home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Text File | 1991-12-22 | 82.2 KB | 2,370 lines |
-
-
-
- 5i'
-
-
- MONTAGE: REC. Q.412 EN T | TE DE CETTE PAGE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 2.3 CLAUSES FOR TRANSMISSION LINE SIGNALLING EQUIPMENT
-
-
-
- Recommendation Q.414
-
-
- 2.3.1 SIGNAL SENDER
-
-
-
-
-
- 2.3.1.1 Signalling frequency
-
-
- The nominal value of the signalling frequency is 3825 Hz.
- Measured at the sending point, the frequency variation from the
- nominal value must not exceed _ | Hz.
-
-
- 2.3.1.2 Send level
-
-
- The send level of the signalling frequency, measured at the
- group distribution frame or an equivalent point, must be -20 _ |
- dBm0.
-
-
- 2.3.1.3 Leaks
-
-
- The level of the signal frequency which may be transmitted to
- line as a leak current (e.g. when static modulators are used), must
- be at least 25 dB below the level of the signalling tone.
-
-
- 2.3.1.4 Phase distribution of the signalling frequencies
-
-
- As the signalling frequency is sent on any circuit in idle
- state, the addition of these tones in moments of low traffic may
- give rise to the following phenomena on certain transmission sys-
- tems:
-
- - high peak voltage on the line caused by the sig-
- nalling tones and involving the possibility of overloading the sys-
- tem;
-
- - intelligible crosstalk due to third-order
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- intermodulation;
-
- - unwanted tones coming from second-order intermo-
- dulation products and occurring within sound-programme circuits.
-
- The following special measures must be taken to avoid these
- effects:
-
- One method recommended is to inject the signalling frequencies
- with random 0 and ~~ radian phases in the channels. An equivalent
- method is to use carrier frequencies of which the phases are ran-
- domly distributed 0 and ~~ radians. With these methods the proba-
- bility of occurrence of 0 and ~~ radian phases should be 0.5
-
- Other methods may be used provided they give comparable
- results.
-
-
-
- 2.3.1.5 Protection of the signalling channel at the sending
- end
-
-
- This signalling channel must be protected at the sending end
- against disturbance from the associated and the adjacent speech
- channel.
-
- When a sinewave at 0 dBm0 level is applied to the
- audio-frequency input of the associated channel, the level measured
- at the group distribution frame or at an equivalent point must not
- exceed the levels shown in Figure 6/Q.414.
-
- When a sinewave of frequency f is applied to the
- audio-frequency input of the adjacent channel it produces two sig-
- nals that appear on the frequency scale of Figure 6/Q.414 as having
- the frequencies
-
- (4000 + f ) and (4000 - f ). The level of the (4000 + f )
- signal, measured at the group distribution frame or at an
- equivalent point, shall not be higher than -33 dBm0 when the
- sinewave with frequency f is applied to the audio-frequency input
- of the adjacent channel at a level shown in Figure 6/Q.414 for the
- frequency of (4000 + f ). The level of the (4000 - f ) signal,
- measured at the group distribution frame or at an equivalent point,
- _________________________
- For further details on the method of random distribu-
- tion of the phases of frequency 3825 Hz, see: Ekholm,
- O. and Johannesson, N.O.: "Loading Effects with Con-
- tinuous Tone Signalling", English edition of TELE ,
- No. 2, 1969. For further details on a systematic method
- of phase distribution, see: Rasch, J. and Kagelmann,
- H.: "On Measures for
-
- Reducing Voltage Peaks and Distortion Noise on Carrier
- Transmission Paths with Single Channel Supervision", Nachrichten-
- technische Zeitschrift (NTZ) , 22 (1969), No. 1, pp. 24-31.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- shall not be higher than -33 dBm0 when the sinewave with
- frequency f is applied to the audio-frequency input of the adjacent
- channel at any level below the value shown in Figure 6/Q.414 for
- the frequency (4000 - f ).
-
-
- FIGURE 6/Q.414, p.
-
-
- When the Go path is looped to the Return path at the group
- distribution frame or an equivalent point, the signal receiver must
- not change condition when:
-
- - the click generator shown in Figure 7/Q.414 is
- connected to the associated speech channel or to the adjacent
- speech channel at the very point where this channel is connected to
- the switching equipment;
-
- - to take the most difficult circumstances possi-
- ble, the channel level adjusting devices are set to such values
- encountered in practice which give rise to the worst disturbance;
-
- - gain is introduced in the loop at the group dis-
- tribution frame or at the equivalent point, so that the receive
- level at the point in question is +3 dBm0.
-
-
-
- FIGURE 7/Q.414, p.
-
-
-
- 2.3.1.6 Response time
-
-
- The response time of the signal sender is defined as the
- interval between the instant when the change signalling condition
- command is applied to the sender and the instant at which the
- envelope of the signalling frequency, measured at the group distri-
- bution frame or at an equivalent point, reaches half of its value
- in the steady state. For each of the two possible changes of sig-
- nalling condition the response time must be less than 7 ms.
-
-
-
- Recommendation Q.415
-
-
- 2.3.2 SIGNAL RECEIVER
-
-
-
-
-
- 2.3.2.1 Recognition of the tone-on condition
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- The receiver must have assumed or assume the tone-on condition
- when at the group distribution frame or at an equivalent point:
-
- - the level of the received frequency has risen
- to -27 dBm0 or more;
-
- - its frequency lies between 3825 _ 6 Hz.
-
- The level of -27 dBm0 specified above does not preclude the
- use of individual adjustments in the channel translating equipment
- to compensate for constant level deviations.
-
-
- 2.3.2.2 Recognition of the tone-off condition
-
-
-
- The receiver must have assumed or assume the tone-off condi-
- tion when the level of the test frequency, at the group distribu-
- tion frame or at an equivalent point, has dropped to the values
- shown in Figure 8/Q.415.
