home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Text File | 1991-12-22 | 161.4 KB | 4,139 lines |
-
-
-
- 5i'
-
-
-
-
-
- SECTION 3
-
- AUTOMATIC AND SEMI-AUTOMATIC
-
- MEASURING SYSTEMS
-
-
-
- Recommendation O.22
-
- CCITT AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION MEASURING
-
-
-
- AND SIGNALLING TESTING EQUIPMENT ATME No. 2
-
- (Geneva, 1972; amended Geneva, 1980, Malaga-Torremolinos, 1984 and
-
-
- Melbourne, 1988)
-
-
- 1 General
-
-
- The CCITT automatic transmission measuring and signalling
- testing equipment (ATME No. 2) is intended to make transmission
- measurements, echo canceller tests and signalling system functional
- tests on all categories of international circuits terminating in
- exchanges with 4-wire switching.
-
- The ATME No. 2 will consist of two parts, namely:
-
- 1) directing equipment at the outgoing end, and
-
- 2) responding equipment at the incoming end.
-
- The responding equipment will be available in the following
- forms:
-
- a) a signalling system functional testing and
- transmission measuring device (Type a),
-
- b) a signalling system functional testing device
- (Type b)
- _________________________
- The text of this Recommendation has been established
- under the responsibility of Study Groups IV and XI. Any
- modification to this text must be submitted for appro-
- val to these Study Groups.
- The concept of functional texts excludes marginal test-
- ing.
- The CCITT directs the attention of Administrations to
- the advantages of providing sufficient signalling sys-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- It is not possible for the signalling system functional test-
- ing devices as found in Types a and b to check the busy flash sig-
- nal. For this purpose a separate test call must be established
- using an appropriate test code. Arrangements will therefore be pro-
- vided to force the transmission of the busy flash signal over the
- circuit under test by the incoming international exchange equip-
- ment. This may be carried out by examination of the test code in
- the exchange equipment or by the provision of a separate responding
- equipment. The busy flash signal should be transmitted as the
- result of a simulation of exchange or circuit congestion. For the
- purposes of this specification, the equipment providing this busy
- test arrangement shall be referred to as responding equipment
- Type c.
-
- Responding equipment Type a is always required. Type b is
- optional; when used in addition to Type a, it is expected to pro-
- vide an economical means for making more frequent signalling tests
- without occupying the transmission measuring equipment. Type c
- responding equipment is required in cases when the signalling sys-
- tem used on the circuits to be tested provides a busy flash line
- signal.
-
-
-
-
- For both-way circuits, directing and responding equipments are
- required at both ends for making signalling system functional
- tests. For transmission measurements over both-way circuits, the
- outgoing end is normally that which is the responsibility of the
- control station, and the incoming end is that which is the respon-
- sibility of the sub-control station. However, these may be inter-
- changed by mutual agreement.
-
- The equipment shall be of modular construction in order that
- only those features desired by the using Administrations need to be
- included. The present specification already takes account of
- operating over circuits using CCITT Signalling Systems Nos. 3, 4,
- 5, 6, 7, R1 and R2.
-
- Results of measurements shall be recorded only at the outgoing
- end, that is by the directing equipment. However, arrangements can
- be made by the Administrations or operating agencies involved to
- send the results of the measurements to the Administrations in
- charge of the incoming end and other points as desired, by mutually
- acceptable means. ATME No. 2 can be used on circuits incorporating
- circuit multiplication systems (CMSs) if the CMS concerned is so
- designed that a 2800 Hz can be used to hold the circuits during
- absence of the normally transmitted signals. TASI is an example of
- a CMS which accepts 2800 Hz as the holding tone
- _________________________
- tem functional testing devices (Type b) to permit
- several signalling system functional tests to be con-
- ducted simultaneously and to permit signalling system
- functional tests to be conducted more frequently than
- transmission tests. (For the application of ATME No. 2,
- see Recommendation M.605 [1].)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 2 Kinds of measurements and tests
-
-
- Transmission measurements of the following kinds will be made
- in both directions of transmission with Type a responders:
-
- a) absolute power level measurement at 1020 Hz ;
-
- b) absolute power level measurement at 400, 1020
- and 2800 Hz (loss/frequency distortion);
-
- c) noise measurements;
-
- d) signal-to-total-distortion (including quantizing
- distortion) ratio measurements at values of holding tone (i.e. -10
- and -25 dBm0);
-
- e) an in-circuit echo canceller testing system
- (ECTS) sequence, intended to test both near-end and far-end can-
- cellers on a circuit under test. The ECTS is suitable for testing
- echo cancellers complying with Recommendation G.165 [2];
-
- f ) on wholly digital circuits between digital
- exchanges, measurements by the director of a director generated
- digital test pattern looped back by a Type a responder.
-
- In addition to tests of the normal signalling functions
- required in the process of setting up the test call, line signals
- such as the following will also be tested:
-
- - clear back,
-
- - forward transfer,
-
- - busy flash (this requires a separate test call
- to a separate test line, see Rec. O.11).
-
- In addition to the transmission measurements made between
- directors and responders it shall also be possible to make measure-
- ments from a director to a digital loopback test line as described
- in Recommendation O.11
-
- The equipment will be designed in such a way that further
- measurements and tests can be incorporated at a later date.
-
-
- 3 Equipment for making transmission measurements and processing the
- results
-
-
- The directing and responding equipments shall each be provided
- with features for making absolute power level, digital test pattern
- tests, echo canceller tests, signal-to-total-distortion ratio and
- _________________________
- For further information about the choice of the test
- signal frequency refer to Recommendation O.6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- noise measurements, as described below. In addition, the directing
- equipment shall have the capability, where required, of receiving
- the results of the measurements made by both the directing and
- responding equipments, making the necessary adjustments to these
- results, as discussed below, and converting the results to the
- proper form for transmission to the output device. The output dev-
- ice is also considered to be part of the directing equipment.
-
-
-
- 3.1 Absolute power level measurements
-
-
-
- 3.1.1 Sending end
-
-
- At the access point at the input to the path to be measured
- there will be connected a sending equipment which will send a tone
- of the appropriate frequency and level as specified in SS 6.3 and
- 9.1.
-
-
- 3.1.2 Measuring end
-
-
- At the access point at the output from the path to be measured
- there will be connected a measuring device whose specifications are
- given in SS 6.3 and 9.1.
-
- The measuring device shall provide results in the form of a
- deviation, expressed in dB, from the nominal absolute power level
- of the circuit at the virtual switching point at the receiving end.
- This assumes that for the responding equipment (see S 3.6), the
- relative level at the receiving end virtual switching point is
- -4 dBr. A level higher than nominal shall be indicated as positive
- " | | *U and a level lower than nominal shall be indicated as
- negative " | (em | *U. For the total distortion measurements, the
- results should give the signal-to-total-distortion ratio in deci-
- bel. The transmission parameters of the switched access path
- between the virtual switching point and the measuring device shall
- be allowed for (see Recommendation M.560 [3]).
-
- If the equipment is capable of detecting an interruption or a
- condition of instability experienced during a measurement (see
- S 10.5) the result shall be indicated as shown in Table 3/O.22.
-
-
- 3.2 Noise measurements
-
-
- Note - When ATME No. 2 is implemented using digital signal
- processing techniques, noise measurement is inherently limited to
- 4 kHz when using an 8 kHz sampling frequency.
-
-
- 3.2.1 Sending end
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- At the access point at the input to the path to be measured
- there will be connected a 600-ohms terminating resistance or a CMS
- locking tone in accordance with SS 6.4.19 or 6.4.20 and 9.3.
-
-
- 3.2.2 Measuring end
-
-
- At the access point at the output from the path to be meas-
- ured, there will be connected a noise measuring device whose
- specifications are given in S 9.2 below.
-
- The noise measuring device shall provide results in terms of
- absolute power level with psophometric weighting referred to
- 0 level (dBm0p), assuming for the responding equipment that the
- relative level at the receiving end virtual switching point is
- -4.0 dBr (see S 3.6). The transmission parameters of the switched
- access path between the virtual switching point and the noise
- measuring device shall be allowed for (see
- Recommendation M.560 [3]).
-
-
- 3.3 Signal-to-total-distortion ratio measurements
-
-
-
- 3.3.1 Sending end
-
-
- At the access point at the input to the path to be measured,
- there will be connected a sending equipment which will send tones
- at two different levels (-10 and -25 dBm0) as specified in S 9.1.
-
-
- 3.3.2 Measuring end
-
-
- The signal-to-total-distortion ratio measurements will be car-
- ried out in two steps.
-
- Step 1
-
- At the access point at the output from the path to be meas-
- ured, there will be connected a noise measuring device connected
- with a 1000 to 1025 Hz signal rejection filter. The noise measuring
- device and the signal rejection filter are specified in S 9.2.
-
- Step 2
-
- At the access point at the output from the path to be measured
- there will be connected a measuring device whose specifications are
- given in SS 6.3 and 9.1.
-
- The measuring device shall provide results in the form of the
- signal-to-total-distortion ratio in decibel. A bandwidth correction
- for the loss of effective noise bandwidth due to the rejection
- filter must be incorporated.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 3.4 Echo canceller testing system (ECTS)
-
-
- As part of the ECTS, the directing and responding equipments
- shall each be provided with features for making absolute power
- level, echo performance ratio and noise measurements, as described
- below. In addition, the directing equipment shall have the capabil-
- ity of receiving the results of the measurements made by both the
- directing and responding equipments, making the necessary adjust-
- ments to these results, as discussed below, and converting the
- results to the proper form.
