .RT .sp 1P .LP 2.1 Both way circuit selection .sp 9p .RT .LP * 2.1.1 IAM sent by controlling SP .LP * 2.1.2 IAM sent by non controlling SP .sp 1P .LP 2.2 Called address sending .sp 9p .RT .LP * 2.2.1 \*Qen bloc\*U operation .LP * 2.2.2 Overlap operation .sp 1P .LP 2.3 Successful call set\(hyup .sp 9p .RT .LP 2.3.1 Ordinary call (with various ACM and ANS) .LP * 2.3.2 Call switched via satellite .LP * 2.3.3 Test for echo suppressor call set\(hyup .LP * 2.3.4 Blocking and unblocking during a call (initiated) .LP * 2.3.5 Blocking and unblocking during a call (received) .sp 2P .LP 3 \fINormal call release\fR .sp 1P .RT .sp 1P .LP * 3.1 Calling party clears: before ACM .sp 9p .RT .sp 1P .LP * 3.2 Calling party clears: before ANS .sp 9p .RT .sp 1P .LP * 3.3 Calling party clears: after ANS .sp 9p .RT .sp 1P .LP * 3.4 Calling party clears: after CLEAR BACK .sp 9p .RT .sp 1P .LP * 3.5 Reanswer .sp 9p .RT .sp 2P .LP 4 \fIUnsuccessful set\(hyup\fR .sp 1P .RT .sp 1P .LP 4.1 SEC .sp 9p .RT .LP 4.1.1 SEC received .LP 4.1.2 SEC sent .sp 1P .LP 4.2 CGC .sp 9p .RT .LP 4.2.1 CGCreceived .LP 4.2.2 CGC sent .sp 1P .LP 4.3 NNC .sp 9p .RT .LP 4.3.1 NNC received .LP 4.3.2 NNC sent .bp .sp 1P .LP 4.4 ADI .sp 9p .RT .LP * 4.4.1 ADI received .LP * 4.4.2 ADI sent .sp 1P .LP 4.5 CFL .sp 9p .RT .LP 4.5.1 CFL received .LP 4.5.2 CFL sent .sp 1P .LP 4.6 SSB .sp 9p .RT .LP * 4.6.1 SSB received .LP * 4.6.2 SSB sent .sp 1P .LP 4.7 UNN .sp 9p .RT .LP * 4.7.1 UNN received .LP * 4.7.2 UNN sent .sp 1P .LP 4.8 LOS .sp 9p .RT .LP 4.8.1 LOS received .LP 4.8.2 LOS sent .sp 1P .LP 4.9 SST .sp 9p .RT .LP 4.9.1 SST received .LP 4.9.2 SST sent .sp 1P .LP 4.10 ACB .sp 9p .RT .LP 4.10.1 ACB received .LP 4.10.2 ACB sent .sp 1P .LP 4.11 DPN .sp 9p .RT .LP 4.11.1 DPN received .LP 4.11.2 DPN sent .sp 2P .LP 5 \fIAbnormal situation during a call\fR .sp 1P .RT .sp 1P .LP 5.1 Inability to release in response to a CLF .sp 9p .RT .sp 1P .LP 5.2 Inability to release in response to a backward signal .sp 9p .RT .sp 1P .LP 5.3 Timers .sp 9p .RT .LP 5.3.1 T2 .LP 5.3.2 T3 .LP 5.3.3 T4 .LP 5.3.4 T5 .LP 5.3.5 T6 .LP * 5.3.6 ANS signal not received (Q.118 Timer) .LP * 5.3.7 Delay in clearing by calling party (Q.118 Timer) .sp 1P .LP 5.4 Reset of circuits during a call .sp 9p .RT .LP 5.4.1 Of an outgoing circuit .LP 5.4.2 Of an incoming circuit .bp .sp 1P .LP 5.5 Receipt of unreasonable signalling information .sp 9p .RT .LP 5.5.1 (Now test No. 1.5.1) .LP fs 5.5.2 Received .sp 1P .LP 5.6 Interruption of signalling relation .sp 9p .RT .sp 2P .LP 6 \fISpecial call set\(hyup\fR .sp 1P .RT .sp 1P .LP 6.1 Continuity check call .sp 9p .RT .LP * 6.1.1 COT applied on an outgoing circuit .LP * 6.1.2 COT applied on previous circuit .LP * 6.1.3 COT on a satellite circuit .LP 6.1.4 Calling party clears during a COT .LP * 6.1.5 Delay of through connect .LP 6.1.6 COT unsuccessful .LP 6.1.7 COT received on incoming circuit .sp 1P .LP 6.2 Automatic repeat attempt .sp 9p .RT .LP 6.2.1 Dual seizure .LP 6.2.2 Circuit reset .LP 6.2.3 Reception of unreasonable signal information .LP * 6.2.4 Blocking of the circuit .LP 6.2.5 Continuity check failure .sp 1P .LP 6.3 Dual seizure .sp 9p .RT .LP 6.3.1 Dual seizure for controlling side .sp 2P .LP 7 \fISupplementary services\fR .sp 1P .RT .sp 1P .LP fs 7.1 CUG .sp 9p .RT .sp 1P .LP fs 7.2 User access to the calling line identity .sp 9p .RT .sp 1P .LP fs 7.3 User access to the called line identity .sp 9p .RT .sp 1P .LP fs 7.4 Redirection of calls .sp 9p .RT .sp 1P .LP fs 7.5 CCBS .sp 9p .RT .sp 1P .LP fs 7.6 Network access to calling line identity .sp 9p .RT .sp 2P .LP 8 \fIPerformance tests\fR .sp 1P .RT .LP \fINote\fR \ \(em\ For further study. .LP .rs .sp 10P .ad r \fBFigure 1/Q.783, p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T1.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 1.1 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE: _ .T& lw(228p) . TITLE:\ Circuit supervision _ .T& lw(228p) . { SUBTITLE:\ Non\(hyallocated circuits } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE: To verify that on receipt of a CIC relating to a circuit which does not exist, SP\ A will discard the message and alert maintenance personnel } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the data in signalling point\ B such that the CIC identifies a circuit that does not exist between SP\ A and SP\ B } _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- IAM _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Arrange for SP B to send an initial address message. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS SHOWN ABOVE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK C: WAS THE INDICATION GIVEN TO THE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL? | | | | | | } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T1.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T2.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 1.2.1 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 1.15.1 _ .T& lw(228p) . TITLE:\ Reset of circuits _ .T& lw(228p) . { SUBTITLE:\ RSC received on an idle circuit } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE:\ To verify that on receipt of a reset circuit signal SP\ A will respond by sending a release guard signal } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS:\ The circuit is idle } _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RSC .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . RLG -------------------------> _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Arrange for SP B to send a reset\(hycircuit signal. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T2.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T3.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 1.2.2 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 1.15.1 _ .T& lw(228p) . TITLE:\ Reset of circuits _ .T& lw(228p) . { SUBTITLE:\ RSC sent on an idle circuit } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE:\ To verify that SP A is able to generate reset\(hycircuit signal } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS:\ The circuit is idle } _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . RSC -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Arrange for SP A to send a reset\(hycircuit signal. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T3.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T4.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 1.2.3 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 1.15.2 _ .T& lw(228p) . TITLE:\ Reset of circuits _ .T& lw(228p) . { SUBTITLE:\ Group reset received } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE: To verify that on receipt of two circuit group reset messages within a period of 5\ seconds, SP\ A will respond by sending a circuit reset acknowledge message } _ .T& lw(228p) . PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS: _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- GRS .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- GRS .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . GRA -------------------------> _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Arrange for SP B to send two circuit group reset messages within a period of 5\ seconds. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: IS THE CIRCUIT GROUP IDLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T4.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T5.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 1.2.4 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 1.15.2 _ .T& lw(228p) . TITLE:\ Reset of circuits _ .T& lw(228p) . SUBTITLE:\ Group reset sent _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE:\ To verify that SP A is able to generate a circuit group reset message } _ .T& lw(228p) . PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS: _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . GRS -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . GRS -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- GRA _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Arrange for SP A to send two circuit group reset messages within a period of 5\ seconds. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: IS THE CIRCUIT GROUP IDLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T5.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T6.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 1.3.1.1 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 5.2 _ .T& lw(228p) . { TITLE:\ Group blocking/unblocking } _ .T& lw(228p) . SUBTITLE:\ HGB received _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE:\ To verify that the hardware failure group blocking procedure can be correctly initiated } _ .T& lw(228p) . PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS: _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- HGB .