home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Text File | 1991-12-22 | 549.5 KB | 9,816 lines |
-
-
-
- 5i'
-
- MONTAGE: REC. Q.31 EN T | TE DE CETTE PAGE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Recommendation Q.32
-
-
- REDUCTION OF THE RISK OF INSTABILITY BY SWITCHING MEANS
-
-
-
-
- For any connection between two-wire terminations, the
- transmission plan admits a certain risk of instability. In an
- international connection, Recommendation G.122 defines for each
- national network its responsibility in this respect.
-
-
- It is recognized in S 2 of that Recommendation that during
- certain phases of the call, the risk of instability could in cer-
- tain circumstances become excessive; this refers in particular to
- conditions other than that of an established connection, viz. dur-
- ing set-up, clear-down and changes in a connection. Appropriate
- precautions must then be taken by the switching services.
-
-
- Techniques applicable to analogue exchanges which will afford
- a reduction of the risk of instability for a national network have
- been shown in earlier versions of Recommendation Q.32 (Red Book
- 1985 and earlier). For digital exchanges these methods are as a
- rule not equally suitable, however, it should be noted that, with
- today's digital networks giving 4-wire transmission down to the
- local exchanges and with corresponding terminating losses, the
- transmission plan may often not require extra loss during
- setting-up, etc., conditions.
-
- Recommendation G.121, S 6.2 calls for a sum of losses round
- the a-t-b path of at least 6 dB; calculating according to
- Recommendation G.122, S 2.2, this would be some four times the
- standard deviation, corresponding to a risk of about 3 in 10 000.
- (The six calls per thousand risk called for in Recommendation G.122
- corresponds to about 3.25 times the standard deviation.) The
- switching services thus only need to maintain this minimum loss in
- cases where it is reduced in the conditions mentioned.
-
- The use of a restricted value of loss (rather than total
- interruption of the 4-wire loop) allows the passage of information
- tones or recorded announcements or of communication with an opera-
- tor, and of national use for non-chargeable calls. Although as a
- rule digital pads are deprecated, the reasons for this are all con-
- cerned with their presence in an established connection, and do not
- apply to their use for the present purpose.
-
-
- Recommendation Q.33
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- PROTECTION AGAINST THE EFFECTS OF FAULTY TRANSMISSION
-
-
-
- ON GROUPS OF CIRCUITS
-
-
- 1 General
-
-
- 1.1 Although certain signalling systems may have the capabil-
- ity to provide an indication when an individual circuit is faulty,
- in order to maintain the required availability of the public net-
- work, it is considered necessary to provide alarm facilities to
- alert maintenance staff when a group of circuits provided by a mul-
- tiplex transmission system is faulty.
-
-
- 1.2 An alarm indication can be initiated on failure of a FDM
- system by means of pilot supervision. On failure of a PCM system,
- and alarm indication initiated at both ends by the loss of frame
- alignment (or multiframe alignement as appropriate) [1], [2].
-
-
- These failure indicators provide the means whereby the faulty
- circuits can be removed from service automatically and, when the
- fault condition no longer exists, be restored automatically by the
- switching control of an international exchange (see S 1.4 below).
-
- Additionally, the existence of such failure indications allow
- an end-to-end indication of circuit availability which is a prere-
- quisite to the operation of Signalling System No. 7 without a per
- call continuity check [see Recommendations Q.724 (TUP) and Q.764
- (ISUP)].
-
- 1.3 Where transmission links comprise several transmission
- systems in tandem, the protection against the effects of faulty
- transmission on groups of circuits can only be maintained if the
- primary multiplex structure is maintained from end-to-end together
- with a transparency of alarm indications. In other cases the provi-
- sions of SS 2 and 3 below apply.
-
-
- 1.4 Following a transmission failure a number of specific sig-
- nalling actions are required to be carried out by the switching
- control of an international exchange. These actions are designed
- to:
-
-
- a) prevent failure of new call attempts;
-
- b) provide appropriate failure indications on esta-
- blished calls;
-
- c) provide a means of releasing circuit connec-
- tions beyond the point of transmission failure.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Paragraph 4 below details the actions to be taken for circuits
- employing Signalling Systems Nos. 5, 6 and 7 (TUP and ISUP). For
- circuits employing Signalling System R2, Recommendation Q.416
- details the actions to be taken.
-
-
- 1.5 The recognition time used by the international exchange to
- validate the alarm ON/alarm OFF states shall be 20 _ 10 mil-
- liseconds. The recognition time is defined as the duration that
- signals representing the alarm ON/OFF states must be present at the
- input of the exchange terminal equipment.
-
-
- Following recognition of the alarm ON or alarm OFF states the
- exchange shall carry out the actions detailed in S 4.
-
-
- 2 Mixed transmission systems
-
-
- 2.1 Some transmission links comprise differing transmission
- systems which for maintenance purposes are treated separately (see
- Recommendation G.704). Examples of such transmission links are
- those with:
-
-
- - analogue/digital conversion via transmulti-
- plexers;
-
- - conversion between 24 and 30 channel PCM systems;
-
- - links via TDMA/DSI satellite systems.
-
- In these cases, failure indications from the local multiplex
- equipment can be used, but alone these do not provide an end-to-end
- indication of circuit availability. Since the multiplex systems use
- different standards, it is usually impossible to provide a ready
- conversion of alarms from one system to another. In order to retain
- the benefits of the alarm indications for groups of circuits it is
- necessary to carry the fault indications on a circuit basis. This
- may be inherent in the normal circuit signalling (as in the case of
- the digital version of Signalling System R2) but in the general
- case some form of individual circuit supervision is required.
-
-
- 2.2 Circuit supervision for digital systems
-
-
-
- 2.2.1 2048 kbit/s systems (Recommendations G.732, G.734)
-
-
- 8448 kbit/s systems (Recommendation G.744)
-
- In these systems there are two frame structure possibilities.
- One supports channel associated signalling, and the other is
- intended for common channel signallig which allows extra time-slots
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- to be used for speech circuits. In order to provide circuit super-
- vision it is necessary to use the frame strcuture for channel asso-
- ciated signalling, even in the case of voice frequency and common
- channel signalling systems. This implies a number of restrictions:
-
- - in the 2048 kbit/s system time slot 16 is not
- available for speech. Additionally, the common channel signalling
- links of Systems No. 6 and No. 7 must use a time slot other than
- number 16;
-
- - similarly, in the 8448 kbit/s system time
- slots 67-70 are required for the circuit supervision and cannot be
- used for speech.
-
- Other systems of transmitting circuit supervision information
- (for example, using a common channel) are for further study.
-
-
- 2.2.2 1544 kbit/s systems (Recommendations G.733, G.735)
-
-
- In this system the S bit is used for circuit supervision in a
- similar manner to its use for channel associated signalling.
-
-
- 2.2.3 Non-standard systems
-
-
- In non-standard transmission systems it will often be neces-
- sary to provide a discrete signalling path for the transmission of
- circuit supervision indications. Annex A to this Recommendation
- describes the arrangements used for circuit supervision on TDMA/DSI
- satellite systems together with the interfacing with the terres-
- trial channels.
-
-
- 3 Signalling of circuit supervision indications
-
-
- 3.1 In integrated digital transmission systems interfacing
- directly with exchanges (e.g. Recommendations G.734, G.744) and
- where systems connect to the other Administrations, it is recom-
- mended that a standard form of circuit supervision be used. This is
- detailed below for 2048 kbit/s PCM systems and 1544 kbit/s PCM sys-
- tems.
-
-
-
-
- 3.2 2048 kbit/s PCM systems
-
-
- Signalling bits "a" and "b" of time slot 16 are used. Under
- abnormal (alarm) conditions both a and b bits are set to 1. The
- normal (no-alarm) condition is when "a" and "b" bits are not both
- equal to 1.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 3.3 1544 kbit/s PCM systems
-
-
- In this system the circuit supervision information is gen-
- erated:
-
- - by forcing bit 2 in every channel time slot to
- the value 0, or
-
- - by modifying the S bit as described
- in S 3.1.3.2.2 of Recommendation G.704 for the 12 frame multiframe,
- or
-
- - by sending a frame alignment alarm sequence
- (1111111100000000) as described in S 3.1.1.3 of
- Recommendation G.704 for the 24 frame multiframe
-
-
- 4 Actions in Signalling Systems Nos. 5, 6 and 7 when a
- transmission alarm occurs
-
-
- This section details the actions which should be taken on cir-
- cuits using Signalling Systems No. 5, No. 6 and No. 7 when a
- transmission alarm occurs concerning the speech path. This annex is
- intended to be applied to new exchange equipment only.
-
- It is split into two broad areas dealing firstly with Signal-
- ling System No. 5 and then with Signalling Systems No. 6 and No. 7.
- This split is required because the actions taken for inband signal-
- ling systems is slightly different to that taken for common channel
- signalling systems.
-
-
- 4.1 Signalling System No. 5
-
-
- The action taken if a transmission alarm occurs during the
- states shown below is as follows:
-
-
- 4.1.1 Outgoing circuit failure
-
-
-
- 4.1.1.1 IDLE STATE
-
-
- Take the circuit out of service to outgoing traffic. Return to
- service when transmission is restored.
-
-
- _________________________
- The third method proposed cannot ensure a proper end to
- end supervision if a TDMA system with multidestination
- of multiplexes or a CME is involved in the connection.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 4.1.1.2 REGISTER STATE
-
-
- The register state is assumed to start with sending of seizure
- signal and to end with sending of end of pulsing signal (ST).
-
- - Send clear forward.
-
- - Send a call unsuccessful indication on incoming
- circuit or possibly carry out a repeat attempt.
-
- - If clear forward release guard sequence fails,
- inhibit the repeat clear forward sequence. Resume the repeat clear
- forward sequence when the transmission is restored limiting the
- number of simultaneous signals to a value which will prevent over-
- load of the transmission system.
-
- - If the clear forward release guard sequence is
- successful, take the circuit out of service to outgoing traffic.
-
-
- 4.1.1.3 SEIZED BUT AFTER REGISTER STATE
-
-
- - Wait for calling party to clear and send clear
- forward.
-
- - If answer signal has not been returned from
- called party, send a call unsuccessful indication on incoming cir-
- cuit.
-
- - If clear forward release guard sequence fails,
- inhibit the repeat clear forward sequence. Resume the repeat clear
- forward sequence when the transmission is restored limiting the
- number of simultaneous signals to a value which will not overload
- the transmission system.
-
- - If clear forward release guard sequence is suc-
- cessful take the circuit out of service to outgoing traffic.
-
-
- 4.1.1.4 BLOCKED
-
-
- - No special action required.
-
-
-
- 4.1.2 Incoming circuit failure
-
-
-
- 4.1.2.1 IDLE STATE
-
-
- - No special action required, respond to incoming
- call as normal.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 4.1.2.2 ALL OTHER STATES
-
-
- - In answered state no special action to be taken,
- send all signals as normal.
-
- - If answer signal has not been returned from
- called party, start a time out device which after a certain inter-
- val clears the chain beyond the faulty circuit.
-
-
- 4.1.3 Bothway circuit
-
-
-
- 4.1.3.1 IDLE STATE
-
-
- - Take the circuit out of service to outgoing
- traffic, respond normally to incoming signals.
-
- - Return to outgoing service when transmission is
- restored.