-
-
- 3.4.1 Absolute power level measurements
-
-
-
- 3.4.1.1 Sending end
-
-
- At the access point at the input to the path to be measured,
- there will be connected a sending equipment which will send a tone
- of the appropriate frequency and level as specified in SS 5.2
- and 9.4.
-
-
- 3.4.1.2 Measuring end
-
-
- At the access point at the output from the path to be measured
- there will be connected a measuring device whose specifications are
- given in SS 6.7 and 9.1.
-
- The measuring device shall provide results in the form of a
- deviation, expressed in decibel, from the nominal absolute power
- level of the circuit at the virtual switching point at the receiv-
- ing end. This assumes that for the responding equipment (see
- S 3.6), the relative level at the receiving end virtual switching
- point is -4.0 dBr. A level higher than nominal shall be indicated
- as positive "+" and a level lower than nominal shall be indicated
- as negative "-". The transmission parameters of the switched access
- path between the virtual switching point and the measuring device
- shall be allowed for (see Recommendation M.560 [3]).
-
- If the equipment is capable of detecting an interruption or a
- condition of instability experienced during a measurement (see
- S 11.5), the result shall be indicated as described in S 3.6.
-
-
- 3.4.2 Noise measurements
-
-
- (To determine echo noise floor in step 1 of echo performance
- test.)
-
-
- 3.4.2.1 Sending end
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- At the access point at the input to path to be measured, there
- will be connected a 600-ohms terminating resistance in accordance
- with SS 6.7 and 9.4.3.
-
-
- 3.4.2.2 Measuring end
-
-
- At the access point at the output from the path to be meas-
- ured, there will be connected a noise measuring device whose
- specifications are given in S 9.5.1.
-
- The noise measuring device shall provide results as noise
- ratios which are the relative power level with psophometric weight-
- ing referred to the -10 (dBm0p) sending level, assuming for the
- responding equipment that the relative level at the receiving end
- virtual switching point is -4.0 dBr (see S 3.6).
-
- Note - This noise level is referred to -10 dBm0p rather than
- 0 dBm0p to make it represent the minimum measurable noise ratio in
- steps 2 and 3 of the echo performance tests in S 3.4.3. The
- transmission parameters of the switched access path between the
- virtual switching point and the noise measuring device shall be
- allowed for (see Recommendation M.560 [3]).
-
-
- 3.4.3 Echo performance ratio measurements
-
-
- (Steps 2 and 3 of echo performance tests)
-
-
- 3.4.3.1 Sending end
-
-
- At the access point at the input to the path to be measured,
- there will be connected a sending equipment which will send a
- -10 dBm0 noise test signal as specified in S 9.4.1e).
-
-
-
- 3.4.3.2 Measuring end
-
-
- At the access point at the ouput form the path to be measured,
- there will be connected an echo performance (noise) measuring dev-
- ice whose specifications are given in S 9.5.1.
-
- The measuring device shall provide results in terms of rela-
- tive power level ratio with psophometric weighting referred to the
- -10 dBm0 noise test signal in S 3.4.3.1, assuming for the respond-
- ing equipment that the relative level at the receiving end virtual
- switching point is -4.0 dBr (see S 3.6). The transmission parame-
- ters of the switched access path between the virtual switching
- point and the noise measuring device shall be allowed for (see
- Recommendation M.560 [3]).
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 3.5 Digital loopback tests
-
-
-
- 3.5.1 Digital test pattern tests to a digital loopback test
- line
-
-
-
- 3.5.1.1 Sending end
-
-
- At the access point at the input to the path to be measured,
- there will be connected a sending equipment which will provide a
- pseudo-random digital test pattern as specified in
- Recommendation O.152, S 2.
-
-
- 3.5.1.2 Measuring end
-
-
- At the access point at the output from the path to be meas-
- ured, there will be connected a receiving equipment as specified in
- Recommendation O.152. This measuring equipment should be capable of
- measuring bit-error ratio, block-error ratio, and errored time
- intervals as defined in Recommendation G.821 [4].
-
-
- 3.5.2 Transmission tests to a digital loopback test line
-
-
-
- 3.5.2.1 Sending end
-
-
- At the access point at the input to the path to be measured,
- there will be connected a sending equipment which will send tones
- of the appropriate frequency and level as specified in SS 6.3, 9.1,
- 9.2 and 9.3.
-
-
- 3.5.2.2 Measuring end
-
-
- At the access point at the output from the path to be measured
- there will be connected measuring equipment provided with features
- for making absolute power level, noise, and
- signal-to-total-distortion ratio measurements and as specified in
- SS 3.1.2, 3.2.2 and 3.3.2 respectively.
-
- It should be noted that measurements made through the digital
- loopback test line will experience twice the circuit distance and
- delay characteristics experienced by a far end measurement device.
- Therefore, measurement results must be compared to circuit mainte-
- nance limits which are modified to reflect a doubling of circuit
- distance and quantizing distortion units (QDUs).
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 3.6 Adjustment results
-
-
- Circuits that may be used in international transit connections
- are operated with a nominal loss of 0.5 dB, that is, the relative
- level at the receiving virtual switching point is -4.0 dBr. How-
- ever, circuits which are not intended to be used in international
- transit connections may be operated with nominal losses greater
- than 0.5 dB (see Recommendation G.131 [5]).
-
- The results of measurement of absolute power level deviations
- and noise sent by the responding equipment to the directing end
- will assume a -4.0 dBr virtual switching point for all circuits.
- Thus, a measured value corresponding to -5.0 dBm at the virtual
- switching point will always be transmitted to the directing equip-
- ment as a deviation of -1.0 dB. Where a circuit is operated with a
- nominal loss greater than 0.5 dB, i.e. the actual relative level at
- the virtual switching point is more negative than -4.0 dBr, the
- directing equipment shall apply the appropriate correction to the
- results of the measurement of absolute power level deviation and
- noise received from the responding equipment. The
- signal-to-total-distortion and the echo performance measurements
- are not affected as the results are presented as
- signal-to-total-distortion ratio in dB or noise signal to echo sig-
- nal ratio in dB.
-
-
-
- 3.7 Recording and presentation of output
-
-
- The output shall be recorded by suitable means, to be decided
- by the Administration concerned. For absolute power level measure-
- ments at 1020 Hz the results shall be presented, with the appropri-
- ate algebraic sign, as deviations from the nominal absolute power
- level at the virtual switching point. The results of measurements
- at 400 and 2800 Hz shall be presented as
-
- deviations from the measured absolute power level at 1020 Hz.
- Results of noise measurements shall be expressed in dBm referred to
- 0 level (dBm0p). The signal-to-total-distortion measurements are in
- the form of signal-to-total-distortion ratios expressed in dB. The
- echo performance measurements are in the form of noise signal to
- echo signal ratios expressed in dB.
-
- An example is given in Table 1/O.22 for measurements made by
- the responding equipment.
- H.T. [T1.22]
- TABLE 1/O.22
- Example of measurements made by the responder
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Measurement {
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Level 1020 400 2800 -13.7 -14.4 -14.6 +0.3 -0.4 -0.6|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- +0.3 -0.7 -0.9|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- +1.3 -0.7 -0.9
- ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- {
- Value at receiving virtual switching point at responding equipment
- } {
- Value transmitted from responding equipment to directing equipment (a
- relative level of -4.0 dBr at the virtual switching point is
- assumed)
- }
- ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Noise power (dBm0) -50 | ua) -46 -46 -45
- ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- {
- Signal-to-total-
- distortion ratio | ua)
- or
- noise ratio (dB)
- } 34 | ua) +34 34 34
- ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- a) With a received total distortion test signal level of -13.7 dBm
- and a total distortion power of -48 dBm.
- Table 1/O.22 [T1.22], p.
-
-
-
- Distinct indications will be given under the following condi-
- tions:
-
- a) the absolute power level deviation exceeds the
- assigned maintenance limit;
-
- b) the noise power value is outside the assigned
- maintenance limit;
-
- c) the signal-to-total-distortion ratio is outside
- the assigned maintenance limit;
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- d) the absolute power level deviation is so great
- that the circuit is rendered unfit for service;
-
-
- e) the noise power value is so great that the cir-
- cuit is rendered unfit for service;
-
- f ) the signal-to-total-distortion ratio is so low
- that the circuit is rendered unfit for service;
-
- g) the echo performance ratio is outside the
- assigned maintenance limits for any dely value at either end. (When
- this happens, the noise floor value measured in step 1 of the test
- must also be recorded);
-
- h) digital error performance values greater than
- the assigned maintenance limit;
-
- i) failure to complete the test call;
-
- j) failure to meet the requirements of the signal-
- ling tests.
-
- In cases i) and j) the point in the programme at which a given
- failure occurs should be indicated.
-
- The form that the output should take has not been specified,
- and international agreement on this point does not appear to be
- necessary, except concerning the following printout conventions
- (see Table 3/O.22 and S 11.5):
- Results of the measurements out of range at the upper end + + +
-
- (printout interpretation of three Code 11 signals) Results of
- the measurements out of range at the lower end - - -
-
- (printout interpretation of three Code 12 signals) XX
- represents the results of the measurement.
- Interruption in measurement tone during absolute power level meas-
- urements 9XX or 7XX
- Instability during absolute power level measurements 8XX or 6XX
-
- It should be noted that when an interruption and instability
- are both detected during a power level measurement only the interr-
- uption will be recorded in the printout and no indication of the
- instability will be given (see S 11.5).