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- HGB .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . HBA -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- HGU .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- HGU .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . HUA -------------------------> _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Arrange for SP B to send two hardware failure oriented group blocking messages within a period of 5\ seconds. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN ONLY BE ORIGINATED FROM SP\ B ON THE CIRCUITS INDICATED BY THE RANGE FIELD IN THE HGB MESSAGE } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { Arrange for SP B to send two hardware failure oriented group unblocking messages within a period of 5 seconds. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK B: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN BE ORIGINATED FROM EITHER SP ON THE CIRCUITS INDICATED BY THE RANGE FIELD } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T6.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T7.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 1.3.1.2 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 5.2 _ .T& lw(228p) . { TITLE:\ Group blocking/unblocking } _ .T& lw(228p) . SUBTITLE:\ HGB sent _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE: To verify that SP A is able to generate both hardware failure oriented group blocking messages and hardware failure oriented group unblocking messages } _ .T& lw(228p) . PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS: _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . HGB -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . HGB -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- HGB .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . HGU -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . HGU -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- HUA _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Arrange for SP A to send two hardware failure oriented group blocking messages within a period of 5\ seconds. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN ONLY BE ORIGINATED FROM SP\ A ON THE CIRCUITS INDICATED BY THE RANGE FIELD IN THE HGB MESSAGE } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { Arrange for SP A to send two hardware failure oriented group unblocking messages within a period of 5 seconds. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK B: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN BE ORIGINATED FROM EITHER SP ON THE CIRCUIT INDICATED BY THE RANGE FIELD } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T7.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T8.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 1.3.1.3 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 5.1 _ .T& lw(228p) . { TITLE:\ Group blocking/unblocking } _ .T& lw(228p) . SUBTITLE:\ MGB received _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE:\ To verify that the maintenance oriented group blocking procedure can be correctly initiated } _ .T& lw(228p) . PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS: _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- MGB .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- MGB .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . MBA -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- MGU .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- MGU .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . MUA -------------------------> _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Arrange for SP B to send two maintenance oriented group blocking messages within a period of 5\ seconds. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN ONLY BE ORIGINATED FROM SP\ B ON THE CIRCUITS INDICATED BY THE RANGE FIELD IN THE MGB MESSAGE } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { Arrange for SP B to send two maintenance oriented group unblocking messages within a period of 5\ seconds. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK B: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN BE ORIGINATED FROM EITHER SP ON THE CIRCUITS INDICATED BY THE RANGE FIELD } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T8.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T9.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 1.3.1.4 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 5.1 _ .T& lw(228p) . { TITLE:\ Group blocking/unblocking } _ .T& lw(228p) . SUBTITLE:\ MGB sent _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE: To verify that SP A is able to generate both maintenance oriented group blocking messages and maintenance oriented group unblocking messages } _ .T& lw(228p) . PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS: _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . MGB -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . MGB -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- MGA .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . MGU -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . MGU -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- MUA _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Arrange for SP A to send two maintenance oriented group blocking messages within a period of 5\ seconds. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN ONLY BE ORIGINATED FROM SP\ A ON THE CIRCUITS INDICATED BY THE RANGE FIELD IN THE MGB MESSAGE } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { Arrange for SP A to send two maintenance oriented group unblocking messages within a period of 5\ seconds. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK B: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN BE ORIGINATED FROM EITHER SP ON THE CIRCUIT INDICATED BY THE RANGE FIELD } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T9.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T10.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 1.3.2.1 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 5.1 _ .T& lw(228p) . { TITLE:\ Circuit blocking/unblocking } _ .T& lw(228p) . SUBTITLE:\ BLO received _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE:\ To verify that the blocking/unblocking procedure can be correctly initiated } _ .T& lw(228p) . PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS: _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- BLO .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . BLA -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- UBL .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . UBA -------------------------> _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Arrange for SP B to send a blocking signal. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN ONLY BE ORIGINATED FROM SP\ B ON THIS CIRCUIT } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { Arrange for SP B to send an unblocking signal. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK B: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN BE ORIGINATED FROM EITHER EXCHANGE ON THIS CIRCUIT } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T10.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T11.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 1.3.2.2 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 5.1 _ .T& lw(228p) . { TITLE:\ Circuit blocking/unblocking } _ .T& lw(228p) . SUBTITLE:\ BLO sent _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE:\ To verify that SP A is able to generate blocking messages } _ .T& lw(228p) . PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS: _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . BLO -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- BLA .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . UBL -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- UBA _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Arrange for SP A to send a blocking signal. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN ONLY BE ORIGINATED FROM SP\ A ON THIS CIRCUIT } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { Arrange for SP A to send an unblocking signal. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK B: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN BE ORIGINATED FROM EITHER SP ON THIS CIRCUIT } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS SHOWN ABOVE? | | | | | | } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T11.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T12.