-
-
- 4.1.3.2 OUTGOING REGISTER STATE
-
-
- - See S 4.1.1.2.
-
-
- 4.1.3.3 OUTGOING AFTER REGISTER STATE
-
-
- - See S 4.1.1.3.
-
-
- 4.1.3.4 INCOMING ANY STATE
-
-
- - See S 4.1.2.
-
-
- 4.1.3.5 BLOCKED
-
-
- - See S 4.1.1.4.
-
-
- 4.2 Signalling System No. 6 or Signalling System No. 7
-
-
- The action taken per speech circuit is as follows.
-
-
- 4.2.1 Outgoing circuit failure
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 4.2.1.1 IDLE STATE
-
-
- - Take the circuit out of service to outgoing
- traffic. Return to service when the transmission is restored.
-
-
- 4.2.1.2 REGISTER STATE
-
-
- The register state is assumed to start with sending of Initial
- Address Message and to end with the receipt of an address complete
- message.
-
- - Send clear forward.
-
- - Send a call unsuccessful indication on incoming
- circuit or possibly carry out a repeat attempt to set up the call
- on another circuit.
-
- - Following receipt of release guard signal, take
- the circuit out of service to outgoing traffic. Return to service
- when transmission is restored.
-
- - Inhibit any repeat continuity check which may be
- taking place.
-
-
- 4.2.1.3 SEIZED BUT AFTER REGISTER STATE
-
-
- - If answer signal has not been received from
- called party, send a call unsuccessful indication on incoming cir-
- cuit.
-
- - If answer signal received, no special action
- required.
-
- - Take the circuit out of service when it becomes
- idle. Return to service when the transmission is restored.
-
-
-
- 4.2.1.4 BLOCKED
-
-
- - No special action required.
-
-
- 4.2.2 Incoming circuit failure
-
-
-
- 4.2.2.1 CIRCUIT IN ANY STATE
-
-
- - If answer signal has not been returned from
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- called party, start a time out device which after a certain inter-
- val clears the chain beyond the faulty circuit.
-
- - If answer has been received no special action is
- required, the transmission of blocking messages when end to end
- alarm continuity is not provided should be for further study.
-
-
- 4.2.3 Bothway circuit failure
-
-
-
- 4.2.3.1 IDLE STATE
-
-
- - Take the circuit out of service to outgoing
- traffic, the transmission of blocking messages when end to end
- alarm continuity is not provided should be for further study.
-
- - Return to outgoing service when transmission is
- restored.
-
-
- 4.2.3.2 OUTGOING REGISTER STATE
-
-
- - See S 4.2.1.2 above.
-
-
- 4.2.3.3 OUTGOING AFTER REGISTER STATE
-
-
- - See S 4.2.1.3 above.
-
-
- 4.2.3.4 INCOMING CIRCUIT IN ANY STATE
-
-
- - See S 4.2.2 above.
-
-
- 4.2.3.5 BLOCKED
-
-
- - No special action required.
- ANNEX A
- (to Recommendation Q.33)
-
- Circuit supervision via TDMA/DSI satellite systems
-
-
- A.1 General
-
-
- A.1.1 When satellite systems employ Time Division Multiple
- Access (TDMA) transmission techniques with Digital Speech Interpo-
- lation (DSI) equipment at an earth station, the integrity of
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- multiplex transmission systems, FDM as well as PCM, used for ter-
- restrial access to the satellite system cannot be maintained within
- the satellite system. For exemple, time slots 0 and 16 of a
- 2048 kbit/s PCM system of the group pilot of a FDM system may not
- be available between earth stations for the transfer of signalling
- or transmission alarm information. The provision of equivalent
- facilities over the satellite section therefore needs special con-
- sideration.
-
-
- A.1.2 Although not necessarily a fault condition, an increase
- in circuit activity on a TDMA/DSI system may lead to an overload
- condition, e.g. "bit stealing" in the DSI equipment. Conveyance of
- overload indicators to the associated ISC may be used to initiate
- appropriate network management actions to reduce or eliminate the
- overload conditions on groups of circuits routed on the TDMA/DSI
- systems.
-
- Implementation of this capability is at the discretion of
- individual Administrations.
-
-
- A.1.3 In accordance with Recommendation Q.7, specified signal-
- ling systems considered to be suitable for international applica-
- tion via TDMA/DSI satellite systems are:
-
- - System R2, provided that the satellite system is
- designed to be transparent to pulsed inter-register signals;
-
- - System No. 5;
-
- - Systems Nos. 6 and 7.
-
-
- A.2 Circuit supervision
-
-
- Possible methods of passing circuit supervision information
- for these signalling systems via a TDMA/DSI satellite system are as
- follows:
-
-
- A.2.1 Signalling System R2
-
-
- A.2.1.1 In the case of System R2, only the digital version of line
- signalling (Recommendations Q.421-Q.424) is specified for use on
- international digital links.
-
- A.2.1.2 A satellite Line Signalling Channel (LSC) is required to
- convey the System R2 digital line signalling code. Two signalling
- bits, "a" and "b" are required in the LSC for each System R2 ter-
- restrial circuit accessing the satellite section. Under transmis-
- sion failure conditions, bits "a" and "b" are set to State 1, so
- that the line signalling protocols of digital R2 will eventually
- block the circuit.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Appendix I shows a typical format and organization of the LSC
- for System R2 line signalling.
-
- A.2.1.3 Fault conditions detected at the earth station and the
- consequent actions to be taken are given: in Tables A-1/Q.33 and
- A-2/Q.33 when terrestrial access is via a 2048 kbit/s PCM system or
- via an FDM system with signalling conversion employed at the earth
- station, respectively.
-
- The application of actions given in these tables enables
- appropriate end-to-end supervision to be provided on a per-circuit
- basis.
-
-
- A.2.2 Signalling System No. 5
-
-
- A.2.2.1 It should be noted that on circuits employing System No. 5
- signalling, some administrations utilize a repeat forward clear
- procedure as a means of achieving clear down under failure condi-
- tions. This procedure, which may involve periodic sending of for-
- ward clear signals synchronously on a number of circuits, can
- result in severe periodic overloading of DSI channels. In order to
- avoid this possible overloading of DSI channels it is preferable to
- limit the number of simultaneous forward clear signals on the cir-
- cuits involved.
-
- A.2.2.2 In order to convey circuit supervision information via the
- satellite system, it will be necessary to provide a satellite sig-
- nalling channel.
-
- The preferred method of conveying circuit supervision informa-
- tion by use of a satellite digital non-interpolated (DNI) channel
- is described in S A.2.2.3.
-
- If an LSC, as provided for in System R2, is available, then a
- second method of passing circuit supervision information is as
- described in S A.2.2.4.
-
-
- A.2.2.3 Use of a DNI supervision channel
-
-
- When a DNI channel is utilized for circuit supervision pur-
- poses, detection by an earth station of circuit failures on its
- terrestrial sector will result in the setting of bits in the DNI
- channel to "1", in accordance with the information contained in
- Appendix II.
-
- Thus, if the failed circuits are digital, the detection of
- failure conditions, such as loss of frame alignment, described in
- Table A-3/Q.33 will result in the setting to "1" of bits in the DNI
- channel associated with the affected circuits.
-
- When the affected circuits are analogue, the failure will be
- detected at the earth station, e.g. by the loss of pilot, or if
- appropriate, by receipt of a pulsed bakward pilot. Fault conditions
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- and consequent actions when analogue access links are employed are
- given in Table A-4/Q.33.
-
- The alarm information passed over the DNI channel can be for-
- warded by the receiving earth station to its associated ISC as
- described in Recommendation Q.33.
-
- An Administration may utilize the alarm information at its ISC
- to block or busy affected circuits, or, for example, to inhibit the
- sending of repeat forward clear signals.
-
- Appendix II shows the format and organization of the DNI
- supervisory channel.
-
-
-
- A.2.2.4 Use of System R2 LSC
-
-
- In this case the "a" and "b" signalling bits in the LSC
- corresponding to the Terrestrial Channels (TCs) for which supervi-
- sion is applied shall assume the following meaning:
-
- Under normal conditions:
-
- b = 0 indicates that the relevant TC is in a normal condi-
- tion. The b = 0 state may be established either within the TDMA
- terminal or at the ISC.
-
- The "a" signalling bit contained in the same slot shall be
- set, as convenient, either to zero or "1".
-
- Under abnormal conditions:
-
- a = b = 1 indicates that the relevant TC is in an abnormal
- condition.
-
- Thus, for effective application, the failure of a distant ter-
- restrial transmission system (FDM or PCM) in either direction
- between an earth station and its associated ISC should result in
- the sending of a = b = 1 for each affected circuit backward over
- the satellite section. The alarm information passed via the LSC is
- transferred from the receiving earth station to its associated ISC
- as follows:
-
- - when digital access circuits are provided, bits a
- and b, in Time Slot 16 corresponding to the faulty circuits, are
- set to "1";
-
- - when analogue access circuits are employed
- receipt by the earth station of bits a = b = 1 for 6 or more cir-
- cuits in an analogue group should result in the removal of the
- group pilot towards the ISC.
-
- This method of using two signalling bits to convey circuit
- supervision information for System No. 5 circuits is inefficient in
- the utilization of satellite channel capacity. However,
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Administrations may need to take into account the possible advan-
- tages of such utilization, for example, a common terrestrial inter-
- face module for both System R2 and System No. 5 circuits may be
- employed at the earth station.
-
- Appendix I shows the format and organization of the LSC for
- System R2 line signalling. Where appropriate to such use of cir-
- cuits employing System No. 5 signalling, the fault conditions and
- consequent actions given in Tables A-1/Q.33 and A-2/Q.33 also
- apply.
-
-
- A.2.3 Signalling System No. 6 and No. 7
-
-
- A.2.3.1 These signalling systems employ a common signalling chan-
- nel which may be conveyed via the satellite system (for example,
- via a 64 kbit/s signalling channel) or via a terrestrial transmis-
- sion path.
-
- A.2.3.2 The provision of transmission alarm information for cir-
- cuit supervision purposes is necessary because:
-
- a) Although a speech path continuity check, where
- used, will remove faulty circuits from service, a faster method is
- required if severe operational problems at the ISC are to be
- avoided when a large number of circuits are affected by a transmis-
- sion system failure.
-
- b) In the case of circuits employing System No. 7,
- end-to-end circuit supervision is required in accordance with
- Recommendation Q.724.
-
- c) It is not mandatory for an ISC recognizing a
- transmission system failure to send a blocking signal for each
- affected circuit.
-
- A.2.3.3 If the common signalling channel and associated circuits
- are routed via the same satellite system, methods of conveying cir-
- cuit supervision information are identical to those described for
- System No. 5. This will require a DNI satellite channel to carry
- circuit supervision information in addition to the common signal-
- ling channel. Digital terrestrial access systems will also require
- a time slot for circuit supervision purposes besides that required
- for common channel signalling.
-
- A.2.3.4 Methods of utilizing the common signalling channel in lieu
- of the DNI channel for the purpose of conveying information on the
- status of the transmission path of the speech circuits require
- further study.
-
- A.2.3.5 Fault conditions and consequent actions to be taken at
- earth stations when system No. 6 or No. 7 is employed, via digital
- and analogue access links, are given in Tables A-3/Q.33
- and A-4/Q.33, respectively.