-
- If directed by the input programme, the date and time (to the
- nearest minute) shall be recorded.
-
- The possibility shall be included to provide a complete record
- of the results of all measurements and signalling tests and the
- identification of all circuits which could not be measured or
- tested because the circuit was occupied or because the responding
- equipment could not be reached. A different indication shall be
- given for each of the latter two categories.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- In addition a shortened record should be obtainable which
- omits information concerning circuits which were within maintenance
- limits and on which no instability or interruption was indicated.
-
-
- 3.8 Remeasurement and retest arrangements
-
-
- Arrangements are required to provide an input data record for
- circuits which were occupied on initial measurement or test and for
- circuits on which the responding equipment could not be reached.
- This input data record should be capable of expansion to include
- all circuits except those which are found to be within maintenance
- limits and on which no instability or interruption was indicated.
- The input data record shall be in such a form that it may be used
- to control the directing equipment so as to permit the reexamina-
- tion of these circuits in any grouping as desired by the using
- Administration.
-
-
- 4 Method of access
-
-
- 4.1 In general, access arrangements will conform to
- Recommendation M.560 [3].
-
-
-
- 4.2 Outgoing international exchange
-
-
- Access to the circuit for test at the outgoing international
- exchange shall conform to Recommendation M.565 [6].
-
-
- 4.3 Incoming international exchange
-
-
- Access to the responding equipment at the incoming interna-
- tional exchange will be gained via a maintenance access line asso-
- ciated with the normal switching equipment. The address information
- to be used to gain access to either Type a or Type b responding
- equipment or to a digital loopback test line at the incoming
- exchange is specified in S 2.4 of Recommendation O.11.
-
-
-
- 5 Operating principles
-
-
- It shall be possible to perform any one, two or more of the
- measurements and tests mentioned in S 2 on the same circuit under
- the control of the directing equipment without releasing the con-
- nection except when the busy flash test is performed, or when tests
- to a digital loopback test line are performed.
-
- 5.1 When the directing equipment has indicated to the
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- responding equipment the kind of measurement to be made, the meas-
- urement is first made at the directing equipment with the respond-
- ing equipment sending a measurement tone or providing a 600-ohm
- termination. The directing equipment then sends the measurement
- tone or provides a 600-ohm termination while the responding equip-
- ment makes the measurement.
-
-
- 5.2 Directing equipment which has access to circuits equipped
- with echo suppressors and/or echo cancellers must be provided
- with arrangements to transmit the echo suppressor/canceller disa-
- bling tone specified in S 9.3. Arrangements must be included in the
- directing equipment to provide for the transmission of this tone
- only on circuits equipped with echo suppressors and/or echo can-
- cellers. These features may be omitted in equipments which do not
- have access to such circuits, but provision must be made to add
- them when required.
-
- 5.3 Directing and responding equipment which has access to
- circuits on routes incorporating a CMS system, or to circuits
- equipped with echo suppressors and/or echo cancellers, must be pro-
- vided with means for transmitting the CMS locking tone as specified
- in S 9.3. Means are required in the directing equipment to transmit
- this tone only on such routes or circuits. If these features are
- not provided initially, arrangements must be made so that they can
- be added when required.
-
- 5.4 Initially Echo canceller testing system (ECTS) signals
- will be sent by the directing equipment to disable or lock-up any
- echo suppressor or circuit multiplication equipment that is present
- on the circuit under test.
-
- Next, loss tests will be made in both directions of transmis-
- sion to ensure that the circuit loss is within nominal values.
-
- Then a series of echo performance (noise ratio) measurements
- will be made toward an echo canceller at the distant end of a cir-
- cuit corresponding to each of three circuit conditions provided by
- its terminating equipment:
-
- a) quiet termination of both directions of
- transmission,
-
- b) 2 dB gain loop with prescribed amount of delay
- to test each stage (cascaded delay section) of the canceller, and
-
- c) 10 dB loss loop with prescribed amount of delay.
-
- The process will then be reversed so as to test both the
- far-end and near-end echo cancellers with one access of the circuit
- under test.
-
- 6 Signalling system testing and transmission measuring
- procedure-director to responder
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 6.1 Establishment of connection and signalling test
- sequence
-
-
- 6.1.1 When the outgoing circuit is seized, the appropriate
- address information is transmitted in accordance with the specifi-
- cation for the signalling system in use.
-
-
- 6.1.2 When access is gained to the responding equipment, the
- answer signal (answer, no charge in Signalling System No. 6 will be
- transmitted. If the responding equipment is occupied, a busy indi-
- cation will be returned to the directing equipment in accordance
- with normal signalling arrangements for the circuit and for the
- access arrangements concerned. If the busy indication is received,
- this will be recorded by the directing equipment and the circuit
- released (see S 3.7.)
-
- 6.1.3 If no signal is received by the directing equipment
- within 15 _ 5 seconds of transmission of the address information,
- then a fault will be recorded and the circuit released.
-
- 6.1.4 When the indication that the answer signal has been
- received is passed to the directing equipment and transmission
- measurements are desired with a responding equipment Type a,
- transmission measurement cycles may take place as described in
- S 6.4. These cycles will end with the end of transmission measuring
- programme signal (Code 15) transmitted by the directing equipment,
- followed by the acknowledgement signal (Code 13)
-
- transmitted by the responding equipment in accordance with the nor-
- mal responding sequence.
-
-
- 6.1.5 When the indication that the answer signal has been
- received is passed to the directing equipment and transmission
- measurements are not desired, or if the responding equipment is of
- Type b, or if the transmission measurement cycles have been com-
- pleted and a complete signalling functional test is required, the
- directing equipment will transmit the forward transfer signal, or
- if this signal is not provided, the Code 11 signal.
-
-
- Where the forward transfer signal is part of the signalling
- system it should be used by the directing equipment to initiate the
- complete signalling function test
-
- a) Forward transfer signal provided
- _________________________
- It should be noted that although the forward transfer
- signal may be part of a signalling system, it may not
- be provided for in some international exchanges using
- such a signalling system. In these cases a complete
- signalling function test will not be possible, unless
- the use of Code 11 [see S 6.1.5, | )] is agreed on a
- bilateral basis.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- The transmission of the line signals initiated by ATME No. 2 equip-
- ment on the international circuit is performed by exchange line
- signalling equipment in accordance with normal signalling pro-
- cedures. Consequently, the actual times at which the various sig-
- nals are transmitted and received depend upon the signalling system
- employed and the circuit propagation time in any particular case.
- If transmission measurements have been made, a forward
- transfer signal will be initiated by the directing equipment
- 500 _ 100 ms after the end of the transmission measuring programme
- signal. If transmission measurements have not been made or if
- Type b equipment is used, the transmission of the forward transfer
- signal will be initiated by the directing equipment 500 _ 100 ms
- after the indication that the answer signal has been received is
- passed to the directing equipment fitted or not fitted with echo
- suppressors/cancellers.
-
- b) Forward transfer signal not provided
-
- If transmission measurements have been made the Code 11
- signal will be transmitted after the end of the transmission
- measuring programme signal. The directing equipment will transmit
- the CMS locking tone between the Code 15 and Code 11 signals on
- circuits equipped with echo suppressors/cancellers to ensure that
- they remain disabled. When the acknowledgement to the Code 15 sig-
- nal is recognized by the directing equipment the Code 15 command
- signal will be disconnected and the CMS locking tone will be con-
- nected within 60 ms. When the end of the command acknowledgement
- signal is recognized by the directing equipment the CMS locking
- tone will be removed and the Code 11 command signal will be con-
- nected 55 _ 5 ms after the disconnection of the CMS locking tone.
- If transmission measurements have not been made or if Type b equip-
- ment is used, the transmission of the Code 11 signal will be pre-
- ceded by transmission of the echo suppressor/canceller disabling
- tone as specified in S 6.4.1. When the acknowledgement of the
- Code 11 signal (return of Code 13) is recognized by the directing
- equipment, the Code 11 command signal will be disconnected.
-
- 6.1.6 If shortened signalling functional tests alone are
- desired, the directing equipment will initiate a clear-forward sig-
- nal on receipt of the answer signal if transmission measurements
- have not been made, or on receipt of the acknowledgement signal
- (Code 13) following the end of transmission measuring programme
- signal when transmission measurements have been made.
-
-
- 6.1.7 When a complete signalling functional test is carried
- out, the indication that a forward transfer signal has been
- received will cause the responding equipment to initiate a
- clear-back signal. For systems without a forward transfer signal
- (see S 6.1.5) the receipt of a Code 11 signal will initiate the
- transmission of a clear-back signal 500 _ 100 ms after the command
- acknowledgement signal.
-
-
- The responding equipment will initiate a reanswer signal
- 500 _ 100 ms after the clear-back signal has been initiated
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Note - It is possible that with a 500-ms gap between the ini-
- tiation of the clear-back and reanswer signals a CMS circuit may
- release the CMS channel. This may also happen in other parts of the
- signalling test sequence.
-
- If the clear-back signal is not received by the directing
- equipment within 5 to 10 seconds of sending the forward transfer
- signal or the Code 11 signal, or if the reanswer signal is not
- received 5 to 10 seconds after the receipt of the clear-back sig-
- nal, a fault will be recorded and the circuit released.
-
- When the reanswer signal is recognized, the directing equip-
- ment will initiate a clear-forward signal.