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 1.3.2.3 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 5.1 _ .T& lw(228p) . { TITLE:\ Circuit blocking/unblocking } _ .T& lw(228p) . { SUBTITLE:\ Blocking from both ends: removal of blocking from one end } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE:\ To verify that the blocking/unblocking procedure can be correctly initiated } _ .T& lw(228p) . PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS: _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . BLO -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- BLA .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- BLO .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . BLA -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . UBL -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- UBA .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- UBL .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . UBA -------------------------> _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Arrange for SP A to send a blocking signal. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN ONLY BE ORIGINATED FROM SP\ A ON THIS CIRCUIT } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { Arrange for SP B to send a blocking signal. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK B: VERIFY THAT A CALL CANNOT BE ORIGINATED ON THIS CIRCUIT BY EITHER SP } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. { Arrange for SP A to send an unblocking signal. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 6. { CHECK C: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN ONLY BE ORIGINATED BY SP B } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 7. { Arrange for SP B to send an unblocking signal. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 8. { CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T12.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T13.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 1.3.2.4 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 9.2 _ .T& lw(228p) . { TITLE:\ Circuit blocking/unblocking } _ .T& lw(228p) . { SUBTITLE:\ Interruption from FDM circuits } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE:\ To verify th at an interruption of the pilot in FDM system causes a blocking signal to be sent } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS:\ The signa lling points must be linked by a transmission system using FDM } _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . BLO -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- BLA .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . UBL -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- UBA _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Arrange for the reception of the pilot signal at SP A to be interrupted more than 4\(hy15\ seconds. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: CONFIRM THAT A CALL CANNOT BE INITIATED BY EITHER SP } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { Arrange for the interruption of the pilot tone to be terminated. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK B: CONFIRM THAT A CALL CAN BE INITIATED BY EITHER SP AFTER A PERIOD OF 4\(hy15\ SECONDS } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T13.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T14.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 1.4.1 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 7.5 _ .T& lw(228p) . { TITLE:\ Continuity check test call } _ .T& lw(228p) . { SUBTITLE:\ CCTC received: Successful } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE:\ To verify th at the continuity test call procedure can be correctly performed } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS:\ Circuit must be idle } _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- CCR .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { | | (hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy } Check tone .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { \f | fR | (hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy } .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- CLF .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . RLG -------------------------> _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Initiate the continuity test call procedure at SP\ B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T14.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T15.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 1.4.2 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 7.5 _ .T& lw(228p) . { TITLE:\ Continuity check test call } _ .T& lw(228p) . { SUBTITLE:\ CCTC sent: successful } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE:\ To verify th at the continuity test call procedure can be correctly performed } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS:\ Circuit must be idle } _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CCR -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . Check Tone { \(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy | | } .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { \(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy | f | fR } .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Initiate the continuity test call procedure at SP A. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T15.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T16.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 1.4.3 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 7.5 _ .T& lw(228p) . { TITLE:\ Continuity check test call } _ .T& lw(228p) . { SUBTITLE:\ CCTC received: unsuccessful } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE:\ To verify tha t the continuity check procedure can be correctly received } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS:\ Ensure th at no backward check tone is detected within the specified time out } _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A \fB\(em\ \fR SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- \fB\(em\ \fR CCR .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . { | | (hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy } \fB\(em\ \fR Check tone .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . { \f | fR | (hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy } .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- \(em\ CCF .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . \ | .T& lw(72p) | rw(84p) | lw(72p) . 1\(hy3 minutes \ | \ T10 .T& lw(72p) | rw(84p) | lw(72p) . \ | .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- \(em\ CCR .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . { | | (hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy } \ \ Check tone .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . { \f | fR | (hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy } .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- \(em\ CCF .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . \ | .T& lw(72p) | rw(84p) | lw(72p) . Maintenance staff alerted 1\(hy3 minutes \ | \ T10 .T& lw(72p) | rw(84p) | lw(72p) . \ | .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- \(em\ CCR .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . { | | (hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy } \ \ Check tone .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . { \f | fR | (hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy } .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- \ \ CCF _ .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Initiate the continuity test call procedure at SP\ B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: WAS THE SECOND CONTINUITY CHECK INITIATED WITHIN\ 1 TO\ 3 MINUTES? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { CHECK B: WERE THE MAINTENANCE STAFF ALERTED ON FAILURE OF THE SECOND CONTINUITY CHECK? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK C: WAS THE CHECK REPEATED AT INTERVALS OF 1 TO 3\ MINUTES? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. { CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T16.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T17.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 1.4.4 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 7.5.3 _ .T& lw(228p) . { TITLE:\ Continuity check test call } _ .T& lw(228p) . { SUBTITLE:\ CCTC sent: unsuccessful } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE:\ To verify th at the continuity test call procedure can be correctly invoked } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS:\ Ensure th at no backward tone is detected within the specified timeout } _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CCR -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . Check tone { \(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy | | } .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { \(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy | f | fR } .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CCF\ \ \(em -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { \fBT10\fR | \ T10\ \ | 1\(hy3 minutes \fBT10\fR | \ } .