-
- H.T. [1T1.33]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- ______________________________________________________________
- TABLE A-1/Q.33
- {
- Fault conditions and consequent actions at earth stations
- with 2048 kbit/s digital access links for System R2 circuits
- }
- ______________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- | |
-
-
-
-
- {
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Prompt maintenance alarm {
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- {
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- {
-
- Yes Yes Note 1 Yes Yes Yes Loss of multiframe alignment Yes Yes Note 1 Yes {
-
-
-
-
- Yes {
-
-
- Yes if possible Yes Yes if possible Yes if possible Yes if possible {
-
- Yes if possible Yes Yes if possible
- __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Loss of reference timing Yes Yes Yes Yes {
- BER exceeded in satellite path
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- } Yes Yes Yes Yes {
- Backward alarm indication from remote ES concerning
- BER in satellite path
- } Yes Yes Note 2 Loss of data unique word
- __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Yes Yes Yes Yes
- __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Table A-1/Q.33 [1T1.33], p.
-
-
-
- H.T. [2T1.33]
-
- _________________________________________________
- {
- TABLE A-1/Q.33 (cont.)
- }
- _________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
- | |
-
-
-
-
- {
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Prompt maintenance alarm {
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- {
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- {
- Backward alarm indication from remote ES concerning
- data unique word
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- } Yes Yes Note 2 Yes Note 3 {
- Loss of alignment or BER exceeded in satellite
- signalling channel
- } Yes Yes Yes {
- Backward alarm indication from remote ES concerning satellite
- signalling channel
- } Yes Yes Note 2 {
- Power supply failure - TDMA/DSI
- } Yes if possible Yes if possible
- _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Yes Yes if possible {
- Power supply failure - satellite signalling equipment
- } Yes if possible Yes Yes if possible
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Note 1 - Prompt maintenance alarm is inhibited if AIS is present.
-
- Note 2 - Prompt maintenance alarm shall be inhibited if the back-
- ward alarm is received from only one origin if the interface con-
- cerned is working to more than one destination. It is not inhibited
- when working to a single destination.
-
- Note 3 - If prompt maintenance alarm according to Note 2 is not
- inhibited.
-
- POUR MONTAGE:
-
- Consequent actions Transmitting part Receiving part
-
- Consequent actions Transmitting part Receiving part
- Table A-1/Q.33 (cont.) [2T1.33], p.
-
-
-
- H.T. [1T2.33]
-
- ________________________________________________________________
- TABLE A-2/Q.33
- {
- Fault conditions and consequent actions at earth stations with
- analogue access links for System R2 circuits
- and signalling conversion at the earth station
- }
- ________________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- | |
-
-
-
-
- {
-
-
-
-
- Prompt maintenance alarm {
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- {
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- {
-
- Yes Yes Yes Note 4 Yes {
-
- Yes if possible Yes Yes if possible Note 4
- Yes if possible {
-
- Yes Yes Note 5
- ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- {
-
- Yes if possible Yes if possible Yes if possible Yes if possible Yes if possible Yes Yes if possible
-
-
- {
-
- Note 6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
- ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Loss of reference timing Yes Yes Yes {
- BER exceeded in satellite path
- } Yes Yes Yes {
- Backward alarm indication from remote ES concerning BER in
- satellite path
- } Note 6 Yes Yes Note 2
- ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Loss of data unique word Yes Yes Yes
- ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 0
-
- Table A-2/Q.33 [1T2.33], p.
-
-
-
- H.T. [2T2.33]
-
- _________________________________________________
- {
- TABLE A-2/Q.33 (cont.)
- }
- _________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
- | |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- {
-
-
-
-
- Prompt maintenance alarm {
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- {
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- {
- Backward alarm indication from remote ES concerning data
- unique word
- } Yes Yes Note 2 Yes Note 3 {
- Loss of alignment or BER exceeded in satellite signalling
- channel
- } Yes Yes Yes {
- Backward alarm indication from remote ES concerning satellite
- signalling channel
- } Note 6 Yes Yes Note 2
- _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- {
- Power supply failure - TDMA/DSI
- } Yes if possible Yes Yes if possible {
- Power supply failure - satellite signalling equipment
- } Yes if possible Yes Yes if possible
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Note 1 - The "relevant blocking signal" is that signal which the
- Recommendation for analogue R.2 line signalling calls for in the
- event of interruption control or it may be the defined blocking
- condition resulting from busying equipment (Orange Book,
- Recommendation Q.416 and Q.424).
-
- Note 2 - Prompt maintenance alarm shall be inhibited if the back-
- ward alarm is received from only one origin if the interface con-
- cerned is working to more than one destination. It is not inhibited
- when working to a single destination.
-
- Note 3 - If prompt maintenance alarm according to Note 2 is not
- inhibited.
-
- Note 4 - In this case the line signalling converter shall apply
- this condition. It is assumed that power supply failure on FDM
- transmission equipment will result in a group pilot failure.
-
- Note 5 - The line signalling converter should comply with the
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- principles described in Recommendation Q.422.
-
- Note 6 - A relevant blocking signal will be generated by the con-
- verter in the analogue part.
-
- Pour Montage
-
- Receiving part Transmitting part Consequent actions
-
- Receiving part Transmitting part Consequent actions
- Table A-2/Q.33 (cont.) [2T2.33], p.
-
-
-
- H.T. [1T3.33]
-
- _________________________________________________________________
- TABLE A-3/Q.33
- {
- Fault conditions and consequent actions at earth stations using
- DNI supervision channel for circuits using in-band
- and common channel signalling with digital
- access links
- }
- _________________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- | |
-
-
-
-
- {
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Prompt maintenance alarm {
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- {
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
-
-
-
- Yes Note 4 Yes Note 1 Yes Yes Yes Loss of multiframe alignment Yes Yes Note 1 Yes Alarm indication from CT Yes {
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Yes if possible Yes Yes if possible Yes if possible Yes if possible {
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- {
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Yes if possible Yes Yes if possible
- _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- {
- Loss of reference timing or burst
- } Yes Yes Yes Yes {
- BER exceeded in satellite path
- } Yes Yes Yes Yes {
- Backward alarm indication from remote ES concerning BER
- in satellite path
- } Yes Yes Note 2
- _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Loss of data unique word Yes Yes Yes Yes
- _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Table A-3/Q.33 [1T3.33], p.
-
-
-
- H.T. [2T3.33]
-
- _________________________________________________
- {
- TABLE A-3/Q.33 (cont.)
- }
- _________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
- | |
-
-
-
-
- {
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Prompt maintenance alarm {
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- {
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- {
- Backward alarm indication from remote ES concerning data unique
- word
- } Yes Yes Note 2 Yes Note 3 Loss of TDMA frame alignment Yes Yes {
- Power supply failure - TDMA/DSI
- } Yes if possible Yes if possible Yes Yes if possible {
- Power supply failure - service supervision signalling equipment
- }
- ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Yes if possible Yes Yes if possible {
- Indication of remote end transmission failure via circuit supervision
- channel
- } Yes
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Note 1 - Prompt maintenance alarm is inhibited if AIS is present.
-
- Note 2 - Prompt maintenance alarm shall be inhibited if the back-
- ward alarm is received from only one origin. If the interface con-
- cerned is working to more than one destination. It is not inhibited
- when working to a single destination.
-
- Note 3 - If prompt maintenance alarm according to Note 2 is not
- inhibited.
-
- Note 4 - For a 2048 kbit/s digital access, bit 3 (TS 0, even
- frames) could be used for this indication. For a 1544 kbit/s digi-
- tal access, fault indication as described in G.733, S 4.2.4 could
- be used for this indication.
-
- Pour Montage
-
- Consequent actions Receiving part Transmitting part
-
- Consequent actions Receiving part Transmitting part
- Table A-3/Q.33 (cont.) [2T3.33], p.
-
-
-
- H.T. [1T4.33]
-
- _________________________________________________________________
- TABLE A-4/Q.33
- {
- Fault conditions and consequent actions at earth stations using
- DNI supervision channel for circuits using in-band
- and common channel signalling with analogue
- access links
- }
- _________________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- | |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- {
-
-
-
- Prompt maintenance alarm {
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- {
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- {
- Loss of forward signal (group pilot failure) or supergroup
- } Yes Yes Yes Yes {
- Power supply failure from trans. equip.
- } Yes Yes if possible Yes Yes if possible {
- Power supply failure - TDMA/DSI
- }
- ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Yes Yes if possible Yes if possible Yes if possible {
- Power supply failure - service supervision signalling equipment
- } Yes Yes if possible
- ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- {
- Loss of reference timing or burst
- } Yes Yes Yes {
- BER exceeded in satellite path
- } Yes Yes Yes {
- Backward alarm indication from remote ES concerning BER in
- satellite path
- } Yes Yes Note 1
- ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Loss of data unique word Yes Yes Yes
- ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Table A-4/Q.33 [1T4.33], p.
-
-
-
- H.T. [2T4.33]
-
- _________________________________________________
- {
- TABLE A-4/Q.33 (cont.)
- }
- _________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
- | |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- {
-
-
-
- Prompt maintenance alarm {
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- {
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- {
- Backward alarm indication from remote ES concerning data unique
- word
- } Yes Yes Note 1 Yes Note 2 Loss of TDMA frame alignment Yes Yes {
- Power supply failure - TDMA/DSI
- } Yes Yes Yes if possible
- ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- {
- Power supply failure - service supervision signalling equipment
- } Yes Yes Yes if possible {
- Indication of remote end transmission failure via circuit supervision
- channel
- } Yes Note 4
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Note 1 - Prompt maintenance alarm shall be inhibited if the back-
- ward alarm is received from only one origin if the interface con-
- cerned is working to more than one destination. It is not inhibited
- when working to a single destination.
-
- Note 2 - If prompt maintenance alarm according to Note 1 is not
- inhibited.
-
- Note 3 - Apart from the requirements concerning the loss of group
- or supergroup pilots and indication of remote and transmission
- failure, all other fault conditions and subsequent actions are
- optional.
-
- Note 4 - An Administration's decision to remove group or super-
- group pilot is dependent on the number of failed circuits in the
- group or supergroup.
-
- Pour Montage
-
- Consequent actions Receiving part Transmitting part
-
- Consequent actions Receiving part Transmitting part
- Table A-4/Q.33 (cont.) [2T4.33], p.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- APPENDIX I
- (to Annex A of Recommendation Q.33)
-
- Format of each 64 kbit/s unit forming
-
- a satellite line signalling channel (LSC)
- for System R2 line signalling
-
-
- H.T. [T5.33]
-
- vide
-
- _________________________________________________________________________________
- Symbol N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 63 64
- _________________________________________________________________________________
- P channel 0 1 Y 1 Y 3 a x+1 a x+2 a x+3 a x+59 a x+60
- _________________________________________________________________________________
- Q channel 1 0 Y 2 Y 4 b x+1 b x+2 b x+3 b x+59 b x+60
- _________________________________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Symbols 1 and 2 carry the fixed pattern shown.
-
- Symbols 3 and 4 carry Backward Alarm Indications related to the
- satellite system.
-
- a n and b n are the signalling bits relating to the terrestrial
- channel connected to International Circuit (IC) number n.
-
- Indicated by the subscript, where:
-
- x = 0 in the first 64 kbit/s unit,
-
- x = 60 in the second 64 kbit/s unit,
-
- x = 120 in the third 64 kbit/s unit,
-
- x = 180 in the fourth 64 kbit/s unit.