-
-
- FIGURE 8/Q.415, p.
-
-
-
-
-
- 2.3.2.3 Protection against near-end disturbances
-
-
- The signal receiver must not change state when any one of the
- following disturbing signals is applied at the 4-wire output of the
- associated speech channel looped at the group distribution frame or
- at an equivalent point:
-
- - a sinusoidal signal whose level as a function of
- the frequency is shown in Figure 9/Q.415,
-
- - a transient signal produced by the click genera-
- tor (described in S 2.3.1.5 above) applied at the point where the
- channel is connected to the switching equipment, all level adjust-
- ing devices being set to such values encountered in practice which
- give rise to the worst disturbance.
-
-
- FIGURE 9/Q.415, p.
-
-
-
- 2.3.2.4 Overall response time of signal sender and receiver
-
-
- When the modulation equipment is looped at the group distribu-
- tion frame or at an equivalent point, the overall response time is
- defined as the interval between the instant when a change
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- signalling condition command is applied to the sender and the
- moment when the changed signalling condition appears at the
- receiver output. For each of the two possible changes of signalling
- condition, the overall response time must be less than 30 ms.
-
-
-
- 2.3.2.5 Interference by carrier leaks
-
-
- The requirements stated in SS 2.3.2.1, 2.3.2.3 and 2.3.2.4
- above must be fulfilled in the presence of carrier leaks.
-
- It is assumed that:
-
- - when the receive level of the signalling tone is
- at its nominal value at the group distribution frame or an
- equivalent point, each carrier leak is present at a level of -
- 26 dBm0;
-
- - the level of the carrier leak varies proportion-
- ally with any variations in the level of the signalling tone.
-
-
- 2.3.2.6 Interference by pilots
-
-
- The specified signalling system is not intended to work in the
- presence of those pilots specified by CCITT having a frequency
- differing by 140 Hz from the nearest multiple of 4 kHz (see
- Recommendation M.460).
-
- On the other hand, the requirements stated in SS 2.3.2.1,
- 2.3.2.2, 2.3.2.3, 2.3.2.4 and 2.3.2.5 above must be met in the
- presence of any other pilot recommended by the CCITT.
-
- It is assumed that variations in level of the pilot and of the
- signalling tones are correlated.
-
-
-
-
- Recommendation Q.416
-
-
- 2.4 INTERRUPTION CONTROL
-
-
-
-
-
- 2.4.1 General
-
-
- In System R2, removal of the tone corresponds to the sending
- of the seizing and answer signals. Steps must be taken, therefore,
- to guard against unwanted interruption of the signalling channels
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- resulting in false signalling. Special devices monitor a number of
- circuits and transmit an indication to each individual equipment as
- soon as an interruption occurs. The whole protection system against
- the effect of interruptions is designated by the term interruption
- control .
-
- In each case, the response time of the interruption control
- must be based on the time required to recognize the signalling con-
- dition.
-
- The interruption control systems in the two directions of
- transmission operate independently of each other.
-
- The interruption control specified uses the group pilot to
- detect interruptions.
-
-
- 2.4.2 Mode of operation of interruption control
-
-
- For each direction of transmission of a carrier circuit con-
- nection the equipment for interruption control comprises:
-
- - a group pilot generator at the outgoing end;
-
- - a pilot receiver and a wiring system for signal-
- ling the interruption at the incoming end.
-
- In principle, the existing pilots of the carrier system will
- be used.
-
- The receiver at one end supervises the pilot transmitted by
- the other end. When a considerable fall in the level of the pilot
- is detected it is assumed that an interruption has occurred on the
- signalling channels associated with the carrier circuits. The
- interruption control equipment then reacts to prevent the unwanted
- transmission of certain signals on those circuits which have
- already been seized or to ensure that idle circuits are blocked.
-
- Figure 10/Q.416 shows functionally an arrangement where the
- pilot receiver controls the relay sets of interrupted circuits.
-
-
- To ensure proper interruption control, it is essential that
- the individual transmission or switching equipments should not
- react to any change of signalling state due to a fault. The action
- initiated by the interruption control must therefore be completed
- in less time than the sum of the response time of the signalling
- receiver and the recognition time for the tone-off condition caused
- by interruption of the signalling channel. Again, to prevent the
- unwanted transfer of certain signals, interruption control, during
- re-establishment of the pilot, must return to alarm off after an
- interval long enough for the signalling equipment to revert to nor-
- mal.
-
- To operate independently for each direction of transmission
- the incoming end interruption control supervises only the forward
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- direction and, if necessary, initiates an operation at the outgoing
- end via the line signalling system. Conversely, interruption con-
- trol at the outgoing end supervises the backward direction of
- transmission only.
-
- Blocking of a circuit at the outgoing end therefore takes
- place in two different ways:
-
- - immediate blocking by intervention of interrup-
- tion control at the outgoing end;
-
- - blocking on recognition in the backward direction
- of the tone-off condition caused by interruption control interven-
- tion at the incoming end.
-
- When the transmission system is re-established, interruption
- control reverts to normal and the signalling equipment must
- automatically revert to normal operating.
-
- Since the action to be taken on the individual circuits
- differs according to their state at the time the fault occurs, the
- different possibilities are dealt with in detail below.
-
-
-
- Figure 10/Q.416, p.5
-
-
-
- 2.4.2.1 Mode of operation of interruption control at the
- incoming end (transmission interrupted in the forward direction)
-
-
- a) Circuit in idle state
-
- Transition of interruption control to alarm brings about:
-
- i) removal of the tone in the backward direction by
- locking of the sending unit in the tone-off condition;
-
- ii) locking of the receiving unit in its position,
- i.e. in the tone-on condition.
-
- The effect of operation i) is to block the circuit at the out-
- going end against possible seizing; operation ii) prevents
- incorrect recognition of seizing of the incoming circuit.