-
-
- 6.1.8 When the clear-forward signal is transmitted (in accor-
- dance with SS 6.1.6 or 6.1.7), a check should be made that the out-
- going circuit has been released and is available for future use. If
- the outgoing circuit is not fully released within 5 to 10 seconds
- of the initiation of the clear-forward signal by the directing
- equipment, a fault will be recorded. It should be noted that the
- test for the release of the circuit may not be possible on certain
- designs of equipment.
-
-
-
- 6.2 Busy flash test
-
-
- The busy flash signal may be tested by establishing a call
- using the address code specified in S 2.4 of Recommendation O.11,
- to force transmission of a busy flash signal by the incoming
- exchange equipment. On receipt of the busy flash signal the circuit
- will be released.
-
- If the busy flash signal is not received within 10 to
- 20 seconds of transmission of the address information then a fault
- will be recorded and the circuit released.
-
- Note - There is no need to make such a test in Signalling
- Systems Nos. 6 and 7 or in Systems R1 and R2.
-
-
- 6.3 Transmission measuring procedure and exchange of infor-
- mation between directing and responding equipments
-
-
- Individual measurement cycles are specified in two groups
- known as "Layer 1" and "Layer 2". One code in Layer 1 has been
- designated to indicate that a measurement cycle in Layer 2 is being
- requested.
-
-
- 6.3.1 Layer 1 procedures
-
-
- The signalling sequence for each Layer 1 individual
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- measurement cycle is specified in S 6.4 and the frequencies and
- codes in Tables 2/O.22, 3/O.22 and 4/O.22. An example of the sig-
- nalling sequence for a cycle involving the measurement of absolute
- power level is shown in Figure 1/O.22. The signalling scheme
- adopted for the command signals between directing and responding
- equipments consists of multi-frequency (MF) signals transmitted in
- compelled sequence; results are transmitted from the responding
- equipment to the directing equipment by means of multi-frequency
- pulse-type signals.
-
- All transmission measurements should be performed with a tone
- level of -10 dBm0 (total distortion measurements may also use a
- -25 dBm0 level). Certain older responding equipment may be equipped
- to test with two tone levels, i.e. 0 dBm0 and -10 dBm0. In these
- circumstances a signal will be sent to inform the responding equip-
- ment of the measurement level to be used. (See Table 2/O.22 and
- S 9.1.) It should be noted that the sensitivity of the measuring
- equipment must be arranged to accommodate both levels.
-
- The signal sender and signal receiver chosen are those speci-
- fied for the CCITT interregister Signalling System No. 5 and the
- equipment used should be as specified in Recommendations Q.153 [7]
- and Q.154 [8] (see Annex A to this Recommendation concerning the
- sensitivity of the signalling receiver.)
-
-
- 6.3.2 Layer 2 procedures
-
-
- The signalling sequence for each Layer 2 individual measure-
- ment cycle is specified in S 6.6 and the frequencies and codes in
- Tables 4/O.22 and 5/O.22. Multi-frequency pulse-type signals are
- used in Layer 2 both for command signals between directing and
- responding equipments and for transmitting results from the
- responding equipment to the directing equipment. When a Layer 2
- procedure has been completed, a designated multi-frequency
- pulse-type signal command returns the dialogue to Layer 1.
-
-
- 6.4 Description of transmission measuring cycles
-
-
- 6.4.1 When the indication that the answer signal has been
- received is passed to the directing equipment, the echo
- suppressor/canceller disabling tone will be transmitted from the
- directing equipment for 2 seconds _ 250 ms.
-
-
- Note 1 - This period takes into account the delay necessary
- for connection to a CMS channel, the time necessary for the assured
- disablement of the echo suppressor or echo canceller, the long pro-
- pagation time likely to be experienced on satellite circuits and
- the delays attributable to the functioning of the signalling sys-
- tem. For circuits not using a line-signalling system involving an
- answer acknowledgement signal (such as Signalling Systems Nos. 3
- and 4) it will be sufficient to send a disabling tone for at least
- 800 ms. If, however, the circuit to be tested is not equipped with
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- echo suppressors/cancellers (see S 5), the procedure in S 6.4.1
- will be omitted.
-
- Note 2 - The specifications for the echo suppressor/canceller
- disabling tone and the CMS locking tone are given in S 9.3.
-
- H.T. [T2.22]
- TABLE 2/O.22
- Command signals from directing equipment to responding
- equipment
-
- ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Code No. Interpretation
- ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- 1 {
- Measure absolute power level at 1020 Hz (sent level 0 dBm0)
- }
- 2 {
- Measure absolute power level at 400 Hz
- with a sent level indicated by the 1020 Hz
- }
- 3 {
- Measure absolute power level at 2800 Hz
- measurement command signal
-
- }
- 4 {
- Measure psophometric noise power (no CMS locking tone
- applied) | ua)
- }
- 5 {
- Measure psophometric noise power (with CMS locking tone applied)
- }
- 6 {
- Measure absolute power level at 1020 Hz and subsequent level measurements in the programme with a sent level of -10 dBm0
- }
- 7 {
- Measure total distortion with -10 dBm0 signal
- }
- 8 {
- Measure total distortion with -25 dBm0 signal
- }
- 9 Shift to Layer 2
- 11 {
- Used instead of forward transfer when this signal is not provided
- }
- 13 {
- Reverse the direction of measurement
- }
- 14 (Reserved for national use)
- 15 End of transmission measurement programme
- ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- a) Applies to circuits on routes which do not incorporate a CMS
- system and are not equipped with echo suppressors and/or cancell-
- ers.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Tableau 2/O.22 [T2.22], p. 2
-
- H.T. [T3.22]
- TABLE 3/O.22
- Signals from responding equipment to directing
- equipment
-
- ________________________________________________________________________________________
- Code No. Interpretation
- ________________________________________________________________________________________
- 1-10 {
- Digits 1, . | | | 9, 0 (measurement results information)
- }
- 11 {
- + (prefix for transmission measurements)
- }
- 12 {
- - (prefix for transmission measurements)
- }
- 9 {
- + (prefix to indicate measurement tone interruption)
- }
- 7 {
- - (prefix to indicate measurement tone interruption)
- }
- 8 {
- + (prefix to indicate measurement tone instability)
- }
- 6 {
- - (prefix to indicate measurement tone instability)
- }
- 13 Command acknowledgement
- 11 (3-times) {
- (out of range at the upper end
- printed out as "+++")
- }
- 12 (3-times) {
- (out of range at the lower end
- printed out as "---")
- }
- 15 {
- Recognition of faulty multi-frequency signal
- }
- ________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Tableau 3/O.22 [T3.22], p. 3
-
-
-
-
-
- Figure 1/O.22, p. 4
-
- H.T. [T4.22]
- TABLE 4/O.22
- Frequency allocation and codes
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- ________________________________________
- Code No. Frequencies (compound) (Hz)
- ________________________________________
- 1 700 + 900
- 2 700 + 1100
- 3 900 + 1100
- 4 700 + 1300
- 5 900 + 1300
- 6 1100 + 1300
- 7 700 + 1500
- 8 900 + 1500
- 9 1100 + 1500
- 10 1300 + 1500
- 11 700 + 1700
- 12 900 + 1700
- 13 1100 + 1700
- 14 1300 + 1700
- 15 1500 + 1700
- ________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Tableau 4/O.22 [T4.22], p. 5
-
-
-
- H.T. [T5.22]
- TABLE 5/O.22
- Layer 2 command signals from directing equipment
- to responding equipment
-
- _________________________________________________________________
- Code No. Layer 2 Interpretation
- _________________________________________________________________
- 1 {
- Echo canceller test system - automatic
- }
- 2 Reserved
- 3 {
- Loop-around test - digital
- }
- 5 Return to Layer 1
- _________________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Tableau 5/O.22 [T5.22], p. 6
-
-
-
-
- 6.4.2 When the echo suppressor/canceller disabling tone is
- removed, the directing equipment will transmit a multi-frequency
- (MF) command signal to the responding equipment. The interval
- between cessation of the tone and transmission of the command sig-
- nal will be 55 _ 5 ms. If, however, the disabling tone has not been
- sent (see S 5) the MF command signal will be sent within 60 ms,
- following the indication that the answer signal has been received.
-
- 6.4.3 When the command signal is received by the responding
- equipment a MF command acknowledgement signal will be transmitted.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 6.4.4 When the command acknowledgement signal is recognized by
- the directing equipment, the command signal will be disconnected
- and the CMS locking tone, if it is to be sent (see S 5), will be
- connected within 60 ms.
-
- 6.4.5 When the cessation of the command signal is recognized
- by the responding equipment the command acknowledgement signal is
- disconnected and the measurement tone is connected within 60 ms.
-
- 6.4.6 The time required for the directing equipment to detect
- the cessation of the command acknowledgement signal and connect the
- measuring equipment will not be less than 60 nor more than 120 ms.
- However, it should be as close to 60 ms as possible to reduce the
- probability of CMS switching during noise measurement.
-
- 6.4.7 The level measurement should be completed within 500 ms
- after connection of the measuring equipment. When the measurement
- is completed, the measuring equipment will be disconnected and the
- CMS locking tone mentioned in S 6.4.4, if present, will be discon-
- nected.
-
- 6.4.8 Following disconnection of the CMS locking tone men-
- tioned in S 6.4.7, a MF command signal will be connected. The
- interval between the tone and the signal will be 55 _ 5 ms. If,
- however, the CMS locking tone was not sent, the command signal will
- be connected 55 _ 5 ms after the measuring equipment has been
- disconnected.