- Tableau I-A/Q.33 [T5.33], p. 9
-
-
-
-
- APPENDIX II
- (to Annex A of Recommendation Q.33)
-
- End-to-end circuit supervision
-
- for in-band and common channel
- signalling systems
-
- End-to-end circuit supervision between corresponding Adminis-
- trations may be provided using a pre-assigned digital
- non-interpolated (DNI) supervisory channel allocated for the pur-
- pose.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- A recommended method of providing such supervision, which uses
- the binary information content of the DNI supervisory channel, is
- shown below. It should be noted that multi-destination operation
- requires a DNI supervisory channel from each destination.
- H.T. [T6.33]
- Format of satellite circuit supervision channel
- (non-interpolated)
-
- _____________________________________________________________________________
- Symbol No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 - 63 64
- _____________________________________________________________________________
- P Channel 0 1 1 0 a 1 a 3 a 5 - a 117 a 119
- _____________________________________________________________________________
- Q Channel 1 0 1 0 a 2 a 4 a 6 - a 118 a 120
- _____________________________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Symbols 1, 2, 3 and 4 are not used and carry the fixed sequence
- shown.
-
- Symbols 5 to 64 represent supervision conditions, with bit a n
- being used for supervision of the Terrestrial Channels (TCs) 2n and
- (2n-1), connected to international circuits.
-
- The meaning of each bit a n is shown below:
-
- a n = 0 Indicates that both of the relevant TCs are in a normal
- condition.
-
- a n = 1 Indicates that either or both of the relevant TCs are in an
- abnormal or fault condition.
- Tableau II-A/Q.33 [T6.33], p. 10
-
-
-
-
-
- References
-
-
- [1] CCITT Recommendation Characteristics of primary PCM
- multiplex equipment operating at 2048 kbit/s , Vol. III,
- Rec. G.732.
-
- [2] CCITT Recommendation Characteristics of primary PCM
- multiplex equipment operating at 1544 kbit/s , Vol. III,
- Rec. G.733.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- SECTION 5
-
- TONES FOR USE IN NATIONAL SIGNALLING SYSTEMS
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Recommendation Q.35
-
- TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF TONES
-
-
-
- FOR THE TELEPHONE SERVICE
-
-
- 1 General
-
-
- Administrations are reminded of the advantages of standardiz-
- ing audible tones as far as possible so that subscribers and opera-
- tors may quickly recognize any tone transmitted of whatever origin
-
- Guidance on the application of tones and recorded announce-
- ments in various situations is given in Recommendation E.182 [2].
-
- In considering the degree of standardization, the CCITT took
- account of the nature of the various tones already in use. It was
- also considered that Administrations introducing new tones would
- find it helpful to know the preferred limits of cadence frequency
- and level.
-
- Limits for tone cadences and frequencies are set forth below,
- all working tolerances being included in the limits.
-
- Besides the limits applying to specifications, limits have
- been laid down for application to existing exchanges.
-
- These latter limits are herein called accepted limits, while
- those for new equipment are called recommended limits.
-
- The present Recommendation covers the case where audible tones
- are applied within the network. However, the same frequencies and
- cadences are to be applied if, in the ISDN, the audible tones are
- generated at the terminal equipment.
-
-
- 2 Electrical levels for tones
-
-
- For international purposes, the levels of the ringing tone ,
- the busy tone , the congestion tone , the special information tone
- and the warning tone have to be defined at a zero relative level
- point at the incoming (in the traffic direction) end of the inter-
- national circuit.
- _________________________
- This Recommendation is also included in the Series E
- Recommendations under the number E.180 (Fascicle II.2)
- See [1] for particular values of tone cadences and fre-
- quencies in actual use.
- Recommendation E.181 [3] specifies the information
- which could be given to users to facilitate recognition
- of foreign tones.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- The level of tones so defined must have a nominal value of
- -10 dBm0. The recommended limits should be not more than -5 dBm0
- nor less than -15 dBm0 measured with continuous tone.
-
-
- For the special information tone, a difference in level of
- 3 dB is tolerable between any two of the three frequencies which
- make up the tone.
-
- For the power level of the dial tone the point of reference is
- the local exchange, where the subscriber line is connected. In the
- existing networks the absolute power at the 2-wire access in the
- direction towards the subscriber station is normally in the range
- of -10 dBm _ | dB. However, with respect to interference with
- multifrequency pushbutton (MFPB) receivers dial tone levels higher
- than -10 dBm should be avoided.
-
- Note - The relative level of local exchanges in an analogue
- network is not fixed. For digital local exchanges the relative lev-
- els are given in Recommendation Q.552 [4]. A preferred level range
- of digital tone generators is -8 dBm0 to -3 dBm0 corresponding with
- the above level range at the output of local exchanges.
-
-
- 3 Acoustical levels for tones
-
-
- When tones are generated by a source within a network, e.g. by
- a telephone exchange, the power level as perceived by the user will
- be influenced by the characteristics of the subscriber's line and
- the equipment between the source and the user's ear.
-
- Furthermore, tones can be generated within the user's equip-
- ment, triggered by signals from the exchange. In these cir-
- cumstances it is necessary to define the tone level in terms of the
- preferred range of sound pressure levels as heard by the listener.
-
- Research has shown that the preferred listening level for
- information tones is substantially independent of room noise, cir-
- cuit noise and tone cadence, but does vary over a range of tone
- frequencies. Figure 1/Q.35 shows the recommended sound pressure
- levels, with upper and lower limits of the recommended range, over
- a range of tone frequencies, based on these experiments.
-
-
- Figure 1/Q.35, p.
-
-
-
-
- It is emphasized that there is no one-to-one relationship
- between electrical and acoustical power levels on various parame-
- ters such as the characteristics of the user's equipment.
-
- It should be noted that the recommended sound pressure levels
- apply only to the most common situation of a user listening via a
- telephone handset, held reasonably close to the ear so that normal
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- "ear coupling loss" values apply.
-
- When using a loudspeaking telephone or a headset, the pre-
- ferred sound pressure level is generally lower than the recommended
- levels.
-
-
- 4 Dial tone
-
-
- 4.1 It is recommended that dial tone should be a continuous
- tone.
-
-
- 4.2 It is recommended that dial tone should be:
-
- - either | a single frequency tone in the range
- 400-450 Hz,
-
- - or | a combined tone composed of up to three
- frequencies, with at least one frequency in each of the ranges
- 340-425 Hz and 400-450 Hz. The difference between any two frequen-
- cies should be at least 25 Hz.
-
- 4.3 Recognizing the local nature of "normal" use of dial tone,
- as well as the technical and economic consequences and consequences
- on customer habits of changes in dial tone, the full range of
- existing dial tones, including non-continuous tones as in Supple-
- ment No. 2 at the end of Fascicle II.2 [1], are considered accept-
- able. However, when adopting a new single frequency dial tone,
- Administrations are recommended to use 425 Hz.
-
- 4.4 Where digital tone generation is applied, the frequencies
- for dial tone should be the same as those recommended for analogue
- generated tones (see Annex A).
-
- 4.5 In order to prevent interference of harmonics or spurious
- components of the dial tone with the frequencies recommended for
- pushbutton telephone sets in Recommendation Q.23 and the MFPB sig-
- nal reception specified in Recommendation Q.24, the maximum permis-
- sible power level of harmonics or quantizing noise of the dial tone
- has to be limited in a suitable way, depending on the specific
- characteristics of the implementations of the dial tone generator
- and the MFPB receivers within the same exchange. Examples of such
- limitations for the dial tone generator are given in Annex B.
-
- Note - In cases of digital generation of the dial tone, the
- quantizing noise is composed of a number of spectral lines which
- depend on the number of samples in the generating pattern. In order
- to reduce the amplitude of the quantizing components, the number of
- samples should be chosen sufficiently high, thus spreading the
- quantizing distortion power more evenly over the whole spectrum.
-
-
- 5 Ringing tone
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 5.1 Ringing tone is a slow period tone, in which the tone
- period is shorter than the silent period.
-
-
- The recommended | limits for the tone period (including
- tolerances) are from 0.67 to 1.5 seconds. For existing exchanges,
- the accepted upper limit for the tone period is 2.5 seconds.
-
- The recommended | limits for the silent period separating two
- tone periods are 3 to 5 seconds. For existing exchanges, the
- accepted upper limit is 6 seconds.
-
- The first tone period should start as soon as possible after
- the called subscriber's line has been found.
-
- Figure 2/Q.35 shows the recommended and accepted limits for
- the ringing tone periods.
-
-
-
- Figure 2/Q.35, p.
-
-
- 5.2 The ringing tone cadence should be similar to the cadence
- used for applying ringing current to the called subscriber's tele-
- phone set, but these two cadences need not be synchronized. The
- electrical parameters of the ringing current must be evaluated by
- the Administration concerned to prevent shock hazard.
-
- 5.3 The recommended frequency for the ringing tone is between
- 400 and 450 Hz. The accepted frequency should be not less than
- 340 Hz, nor more than 500 Hz. Frequencies between 450 and 500 Hz in
- the accepted frequency range should, however, be avoided. Adminis-
- trations adopting a new single frequency ringing tone are recom-
- mended to use 425 Hz.
-
- The ringing tone frequency may be modulated by a frequency
- between 16 and 100 Hz, but such modulation is not recommended for
- new equipment. If the accepted frequency is more than 475 Hz, no
- modulation by a lower frequency is allowed.
-
- 5.4 Where digital tone generation is applied, the frequency
- for ringing tone should be the same as that recommended for analo-
- gue generated tones (see Annex A).
-
-
- 6 Busy tone and congestion tone
-
-
- 6.1 The (subscriber) busy tone and the (equipment or circuit
- group) congestion tone are quick period tones in which the tone
- period is theoretically equal to the silent period complete cycle
- (tone period E + silent period S ) should be between 300 and
- 1100 milliseconds.
-
-
- The ratio E /S of the tone period to the silent period should
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- be between 0.67 and 1.5 (recommended values).
-
- For existing exchanges, or for tones to be used in a special
- way, it is accepted that the tone period may be up to 500 mil-
- liseconds shorter than the silent period (E _" S -
- 500 milliseconds). In no circumstances should the tone period be
- shorter than 100 milliseconds.
-
-
- Figure 3/Q.35 shows the recommended and the accepted areas for
- the busy tone and the congestion tone periods.
-
-
- Figure 3/Q.35, p.
-
-
- 6.2 The busy tone (of the called subscriber) and the conges-
- tion tone (of switching equipment or circuit groups) can be identi-
- cal or almost identical, providing that this does not create any
- serious problems for the network and does not cause the subscriber
- to become confused. However, a distinction between these two tones
- is desirable:
-
- - to allow Administrations to assess the quality of
- service,
-
- - for the convenience of experienced subscribers.
-
- 6.3 Where a distinct congestion tone is used, it is recom-
- mended that:
-
- a) the same frequency | should be used for the
- busy tone and the congestion tone;
-
- b) the busy tone should have a slower cadence than
- the congestion tone, but both cadences should be within the limits
- mentioned in S 5.1 above.
-
- 6.4 The recommended | frequency for the busy tone and for the
- congestion tone must be between 400 and 450 Hz. The accepted fre-
- quency must not be less than 340 nor more than 500 Hz. Frequencies
- between 450 and 500 Hz in the accepted frequency range should, how-
- ever, be avoided. Administrations adopting a new single frequency
- for busy and congestion tones are recommended to use 425 Hz.