-
- Return of interruption control to normal ensures return to the
- idle state of the circuits affected by the fault, by switching
- sending units at the incoming end to the tone-on condition.
-
- b) Circuit seized prior to answered state
-
- Transition of interruption control to alarm brings about:
-
- i) locking of the sending unit in its position,
- i.e. in the tone-on condition;
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- ii) locking of the receiving unit in its position,
- i.e. in the tone-off condition;
-
- iii) start of a time-out device which after a cer-
- tain interval clears the chain beyond the faulty circuit; this tim-
- ing arrangement may be the one specified in Recommendation Q.118,
- S 4.3.3.
-
-
- Operation i) prevents the transfer of an answer signal while
- interruption control is in action. If the called subscriber answers
- before the time out delay mentioned in iii) above has elapsed, then
- the timer is stopped. For existing equipment this requirement may
- not apply. If the called subscriber clears while interruption con-
- trol is active, the part of the connection beyond the faulty cir-
- cuit must be released immediately.
-
- Operation iii) prevents blocking of the called subscriber's
- line if the fault persists; short breaks, on the other hand, have
- no effect.
-
- When the caller clears, operations i) and ii) block the faulty
- circuit against any new seizure even when the backward signalling
- channel is still intact; since the release-guard signal has not
- been sent the outgoing circuit cannot return to the idle state.
-
- When interruption control reverts to normal before the called
- subscriber has answered, the call may still mature normally, pro-
- vided the caller is holding.
-
- If the called subscriber has answered during the time-out
- delay and the interruption control reverts to normal with both the
- calling and called subscribers holding, the answer signal is sent
- immediately.
-
- If at the moment when interruption control reverts to normal
- the called subscriber has already cleared, operation ii) ensures
- that in all cases the release-guard sequence takes place as in
- S 2.2.2.6 a) above (either
-
- immediately if the outgoing exchange has already sent the
- clear-forward signal or when the caller clears). If, on the other
- hand, the called subscriber is still holding and the outgoing
- exchange is already sending the clear-forward signal when interrup-
- tion control reverts to normal the circuit returns to the idle
- state at the outgoing end as described in S 2.2.2.6 b) above.
-
- c) Circuit in answered state
-
- Transition of interruption control to alarm brings about:
-
- i) locking of the sending unit in its position,
- i.e. in the tone-off condition;
-
- ii) locking of the receiving unit in its position,
- i.e. in the tone-off condition.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- When the caller clears, operation i) blocks the faulty circuit
- against any new seizure, even when the backward signalling channel
- is still intact; since the release-guard signal has not been sent,
- the outgoing circuit cannot return to the idle state.
-
- When the called subscriber clears, the part of the connection
- beyond the faulty circuit (including the called subscriber's line)
- must be released immediately.
-
- When interruption control reverts to normal with both sub-
- scribers still on the line, the connection is maintained.
-
- When the caller has already cleared by the time the interrup-
- tion control reverts to normal, the release-guard sequence is car-
- ried out as in Recommendation Q.412, S 2.2.2.6 b) or c).
-
- d) Circuit in clear-back state
-
- Transition of interruption control to alarm causes:
-
- i) locking of the sending unit in its position,
- i.e. in the tone-on condition;
-
- ii) locking of the receiving unit in its position,
- i.e. in the tone-off condition;
-
- iii) immediate release of the part of the connec-
- tion beyond the faulty circuit (including the called subscriber's
- line).
-
- When interruption control reverts to normal, the release-guard
- signal is sent as in Recommendation Q.412, S 2.2.2.6 c) as soon as
- the clear-forward signal is recognized.
-
- e) Circuit in release
-
- When interruption control functions after a clear-forward sig-
- nal has been recognized at the incoming end, it causes:
-
- i) locking of the sending unit in the tone-off |
- ondition; if at the instant interruption control operates, the
- tone-on condition exists in the backward direction, it will be
- switched to the tone-off condition following recognition of the
- clear-forward signal and locking in the tone-off condition can take
- place as prescribed;
-
- ii) locking of the receiving unit in its position,
- i.e. in the tone-on condition.
-
-
- The effect of operation i) is to guard the faulty circuit from
- a new seizure at the outgoing exchange.
-
- Operation ii) ensures the release of the part of the connec-
- tion beyond the faulty circuit (including the called subscriber's
- line).
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- When interruption control reverts to normal the tone-on |
- ondition is established in the backward direction and causes the
- circuit at the outgoing exchange to return to the idle state.
-
-
- 2.4.2.2 Mode of operation of interruption control at the
- outgoing end
- | transmission in the backward direction interrupted)
-
-
- a) Circuit in idle state
-
- Transition of interruption control to alarm is immediately
- followed by blocking of the outgoing circuit.
-
- b) Circuit seized but not in answered state
- (including clear-back)
-
- i) Transition of interruption control to alarm
- causes locking of the receiving unit in its position, i.e. the
- tone-on condition. This operation prevents recognition of an answer
- signal or return to the answered state should the called subscriber
- have cleared.
-
- ii) As soon as a clear-forward signal is sent on
- the part of the connection preceding the faulty circuit, it must be
- retransmitted; the tone must therefore be established in the for-
- ward direction to ensure, assuming that the forward signalling
- channel is left intact, that the part of the connection beyond the
- faulty circuit is released.
-
- iii) When interruption control reverts to normal,
- the tone may already have been sent in the forward direction as a
- clear-forward signal. If the forward signalling channel has
- remained intact, recognition at the incoming end of the tone-on
- condition will have caused generation of the release-guard sequence
- which, because of the fault, will not have been received at the
- outgoing end. Exceptionally, therefore, return of the outgoing
- circuit to the idle state must take place simply on recognition of
- tone-on in the backward direction without necessarily taking into
- account time-out T1.
-
- c) Circuit in answered state
-
- In this case transition of interruption control to alarm does
- not cause immediate action. A clear-forward signal sent on the part
- of the connection preceding the faulty circuit must be repeated
- forward to ensure that, if the forward signalling channel is left
- intact, the part beyond the faulty circuit is cleared.