-
- 6.4.9 When the MF command signal is recognized by the respond-
- ing equipment, the measurement tone will be removed and a
- multi-frequency command acknowledgement signal will be transmitted.
- The interval between cessation of the measurement tone and the com-
- mencement of the MF command acknow ledgement signal will
- be 55 _ 5 ms.
-
- 6.4.10 The recognition of the command acknowledgement signal
- by the directing equipment will cause the disconnection of the com-
- mand signal and the connection of the measurement tone within 60 ms
- of the end of the command signal.
-
- 6.4.11 When the cessation of the MF command signal is detected
- by the responding equipment, the command acknowledgement signal
- will be disconnected and the CMS locking tone, if provided in the
- responding equipment, will be connected within 60 ms of the end of
- the command acknowledgement signal.
-
- 6.4.12 The time required for the responding equipment to
- detect the cessation of the command signal and connect the measur-
- ing equipment will not be less than 60 nor more than 120 ms. How-
- ever, it should be as close to 60 ms as possible to reduce the pro-
- bability of CMS switching during noise measurement.
-
- 6.4.13 The measurement should be completed within 500 ms after
- the connection of the measuring equipment. When the measurement is
- completed, the measuring equipment will be disconnected.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 6.4.14 When the responding equipment is ready to transmit
- measurement results information to the directing equipment, the CMS
- locking tone mentioned in S 6.4.11 will be disconnected if it has
- been sent. The first MF pulse to be used for the transmission of
- results will follow after an interval of 55 _ 5 ms from the discon-
- nection of the CMS locking tone. If the locking tone was not sent,
- the first MF pulse will be sent within 60 ms after disconnection of
- the measuring equipment.
-
- 6.4.15 Measurement result information will be transmitted as
- three MF pulses in the form of a prefix followed by two digits of
- Codes 1 to 10 as appropriate (see Table 4/O.22). The last two
- digits will be sent in order of significance (most significant
- digit first). The pulse-length will be 55 _ 5 ms and the interval
- between pulses 55 _ 5 ms. The digit zero is represented by Code 10.
-
- 6.4.16 If the responding equipment is provided with a CMS
- locking tone this tone will be applied within 60 ms after the third
- MF pulse has been sent.
-
- 6.4.17 When the third MF pulse is recognized by the directing
- equipment, the measurement tone will be disconnected. A MF command
- signal will be sent by the directing equipment after an interval of
- 55 _ 5 ms from disconnection of the measurement tone. If the
- responding equipment has sent the CMS locking tone mentioned in
- S 6.4.16, this tone will be disconnected on recognition by the
- responding equipment of the MF command signal sent by the directing
- equipment. The responding equipment must send the command ack-
- nowledgement signal 55 _ 5 ms after cessation of the CMS locking
- tone. If the MF command signal sent by the directing equipment is
- the start of a new measurement cycle the new test sequence will
- proceed from the point described in S 6.4.4 and will consist of a
- repetition of the sequence in SS 6.4.4 to 6.4.17.
-
- 6.4.18 If the foregoing test sequence completes the transmis-
- sion measuring programme, the MF command signal mentioned in
- S 6.4.17 will be the end of programme signal .
-
- 6.4.19 In the case of all noise measurements, the measurement
- tone mentioned in SS 6.4.5, 6.4.9, 6.4.10 and 6.4.17 must be
- replaced by a 600-ohm terminating resistor.
-
- 6.4.20 In the case of noise measurements carried out on routes
- incorporating a CMS system or on circuits equipped with echo
- suppressors/cancellers, to ensure that the CMS locking tone is on
- in the direction which is not being measured, the CMS locking tone
- mentioned in SS 6.4.4, 6.4.11 and 6.4.16 must be applied.
-
- 6.4.21 In the case of noise measurements, the responding
- equipment is informed of the necessity for the CMS locking tone
- mentioned in S 6.4.20 by the MF command signal, measure pso-
- phometric noise power (with CMS locking tone applied) (see
- Table 2/O.22).
-
- 6.4.22 The signal-to-total-distortion measurement will be car-
- ried out in two steps:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- a) detection of the total distortion measuring
- signal using the same method as for idle noise but with the 2800 Hz
- stop filter replaced by the 1000-1025 Hz rejection filter;
-
- b) measuring of the level using the 1004-1020 Hz
- test signal at either -10 or -25 dBm0 depending on the requested
- test.
-
- 6.4.23 When making total distortion measurements, the measure-
- ment tone mentioned in SS 6.4.5, 6.4.9, 6.4.10 and 6.4.17 must be
- replaced by the proper level total distortion test signal (either
- -10 or -25 dBm0).
-
-
- 6.5 End-of-programme procedure
-
-
- When transmission measurement is complete, the remainder of
- the operations will be continued in accordance with SS 6.1.4
- through 6.1.8, insofar as they apply.
-
-
- 6.6 Description of Layer 2 transmission measuring cycles
-
-
- After a compelled MF Code 9 has been used in Layer 1 to enter
- Layer 2 and MP command acknowledgement has been detected (not wait-
- ing for it to cease), a MF pulse-type signal is used to select a
- measurement cycle (see Table 5/Q.22). Some Layer 2 measurement
- cycles contain no-signal intervals of a length sufficient to cause
- a CMS circuit to switch the CMS connecting channel.
-
- The directing equipment may exit a Layer 2 measurement cycle
- by sending a pulse-type MF Code 5. If required as specified in
- S 6.4.1, the directing equipment will then send the echo
- suppressor/canceller disable tone. This assures that echo suppres-
- sors and/or cancellers will not interfere with the compelled MF
- commands used in Layer 1.
-
-
-
- 6.7 Description of echo canceller testing cycles
-
-
- 6.7.1 The test descriptions in this section follow the test
- sequence shown in Figures 2/O.22 and 3/O.22. All gaps between the
- MF pulse bursts and other actions shall be 80 _ | ms unless other-
- wise specified Timing and other error conditions are covered in
- S 6.8.
-
-
- 6.7.2 The director sends a Code 9 MF command to indicate that
- a Layer 2 cycle is being specified.
-
- 6.7.3 When the command signal is received by the responding
- equipment a MF command acknowledgement signal will be transmitted.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 6.7.4 When the command acknowledgement signal is recognized by
- the directing equipment the command signal will be disconnected and
- a pulsed MF command sent (S 6.7.6).
-
- 6.7.5 When the cessation of the command signal is recognized
- by the responding equipment the command acknowledgement signal is
- disconnected.
-
- 6.7.6 The directing equipment begins the test sequence by
- transmitting to the responder an MF priming burst which specifies a
- 1020 Hz test tone and automatic test timing (see SS 6.3 and 6.4 and
- Table 5/O.22).
-
- 6.7.7 Following the initial MF priming burst, the director
- pauses for 500 ms to ensure that echo cancellers are enabled. It
- then sends an 800 ms period of 2100 Hz tone, if required, which
- disables any echo suppressors which may be on the circuit under
- test and provides lockup for any circuit multiplication equipment
- employed on the circuit.
-
- 6.7.8 Next the director sends test tone (1020 Hz) at -10 dBm0
- to the responder while it waits for the responder to measure the
- received level of the tone and return a measurement result.
-
- 6.7.9 The responder detects the presence of the test tone,
- measures the level, and returns the results of the measurement as
- pulsed MF digits. It then applies test tone (1020 Hz) at -10 dBm0
- toward the director.
-
- 6.7.10 Upon receipt of the measurement result from the
- responder, the director removes test tone and waits for receipt of
- test tone from the responder upon which it makes a level measure-
- ment.
-
- 6.7.11 The director next sends MF priming bursts to specify
- the test sequence for the far-end echo canceller (at the responder
- end) or for the near-end echo canceller (at the director end). The
- following steps test the far-end echo canceller.
-
- 6.7.12 After sending the priming digit specifying a far-end
- echo canceller test, the director applies a noise test signal and
- waits for an MF confirmation burst from the responder.
-
- 6.7.13 Upon receiving the priming burst indicating a far-end
- echo canceller test, the responder removes the test tone it had
- been sending, returns an MF confirmation burst, and provides a
- quiet termination on both transmit and receive paths of the circuit
- under test as the step 1 condition.
-
- 6.7.14 Upon receiving the step 1 confirmation MF burst, the
- director continues the noise signal for 500 ms to allow the far-end
- echo canceller to zero its internal registers on receipt of the
- noise signal, and then the director makes a noise ratio measurement
- which is an indication of the far-to-near circuit noise. (This
- measurement is only an indication of the noise performance of the
- circuit under test but is intended to assure that excessive circuit
- noise problems are not distorting the canceller tests.) The
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- director then sends an MF priming burst to advance the responder to
- step 2 conditions and indicates, using two more MF priming bursts,
- the amount of delay to be
-
- provided in the 2 dB gain loop. The requested value of delay in the
- loop should be continuously variable from 0 to 75 ms in steps of
- 1 ms. After the priming is completed, it then resumes sending the
- noise signal toward the responder.
-
- 6.7.15 Upon receiving the step 2 priming from the director,
- the responder removes the step 1 terminations, provides a 2 dB gain
- loop with the specified delay, and returns the step 2 priming con-
- firmation MF burst.
-
- 6.7.16 The director receives the step 2 confirmation MF, con-
- tinues the noise signal for 500 ms to allow the far-end canceller
- to adjust to the two-talker state, and then makes a noise ratio
- measurement of the looped-back signal. It then sends an MF priming
- burst to advance the responder to the step 3 condition which is a
- 10 dB loss loop with the same delay and applies the noise signal
- toward the responder.