-
-
- 6.5 Where digital tone generation is applied, the frequency
- for busy and congestion tones should be the same as that recom-
- mended for analogue generated tones (see Annex A).
-
-
- 7 Special information tone
-
-
- 7.1 The special information tone is provided for all cases in
- which neither the busy nor the congestion tone can give the
- required information to the calling subscriber in the case of call
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- failure. There are three ways in which it may be used:
-
-
- a) when in special cases no provision is made for
- recourse either to a recorded announcement or to an operator, the
- equipment at the point which the calls have reached must:
-
- 1) either | connect the special information tone
- to the call,
-
- 2) or | preferably, if technically available, send
- an appropriate backward signal such that connection to the special
- information tone will be made by equipment which is nearer to the
- caller;
-
- b) when the call is connected to a recorded voice
- machine; the tone is then given during the silent intervals between
- transmissions of the announcement;
-
- c) under arrangements made at manual positions
- serving lines which have been abnormally routed so that by operat-
- ing a key the operators may send the special information signal
- when, for example, the calling subscriber fails to understand the
- operator.
-
- When the special information tone is applied with or without a
- recorded announcement, it should be recognized that customers may
- refer to an operator if they fail to understand the meaning of the
- recorded announcement and/or the special information tone.
-
- 7.2 The special information tone has a tone period theoreti-
- cally equal in length to the silent period.
-
- Tone period - The tone period consists of three successive
- tone signals, each lasting for 330 _ 70 milli seconds. Between
- these tone signals there may be a gap of up to 30 milliseconds.
-
- Silent period - This lasts for 1000 _ 250 milliseconds.
-
- 7.3 The frequencies used for the three tone signals are:
- 950 _ 50 Hz; 1400 _ 50 Hz; 1800 _ 50 Hz, sent in that order.
-
-
- 8 Warning tone to indicate that a conversation is being
- recorded
-
-
- Where a conversation is being recorded at a subscriber's sta-
- tion, it is recommended that the Administration require the use of
- a warning tone to indicate that the conversation is being recorded.
- When such a tone is applied, it is recommended that:
-
- a) it consists of a 350-500 ms pulse every 15 _ 3
- seconds of recording time, and
-
- b) the frequency of the tone should be 1400
- Hz _ 1.5%.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 9 Payphone recognition tone
-
-
- 9.1 Where Administrations see the necessity of application of
- a payphone recognition tone in order to allow operators to recog-
- nize that a call originates at a payphone station or that the
- called number belongs to a payphone station it is recommended to
- use a payphone recognition tone.
-
-
- The application of the tone will depend on the operational
- requirements of individual Administrations, e.g. in some cases the
- tone will only be required on an incoming call to the payphone,
- whilst in others there may be a requirement for the tone to be
- present on originating calls and throughout the period of the call.
-
- 9.2 The tone is a combination of two frequencies f1and f2in
- the range:
-
-
- f1: 1100-1750 Hz
-
- f2: 750-1450 Hz
-
- with the ratio: f1/f2= 1.2 to 1.5 and with a cadence (frequency
- sequence) as follows:
-
- f1on 200 ms, silence 200 ms, f2on 200 ms, silence 2 s (one
- cycle is therefore 2.6. s).
-
-
-
- 9.3 Duration and level
-
-
- 9.3.1 A principal purpose of the payphone recognition tone in
- international telephony is to identify a called station as a pay-
- phone where the possibility exists of attempted fraud on a collect
- call. For this purpose the tone must be produced as soon as a pay-
- phone answers a call, it must be clearly audible to an operator,
- and it must cease before it can seriously interfere with conversa-
- tion.
-
-
- When the tone is used on an incoming call to a payphone, it
- should have, in addition to those characteristics defined in S 9.2,
- a duration of 5 complete cycles (13 s).
-
- 9.3.2 If the tone is used to identify payphones which are ori-
- ginating calls, its duration is not specified.
-
-
- 9.3.3 The specification in S 9.3.1 applies only to the first
- five cycles of the tone when the payphone is the receiving station.
-
- For use throughout a call or during conversation, the level
- and duration of the tone have to meet two contradictory
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- requirements:
-
- - the public exchange operator should be able to
- detect and recognize the tone in the presence of the highest
- expected levels of speech;
-
- - the tone should not interfere unduly with normal
- conversation.
-
- Experience of customer reaction to the tone requires that the
- time during which the tone is applied should be as short as possi-
- ble, subject to operational requirements. Similarly the level of
- the tone should be as low as possible and significantly lower than
- the recommended levels for other tones (e.g. -20 dBm at the pay-
- phone output). The duration of the tone and the level at which it
- is applied are interdependent factors, the shorter the duration the
- higher the level and vice versa. (Further studies on the recom-
- mended levels and duration will be carried out.)
-
-
- 10 Call waiting tone
-
-
- 10.1 The call waiting tone is used to advise a subscriber who
- is engaged on a call that another subscriber is attempting to call.
-
-
- 10.2 The tone is intended to be sufficiently alerting to
- succeed in its purpose without interfering with existing conversa-
- tion.
-
- 10.3 The recommended | specification of the tone is one or
- more cycles defined by a frequency f in the range:
-
- f : 400 to 450 Hz
-
- and with a cadence (frequency sequence) as follows:
-
- a) f on 300 to 500 ms, silence 8 to 10s; ( f = 300
- ms is preferable to the longer tone since the ongoing conversation
- would be interrupted for a briefer interval), or
-
- b) f on 100 to 200 ms, silence 100 to 200 ms, f on
- 100 to 200 ms (the total to be no more than 500 ms); 8 to 10 s
- silence.
-
- Other tones may be acceptable
-
- 10.4 The second and subsequent cycles may be at a lower level
- than the initial tone.
-
-
- 10.5 Where the tone continues for more than one cycle, it
- should preferably cease when it is no longer possible to accept the
- waiting call.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 11 Caller waiting tone
-
-
- 11.1 This tone advises a caller that a called station, though
- busy, has a call waiting service active.
-
-
- 11.2 It is intended that, if this tone is not correctly inter-
- preted by subscribers, it be misinterpreted as the ringing tone.
-
- 11.3 To dissuade a caller from waiting indefinitely, the tone
- may cease 30 seconds after it starts and may be replaced by busy
- tone, or an Administration may decide to disconnect the calling
- station.
-
-
- 11.4 The caller waiting tone consists of a ringing tone fol-
- lowed after a silent interval of 0 to 200 ms, by one of the follow-
- ing:
-
- (a) the tone defined in S 10.3 a),
-
- (b) the pair of tones defined in S 10.3 b), or
-
- (c) another call waiting tone in use by an Adminis-
- tration, provided that it can be appended to each sounded part of
- the ringing tone.
-
- 11.5 The caller waiting tone, as defined in S 11.4, should be
- distinguishably different from the ringing tone when directly com-
- pared with it.
-
-
-
- 12 Machine recognition of tones
-
-
- The CCITT appreciates the value of machine recognition of
- tones for the purpose of service observations, maintenance, testing
- or for the collection of statistics where equivalent electrical
- signals do not exist. However, the CCITT considered, at Mar del
- Plata in 1968, that such machine recognition should not be a sub-
- stitute for electrical signals. Where machine recognition of audi-
- ble tones is to be introduced, the tone frequencies and cadences
- must be within close limits of precision.
-
- For dial tone, ringing tone, busy and congestion tones a work-
- ing frequency tolerance of _ | % should be met.
-
- Note - The figure of 1% is taken as a compromise out of
- several national specifications which vary between _ | .5% and _ |
- .5%. (See also Supplement No. 3 in Fascicle II.2.)
- ANNEX A
- (to Recommendation Q.35)
- _________________________
- The specification of this time needs further study.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Digital generation of tones
-
-
- The practice of several Administrations and equipment
- designers for digital generation of tones is known to deviate
- largely:
-
-
- - in the frequency chosen within the recommended
- range;
-
- - in the power level which varies with the national
- application;
-
- - in the mechanism of generation of tones and sig-
- nal frequencies where, in part, the same equipment is used.
-
- Therefore, it was found difficult to standardize on a fixed
- number of samples with a coded bit-stream, which represents one
- frequency with one distinct power level.
-
- On the other hand there is no necessity for standardizing
- digital generated tones in a more stringent way than analogue gen-
- erated tones for the following reasons:
-
- - It is to the interest of Administrations that
- subscribers should not be confused by hearing different tones for
- the same purpose within their national networks. Consequently the
- practice already in use for analogue generated tones should be
- maintained for reasons associated with the human factor.
-
- - The advantages that can be achieved by standar-
- dizing the code words for the tones in order to allow automatic
- recognition of tones by monitoring the bit stream seem to be so
- small that they do not justify a stringent restriction on all pos-
- sible methods for digital generation of any frequency allocated
- with any level.
-
- - For a long period of time a mixture of analogue
- and digital networks will exist. Thus, machine recognition of tones
- will have to be performed also with analogue receivers.
-
- However, when Administrations have full freedom to make new
- decisions about tones in future networks, especially with respect
- to an all-digital network, they may consider a preferred solution
- for the digital generation of dial tone, busy tone, congestion tone
- and ringing tone having a uniform frequency of 425 Hz, as recom-
- mended by CCITT.
-
- ANNEX B
- (to Recommendation Q.35)
-
- Examples for
- limitation of spurious components of the dial
- tone
-
- with respect to interference with the frequencies
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- recommended
- for
- pushbutton telephone sets in Recommendation Q.23
-
- B.1 Method A | (used by ATT)
-
-
- The total distortion power should be at least 33 dB less than
- the dial tone power, and the distortion power in any 100 Hz band
- above 500 Hz should be at least 40 dB less than the dial tone
- power.
-
-
- B.2 Method B | (used by the Federal Republic of Germany)
-
-
- In the frequency range from 500 to 2000 Hz [i.e. the range of
- multifrequency pushbutton (MFPB) frequencies] the distortion power
- in any 100 Hz band should be at least 40 dB below the dial tone
- power. In addition, in the frequency range above 2000 Hz up to
- 4000 Hz the total distortion power should be at least 25 dB below
- the dial tone power.
-
-
- References
-
-
- [1] Various tones used in national networks , Vol. II,
- Supplement No. 2.
-
- [2] CCITT Recommendation Application of tones and recorded
- announcements in telephone services , Vol. II, Rec. E.182.
-
- [3] CCITT Recommendation Customer recognition of foreing
- tones , Vol. II, Rec. E.181.
-
- [4] CCITT Recommendation Transmission characteristics at
- 2-wire analogue interfaces of a digital exchange , Vol. VI,
- fascicle VI.5, Rec. Q.552.
-
-
-
- Recommendation Q.36
-
-
- CUSTOMER RECOGNITION OF FOREIGN TONES
-
-
-
-
- 1 In order to facilitate recognition of foreign ringing and
- busy tones by a subscriber dialling an automatic international
- call, the information given to subscribers should:
-
- _________________________
- This Recommendation is also included in the Series E
- Recommendations under the number E.181.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 1) emphasize that a slow repetition rate of the
- tone means "ringing" whereas a rapid repetition rate means "busy";
-
- 2) indicate that in some countries the ringing tone
- may be heard as a sequence of two short tones, pause, two more
- short tones, pause, and so on.