-
- Once the interruption control reverts to normal the connection
- is maintained provided the caller and the called subscriber are
- still holding. On the other hand, by the time the interruption con-
- trol reverts to normal the clear-forward signal may already have
- been sent and the situation will be the one described in
- S 2.4.2.2 b), iii).
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- d) Circuit in release
-
- [See S 2.4.2.2 b), iii).]
-
-
- 2.4.3 Clauses on interruption control equipment
-
-
- Adoption of thresholds with widely differing levels makes for
- economy in the design of interruption control equipment. Against
- this must be set the fact that the device cannot cope with the
- effects of certain slow drops in level. However, the probability of
- these occurring in practice is very small.
-
-
- 2.4.3.1 Pilots
-
-
- Interruption control uses the 84.08 kHz group pilot or by
- bilateral agreement and, at the request of the receiving end coun-
- try, the 104.08 kHz group pilot.
-
- However, if the ends of the supergroup link coincide with the
- end of the five group links it is carrying, the supergroup pilot
- may also be used.
-
-
-
- 2.4.3.2 Alarm-on threshold
-
-
- Interruption control must pass to alarm-on | hen the pilot
- level, measured at the group distribution frame or at an equivalent
- point, drops to -29 dBm0.
-
-
-
- 2.4.3.3 Alarm-off threshold
-
-
- Interruption control must revert to alarm-off | i.e. normal
- when the pilot level, measured at the group distribution frame or
- at an equivalent point, rises to -24 dBm0.
-
-
- 2.4.3.4 Response time for a drop in level
-
-
- Interruption control must pass from normal to alarm-on within
- an interval t v such that:
-
- 5 ms t v tr\ds m\di\dn
- + 13 ms
-
-
- when the pilot level, measured at the group distribution frame or
- at an equivalent point, suddenly drops from its nominal level to
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -33 dBm0.
-
-
- In the above formula, tr\dsm\di\dnis the minimum response time
- of the signalling receiver for a drop in level, taking into account
- a possible variation of _ | dB in the signalling tone level from
- its nominal value, the level being measured on the receiving side
- of the group distribution frame or at an equivalent point.
-
- If the value (40 _ 10) ms is exclusively applied, it is possi-
- ble to use the minimum value of 30 ms instead of 13 ms for the
- interruption control device.
- The figure of 13 ms in the above formula is derived on the assump-
- tion that the output of the interruption control equipment acts
- upon the input of the device which regulates the recognition time
- for the tone-on and tone-off conditions (20 _ 7 ms) , i.e. absence
- of a direct current signal at this input for a period of up to
- 13 ms has no relevance.
-
-
- 2.4.3.5 Response time for rise in level
-
-
- Interruption control must revert from the alarm-on to normal
- in an interval t ^ such that:
-
- tr\ds m\da\dx - 13 ms t
- ^ 500 ms
-
-
- when the pilot level, measured at the group distribution frame or
- at an equivalent point, suddenly rises from its nominal level to
- -33 dBm0.
-
- In the above formula, tr\dsm\da\dxis the maximum response time
- of the signalling receiver for a rise in level, taking into account
- a possible variation of _ | dB in the signalling tone level from
- its nominal value, the level being measured on the receiving side
- of the group distribution frame or at an equivalent point.
-
- The figure of 13 ms in the above formula is derived on the
- assumption that the output of the interruption control equipment
- acts upon the input of the device which regulates the recognition
- time for tone-on and tone-off condition (20 _ 7 ms) i.e. absence of
- a direct current signal at this input for a period of up to 13 ms
- has no relevance.
-
-
-
- 2.4.3.6 Precautions against noise
-
-
- An interruption may produce increased noise on the group link.
- Interruption control must be capable of distinguishing between the
- pilot itself and a high level noise simulating the pilot.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Interruption control must not revert to normal in the presence
- of white noise having a spectral power density of not more than
- -47 dBm0 per Hz.
-
- To facilitate the design of interruption control equipment
- operating satisfactorily at high noise levels, the upper limit of
- 500 ms for t ^ has been specified.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- SECTION 3
-
- LINE SIGNALLING, DIGITAL VERSION
-
-
-
- Recommendation Q.421
-
-
- 3.1
- DIGITAL LINE SIGNALLING CODE
-
-
-
-
-
- 3.1.1 General
-
-
- Primary PCM multiplexes (see Recommendations G.732 and G.734)
- economically provide more than one signalling channel per speech
- circuit in each direction of transmission. By making use of the
- increased signalling capacity, simplification of the outgoing and
- incoming switching equipment can be achieved since the timing con-
- ditions necessary for the System R2 line
-
- signalling, analogue version, are not required. For this rea-
- son the digital version of System R2 line signalling is recommended
- for use on PCM systems in national and international public
- switched networks and is specified below.
-
- Note - The continuous line signalling scheme specified for
- FDM systems may also be used on PCM systems by utilizing one sig-
- nalling channel only in each direction. In this case relay sets
- designed for the continuous line signalling system on FDM channels
- can be used provided that the functions specified for the interrup-
- tion control on FDM circuits (see Recommendation Q.416) are per-
- formed by use of the local alarm facility provided by PCM equip-
- ment. This method of line signalling on PCM systems is not recom-
- mended for use on international circuits.
-
- The digital version of System R2 line signalling uses two sig-
- nalling channels in each direction of transmission per speech cir-
- cuit. These signalling channels are referred to as afand bffor the
- forward direction (i.e. the direction of call set-up) and aband
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- bbfor the backward direction.
-
- Under normal conditions:
-
- - The afchannel identifies the operating condition
- of the outgoing switching equipment and reflects the condition of
- the calling subscriber's line.
-
- - The bfchannel provides a means for indicating a
- failure in the forward direction to the incoming switching equip-
- ment.