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CCR\ \ \(em -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . Check tone { \(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy | | } .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { \(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy | f | fR } .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CCF\ \ \(em -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . { \fBT10\fR | \ T10\ \ | 1\(hy3 minutes \fBT10\fR | } Maintenance staff alerted .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CCR\ \ \(em -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . Check tone { \(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy | | } .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { \(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy | f | fR } .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CCF -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Initiate the continuity test call procedure at SP\ A. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: WAS THE SECOND CONTINUITY CHECK INITIATED WITHIN\ 1 TO 3\ MINUTES? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { CHECK B: WERE THE MAINTENANCE STAFF ALERTED ON FAILURE OF THE SECOND CONTINUITY CHECK? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK C: WAS THE CHECK REPEATED AT INTERVALS OF 1 TO 3\ MINUTES? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. { CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T17.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T18.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 1.5.1 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 6.5 _ .T& lw(228p) . { TITLE:\ Receipt of unreasonable information } _ .T& lw(228p) . SUBTITLE:\ Received _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE: To verify that the action taken by a signalling point upon receipt of unreasonable signalling information is as stated in Q.724 \(sc\ 6.5 } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS: a) Arrange the data in signalling point B such that CLF, RLG, and UBL messages may be initiated b) The circuit should be idle and unblocked } _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . a) .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- CLF .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . RLG -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . b) .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . c) <------------------------- UBL .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . UBA -------------------------> _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Arrange for SP B to send a clear forward signal. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS IN a) ABOVE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { Arrange for SP B to send a release guard signal. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. { CHECK C: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 6. { CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS IN b) ABOVE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 7. { Arrange for SP B to send an unblocking signal. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 8. { CHECK E: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 9. { CHECK F: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS IN c) ABOVE? | | | | | | } .TE .LP \fINote\fR \ \(em\ This test covers only some of the ambiguous messages which could be received. .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T18.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T19.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 2.1.1 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 1 _ .T& lw(228p) . { TITLE:\ Both way circuit selection } _ .T& lw(228p) . { SUBTITLE:\ IAM sent by controlling SP } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE: To verify that signalling point A can initiate an outgoing call on a circuit capable of bothway operation when the controlling SP is\ A } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS: a) Called termination is free b) Circuit selected is capable of bothway operation c) Circuit selected is as in test number 2.1.2 d) SP A is the controlling signalling point } _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ACM .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { \f | | fR \(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy } Ringing tone .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ANC .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . Speech { \(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em } Speech .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Make a call from SP A TO SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: CAN RINGING TONE BE HEARD? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { The called party should answer the call. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. { The calling party should clear the call. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 6. { CHECK C: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 7. { CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T19.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T20.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 2.1.2 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 1 _ .T& lw(228p) . { TITLE:\ Bothway circuit selection } _ .T& lw(228p) . { SUBTITLE:\ IAM sent by non\(hycontrolling SP } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE: To verify that signalling point A can initiate an outgoing call on a circuit capable of bothway operation when the non\(hycontrolling SP is\ A } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS: a) Called termination is free b) Circuit selected is capable of bothway operation c) Circuit selected is as in test number 2.1.1 d) SP B is the controlling signalling point } _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ACM .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { \f | | fR \(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy } Ringing tone .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ANC .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . Speech { \(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em } .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: CAN RINGING TONE BE HEARD? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { The called party should answer the call. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. { The calling party should clear the call. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 6. { CHECK C: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 7. { CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T20.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T21.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 2.2.1 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 1 _ .T& lw(228p) . { TITLE:\ Called address sending } _ .T& lw(228p) . { SUBTITLE:\ \*QEN BLOC\*U operation } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE:\ To verify that a call can be successfully established (all digits included in the IAM) } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS: a) Called termination is free b) The exchange data is arranged such that all digits are included in the IAM } _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ACM .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { \f | | fR \(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy } Ringing tone .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ANC .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . Speech { \(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em } Speech .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: IS RINGING TONE HEARD? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { The called party should answer the call. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. { The calling party should clear the call. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 6. { CHECK C: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 7. { CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 8. { For validation testing repeat this test in the reverse direction Where SPA is in a position to know, by digit analysis that the final digit has been sent. Confirm that an End\(hyof\(hypulsing (ST) signal is included in the IAM. } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T21.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T22.