-
- In addition, it may be useful for the purpose of educating
- subscribers:
-
- - to provide auditory samples of such tones by
- tape recording or other means, or
-
- - to include detailed descriptions of tones in
- directories.
-
-
-
-
- 2 Modern international signalling systems are capable of
- exchanging signals corresponding to indications normally given to
- subscribers by means of audible tones (busy, congestion,
- ringing, etc.). Administrations are encouraged to arrange their
- networks so that these information signals can be sent between
- countries in order that they can be recognized and converted into
- tones or announcements as near to the calling subscriber as practi-
- cal. This procedure could significantly reduce the language prob-
- lems arising from the growing use of recorded announcements.
-
-
- Note - This Recommendation is complementary to
- Recommendation E.180 on the standardization of tones in the inter-
- national telephone network. Whilst standardization is of primary
- importance, telephone users need information to assist them in
- recognizing foreign tones until such time as standardization is
- complete.
-
- This is the purpose of S 1 of the present Recommendation
- which, as extensive human factor experiments show, should greatly
- reduce subscriber confusion.
-
- The measure mentioned in S 2 does not eliminate the need for
- tone standardization as well, but can reduce customer difficulties
- in cases where standardization may be impractical for a long period
- but sophisticated exchanges arrangements are available.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- SECTION 6
-
- GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS FOR INTERNATIONAL TELEPHONE
-
- CONNECTIONS AND INTERNATIONAL TELEPHONE CIRCUITS
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 6.0 General
-
-
-
- Recommendation Q.40
-
-
- THE TRANSMISSION PLAN
-
-
-
-
- 1 Principles
-
-
- The transmission plan of the CCITT established in 1964 was
- drawn up with the object of making use, in the international ser-
- vice, of the advantages offered by 4-wire switching. It is referred
- to in the Recommendations appearing in Part I, Section 1 of the
- Series G Recommendations. However, the recommendations in the plan
- are to be considered as met if the use of technical means other
- than those described below gives an equivalent performance at the
- international exchange.
-
- Recommendations G.121 [1] and G.122 [2] describe the condi-
- tions to be fulfilled by a national network for this transmission
- plan to be put into effect.
-
- Note 1 - From the point of view of the transmission plan, no
- distinction is made between intercontinental circuits and other
- international circuits.
-
- Note 2 - Short trans-frontier circuits are not covered by
- this plan and should be the subject of agreement between the
- Administrations concerned.
-
-
-
-
-
- 2 Definition of the constituent parts of a connection
-
-
-
- 2.1 The international chain of circuits and the national
- systems
-
-
- A complete international telephone connection consists of
- three parts, as shown in Figure 1/Q.40. The division between these
- parts is determined by the virtual analogue switching points in the
- _________________________
- This Recommendation is an extract of
- Recommendation G.101 [3]. The suspensive points show
- where a passage in Recommendation G.101 has not been
- reproduced under Q.40.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- originating/terminating international switching centres (ISCs).
- These are theoretical points with specified relative levels (see
- Figure 2/Q.40 and SS 5.1 and 5.2 of Recommendation G.101).
-
-
-
-
- The three parts of the connection are:
-
- - Two national systems, one at each end. These may
- comprise one or more 4-wire national trunk circuits with 4-wire
- interconnection, as well as circuits with 2-wire connection up to
- the local exchanges and the subscribers sets with their subscriber
- lines.
-
- - An international chain made up of one or more
- 4-wire international circuits. These are interconnected on a 4-wire
- basis in the international centres which provide for transit
- traffic and are also connected on a 4-wire basis to national sys-
- tems in the international centres.
-
- - An international 4-wire circuit is delimited by
- its virtual analogue switching points in an international switching
- centre.
-
- Note 1 - In principle the choice of values of the relative
- levels at the virtual analogue switching points on the side of a
- national system is a national matter. In practice, several coun-
- tries have chosen -3.5 dBr for receiving as well as for sending.
- These are theoretical values; they need not actually occur at any
- specific equipment item; however they serve to determine the rela-
- tive levels at other points in the national network. If, for
- instance, the loss "t -b " or "a -t " is 3.5 dB (as is the case in
- several countries, see Table A-1/G.121), then it follows that the
- relative levels at point t are 0 dBr (input) and -7 dBr (output).
-
- Note 2 - The virtual analogue switching points may not be the
- same as the points at which the circuit terminates physically in
- the switching equipment. These latter points are known as the cir-
- cuit terminals ; the exact position of these terminals is decided
- in each case by the Administration concerned.
-
-
- FIGURE 1/Q.40 p.
-
-
-
- 2.2 National extension circuits: 4-wire chain
-
-
- When the maximum distance between an international exchange
- and a subscriber who can be reached from it does not exceed about
- 1000 km or, exceptionally, 1500 km, the country concerned is con-
- sidered as of average size. In such countries, in most cases, not
- more than three national circuits are interconnected on a 4-wire
- basis between each other and to international circuits. These cir-
- cuits should comply with the Recommendations of Subsection 1.2 [4]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- of Volume III, Fascicle III.1 (Recs. G.120, G.121, G.122, G.123
- and G.125).
-
- In a large country, a fourth and possibly a fifth national
- circuit may be included in the 4-wire chain, provided it has the
- nominal transmission loss and the characteristics recommended for
- international circuits used in a 4-wire chain (see
- Recommendation G.141, S 1, S 4 of this Recommendation and the
- Recommendations in Subsection 1.5 of Volume III, Fascicle III.1,
- Recs. G.151 [5], G.152 [6] and G.153 [7]).
-
- Note - The abbreviation "a 4-wire chain " (see Figure 3/Q.40)
- signifies the chain composed of the international chain and the
- national extension circuits connected to it, either by 4-wire
- switching or by some equivalent procedure (as understood in S 1
- above).
-
-
-
- FIGURE 2/Q.40, p.
-
-
-
-
-
- Figure 3/Q.40 p.
-
-
-
- 3 Number of circuits in a connection
-
-
-
- 3.1 National circuits
-
-
- It seems reasonable to assume that in most countries any local
- exchange
- | can be connected to the international network by means of a
- chain of four (or less) national circuits. Five national circuits
- may be needed in some countries, but it is unlikely that any coun-
- try may need to use more than five circuits. Hence the CCITT has
- reached the conclusion that four circuits is a representative fig-
- ure to assume for the great majority of international connections.
-
- In most modern national networks, the four circuits will prob-
- ably include three 4-wire amplified circuits (usually set up on FDM
- carrier systems) and one 2-wire circuit, probably unamplified. How-
- ever, cases in which local exchanges are reached by four amplified
- circuits, among them usually at least one PCM circuit, are becoming
- more and more frequent. All these circuits may be 4-wire circuits.
-
-
-
- 3.2 International circuits
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- According to the International Telephone Routing Plan
- (Recommendation E.171), the number of international circuits is
- restricted to four.
-
-
- 3.3 Hypothetical reference connections
-
-
- (See Recommendation G.103 [9].)
-
-
-
-
-
- References
-
-
- [1] CCITT Recommendation Loudness ratings (LRs) of national
- systems , Vol. III, Rec. G.121.
-
- [2] CCITT Recommendation Influence of national systems on
- stability, talker echo, and listener echo in international connec-
- tions , Vol. III, Rec. G.122.
-
-
- [3] CCITT Recommendation The transmission plan , Vol. III,
- Rec. G.101.
-
- [4] CCITT Recommendations G.120, G.121, G.122, G.123 and
- G.124; Subsection 1.2: General characteristics of national systems
- forming part of international connections of Volume III.
-
- [5] CCITT Recommendation General performance objectives
- applicable to all modern international circuits and national exten-
- sion circuits , Vol. III, Rec. G.151.
-
- [6] CCITT Recommendation Characteristics appropriate to
- long-distance circuits of a length not exceeding 2500 km ,
- Vol. III, Rec. G.152.
-
- [7] CCITT Recommendation Characteristics appropriate to
- international circuits more than 2500 km in length , Vol. III,
- Rec. G.153.
-
- [8] CCITT Recommendation Pulse code modulation (PCM) of
- voice frequencies , Vol. III, Rec. G.711.
-
- [9] CCITT Recommendation Hypothetical reference connections
- , Vol. III, Rec. G.103.
-
- 6.1 General recommendations on the transmission quality for
- an entire international telephone connection
-
-
-
- Recommendation Q.41
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- MEAN ONE-WAY PROPAGATION TIME
-
-
-
-
- The times in this Recommendation are the means of the propaga-
- tion times in the two directions of transmission in a connection.
- When opposite directions of transmission are provided by different
- media (e.g. a satellite channel in one direction and a terrestrial
- channel in the other) the two times contributing to the mean may
- differ considerably.
-
-
-
- 1 Limits for a connection
-
-
- It is necessary in an international telephone connection to
- limit the propagation time between two subscribers. As the propaga-
- tion time is increased, subscriber difficulties increase, and the
- rate of increase of difficulty rises, see b) below. Relevant evi-
- dence is given in the bibliography of Recommendation G.114 [1].
-
- As a network performance objective, CCITT therefore recommends
- the following limitations on mean one-way propagation times when
- echo sources exist and appropriate echo control devices, such as
- echo suppressors and echo cancellers, are used:
-
- a) 0 to 150 ms, acceptable.
-
- Note - Echo suppressors specified in Reference [2] may be
- used for delays not exceeding 50 ms (see Reference [3]).
-
- b) 150 to 400 ms, acceptable, provided that
- increasing care is exercised on connections as the mean one-way
- propagation time exceeds about 300 ms, and provided that echo con-
- trol devices, such as echo suppressors and echo cancellers,
- designed for long delay circuits are used.
-
- c) Above 400 ms, unacceptable. Connections with
- these delays should not be used except under the most exceptional
- circumstances.
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 2 Values for circuits
-
-
- _________________________
- This Recommendation is an extract of
- Recommendation G.114 [1]. The suspensive points show
- where a passage in Recommendation G.114 has not been
- reproduced under Q.41.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- In the establishment of the general interconnection plan
- within the limits in S 1 the one-way propagation time of both the
- national extension circuits and the international circuits must be
- taken into account. The propagation time of circuits and connec-
- tions is the aggregate of several components; e.g. group delay in
- cables and in filters encountered in FDM modems of different types.
- Digital transmission and switching also contribute delays. The con-
- ventional planning values given in S 2.1 may be used to estimate
- the total propagation time of specified assemblies which may form
- circuits or connections.
-
-
- 2.1 Conventional planning values of propagation time
-
-
- Provisionally, the conventional planning values of propagation
- time in Table 1/Q.41 may be used.
-
-
- 2.2 National extension circuits
-
-
- The main arteries of the national network should consist of
- high-velocity propagation lines. In these conditions, the propaga-
- tion time between the international centre and the subscriber
- farthest away from it in the national network will probably not
- exceed:
-
- a) In purely analogue networks
-
- 12 + (0.004 x distance in kilometres) ms.
-
-
- Here the factor 0.004 is based on the assumption that
- national trunk circuits will be routed over high-velocity plant
- (250 km/ms). The 12 ms constant term makes allowance for terminal
- equipment and for the probable presence in the national network of
- a certain quantity of loaded cables (e.g. three pairs of channel
- translating equipments plus about 160 km of H 88/36 loaded cables).