-
- 6.7.17 Upon receiving the step 3 priming MF burst from the
- director, the responder applies the step 3 conditions and returns a
- confirmation MF burst.
-
-
- 6.7.18 The director receives the step 3 confirmation MF burst,
- continues the noise signal for 500 ms to allow the far-end echo
- canceller to attempt to cancel the looped noise, and then makes a
- noise ratio measurement of the returned signal.
-
- 6.7.19 If the far-end canceller has additional delay stages to
- be tested, the director may repeat the step 2 and step 3 sequences
- with the appropriate values of delay for testing each stage.
-
- 6.7.20 If there are no additional far-end echo canceller delay
- stages to test and there is no near-end echo canceller to be
- tested, and if no completed tests are to be repeated, nor has a
- test of the far-end canceller disabler been requested, the director
- sends an MF priming burst instructing the responder to return to
- Layer 1.
-
- a) If there is no near-end canceller to be tested
- and the disabler function of the far-end canceller is to be tested,
- that test is performed at this time. (Note that if there is also a
- near-end canceller, testing of the far-end canceller disabler func-
- tion is done after the near-end canceller has been tested.)
-
- b) To test the operation of the far-end echo can-
- celler disabler, it is assumed that the previously described
- sequence has been applied to the far-end canceller and exited with
- the 10 dB loss loop still applied by the responder while it awaits
- additional commands.
-
- c) The director removes the noise signal used for
- the 10 dB loss loop measurement and sends for 800 ms an echo
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- canceller disable signal consisting of a 2100 Hz burst with phase
- reversed 180 | ediodically (see S 9.4.1 c). Upon receipt of this
- signal, the disabler in the echo canceller should operate, thus
- disabling the canceller action.
-
- d) The director removes the disable signal, sends
- an MF priming burst, and applies the noise signal upon which the
- far-end canceller should now take no action. Upon receiving the MF
- burst, the responder removes the 10 dB loss loop with delay,
- returns an MF confirmation burst, and applies a 10 dB loss loop
- with no delay. Upon receipt of the MF confirmation burst from the
- responder, the director continues the noise signal for 500 ms and
- then makes a noise ratio measurement of the returned signal (which
- should differ from the previous 10 dB loss loop measurement because
- the canceller has been disabled).
-
- e) The director then removes the noise signal and
- sends an MF priming burst instructing the responder to return to
- Layer 1.
-
- 6.7.21 If there is a near-end echo canceller to be tested, the
- director sends an MF priming burst which instructs the responder to
- assume the control function and indicates the number of stages to
- be tested in the near-end canceller. The director then applies test
- tone toward the responder (see Figure 3/O.22).
-
-
- 6.7.22 Upon receipt of the command to assume test control, the
- responder sends a step 1 priming MF burst to the director. The
- responder then applies a noise signal and awaits a step 1 confirma-
- tion MF burst from the director. The 3-step sequence proceeds as
- for the far-end canceller except that the responder returns by MF
- bursts the results of the previous step's measurement immediately
- after sending the MF priming burst requesting the next step condi-
- tions.
-
- 6.7.23 When testing of the near-end canceller is completed,
- the responder sends an MF burst indicating return of control to the
- director and applies test tone.
-
- a) If testing only the near-end canceller disabler
- function has been requested, the director sends an MF priming
- instructing the responder to perform a series of operations while
- the director applies a quiet termination.
-
- b) Upon receipt of the disabler test MF priming
- burst, the responder removes the test tone and applies for 800 ms
- the echo canceller disable signal (see S 9.4.1 c)). The responder
- then sends an MF priming burst and applies the noise test signal.
- Upon receipt of the MF priming burst, the director returns an MF
- confirmation burst and applies a 10 dB loss loop with no delay.
- Upon receipt of the MF confirmation burst, the responder continues
- the noise signal for 500 ms upon which the disabled near end can-
- celler should take no action. The responder next makes a noise
- ratio measurement of the returned signal. The responder returns the
- result as MF bursts, preceded by an MF burst indicating return of
- control to the director, and awaits the next command. Upon receipt
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- of these MF bursts, the director removes the 10 dB loss loop and
- pauses 500 ms to allow the canceller to become enabled.
-
-
- c) If testing both near-end and far-end disablers
- has been requested, the sequence described in b) proceeds to the
- point where the 10 dB noise ratio value, measured with the near-end
- canceller disabled, has been returned by the responder. Since the
- far-end disabler is also to be tested, the responder returns test
- tone (with no pause) and awaits further director command.
-
- d) Upon receiving the near-end disabler test
- result, the director removes the 10 dB loss loop (no delay) test
- condition, sends an MF burst requesting the 10 dB loop and applies
- the noise signal.
-
- e) Upon receiving the command, the responder
- removes the test tone, provides a 10 dB loss loop (no delay), and
- returns a confirmation MF burst.
-
- f ) Upon receipt of the confirmation MF burst, the
- director continues the noise signal for 500 ms upon which the dis-
- abled far-end canceller should now take no action. The director
- then makes a noise ratio measurement of the returned signal (which
- should indicate no cancellation).
-
- g) After making the measurement, the director
- pauses 500 ms to allow the canceller(s) to become enabled.
-
- 6.7.24 The director sends an MF priming burst instructing the
- responder to return to Layer 1. Note, at this point any CMS on the
- circuit may have been released during the 500 ms pause. (See
- Figures 2/O.22 and 3/O.22).
-
-
- 6.8 Echo canceller test timing and error considerations
-
-
-
- 6.8.1 Automatic testing - director function
-
-
- 6.8.1.1 If no response is received from the responder within
- 5 seconds of a prompt, send a return to Layer 1 MF command to the
- responder and report timeout.
-
-
- 6.8.1.2 If an MF burst is received that is out of sequence,
- undefined, or bad (e.g., more than two MF frequencies received)
- record an MF digit error condition, remain at current position in
- the test sequence, and restart the timeout timer. If correct MF is
- not received by the next timeout, report "MF error" and return to
- Layer 1. If correct MF is received, continue with normal sequence.
-
- 6.8.1.3 If an MF error report is received from the responder
- indicating that it has perceived receipt of an undefined,
- out-of-sequence, or bad MF digit, report that disposition, send a
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- return to Layer 1 MF to the responder, and return to Layer 1.
-
-
- 6.8.2 Automatic testing - responder function
-
-
- If an MF burst is out of sequence, undefined, or bad, send a
- "bad MF" report MF (Code 13) to the director and remain at current
- position in test sequence.
-
-
- 6.9 Responder digital loopback test
-
-
- 6.9.1 The director sends a Code 9 MF command to indicate that
- a Layer 2 cycle is being specified.
-
-
- 6.9.2 When the command signal is received by the responding
- equipment an MF command acknowledgement signal will be transmitted.
-
- 6.9.3 When the command acknowledgement signal is recognized by
- the directing equipment the command signal will be disconnected and
- a pulsed Code 3 MF command sent.
-
- 6.9.4 When the cessation of the command signal is recognized
- by the responding equipment the command acknowledgement signal is
- disconnected and the digital loopback is applied in response to the
- Code 3.
-
- 6.9.5 The directing equipment begins the test sequence by
- transmitting the digital test pattern and analyzing the looped
- return signal.
-
-
-
- Figure 2/O.22, p. 7
-
-
-
-
-
- Figure 3/O.22, p. 8
-
-
-
-
- 6.9.6 At the conclusion of the test, the director removes the
- test pattern and sends a Code 5 pulsed multi-frequency command
- instructing the responder to return to Layer 1. If a Code 5 is not
- received within 30 seconds of the application of the digital loop-
- back, the responder will remove the digital loopback and return to
- Layer 1. However, the director may begin a new 30 second test
- interval by sending a pulsed multi-frequency Code 3 command
- instead of a Code 5 before the current 30 second interval has
- expired.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 6.10 System supervision
-
-
- 6.10.1 Each MF signal must consist of two, and only two, fre-
- quencies. If one or more than two frequencies are received by the
- directing equipment, the measurement is recorded as faulty and the
- connection is released. If one or more than two frequencies are
- received by the responding equipment it shall be arranged to return
- Code 15 in place of the command acknowledgement signal Code 13. The
- directing equipment will then recognize the signal, record the
- measurements as a fault and release the connection.
-
-
- 6.10.2 In the transmission of measurement results, the code
- signals must comprise three, and only three, digits. When this is
- not the case, the measurement is recorded as faulty, and the con-
- nection is released.
-
- 6.10.3 Arrangements must be provided at the directing equip-
- ment to monitor the full duration of the programme. In addition to
- the time out requirements given in other parts of this specifica-
- tion, if at any time the programme fails to progress for a period
- of 20 to 40 seconds then the test is recorded as faulty and the
- connection is released. An alarm may be given to the maintenance
- staff.
-
-
- 7 Description of tests to digital loopback test lines
-
-
- 7.1 The directing equipment shall be capable of making the
- following tests of measurements to a digital loopback test line as
- specified in Recommendation O.11. The type of test to be made will
- depend on the type of circuit under test. For all tests it is
- assumed that any echo suppressors or cancellers have been disabled
- before the start of the tests using the appropriate disabling tone
- and/or CMS locking tone (see S 6.4).
-
-
-
- 7.2 Analogue tests on all circuit types
-
-
- The following tests can be made on analogue, composite
- digital/analogue and wholly digital circuits.