-
- - The abchannel reflects the condition of the
- called subscriber's line (on hook or off hook).
-
- - The bbchannel indicates the idle or seized state
- of the incoming switching equipment.
-
- The line signals are transmitted link-by-link.
-
- The digital version of System R2 line signalling also speci-
- fies a means for appropriate action in the case of faulty transmis-
- sion conditions on the PCM multiplex, see Recommendation Q.424.
-
- The signalling system is specified for one-way operation, but
- both-way operation is also possible (see S 3.2.7 below).
-
-
-
- 3.1.2 Signalling code
-
-
- Table 2/Q.421, shows the signalling code on the PCM line under
- normal conditions.
-
- H.T. [2/Q.421]
- TABLE 2/Q.421
-
- __________________________________________________
- Signalling code
- State of the circuit Forward Backward a f
- __________________________________________________
- Idle/Released 1 0 1 0
- Seized 0 0 1 0
- Seizure acknowledged 0 0 1 1
- Answered 0 0 0 1
- Clear-back 0 0 1 1
- Clear-forward |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
- 0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
- 1
-
-
- or
- 1 1
- Blocked 1 0 1 1
- __________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
-
- |
- |
- |
-
- |
- |
- |
-
- |
- |
- |
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Table [2/Q.421], p.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Recommendation Q.422
-
-
- 3.2 CLAUSES FOR EXCHANGE LINE SIGNALLING EQUIPMENT
-
-
-
-
-
- 3.2.1 Recognition of a change of signalling code
-
-
-
- 3.2.1.1 Signalling channel transitions
-
-
- The recognition time for a transition from 0 to 1 or vice
- versa on a signalling channel is 20 _ 10 ms. This value presupposes
- the existence of protection against the effects of faulty transmis-
- sion conditions on the PCM multiplex.
-
- The recognition time is defined as the duration that the sig-
- nals representing 0 or 1 must have at the output of the terminal
- equipment of a signalling channel in order to be recognized by the
- exchange equipment.
-
-
-
- 3.2.1.2 Change of signalling code
-
-
- Recognition of a change of signalling code is thus defined as
- either of the following:
-
- a) Recognition of a transition detected on one sig-
- nalling channel with no transition detected on the second signal-
- ling channel during the recognition period.
-
- b) Recognition of a transition detected on the
- second signalling channel during the recognition period already
- being applied to the first signalling channel. In this case, a
- change of signalling code is recognized only when both recognition
- timing periods have elapsed.
-
-
- 3.2.2 Sent signal time tolerance
-
-
- The time difference between application of transitions
- intended to be simultaneous on two signalling channels in the same
- direction of transmission must not exceed 2 ms.
-
-
-
-
- 3.2.3 States and procedures under normal conditions | see
- Table 2/Q.421)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- In the forward direction bf= 0 is established permanently.
-
-
- 3.2.3.1 Idle state
-
-
- In the idle state the outgoing end sends af= 1, bf= 0. At the
- incoming end this results in sending ab = 1, bb= 0 in the backward
- direction, provided that the switching equipment at the incoming
- end of the circuit is idle.
-
-
- 3.2.3.2 Seizing procedure
-
-
- i) Seizure
-
- Seizing should occur only if ab = 1, bb = 0 is recognized.
- The outgoing end changes af = 1 into af = 0. The code af = 0,
- bf = 0 must be maintained until the seizing acknowledgement signal
- is recognized. In this way the outgoing switching equipment will
- only be able to send the clear-forward signal after recognition of
- the seizing acknowledgement signal.
-
- ii) Seizure acknowledgement
-
- After having recognized the seizing signal, the incoming
- end sends ab = 1, bb = 1 as an acknowledgement.
-
-
- 3.2.3.3 Answering
-
-
- The off-hook condition of the called subscriber's line pro-
- vokes the incoming switching equipment to send ab = 0, bb = 1.
-
- The answered state must be established on the preceding link
- immediately after it is recognized: see also S 3.2.3.6 below.
-
-
- 3.2.3.4 Clear-back
-
-
- The on-hook condition of the called subscriber's line provokes
- the incoming switching equipment to send ab = 1, bb = 1. The
- clear-back state must be established on the preceding link immedi-
- ately after it is recognized: see also S 3.2.3.6 below.
-
-
- 3.2.3.5 Clear-forward procedure
-
-
- The cleared condition of the calling subscriber's line or the
- release of the outgoing switching equipment will normally result in
- sending af = 1, bf = 0. The outgoing switching equipment will not
- be restored to the idle state until recognition of the code ab = 1,
- bb = 0: see also SS 3.2.3.2, 3.2.3.6 and Table 3/Q.422.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 3.2.3.6 Release procedure
-
-
- Recognition of the clear-forward signal in the incoming
- switching equipment initiates the release of the succeeding link
- even though answering or clearing by the called party has occurred.
- Upon complete release of the incoming switching equipment, the code
- ab = 1, bb = 0 is established on the circuit. This will cause the
- circuit to be restored to the idle state and the outgoing switching
- equipment to become available for another call.
-
-
- 3.2.3.7 Blocking and unblocking procedure
-
-
- Blocking of an idle circuit to new calls at the outgoing end
- must occur as soon as ab = 1 and bb = 1 is recognized: see also
- Tables 3/Q.422 and 4/Q.422.
-
- The recognition of ab = 1, bb = 0 restores the circuit to the
- idle state.
-
-
- 3.2.4 Actions appropriate to various signalling conditions
-
-
- In addition to normal conditions described in Table 2/Q.421
- other conditions due to faults may be encountered. Tables 3/Q.422
- and 4/Q.422 indicate the states appropriate to each signalling code
- recognized and the actions to be taken at the outgoing and incoming
- end respectively of a circuit operated with the digital version of
- System R2 line signalling.