- For an average-sized country (see Figure 2/G.103) the one-way pro-
- pagation time will be less than 18 ms.
-
- b) In mixed analogue/digital networks the propaga-
- tion time can generally be estimated by the equation given for
- purely analogue networks. However, under certain unfavourable con-
- ditions increased delay may occur compared with the purely analogue
- case. This occurs in particular when digital exchanges are con-
- nected with analogue transmission systems through PCM/FDM equip-
- ments in tandem, or transmultiplexers. With the growing degree of
- digitisation the propagation time will gradually approach the con-
- dition of purely digital networks.
-
- c) In purely digital networks between exchanges
- (e.g. an IDN) the propagation time as defined above will probably
- not exceed:
-
- 3 + (0.004 x distance in kilometres) ms.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- The 3 ms constant term makes allowance for one PCM coder or
- decoder and five digitally switched exchanges.
-
- Note - The value 0.004 is a mean value for coaxial cable
- systems and radio-relay systems; for optical fibre systems 0.005 is
- to be used.
-
- d) In purely digital networks between subscribers
- (e.g. an ISDN) the delay of c) above has to be increased by up to
- 3.6 ms if burst-mode (time compression multiplexing) transmission
- is used on 2-W local subscriber lines.
-
-
- 2.3 International circuits
-
-
- International circuits will use high-velocity transmission
- systems, e.g. terrestrial cable or radio-relay systems, submarine
- systems or satellite systems. The planning values of S 2.1 may be
- used.
-
- The magnitude of the mean one-way propagation time for cir-
- cuits on high altitude communication satellite systems makes it
- desirable to impose some routing restrictions on their use. Details
- of these restrictions are given in Recommendation Q.13. (See also
- Annex A to Recommendation G.114.)
-
-
-
-
- H.T. [T1.41]
- TABLE 1/Q.41
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- _________________________
- For short nearby links, telecommunications cables
- operated at voice frequencies may also be used in the
- conditions set out in the introduction to
- Sub-section 5.4 of Fascicle III.2.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- _______________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Transmission medium {
- Contribution to one-way
- propagation time
- } Remarks
- _______________________________________________________________________________________________________
- {
- Terrestrial coaxial cable or radio relay system;
- FDM and digital transmission
- } 4 us/km {
- Allows for delay in repeaters and regenerators
- }
- _______________________________________________________________________________________________________
- {
- Optical fibre cable system;
- digital transmission
- } 5 us/km {
- Allows for delay in repeaters and regenerators
- }
- _______________________________________________________________________________________________________
- {
- Submarine coaxial cable system
- } 6 us/km
- _______________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Satellite system
- {
- - 14 | 00 km altitude
- - 36 | 00 km altitude
- } 110 ms 260 ms Between earth stations only
- _______________________________________________________________________________________________________
- {
- FDM channel modulator or demodulator
- } 0.75 ms | ua)
- Half the sum of propagation times in both directions of
- transmission
- }
- _______________________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- a) These values allow for group-delay distortion around frequencies
- of peak speech energy and for delay of intermediate higher order
- multiplex and through-connecting equipment.
-
- b) This value refers to FDM equipments designed to be used with a
- compandor and special filters.
-
- c) For satellite digital communications where the transmultiplexer
- is located at the earth station, this value may be increased to
- 3.3 ms.
-
- d) These are mean values; depending on traffic loading, higher
- values can be encountered, e.g. 0.75 ms (1.950 ms, 1.350 ms or
- 1.250 ms respectively with 0.95 probability of not exceeding). (For
- details see Recommendation Q.551).
-
- e) Echo cancellers, when placed in service, will add a one-way pro-
- pagation time of up to 1 ms in the send path of each echo
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- canceller. This delay excludes the delay through any codec in the
- echo canceller. No significant delay should be incurred in the
- receive path of the echo canceller.
- } 0.5 ms | ub) PCM coder or decoder 0.3 ms | ua)
- PCM/ADPCM/PCM transcoding 0.5 ms | ua) Transmulti-
- plexer 1.5 ms | uc)
- { Digital transit exchange, digital-digital
- } 0.45 ms | ud)
- { Digital local exchange, analogue-analogue
- } 1.5 ms | ud)
- { Digital local exchange, analogue subscriber line-digital junc-
- tion
- } 0.975 ms | ud)
- { Digital local exchange, digital subscriber line-digital junction
- } 0.825 ms | ud) Echo cancellers 1 | ms | ue) _
-
- Tableau 1/Q.41 [T1.41] p. (a traiter comme tableau MEP)
-
-
-
-
-
- References
-
-
- [1] CCITT Recommendation Mean one-way propagation time ,
- Vol. III, Rec. G.114.
-
- [2] CCITT Recommendation Definitions relating to echo
- suppressors and characteristics of a far-end operated, differen-
- tial, half-echo suppressor , Blue Book, Vol. III, Rec. G.161, ITU,
- Geneva, 1965.
-
- [3] CCITT Recommendation Stability and echo , Vol. III,
- Rec. G.131, S 2.2.
-
- 6.2 General characteristics of national systems forming part
- of international connections
-
-
- (See Recommendations G.120 to G.125, Fascicle III.1.)
-
- 6.3 General characteristics of the "4-wire chain" formed by
- the international circuits and national extension circuits
-
-
- (Overall characteristics for the 4-wire chain are
- defined in Recommendation Q.40, S 2.)
-
-
- Recommendation Q.42
-
-
-
-
-
- STABILITY AND ECHO (ECHO SUPPRESSORS)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- (See Recommendation G.131 in Fascicle III.1 and
- Recommendation Q.115)
-
-
-
- 6.4 General characteristics of the 4-wire chain of interna-
- tional circuits; international transit
-
-
-
- Recommendation Q.43
-
-
- TRANSMISSION LOSSES, RELATIVE LEVELS
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 5.3 Definitions
-
-
-
- 5.3.1 transmission reference point
-
-
- F: point de reference pour la transmission
-
- S: punto de referencia para la transmision
-
- A hypothetical point used as the zero relative level point in
- the computation of nominal relative levels. At those points in a
- telephone circuit the nominal mean power level (-15 dBm) defined in
- the Recommendation G.223 [2] shall be applied when checking
- whether the transmission system conforms to the noise objectives
- defined in Recommendation G.222 [3].
-
- Note - For certain systems, e.g. submarine cable systems
- (Recommendation G.371 [4]), other values apply.
-
- Such a point exists at the sending end of each channel of a
- 4-wire switched circuit preceding the virtual switching point; on
- an international circuit it is defined as having a signal level of
- +3.5 dB above that of the virtual switching point.
-
- In frequency division multiplex equipment, a hypothetical
- point of flat zero relative level (i.e. where all channels have the
- same relative level) is defined as a point where the multiplex sig-
- nal, as far as the effect of intermodulation is concerned,
- _________________________
- This Recommendation is an extract of Recommendation
- G.101 [1]. The suspensive points show where a passage
- in Recommendation G.101 has not been reproduced
- under Q.43.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- can be represented by a uniform spectrum random noise signal
- with a mean power level as defined in the Recommendation cited
- in [5]. The nominal mean power level in each telephone channel is
- -15 dBm as defined in the Recommendation cited in [2].
-
-
- 5.3.2 relative (power) level
-
-
- F: niveau relatif de puissance
-
- S: nivel relativo (de potencia)
-
-
- 5.3.2.1 Basic significance of relative level in FDM systems
-
-
- The relative level at a point in a transmission system charac-
- terizes the signal power handling capacity at this point with
- respect to the conventional power level at a zero relative level
- point
-
- If, for example, at a particular point in an FDM system
- designed for a large number of channels the mean power handling
- capacity per telephone channel corresponds to an absolute power
- level of S dBm, the relative level associated with this point is
- (S + 15) dBr. In particular, at a 0 dBr point, the conventional
- mean power level referred to one telephone channel is -15 dBm.
-
-
- 5.3.2.2 Definition of relative level, generally applicable
- to all systems
-
-
- The relative level at a point on a circuit is given by the
- expression 10 log1\d0(P /P0) dBr, where P represents the power of a
- sinusoidal test signal at the point concerned and P0to the power of
- that signal at the transmission reference point. This is numeri-
- cally equal to the composite gain (definition in Yellow Book ,
- Fascicle X.1) between the transmission reference point and the
- point concerned, for a nominal frequency of 1000 Hz. For example,
- if a reference signal of 0 dBm at 1000 Hz is injected at the
- transmission reference point, the level at a point of x dBr will
- be x dBm (apparent power Px = 10 x/10mW). In addition, application
- of a digital reference sequence (DRS, S 5.3.3) will give a level of
- x dBm at a point of x dBr. The voltage of 0 dBm0 tone at any
- voiceband frequency at a point of x dBr is given by the expres-
- sion:
-
- V =
- \|
- ____________________________________________
- 10 fIx /10 x 1 W x 10 (em3 |
- |fIZ RfR|
- | 1000 volts
-
- _________________________
- Taking into account such aspects as (basic) noise, in-
- termodulation noise, peak power, etc. (see
- Recommendation G.223).
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- where |
- |fIZ RfR|
- | 1000 is the modulus of the nominal impedance of
- the point at a nominal frequency of 1000 Hz.
-
-
- Note 1 - The nominal reference frequency of 1000 Hz is in
- accordance with Recommendation G.712, S 16. For existing (analogue)
- transmission systems, one may continue to use a reference frequency
- of 800 Hz.
-
- Note 2 - The relative levels at particular points in a
- transmission system (e.g. input and output of distribution frames
- or of equipment like channel translators) are fixed by convention,
- usually by agreement between manufacturers and users.
-
- The Recommendations of the CCITT are elaborated in such a way that
- the absolute power level of any testing signal to be applied at the
- input of a particular transmission system, to check whether it con-
- forms to these recommendations, is clearly defined as soon as the
- relative level at this point is fixed.
-
- Note 3 - The impedance ZRmay be resistive or complex; in the
- latter case the power Pxis an apparent power.
-
- Note 4 - It is assumed that between the virtual analogue
- switching points of a circuit, established over international
- transmission systems, only points of equal relative level are
- interconnected in those systems, so that the transmission loss of
- the circuit will be equal to the difference in relative levels at
- the virtual analogue switching points (see S 5.2 of this Recommen-
- dation).
-
-
- 5.3.2.3 Relation between corrected send reference
- equivalents, loudness ratings and relative levels
-
-
- The relationship between the 0 dBr point and the level of
- Tm\da\dxin PCM encoding/decoding processes standardized by the
- CCITT is set forth in Recommendation G.711 [6]. In particular, if
- the minimum nominal corrected send reference equivalent (CSRE) of
- local systems referred to a point of 0 dBr of a PCM encoder is not
- less than 3.5 dB, or the minimum nominal send loudness rating (SLR)
- under the same conditions is not less than -1.5 dB, and the value
- of Tm\da\dxof the process is set at +3 dBm0 (more accurately
- 3.14 dBm0 for A-law and 3.17 for u-law), then in accordance with
- S 3 of Recommendation G.121 [7], the peak power of the speech will
- be suitably controlled.
-
-
-
- 5.3.2.4 Compatibility of relative levels of analogue and
- digital systems
-
-
- When the signal load is controlled as outlined in S 5.3.2.3,
- points of equal relative levels of FDM and PCM circuits may be
- directly connected together and each will respect the other's
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- design criteria. This is of particular importance when points in
- the two multiplex hierarchies are connected together by means of
- transmultiplexers, codecs or modems.