-
- a) Looped received power at 1020 Hz
-
- b) Looped received noise with and without the CMS
- locking tone
-
- c) Looped signal-to-total distortion ratio with
- 1020 Hz test signal at -10 or -25 dBm0 depending on the requested
- test.
-
- Note - Looped 400 and 2800 Hz measurements are not being
- specified.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 7.3 Digital tests on wholly digital circuits
-
-
- The directing equipment shall be capable of implementing bit
- integrity tests per Recommendation O.152 to a digital loopback test
- line for wholly digital circuits between digital exchanges. The
- interval between removal of the echo canceller/suppressor disabling
- tone and/or CMS locking tone is removed and application of the test
- tone or digital test pattern shall be 55 _ | ms. The results shall
- be capable of being expressed in terms of estimated percent error
- free seconds and of estimated bit error ratio. The length of test
- intervals shall be specified in seconds from 10 to 600 as an input
- parameter.
-
-
- 8 Programming
-
-
- The directing equipment will be programmed by manual or
- automatic means at the option of the using Administration or
- operating agency. Information to be supplied to the directing
- equipment will consist of the following:
-
- 1) the identification of the circuit to be tested;
-
- 2) the kind of circuit (CMS, echo
- suppressor/canceller equipped, etc.) and the kind of signalling
- system;
-
- 3) the location on the circuit of the echo cancell-
- ers: near-end, far-end or both ends;
-
- 4) sufficient address to identify the particular
- type of responding equipment at the incoming international
- exchange;
-
- 5) the measurements to be made, the nominal values,
- the assigned maintenance limits, and whether the canceller disabler
- tests are to be performed;
-
-
- 6) whether the results are to be recorded by the
- output equipment;
-
- 7) whether or not the date and time of the test
- should be recorded by the output equipment;
-
- 8) whether there should be a shortened record as
- described in S 3.7.
-
-
- 9 Specifications for transmission measuring apparatus and for disa-
- bling tones and locking tones
-
-
- The equipment shall perform under the climatic conditions as
- shown in Recommendation O.3.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 9.1 Absolute power level measuring device
-
-
-
- 9.1.1 Sending equipment
-
-
- Level measurements:
-
- Frequencies: | 400 _ 5 Hz, 1020 +2, | (em7 Hz and 2800 _
- | 4 Hz.
-
- Absolute power level sent: | 0 dBm0 _ 0.1 dB (or
- -10 dBm0 _ 0.1 dB, see S 6.3).
-
- Purity of output: | ratio of total output to unwanted sig-
- nal at least 36 dB.
-
- Total distortion test signal:
-
- Frequency: | The nominal frequency of the total distortion
- test signal shall be 1020 Hz. The frequency stability of the test
- signal shall be _ | Hz.
-
- Absolute power level sent: | -10 dBm0 _ | .1 dB and -25
- dBm0 _ | .1 dB.
-
- Purity of output: | ratio of total output to unwanted sig-
- nal at least 36 dB.
-
- Impedance: | 600 ohms balanced - earth free.
-
- Pending the general adoption of a method for measuring the balance
- with respect to earth, the method to be used is left for agreement
- between the constructor of the equipment and the Administration
- concerned.
- Any interface equipment provided to meet the signalling require-
- ments of the exchange, or for purposes of controlling functions
- with the ATME No. 2, must be considered as part of the ATME No. 2
- for the purpose of determining the balance to earth.
- Longitudinal conversion loss | (see Figure 1/O.9): At
- _________________________
- It is intended that only a single tone in the range
- 1020 +2, | (em7 Hz will be required and that it can be
- used for both 1020 Hz level and total distortion meas-
- urements.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- least 46 dB between 300 and 3400 Hz , |
-
- Return loss requirement for older equipment should conform to
- greater than 30 dB at each of the above sending equipment frequen-
- cies.
- Return loss: | greater than 46 dB at 1020 Hz and greater
- than 30 dB between 200 and 4000 Hz.
-
-
- 9.1.2 Receiving equipment
-
-
- Frequency range: | 390-2820 Hz.
-
- Impedance: | 600 ohms balanced - earth free.
-
- Balance with respect to earth: | at least 46 dB between
- 300 and 3400 Hz, and below 300 Hz increasing such that at least
- 60 dB at 50 Hz is obtained ,
-
- Return loss: | greater than 46 dB at 1020 Hz and greater
- than 30 dB between 200 and 4000 Hz.
-
- Measuring range: | from -9.9 dB to +5.1 dB relative to
- the nominal absolute power level of the -4.0 dBr receiving virtual
- switching point. It should be borne in mind that the nominal value
- of absolute power level at the receiving virtual switching point
- will depend on the absolute power level at the sending end which
- may be 0 dBm0, -10 dBm0 or -25 dBm0 (see S 6.3).
-
- Accuracy (absolute): | at 1020 Hz, _ | .2 dB; at 400 and
- 2800 Hz, _ | .2 dB referred to the 1020 Hz value.
-
- Resolution (smallest measurement step): | .1 dB.
-
-
- 9.2 Noise and total distortion measuring apparatus
-
-
- Weighting: | psophometric with requirements as specified in
- Recommendation O.41.
-
- 2800-Hz suppression: | when noise measurements are made on
- circuits involving a CMS system or on circuits equipped with echo
- suppressors and/or echo
-
-
- cancellers, a stop filter for 2800 Hz must be inserted before car-
- rying out the noise measurement. The requirements for the filter
- are given in Figure 4/O.22. When measuring white noise with pso-
- phometric weighting the insertion of the filter in the noise
- measuring circuit shall not cause a difference from the reading
- without the filter of more than 1 dB.
-
- 1000-1025 Hz suppression: | when total distortion measure-
- ments are made, a test signal rejection filter for 1000 to 1025 Hz
- _________________________
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- must be inserted before carrying out the total distortion signal
- measurement. The requirements for the filter are given in Figure
- 5/O.22. A bandwidth correction for the loss of effective noise
- bandwidth due to the rejection filter must be incorporated in the
- ATME No. 2 system.
-
- Method of detection for idle noise: | the method of
- detection shall be such that if white Gaussian noise, or a sine
- wave of any frequency between 390 and 2820 Hz is applied at the
- input in the absence of the 2800-Hz stop filter mentioned above,
- for a period of 375 _ 25 ms, the output indication will be the same
- in each case, within _ | dB, as that given by the CCITT psophome-
- ter when the same white Gaussian noise or sine wave is applied at
- its input for a period of 5 seconds.
-
- Method of detection of the signal-to-total-distortion
- ratio:
- | the method of detection of the total distortion signal shall be
- the same as that for idle noise as given above except with the 1000
- to 1025 Hz rejection filter replacing the 2800 Hz stop filter. In
- addition, the level of the received 1004-1020 Hz test signal must
- be measured and compared with the total distortion signal to deter-
- mine the signal-to-total-distortion ratio in dB.
-
- Measuring interval: | 375 _ 25 ms.
-
- Impedance: | 600 ohms balanced.
-
- Input longitudinal interference loss | (see Figure
- 5/O.9): at least 46 dB between 300 and 3400 Hz, and below 300 Hz
- increasing such that at least 60 dB and 50 Hz is obtained ,
-
- Return loss: | greater that 46 dB at 1020 Hz and greater
- that 30 dB between 200 and 4000 Hz.
-
- Measuring range: | -30 to -65 dBm0p.
-
- Accuracy: | _ | dB at calibrating frequency from -30 to
- -55 dBm0p. Between -55 dBm0p and -65 dBm0p an accuracy of _ | dB
- is allowed, but _ | dB remains desirable.
-
- Resolution (smallest measurement step): | 1 dB.
-
-
- 9.3 Disabling and locking tones
-
-
- - Echo suppressor/canceller disabling tone: (CMS
- lock-up or CMS locking tone)
-
- Frequency: | 2100 Hz _ 8 Hz.
-
- Level: | -12 dBm0 _ 1 dB.
- _________________________
- This is the same rejection filter characteristic as
- specified in Recommendation O.132.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- The 2100 Hz tone should be periodically interrupted
- every 450 | (+- | 5 ms by a 180 | (+- | degree phase shift. The
- interruption interval may be asynchronous with the beginning of the
- tone-on interval.
-
- - CMS holding tone:
-
- Frequency: | 2800 Hz _ 14 Hz.
-
- Level: | -10 dBm0 _ 1 dB.
-
- - For the two tones:
-
- Impedance: | 600 ohms balanced - earth free.
-
- Input longitudinal interference loss | (see Figure
- 5/O.9): at least 46 dB between 300 and 3400 Hz. ,
-
- Return loss: | greater than 46 dB at 1020 Hz and
- greater than 30 dB and 4000 Hz.
-
-
-
- Figure 4/O.22, p.
-
-
-
- Figure 5/O.22, p.
-
-
-
-
-
- 9.4 ECTS sending apparatus of the directing and responding
- equipment
-
-
-
- 9.4.1 Signal and tone frequencies
-
-
- a) test tone: 1020 +2, | (em7 Hz
-
- b) disable tone: 2100 Hz _ | Hz (echo suppressors
- and CMS)
-
- c) disable tone for echo canceller: 2100 Hz _ |
- Hz. The 2100 Hz tone should be periodically interrupted every 450
- _ | 5 ms by a 180 _ | degree phase shift. The interruption inter-
- val may be asynchronous with the beginning of the tone-on interval.