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 2.2.2 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 1 _ .T& lw(228p) . { TITLE:\ Called address sending } _ .T& lw(228p) . { SUBTITLE:\ Overlap operation (with SAM and SAO) } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE:\ To verify that signalling point A can initiate a call using an IAM followed by SAM and a SAO } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS: a) Called termination is free b) The signalling point data is arranged such that digits are generated in an IAM followed by a SAM and a SAO } _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . SAM -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . SAO -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ACM .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { \f | | fR \(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy } Ringing tone .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ANC .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . Speech { \(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em } Speech .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: IS RINGING TONE HEARD? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { The called party should answer the call. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. { The calling party should clear the call. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 6. { CHECK C: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 7. { CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 8. { For validation testing repeat this test in the reverse direction. Note\ \(em The message flow may not be as above (There may be various SAMs and SAOs). } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . { Where SPA is in a position to know by digit analysis that the final digit has been sent. Confirm that an end\(hyof\(hypulsing (ST) signal is included in the last address message. } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T22.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T23.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 2.3.1 _ .T& lw(228p) . { REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 1.6 and 1.10 } _ .T& lw(228p) . { TITLE:\ Successful call set\(hyup } _ .T& lw(228p) . { SUBTITLE:\ Ordinary call (with various ACM and ANS) } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE: To verify that a call can be successfully completed using various combinations of address complete messages and answer messages } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS:\ Called termination is free } _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ACM .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { \f | | fR \(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy } Ringing tone .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ANC .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . Speech { \(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em } Speech .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 2. { CHECK A: CAN RINGING TONE BE HEARD? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 3. { The called party should answer the call. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 4. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 5. { The calling party should clear the call. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 6. { CHECK C: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 7. { CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 8. { Repeat steps 1\(hy7 with all combinations of bits A&B in the address complete message. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 9. { Repeat steps 1\(hy8 with ANC replaced with an ANN. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 10. { Repeat this test in the reverse direction. } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T23.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T24.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 2.3.2 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 1 _ .T& lw(228p) . { TITLE:\ Successful call set\(hyup } _ .T& lw(228p) . { SUBTITLE:\ Call switched via a satellite } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE:\ To verify the satellite indicator in the initial address message is correctly set } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS: a) Called termination is free b) The signalling point data is arranged such that the call is switched via a satellite connection or has a satellite connection already included in the path } _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ACM .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { \f | | fR \(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy } Ringing tone .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ANC .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . Speech { \(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em } Speech .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: IS RINGING TONE HEARD? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { The called party should answer the call. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. { The calling party should clear the call. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 6. { CHECK C: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 7. { CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 8. { CHECK E: WAS THE SATELLITE INDICATOR BIT IN THE IAM SET TO\ 1? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 9. { For validation testing repeat this test in the reverse direction? | | | | | | } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T24.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T25.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 2.3.3 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 11 _ .T& lw(228p) . { TITLE:\ Successful call set\(hyup } _ .T& lw(228p) . { SUBTITLE:\ Test for echo suppressor call set\(hyup } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE:\ To verify that a call can be successfully established with the inclusion of echo suppressors } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS: a) Called termination is free b) The signalling point data is arranged such that the call is routed over a route requiring echo suppressors or already has an echo suppressor included in the connection } _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ACM .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { \f | | fR \(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy } Ringing tone .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ANC .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . Speech { \(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em } Speech .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 2. { CHECK A: IS RINGING TONE HEARD? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 3. { The called party should answer. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 4. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 5. { CHECK C: IS ECHO PERCEIVED BY EITHER PARTY? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 6. { The calling party should clear the call. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 7. { CHECK D: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 8. { CHECK E: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 9. { CHECK F: WAS THE MESSAGE INDICATOR BIT G (OUTGOING HALF ECHO SUPPRESSOR INCLUDED) IN THE IAM SET TO 1? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 10. { CHECK G: WAS THE MESSAGE INDICATOR BIT D (INCOMING HALF ECHO SUPPRESSOR INCLUDED) IN THE ACM SET TO 1? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 11. { For validation testing repeat this test in the reverse direction. } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T25.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T26.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 2.3.4 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 5 _ .T& lw(228p) . { TITLE:\ Successful call set\(hyup } _ .T& lw(228p) . { SUBTITLE:\ Blocking and unblocking during a call (initiated) } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE:\ To verify that the circuit blocking and unblocking procedure can be correctly initiated during a call } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS:\ Called termination is free } _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ACM .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { \f | | fR \(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy } Ringing tone .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ANC .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . Speech { \(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em } Speech .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . BLO -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- BLA .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . UBL -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- UBA _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 2. { CHECK A: CAN RINGING TONE BE HEARD? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 3. { The called party should answer the call. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 4. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 5. { SP A should initiate circuit blocking relating to the circuit used for this call. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 6. { CHECK C: IS SPEECH STILL POSSIBLE? | | | | | | \fR } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 7. { The calling party should clear the call. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 8. { CHECK D: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN ONLY BE ORIGINATED ON THIS CIRCUIT BY SP\ A? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 9. { SP A should send an unblocking signal. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 10. { CHECK E: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN BE SUCCESSFULLY ORIGINATED \fR FROM EITHER SP. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 11. { CHECK F: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 12. { Repeat this test in the reverse direction. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . { \fINote\fR \ \(em\ The blocking signal may be generated after the call has cleared. } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T26.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T27.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 2.3.5 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 5 _ .T& lw(228p) . { TITLE:\ Successful call set\(hyup } _ .T& lw(228p) . { SUBTITLE:\ Blocking and unblocking during a call (received) } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE:\ To verify that the circuit blocking and unblocking procedure can be correctly received during a call } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS:\ Called termination is free } _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ACM .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { \f | | fR \(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy } Ringing tone .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ANC .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . Speech { \(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em } Speech .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- BLO .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . BLA -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- UBL .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . UBA -------------------------> _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 2. { CHECK A: CAN RINGING TONE BE HEARD? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 3. { The called party should answer the call. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 4. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 5. { SP B should initiate circuit blocking relating to the circuit used for this call. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 6. { CHECK C: IS SPEECH STILL POSSIBLE? | | | | | | \fR } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 7. { The calling party should clear the call. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 8. { CHECK D: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN ONLY BE ORIGINATED ON THIS CIRCUIT BY SP\ B? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 9. { SP B should send an unblocking signal. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 10. { CHECK E: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN BE SUCCESSFULLY ORIGINATED \fR FROM EITHER SP. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 11. { CHECK F: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 12. { Repeat this test in the reverse direction. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . { \fINote\fR \ \(em\ The blocking signal may be generated after the call has cleared. } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T27.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T28.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 3.1 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 1.14 _ .T& lw(228p) . TITLE:\ Normal call release _ .T& lw(228p) . { SUBTITLE:\ Calling party clears before address complete } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE:\ To verify that the calling party can successfully release a call prior to receipt of an address complete message } _ .T& lw(228p) . PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS: _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { The calling party should clear the call prior to receipt of the address complete signal. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { CHECK A: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. { Repeat this test in the reverse direction. } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T28.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T29.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 3.2 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 1.14 _ .T& lw(228p) . TITLE:\ Normal call release _ .T& lw(228p) . { SUBTITLE:\ Calling party clears before answer } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE:\ To verify that the calling party can successfully release a call prior to receipt of answer } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS:\ Called termination is free } _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ACM .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { \f | | fR \(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy } Ringing tone .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: IS RINGING TONE HEARD? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { The calling party should clear the call prior to receipt of an answer signal. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK B: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 6. { For validation testing this test should be repeated in the reverse direction. } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T29.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T30.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 3.3 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 1.14 _ .T& lw(228p) . TITLE:\ Normal call release _ .T& lw(228p) . { SUBTITLE:\ Calling party clears after answer } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE:\ To verify that the calling party can successfully release a call in the speech state } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS:\ Called termination is free } _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ACM .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { \f | | fR \(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy } Ringing tone .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ANC .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . Speech { \(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em } Speech .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: IS RINGING TONE HEARD? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { The called party should answer the call. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. { The calling party should clear the call. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 6. { CHECK C: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 7. { CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 8. { For validation testing this test should be repeated in the reverse direction. } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T30.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T31.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 3.4 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 1.14 _ .T& lw(228p) . TITLE:\ Normal call release _ .T& lw(228p) . { SUBTITLE:\ Called party clears } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE:\ To verify that the calling party can successfully release a call in the clear back state } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS:\ Called termination is free } _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ACM .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { \f | | fR \(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy } Ringing tone .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ANC .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . Speech { \(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em } Speech .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- CBK .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: IS RINGING TONE HEARD? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { The called party should answer the call. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. { The called party should clear the call. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 6. { The calling party should clear the call. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 7. { CHECK C: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 8. { CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 9. { For validation testing repeat this test in the reverse direction. } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T31.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T32.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 3.5 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 1.14 _ .T& lw(228p) . TITLE:\ Normal call release _ .T& lw(228p) . { SUBTITLE:\ Called party clears and reanswers } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE:\ To verify that the called subscriber can successfully clear and reanswer a call in the speech state } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS:\ Called termination is free } _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ACM .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { \f | | fR \(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy\(hy } Ringing tone .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ANC .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . Speech { \(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em } Speech .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- CBK .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RAN .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . Speech { \(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em\(em } Speech .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 2. { CHECK A: IS RINGING TONE HEARD? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 3. { The called party should answer the call. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 4. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 5. { The called party should clear the call. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 6. { The called party should reanswer the call. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 7. { CHECK C: IS SPEECH STILL POSSIBLE? | | | | | | \fR } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 8. { The calling party should clear the call. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . \ 9. { CHECK D: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 10. { CHECK E: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 11. { For validation testing repeat this test in the reverse direction. } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T32.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T33.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 4.1.1 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 1.8 _ .T& lw(228p) . TITLE:\ SEC _ .T& lw(228p) . SUBTITLE:\ SEC received _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE: To verify the call will be immediately released by the outgoing signalling point if a switching equipment congestion signal is received and the correct indication is given to the calling party } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the data in signalling point B such that switching equipment congestion is returned to the request } _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- SEC .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Attempt to make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence with a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: IS THE APPROPRIATE TONE OR ANNOUNCEMENT RETURNED TO THE CALLING PARTY? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { CHECK B: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . { \fINote\fR \ \(em\ It may not be possible to confirm that the appropriate tone is returned to the calling party. In this case it must be verified that the signalling point under test retransmits the signal received. } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T33.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T34.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 4.1.2 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 1.8 _ .T& lw(228p) . TITLE:\ SEC _ .T& lw(228p) . SUBTITLE:\ SEC sent _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE:\ To verify that SP A is able to generate a switching equipment congestion message } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the data in SP A such that switching equipment congestion is returned to the call request } _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- IAM .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . SEC -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- CLF .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . RLG -------------------------> _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Attempt to make a call from SP B to SP A. Record the message sequence with a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: IS THE APPROPRIATE TONE OR ANNOUNCEMENT RETURNED TO THE CALLING PARTY? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { CHECK B: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . { \fINote\fR \ \(em\ It may not be possible to confirm that the appropriate tone is returned to the calling party. In this case it must be verified that the signalling point under test retransmits the signal received. } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T34.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T35.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 4.2.1 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 1.8 _ .T& lw(228p) . TITLE:\ CGC _ .T& lw(228p) . SUBTITLE:\ CGC received _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE: To verify that a call will be immediately released by the outgoing signalling point if a\fR circuit group congestion signal is received and the correct indication is given to the calling party } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the data in signalling point B such that a circuit group congestion signal is returned to the call request } _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- CGC .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Attempt to make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: IS THE APPROPRIATE TONE OR ANNOUNCEMENT RETURNED TO THE CALLING PARTY? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { CHECK B: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . { \fINote\ 1\fR \ \(em\ An address complete signal (without subscriber free) may be sent in the backward direction before a CGC signal is sent. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . { \fINote\ 2\fR \ \(em\ It may not be possible to confirm that the appropriate tone is returned to the calling party. In this case it must be verified that the signalling point under test retransmits the signal received. } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T35.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T36.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 4.2.2 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 1.8 _ .T& lw(228p) . TITLE:\ CGC _ .T& lw(228p) . SUBTITLE:\ CGC sent _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE:\ To verify that SP A is able to generate a circuit group congestion signal } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the data in signalling point A such that a circuit group congestion signal is returned to the call request } _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- IAM .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CGC -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- CLF .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . RLG -------------------------> _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Attempt to make a call from SP B to SP A. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: IS THE APPROPRIATE TONE OR ANNOUNCEMENT RETURNED TO THE CALLING PARTY? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { CHECK B: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . { \fINote\ 1\fR \ \(em\ An address complete signal (without subscriber free) may be sent in the backward direction before a CGC signal is sent. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . { \fINote\ 2\fR \ \(em\ It may not be possible to confirm that the appropriate tone is returned to the calling party. In this case it must be verified that the signalling point under test retransmits the signal received. } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T36.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T37.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 4.3.1 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.\ 724 \(sc 1.8 _ .T& lw(228p) . TITLE:\ NNC _ .T& lw(228p) . SUBTITLE:\ NNC received _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE: To verify that the call will be immediately released by the outgoing signalling point if a national network congestion signal is received and the correct indication is given to the calling party } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the data in SP B such that a national network congestion signal is returned to the call request } _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- NNC .