-
-
- 5.3.2.5 Determination of relative level
-
-
- Figure 1/Q.43 illustrates the principle of how the relative
- level at the input and output analogue points of a "real" codec can
- be determined.
-
-
- Figure 1/Q.43, p.
-
-
- When using Figure 1/Q.43 to determine the relative levels of a
- "real" codec with non-resistive impedances at the analogue input
- and output ports, the following precautions must be observed:
-
- i) the test frequency should be 1000 Hz with a
- suitable offset;
-
- ii) the power at points s and r is expressed as
- apparent power , i.e.:
-
- Apparent power level = 10 log
- 10
-
- |
- |Modulus of nominal impedance at 1000~Hz)(1 W)
- _____________________________________________|
- |
- dBm
-
-
-
-
- iii) point r is terminated with the nominal design
- impedance of the decoder to avoid significant impedance mismatch
- errors.
-
- Note - Precautions ii), iii) above are, of course equally
- applicable to the case of resistive input and output impedances and
- would generally be observed by conventional test procedures. Stan-
- dardizing the reference frequency as in i) above is, however,
- essential for complex impedances because of the variation of nomi-
- nal impedance with the test frequency.
-
-
-
- 5.3.2.6 Relative level of a point in a digital link
-
-
- The relative level to be associated with a point in a digital
- path carrying a digital bit stream generated by a coder lined-up in
- accordance with the principles of S 5.3.2.3 above is determined by
- the value of the digital loss or gain between the output of the
- coder and the point considered. If there is no such loss or gain
- the relative level at the point considered is, by convention, said
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- to be 0 dBr.
-
- The equivalent absolute power level of a digital link may be
- established as in Figure 2/Q.43 by using an ideal decoder by com-
- paring the power at the output of the ideal decoder with that at
- the analogue zero relative level point originating the digital sig-
- nal.
-
-
-
- Figure 2/Q.43, p.
-
-
-
- 5.3.3 PCM digital reference sequence (DRS)
-
-
- F: sequence numerique de reference MIC
-
- S: secuencia de referencia digital MIC (SRD)
-
- 5.3.3.1 A PCM digital reference sequence is one of the set of
- possible PCM code sequences that, when decoded by an ideal decoder,
- produces an analogue sinusoidal signal at the agreed test reference
- frequency (i.e. a nominal 800 or 1000 Hz signal suitably offset)
- at a level of 0 dBm0.
-
- Conversely, an analogue sinusoidal signal at 0 dBm0 at the
- test reference frequency applied to the input of an ideal coder
- will generate a PCM digital reference sequence.
-
- Some particular PCM digital reference sequences are defined in
- Recommendation G.711 [6] in respect to A-law and u-law codecs.
-
-
- 5.3.3.2 In studying circuits and connections in mixed
- analogue/digital networks, use of the digital reference sequence
- can be helpful. For example, Figure 3/Q.43 shows the various level
- relationships that one obtains (conceptually) on a Type 2 interna-
- tional circuit where one end terminates at a digital exchange and
- the other end at an analogue exchange. In the example of
- Figure 3/Q.43, the analogue portion is assumed to require a loss of
- 0.5 dB and that provision for this loss is made by introducing a
- 1.0 dB pad (0.5 dB for each direction of transmission) in the
- receive direction at the analogue exchange. This has been deli-
- berately chosen to illustrate the utility of the concept of a digi-
- tal reference sequence.
-
- Figure 3/Q.43 gives an example where all the analogue loss is
- introduced in the output direction at the analogue exchange. In
- this case the relative levels at the various codecs can be derived
- from either the DRS or the transmission reference point at the
- input of the international circuit with no ambiguity.
-
- If, however, in Figure 3/Q.43 the analogue circuit section is
- lined up so as to give an overall loss in the direction b1-a2, care
- must be taken in the use of the DRS. In this case the 0 dBm0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- sinusoidal reference signal and DRS may result in different levels
- at the point a2. Account should be taken of this effect when
- designing lining-up procedures for mixed analogue/digital circuits.
-
- As a general principle, the relative levels on a mixed
- analogue/digital circuit should be referred to the transmission
- reference point at the input of the circuit.
-
-
- 5.3.4 circuit test access point
-
-
- The CCITT has defined circuit test access points as being
- "4-wire test-access points so located that as much as possible of
- the international circuit is included between corresponding pairs
- of these access points at the two centres concerned". These points,
- and their relative
-
-
- level (with reference to the transmission reference point),
- are determined in each case by the Administration concerned. They
- are used in practice as points of known relative level to which
- other transmission measurements will be related. In other words,
- for measurement and lining-up purposes, the relative level at the
- appropriate circuit test access point is the relative level with
- respect to which other levels are adjusted.
-
-
- 5.3.5 Measurement frequency
-
-
- For all international circuits 800 Hz is the recommended fre-
- quency for single-frequency maintenance measurements between the
- Administrations concerned, 1000 Hz may be used for such measure-
- ments.
-
- A frequency of 1000 Hz is in fact now widely used for
- single-frequency measurements on some international circuits.
-
- Multifrequency measurements made to determine the
- loss/frequency characteristic will include a measurement at 800 Hz
- and the frequency of the reference measurement signal for such
- characteristics can still be 800 Hz.
-
- Note 1 - Definitions of SS 5.3.1 and 5.3.2 are used in the
- work of Study Group XII. Definitions of SS 5.3.4 and 5.3.5, taken
- from Recommendations M.565 [10] and M.580 [11], are included for
- information.
-
- Note 2 - In order to take account of PCM circuits and circuit
- sections, the nominal frequencies 800 Hz and 1000 Hz are in fact
- offset by appropriate amounts to avoid interaction with the sam-
- pling frequency. Details can be found in Supplement No. 3.5 to
- Volume IV [12].
-
-
- Figure 3/Q.43, p.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 5.4 Interconnection of international circuits in a transit
- centre
-
-
- In a transit centre, the virtual analogue switching points of
- the two international circuits to be interconnected are considered
- to be connected together directly without any additional loss or
- gain. In this way a chain of international circuits has a nominal
- transmission loss in transit equal to the sum of the individual
- circuit losses.
-
-
-
- References
-
-
- [1] CCITT Recommendation The transmission plan , Vol. III,
- Rec. G.101.
-
- [2] CCITT Recommendation Assumptions for the calculation of
- noise on hypothetical reference circuits for telephony , Vol. III,
- Rec. G.223, S 1.
-
- [3] CCITT Recommendation Noise objectives for design of
- carrier-transmission systems of 2500 km , Vol. III, Rec. G.222.
-
- [4] CCITT Recommendation FDM carrier systems for submarine
- cable , Vol. III, Rec. G.371.
-
- [5] CCITT Recommendation Assumptions for the calculation of
- noise on hypothetical reference circuits for telephony , Vol. III,
- Rec. G.223, S 2.
-
- [6] CCITT Recommendation Pulse code modulation (PCM) of
- voice frequencies , Vol. III, Rec. G.711.
-
- [7] CCITT Recommendation Loudness ratings (LRs) of
- national systems , Vol. III, Rec. G.121, S 3.
-
- [8] CCITT Recommendation 12-channel terminal equipments ,
- Vol. III, Rec. G.232, S 11.
-
- [9] CCITT Recommendation The transmission plan , Vol. III,
- Rec. G.101, Figure 5/G.101.
-
- [10] CCITT Recommendation Access points for international
- telephone circuits , Vol. IV, Rec. M.565.
-
- [11] CCITT Recommendation Setting up and lining up an
- international circuit for public telephony , Vol. IV, Rec. M.580.
-
- [12] Test frequencies on circuit routed over PCM systems ,
- Vol. IV, Supplement No. 3.5.
-
-
- Recommendation Q.44
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- ATTENUATION DISTORTION
-
-
-
-
- 1 Attenuation distortion
-
-
-
- 1.1 All-analogue conditions
-
-
- The design objectives recommended for carrier terminal equip-
- ment by the Recommendation cited in [3] are such that for a chain
- of six circuits, each equipped with a single pair of channel
- translating equipments in accordance with that Recommendation, the
- network performance objective for the attenuation distortion given
- by Figure 1/G.132 [2] will in most cases be met. The distortion
- contributed by the seven international centres is thereby included.
-
- Note - To assess the attenuation distortion of the interna-
- tional chain, the limits indicated for international circuits in
- Recommendation G.151, S 1 [4] must not be added to the limits for
- international centres mentioned in Recommendation Q.45. In fact, on
- the one hand, some exchange equipment would be counted twice if
- this addition were made; on the other, the specification limits of
- Recommendation Q.45 apply to the worst possible connection through
- an international exchange, while the maintenance limits of Recom-
- mendation G.151, S 1 apply to the poorest international circuit.
- The specifications of the various equipments are such that the mean
- performance will be appreciably better than could be estimated by
- the above-mentioned addition.
-
-
- 1.2 Mixed analogue/digital conditions
-
-
- In the mixed analogue/digital period, it is expected that the
- attenuation/frequency characteristics of the analogue carrier ter-
- minal equipment that is to be used in international telephone con-
- nections will continue to be governed by existing Recommendations
- that are relevant to this type of circuit.
-
-
- Where unintegrated PCM digital processes are to be included in
- international telephone connections, it is recommended that the
- attenuation/frequency characteristic of the bandpass filters asso-
- ciated with such processes should comply with the more stringent
- version of Figure 1/G.712 [5]. The latter Recommendation applies
- specifically to cases where integrated PCM digital processes are
- associated with trunk junctions (toll connecting trunks), trunk
- circuits (intertoll trunks), and international circuits.
-
- With regard to the incoporation of unintegrated PCM digital
- processes in local telephone networks, the required
- attenuation/frequency characteristics of the bandpass filters
- involved are still under study.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 2 The network performance objectives for the variation with
- frequency of transmission loss in terminal condition of a worldwide
- 4-wire chain of 12 circuits (international plus national exten-
- sions), each one routed over a single group link, are shown in
- Figure 1/Q.44 which assumes that no use is made of high-frequency
- radio circuits or 3-kHz channel equipment.
-
-
-
- Figure 1/Q.44 p.
-
-
-
- References
-
-
- [1] CCITT Recommendation Transmission losses, relative lev-
- els and attenuation distortion , Vol. III, Rec. G.141.
-
- [2] CCITT Recommendation Attenuation distortion , Vol. III,
- Rec. G.132.
-
- [3] CCITT Recommendation 12-channel terminal equipments ,
- Vol. III, Rec. G.232, S 1.
-
- [4] CCITT Recommendation General performance objectives
- applicable to all modern international circuits and national exten-
- sion circuits , Vol. III, Rec. G.151, S 1.
-
- [5] CCITT Recommendation Performance characteristics of the
- PCM multiplex at audio frequencies , Vol. III, Rec. G.712.
-
-
- Recommendation Q.45
-
-
- TRANSMISSION CHARACTERISTICS OF AN ANALOGUE INTERNATIONAL EXCHANGE
-
-
-
-
- A new Recommendation Q.45 | fIbis is published in the Blue
- Book with terminology and structure consistent with
- Recommendations Q.551-Q.554. There are no changes of technical sub-
- stance. Recommendation Q.45 in the Red Book is adequate for exist-
- ing references to Q.45.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-