-
-
-
-
- 3.2.4.1 Outgoing end
-
- H.T. [3/Q.422]
- TABLE 3/Q.422
-
- ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
-
-
- Received code
-
- {
- a b = 0, b b = 0 a b = 0, b b = 1 a b = 1, b b = 0 a b = 1, b b = 1
- ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Idle/Released a f = 1, b f = 0 Abnormal, see Note 1 Abnormal, see Note 1 Idle Blocked
- ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Seized a f = 0, b f = 0 Abnormal, see Note 2 Abnormal, see Note 2 Seized see Note 2 Seizure acknowledged
- ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Seizure acknowledged a f = 0, b f = 0 Abnormal, see Note 3 Answered Abnormal, see Note 3 Seizure acknowledged
- ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Answered a f = 0, b f = 0 Abnormal, see Note 4 Answered Abnormal, see Note 4 Clear-back
- ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Clear-back a f = 0, b f = 0 Abnormal, see Note 4 Answered Abnormal, see Note 4 Clear-back
- ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Clear-forward a f = 1, b f = 0 Abnormal, see Note 1 Clear-forward Released = Idle Clear-forward
- ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Blocked a f = 1, b f = 0 Abnormal, see Note 1 Abnormal, see Note 1 Idle Blocked
- ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
- Note 1 - In these abnormal conditions the outgoing end must
- prevent a new seizure of the circuit. A delayed alarm should also
- be given (see S 3.2.6).
-
- Note 2 - Non-recognition of the seizing acknowledgement signal
- 100 ms-200 ms after sending the seizing signal on a terrestrial
- link or 1-2 seconds after sending the seizing signal on a satellite
- link results in an alarm and either congestion information being
- sent backward or a repeat attempt being made to set up the call.
- The outgoing end must prevent a new seizure of the circuit. When
- the seizing acknowledgement signal is recognized after the time-out
- period has elapsed, the clear-forward signal must be sent.
-
- Note 3 - Receipt of b b = 0 by the outgoing switching equipment
- for 1-2 seconds after recognition of the seizing acknowledgement
- signal and prior to recognition of the answer signal, results in an
- alarm and either congestion information being sent backward or a
- repeat attempt being made to set up the call. The outgoing end must
- prevent new seizures of the circuit. When b b reverts to 1 after
- the 1-2 seconds timeout period has elapsed, the clear-forward sig-
- nal must be sent.
-
- Note 4 - In the case of recognition of b b = 0 whilst in the
- answered or clear-back state, immediate action is not necessary. On
- receipt of clearing from the preceding link, the clear-forward sig-
- nal (a f = 1, b f = 0) must not be sent until b b is restored to 1.
- A delayed alarm should also be given.
- Tableau [3/Q.422] + Remarques, p.7
-
-
-
- Blanc
-
-
-
-
- 3.2.4.2 Incoming end
-
- H.T. [4/Q.422]
- TABLE 4/Q.422
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
-
-
- Received code
-
- {
- a f = 0, b f = 0 a f = 0, b f = 1 a f = 1, b f = 0 a f = 1, b f = 1
- ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Idle/Released a b = 1, b b = 0 Seized Fault see Note 1 Idle Fault see Note 1
- ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Seizure acknowledged a b = 1, b b = 1 Seizure acknowledged Fault See Note 2 Clear- forward Fault See Note 2
- ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Answered a b = 0, b b = 1 Answered Fault see Note 3 Clear- forward Fault see Note 3
- ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Clear-back a b = 1, b b = 1 Clear-back Fault see Note 4 Clear- forward Fault see Note 4
- ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Clear-forward {
- a
- b = 0, b
- b = 1
- or
- a
- b = 1, b
- b = 1
- } Abnormal seized see Note 7 Fault see Note 7 Clear- forward see Note 7 Fault see Note 7
- ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Blocked a b = 1, b b = 1 Abnormal seized see Note 5 Fault see Note 6 Blocked Fault see Note 6
- ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Note 1 - When in the idle/released state b f changes to 1, b b
- must be changed to 1.
-
- Note 2 - In these cases a time-out device is started, which after
- a certain interval clears the connection beyond the faulty circuit:
- this timing arrangement may be the one specified in
- Recommendation Q.118, Section 4.3.3. If the answer signal is recog-
- nized during the time-out delay, the timer is stopped but the
- answer signal is not sent on the preceding link until recognition
- of a f = 0, b f = 0. If the clear-back signal is recognized while
- the fault persists, the connection beyond the faulty circuit must
- be released immediately. Additionally, when the incoming register
- has not started to send the last backward signal, the rapid release
- procedure described in Note 5 may be used.
-
- Note 3 - In these cases no action is taken until the clear-back
- signal is recognized, at which stage the connection beyond the
- faulty circuit is immediately released.
-
- Note 4 - Under these conditions the succeeding link must be
- released immediately.
-
- Note 5 - In this case immediate action is not necessary. However,
- rapid release of the circuit should occur if the incoming end simu-
- lates answer by sending a b = 0, b b = 1.
-
- Note 6 - Under these conditions no action is taken.
-
- Note 7 - After clear-forward signal is recognized and until the
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- code a b = 1, b b = 0 is sent, all transitions in the forward
- direction shall be ignored.
- Tableau [4/Q.422] + Remarques, p.8
-
-
-
- Blanc
-
-
-
-
- 3.2.5 Abnormal conditions
-
-
-
- 3.2.5.1 Special release arrangements
-
-
- a) If an exchange where an outgoing R2 register is
- situated recognizes ab = 0, bb = 1 (premature answer) before an
- address-complete signal A-6 or a Group B signal is received, the
- connection must be released. Congestion information is then sent
- backward or a repeat attempt is made to set up the call.
-
- b) In the cases of non-receipt of the answer sig-
- nal, of delay in clearing by the calling subscriber in automatic
- working and of non-receipt of the clear-forward signal by the
- incoming exchange after the clear-back signal has been sent, the
- provisions of Recommendation Q.118 apply.