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Attempt to make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: IS THE APPROPRIATE TONE OR ANNOUNCEMENT RETURNED TO THE CALLING PARTY? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { CHECK B: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . { \fINote\ 1\fR \ \(em\ An address complete signal (without subscriber free) may be sent in the backward direction before a NNC signal is sent. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . { \fINote\ 2\fR \ \(em\ It may not be possible to confirm that the appropriate tone is returned to the calling party. In this case it must be verified that the signalling point under test retransmits the signal received. } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T37.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T38.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 4.3.2 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 1.8 _ .T& lw(228p) . TITLE:\ NNC _ .T& lw(228p) . SUBTITLE:\ NNC sent _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE:\ To verify that SP A is able to generate a national network congestion signal } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the data in signalling point A such that a national network congestion signal is returned to the call request, where SP A is now an I/C exchange } _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- IAM .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . NNC -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- CLF .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . RLG -------------------------> _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Attempt to make a call from SP B to SP A. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: IS THE APPROPRIATE TONE OR ANNOUNCEMENT RETURNED TO THE CALLING PARTY? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { CHECK B: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . { \fINote\ 1\fR \ \(em\ An address complete signal (without subscriber free) may be sent in the backward direction before a NNC signal is sent. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . { \fINote\ 2\fR \ \(em\ It may not be possible to confirm that the appropriate tone is returned to the calling party. In this case it must be verified that the signalling point under test retransmits the signal received. } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T38.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T39.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 4.4.1 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 1.7 _ .T& lw(228p) . TITLE:\ ADI _ .T& lw(228p) . SUBTITLE:\ ADI received _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE: To verify that on receipt of an address incomplete message the call is immediately released and the correct indication given to the calling party } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS: Signalling point B should be able to determine that the proper number of digits has not been received } _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ADI .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B, but do not enter the final digit. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: WAS THE CORRECT TONE OR ANNOUNCEMENT SENT TO THE CALLING SUBSCRIBER? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { CHECK B: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . { \fINote\fR \ \(em\ It may not be possible to confirm that the appropriate tone is returned to the calling party. In this case it must be verified that the signalling point under test retransmits the signal received. } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T39.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T40.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 4.4.2 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 1.7 _ .T& lw(228p) . TITLE:\ ADI _ .T& lw(228p) . SUBTITLE:\ ADI sent _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE:\ To verify that signalling point A is able to generate an address incomplete signal } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS:\ SP A should be able to determine that the proper number of digits has not been received } _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- IAM .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . ADI -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- CLF .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . RLG -------------------------> _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Make a call from SP B to SP A, but do not enter the final digit. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: WAS THE CORRECT TONE OR ANNOUNCEMENT SENT TO THE CALLING SUBSCRIBER? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { CHECK B: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . { \fINote\fR \ \(em\ It may not be possible to confirm that the appropriate tone is returned to the calling party. In this case it must be verified that the signalling point under test retransmits the signal received. } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T40.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T41.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 4.5.1 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 6.3 _ .T& lw(228p) . TITLE:\ CFL _ .T& lw(228p) . SUBTITLE:\ CFL received _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE: To verify that the call will be immediately released by the outgoing signalling point if a call failure signal is received and the correct indication is given to the calling party } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the data in signalling point B such that a call failure signal is returned to the call request } _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- CFL .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Attempt to make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: IS THE APPROPRIATE TONE OR ANNOUNCEMENT RETURNED TO THE CALLING PARTY? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { CHECK B: IS THE CALL IDLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . { \fINote\ 1\fR \ \(em\ An address complete signal may be sent in the backward direction before a CFL signal is sent. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . { \fINote\ 2\fR \ \(em\ It may not be possible to confirm that the appropriate tone is returned to the calling party. In this case it must be verified that the signalling point under test retransmits the signal received. } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T41.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp .ce \fBH.T. [T42.783]\fR .ce \fBTUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION\fR .ps 9 .vs 11 .nr VS 11 .nr PS 9 .TS center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER:\ 4.5.2 _ .T& lw(228p) . REFERENCE:\ Q.724 \(sc 6.3 _ .T& lw(228p) . TITLE:\ CFL _ .T& lw(228p) . SUBTITLE:\ CFL sent _ .T& lw(228p) . { PURPOSE:\ To verify that signalling point A is able to generate a call failure signal } _ .T& lw(228p) . { PRE\(hyTEST CONDITIONS:\ Arrange the data in SP A such that a call failure signal is returned to the call request } _ .T& cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION:\ 1 TYPE OF TEST:\ VAT TYPE OF SP:\ SP _ .T& lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: .T& lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP\ \ A SP\ \ B .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- IAM .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CFL -------------------------> .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- CLF .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . RLG -------------------------> _ .T& lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Attempt to make a call from SP B to SP A. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: IS THE APPROPRIATE TONE OR ANNOUNCEMENT RETURNED TO THE CALLING PARTY? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { CHECK B: IS THE CALL IDLE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . { \fINote\ 1\fR \ \(em\ An address complete signal may be sent in the backward direction before a CFL signal is sent. } .T& cw(18p) | lw(210p) . { \fINote\ 2\fR \ \(em\ It may not be possible to confirm that the appropriate tone is returned to the calling party. In this case it must be verified that the signalling point under test retransmits the signal received. } _ .TE .nr PS 9 .RT .ad r \fBTableau [T42.783], p.\fR .sp 1P .RT .ad b .RT .LP .bp