-
-
- 3.2.5.2 Safeguard against failures
-
-
- The PCM equipment and the exchange line signalling equipment
- should be designed in such a way that at least those faults which
- are most likely to occur in this equipment or in the interconnect-
- ing cables, result in blocking of the circuit at the outgoing end
- and in the ultimate clearing of the connection beyond the incoming
- switching equipment. This can be achieved, as far as possible, by
- ensuring that a = 1, b = 1 is sent on line upon:
-
- - removal of PCM or switching equipment by mainte-
- nance personnel;
-
- - occurrences of abnormal conditions (e.g. open
- wire, low voltage) in switching equipment.
-
-
-
- 3.2.6 Alarms for technical staff
-
-
- According to Recommendation Q.117, an alarm must in principle
- be given to the technical staff upon recognition of abnormal condi-
- tions.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Arrangements for these alarms are to be specified by the
- Administrations.
-
- It is recommended that a delayed alarm be given at the outgo-
- ing end for the procedure described under S 3.2.3.7 above (block-
- ing) and for the following reasons:
-
- - when the abnormal conditions covered by Note 1 to
- Table 3/Q.422 are applicable;
-
- - when the seizing acknowledgement signal is not
- recognized within the time specified in Note 2 to Table 3/Q.422
- after sending the seizing signal;
-
- - when, after recognition of the seizing ack-
- nowledgement signal and prior to recognition of the answer signal,
- bb = 0 is received for 1-2 seconds;
-
- - when the abnormal conditions covered by Note 4 to
- Table 3/Q.422 are applicable.
-
- It is also recommended that a delayed alarm be given under PCM
- failure conditions specified in Recommendations G.732 and G.734.
-
-
- 3.2.7 Both-way working
-
-
- System R2 is specified for one-way working, but in principle
- the line signalling code detailed in Recommendation Q.421 is also
- suitable for use on both-way circuits. Where Administrations have
- undertaken, by bilateral agreement, to use both-way working, the
- clauses and additional specifications for exchange signalling
- equipment detailed in SS 3.2.7.1 and 3.2.7.2 below, must be
- observed.
-
-
-
- 3.2.7.1 Procedures under normal conditions
-
-
- a) Double seizure
-
- Double seizure is assumed if the outgoing equipment is in
- a seized state and the signalling code ab = 0, bb = 0 is recognized
- instead of ab = 1, bb = 1 (seizure acknowledgement). In such a
- situation the connection must be released at both ends and conges-
- tion information sent to the calling subscriber or a repeat attempt
- must be made. On recognition of double seizure the line signalling
- equipment at both ends must maintain the seized state for a minimum
- of 100 ms after which the clear-forward signal af = 1, bf = 0 must
- be sent.
-
-
- 100 ms after sending the clear-forward signal and on
- recognition of ab = 1, bb = 0 each end may assume the idle state.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- The clear-forward state af = 1, bf = 0 must be maintained
- for at least 100 ms to ensure that it is recognized at the other
- end.
-
- In the sense of preventive action it is recommended that an
- opposite order of circuit selection be used by each exchange of a
- both-way circuit group to minimize double seizure.
-
- b) Requirements for circuit release
-
- When a both-way circuit is released, the end which acted as
- the incoming end must maintain the signalling code ab = 1, bb = 0
- for at least 100 ms to ensure that the signal is recognized at the
- other end after which the circuit becomes idle.
-
- c) Blocking and unblocking procedure
-
- When a both-way circuit is blocked manually in its idle
- state at one end (e.g. end B) the blocking signal must be sent to
- the other end (A). The circuit must then be kept blocked locally
- (at end A) against all calls in the A to B traffic direction as
- long as the blocked state persists in the B to A direction.
-
- In order to avoid permanent blocking, end A should maintain
- the signalling code a = 1, b = 0 in the direction A to B.
-
- When the blocked state is removed, end B must send the
- clear-forward signal and must maintain that state for at least 100
- ms, before assuming the idle state.
-
-
- 3.2.7.2 Special arrangement
-
-
- The physical realization of signalling equipment terminating a
- bothway circuit may allow that part of the equipment concerned with
- outgoing calls to be removed without preventing the remaining
- equipment from being used for incoming calls. In this case it is
- only necessary to block the circuit locally against outgoing calls
- and a blocking signal need not be sent to the other end.
-
-
-
-
-
- Recommendation Q.424
-
-
- 3.3 PROTECTION AGAINST THE EFFECTS OF FAULTY TRANSMISSION
-
-
-
-
- Faulty transmission conditions in PCM systems can lead to
- degradation of the speech channels and erroneous signalling. In the
- case of primary PCM multiplex equipment operating at 2048 kbit/s
- failures due to loss of frame or multi-frame alignment and/or
- failure of any other important function results in both PCM termi-
- nals going into alarm condition in accordance with
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Recommendations G.732 and G.734.
-
-
- Thus both PCM terminals apply the state corresponding to
- state 1 on the PCM line on each "receive" signalling channel at the
- interfaces with the switching equipment, as indicated in Table 4 of
- Recommendation G.732. In this way, the incoming switching equipment
- receives the equivalent of af = 1,
-
- bf = 1 on the PCM line and the outgoing switching equipment
- receives the equivalent of ab = 1, bb = 1.
-
- These characteristics are taken into account in the present
- specifications (see S 3.2.4) so that:
-
- - at the outgoing end (see Table 3/Q.422) a PCM
- fault results in a blocked state, seizure acknowledged state or
- clear-back state. This means that all circuits in the idle state of
- a faulty PCM multiplex will be blocked against seizure and that
- seized circuits will go to or remain in the seizure acknowledged or
- clear-back state;
-
- - at the incoming end (see Table 4/Q.422) a PCM
- fault can be identified and appropriate actions can be taken.
-
-
- When the signalling equipment is a part of a digital exchange,
- it may receive alarm indications in a form other than both signal-
- ling bits in state one. The failure may be detected by the signal-
- ling equipment or an indication be received from the PCM terminal
- according to Recommendation G.734.
-
- When the signalling equipment recognizes a failure it must:
-
- - block the detection of signalling transitions to
- avoid recognition of erroneous signalling codes caused by the
- failure. This action must be taken as soon as possible and at least
- within 3 ms as specified in Recommendation G.734 for a PCM termi-
- nal,
-
- - react as specified in Tables 3/Q.422 and 4/Q.422
- when a signalling code a = 1, b = 1 is detected at the input of
- signalling equipment situated at the analogue access of a PCM ter-
- minal equipment complying with Recommendation G.732.
-
-
-
-
-
- Recommendation Q.430
-
- 3.5 CONVERSION BETWEEN ANALOGUE AND DIGITAL VERSIONS
-
-
-
- OF SYSTEM R2 LINE SIGNALLING
-
-
- This Recommendation is applicable to a conversion equipment
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- placed on the circuit between two switching exchanges each using
- one of the two versions specified for System R2 line signalling.
- Owing to this particular use, all the specifications for the two
- versions of the line signalling may not be fully observed.
- Nevertheless, the diagrams which follow are based on the principles
- of CCITT Recommendations Q.411, Q.412 and Q.416 for the analogue
- version and on Recommendations Q.421, Q.422 and Q.424, for the
- digital version. The only time conditions taken into account in
- this Recommendation are those set out in the aforementioned Recom-
- mendations. The operation of the
-
-
- interruption control device is also, wherever possible, that speci-
- fied in Recommendation Q.416. As stated in that Recommendation, the
- receiver is blocked immediately whenever pilot tone off is
- detected: since this is a routine operation, it has not been
- represented explicitly in the diagrams.
-
- The conversion diagrams have been divided into four parts:
-
- - for conversion between the analogue version at
- the incoming end and the digital version at the outgoing end, into:
-
- - incoming analogue,
-
- - outgoing digital;
-
- - for conversion between the digital version at the
- incoming end and the analogue version at the outgoing end, into:
-
- - incoming digital,
-
- - outgoing analogue.
-
- It should be noted, however, that this Recommendation can be
- simplified with respect to alarm processing when the conversion
- equipment is connected directly at the input or output of a switch-
- ing exchange; the processes necessary for this application are
- shown on the diagrams with thickened lines.
-
-
-
- 1 Drawing conventions
-
-
- - tone
-
- tf = 1 tone on forward
-
-
- tf = 0 tone off forward
-
-
- tb = 1 tone on backward
-
-
- tb = 0 tone off backward
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- When recognized
-
-
- p = 1 pilot tone on
-
-
- p = 0 pilot tone off
-
-
- - signalling bits
-
- The conventions are those of Recommendation Q.421.
-
-
-
- 2 Conversion incoming analogue version to outgoing digital version
-
-
-
- 2.1 Incoming analogue
-
-
-
- Figure CCITT-55980, p.
-
-
- List of timers:
-
- T2: Recommendation Q.412 (S 2.2.2.7)
-
- T3: 2 to 3 mn Recommendation Q.118 (S 4.3.3)
-
- In sheets 2 and 4 the diagram for group pilot supervision is
- given.
-
- In sheets 3 and 5 the diagram for supergroup pilot supervision
- is given.
-
- Sheet 1 is for group and supergroup pilot supervision.
-
-
- Blanc
-
-
-
-
- FIGURE CCITT-60881 (feuillet 1), p.10
-
-
-
-
-
- FIGURE CCITT-60891 (feuillet 2), p.11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- FIGURE T1115760-88 (feuillet 3), p.
-
-
-
-
-
- FIGURE CCITT-60901 (feuillet 4), p.12
-
-
-
-
-
- FIGURE T1115770-88 (feuillet 5), p.
-
-
-
-
-
- 2.2 Outgoing digital
-
-
-
- Figure CCITT-55990, p.
-
-
- List of timers:
-
- T6: Recommendation Q.422 (S 3.2.4.1, Note 2 to Table 3)
-
-
- Blanc
-
-
-
-
- Figure CCITT-60911 (Sheet 1 of 3), p.
-
-
-
-
-
- Figure CCITT-60920 (Sheet 2 of 3), p.
-
-
-
-
-
- Figure CCITT-60930 (Sheet 3 of 3), p.
-
-
-
-
-
- 3 Conversion incoming digital version to outgoing analogue version
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 3.1 Incoming digital
-
-
-
- Figure CCITT-56000, p.
-
-
- List of timers:
-
- T3: 2 to 3 mn Recommendation Q.118 (S 4.3.3)
-
-
- Blanc
-
-
-
-
- Figure CCITT-60940 (Sheet 1 of 3), p.
-
-
-
-
-
- Figure CCITT-60950 (Sheet 2 of 3), p.
-
-
-
-
-
- Figure CCITT-60960 (Sheet 3 of 3), p.
-
-
-
-
-
- 3.2 Outgoing analogue
-
-
-
- Figure CCITT-50610, p.
-
-
- List of timers:
-
- T1: Recommendation Q.412 (S 2.2.2.7)
-
- T5: 100 ms Recommendation Q.412 (S 2.2.2.1)
-
- Automatic restoration of an abnormally blocked circuit
- Recommendation Q.490 (S 6.6)
-
- n: number of attempts made
-
- T4: 30 s to 2 mn
-
- T7: 2 to 3 s
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Blanc
-
-
-
-
- Figure CCITT-60971 (Sheet 1 of 5), p.
-
-
-
-
-
- Figure CCITT-60981 (Sheet 2 of 5), p.
-
-
-
-
-
- Figure CCITT-60991 (Sheet 3 of 5), p.
-
-
-
-
-
- Figure CCITT-70001 (Sheet 4 of 5), p.
-
-
-
-
-
- Figure, p.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-