-
- d) CMS holding tone: 2800 Hz _ | 4 Hz
-
- e) noise signal: the noise test signal is obtained
- by passing a wideband quasi random noise source signal through a
- bandpass filter network meeting the requirements given in
- Table 6/O.22.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- H.T. [T6.22]
- TABLE 6/O.22
- Filter response
-
- ______________________________________________________
- Frequency (Hz) Loss | ua) (dB) Tolerance (dB)
- ______________________________________________________
- 200 _" 30.8 -
- 300 _" 21.8 _ | .3
- 560 {
- _"
- 3.8
- } _ | .4
- 750 _" 0.2 _ | .2
- 1000 {
- _"
- 0.8
- } _ | .1
- 1500 _" 0.1 _ | .2
- 1965 {
- _"
- 3.8
- } _ | .4
- 2400 _" 10.9 _ | .2
- 3000 _" 22.9 _ | .0
- 4000 _" 42.6 _ | .0
- _" 5000 45.8 -
- ______________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- a) Excluding any flat insertion loss.
- Tableau 6/O.22 [T6.22], p.
-
-
-
- 9.4.2 Signal and tone levels
-
-
- a) for loss measurements: -10 _ | .1 dBm0
-
- b) disable tone: -12 _ | dBm0
-
- c) CMS holding tone: -10 _ | Bm0
-
- d) noise signal: -10 _ | dBm0
-
-
- 9.4.3 Impedance
-
-
- 600 ohms balanced with longitudinal conversion , loss (see
- Figure 1/O.9) of at least 46 dB between 300 and 3400 Hz. Return
- loss greater than 46 dB at 1020 Hz and greater than 30 dB between
- 200 and 4000 Hz.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 9.4.4 Purity of tone output
-
-
- Better than 30 dB.
-
-
- 9.4.5 Loop characteristics
-
-
- a) value of loop delay, 0 to 75 ms _ | .2 ms
-
- b) loop gain 2.0 dB _ | .1 dB
-
- c) loop loss 10.0 dB _ | .1 dB
-
-
- 9.5 ECTS receiving apparatus of the directing and respond-
- ing equipment
-
-
-
- 9.5.1 Measuring ranges
-
-
- a) for loss measurement: from 0 _ | .1 dBm to -40 _
- | .1 dBm
-
- b) for echo performance and noise measurement: from
- 0 to -65 dBm (_ | dB to -55 dBm, _ | dB to -65 dBm) using a
- detector with response per Recommendation O.41, Table 1/O.41.
-
-
- 9.5.2 Measuring interval
-
-
- 500 _ | 5 ms.
-
-
- 9.5.3 Impedance
-
-
- 600 ohms balanced with input longitudinal interference loss ,
- (see Figure 5/O.9) of at least 46 dB between 300 and 3400 Hz.
- Return loss greater than 46 dB at 1020 Hz and greater than 30 dB
- between 200 and 4000 Hz.
-
-
- 9.6 ECTS command signals exchanged between the directing
- equipment and the responding equipment
-
-
- Test sequence commands and responses exchanged between the
- directing and responding equipment will be pulse-type multifre-
- quency (MF) signals. The signal sender and signal receiver are
- those specified for the CCITT No. 5 Interregister Signalling System
- per CCITT Recommendation Q.153 [7] and Q.154 [8]. The frequencies
- and the meaning of the codes are given in Table 7/O.22.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 9.7 Digital pattern generator and detector
-
-
-
- 9.7.1 Test pattern generator
-
-
- The test pattern generator shall utilize the pseudorandom test
- pattern specified in Recommenda- tion O.152, S 2.
-
-
- 9.8 Test pattern detector
-
-
- The detector is designed to measure the error performance of
- the 64 kbit/s digital path by the direct comparison of the received
- pseudorandom test pattern with an identical locally generated pseu-
- dorandom test pattern as specified in Recommendation O.152.
-
- H.T. [T7.22]
- TABLE 7/O.22
- ECTS command signals between director and
- responder
-
-
-
- __________________________________________________________________________________
- Code No. Frequency (Hz) Meaning
- __________________________________________________________________________________
- 1 700 + 900 Automatic test
- 2 700 + 1100 Reserved
- 3 900 + 1100 Spare
- 4 700 + 1300 Spare
- 5 900 + 1300 Return to Layer 1
- 6 1100 + 1300 Step 1 priming MF
- 7 700 + 1500 Request confirmation
- 8 900 + 1500 Step 2 priming MF
- 9 1100 + 1500 Step 3 priming MF
- 10 1300 + 1500 {
- Request responder assume control
- }
- 11 700 + 1700 Test disablers at both ends
- 12 900 + 1700 {
- Test near-end disabler only
- }
- 13 1100 + 1700 MF error condition
- 14 1300 + 1700 Control returned to director
- 15 1500 + 1700 Spare
- __________________________________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Table 7/O.22 [T7.22], p.
-
-
-
- 10 Calibration
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 10.1 Built-in calibration
-
-
- The accuracy desired from the ATME No. 2 makes calibration
- equipment of laboratory-type accuracy necessary. Such accuracy is
- seldom provided by normal maintenance equipment available to
- repeater station staff. Hence, built-in calibration features should
- be provided. Due regard should be paid to the ease of maintenance,
- and adequate access facilities should be provided.
-
-
- 10.2 Self-check
-
-
- The responding and directing equipments shall each incorporate
- a local self-checking facility on the transmission measuring unit
- which will bring in a local alarm and disable the unit when it is
- out of tolerance. This self-check should be applied at least daily.
- If they so wish, user Administrations may incorporate arrangements
- for making this self-check automatically.
-
-
- 11 Optional arrangements
-
-
-
- 11.1 Automatic start
-
-
- In the long term, the operation of the ATME No. 2 without any
- attention by technical personnel will be desirable. The addition of
- timed automatic start facilities to the ATME No. 2 is required when
- unattended operation of the ATME No. 2 is intended.
-
-
- 11.2 Timed automatic selection of particular circuits or
- groups of circuits
-
-
- It may be desirable to select for test a particular circuit,
- or group of circuits, at specified times according to a prearranged
- programme, for example noise measurement during busy and non-busy
- hours.
-
-
-
- 11.3 Automatic repeat attempt
-
-
- It may be desirable to incorporate an automatic repeat test
- facility for circuits which have been rejected as faulty. The
- arrangement should permit an automatic repeat attempt of the
- relevant test cycle immediately following the first test.
-
- A test cycle is defined as a sequence of measurements commenc-
- ing with command Codes 1 to 9 and not command Code 13.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 11.4 Switching pad test
-
-
- Administrations may use their ATME No. 2 directing equipment
- to test a pad-switching facility provided at the outgoing end of an
- international circuit.
-
- Such testing must not involve any other Administration in mak-
- ing changes to their signalling, switching or ATME No. 2 equipment
- or to their operating and maintenance procedures.
-
-
- 11.5 Interruption and instability during level measurements
-
-
- It may be desirable to detect an interruption or a condition
- of instability during the level measuring interval at the directing
- and/or the responding equipments. If such indications are available
- they will always be recorded by the directing equipment
- (see S 3.7).
-
- When an interruption and instability are both detected during
- a 500-ms measuring period only the indication of an interruption
- shall be transmitted and recorded.
-
-
- 11.6 Nonavailability of responding equipment
-
-
- It may happen that, as a result of a failure at the responding
- end, all attempts made at the directing end to set up a call with a
- particular responding equipment will be unsuccessful - there may be
- no reply or the busy tone may be received. As this state of affairs
- could seriously affect the carrying out of a measurement programme
- as planned, it would appear to be desirable to ensure either:
-
- - that this situation should give rise to an alarm
- signal if the directing equipment is operating under supervision;
-
- - or that the directing equipment should be able
- automatically to select an alternative measurement programme if it
- is operating without supervision.
-
- ANNEX A
- (to Recommendation O.22)
-
- Sensitivity of the signalling receiver
-
-
- A.1 The multi-frequency signal sender and receiver specified
- for ATME No. 2 is given in Recommendations Q.153 [7] and Q.154 [8]
- respectively, as used in CCITT Signalling System No. 5.
-
-
- The sending level per frequency equals -7 _ 1 dBm0 and there-
- fore the nominal receiving level at the -4.0 dBr virtual switching
- point equals -11 dBm.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- The operating limits of the multi-frequency receiver give a
- minimum margin of _ | dB on the nominal absolute level of each
- received signal (i.e. taken to mean per frequency).
-
- Therefore the receiver minimum operate level range at the
- -4.0 dBr virtual switching point:
-
- = -11 dBm _ 7 dB
-
- = -18 dBm to -4 dBm
-
-
-
-
- A.2 The maximum circuit loss | eviation from nominal over
- which the multi-frequency signals can be received is:
-
- (-11 - 1) - (-18) = +6.0 dB
-
-
-
- and the minimum circuit loss | eviation from nominal over which
- the multi-frequency signals can be received is:
-
- (-11 + 1) - (-4) = -6.0 dB
-
-
-
- A.3 Therefore the circuit loss | eviation limits between
- which multi-frequency signals can be received is _ | .0 dB about
- the nominal loss, whereas ATME No. 2 is capable of measuring devia-
- tions greater than these values (see S 9.1 of this Recommendation).
-
- A.4 Although the specification for the multi-frequency signal
- receiver (Recommendation Q.154 [8]) stipulates that a received
- signal may vary _ | dB about the nominal receive level of -7 dBm0,
- Recommendation Q.154 [8] also states that the receiver shall not
- operate to a signal 17 dB below the nominal received signal level,
- which means that in the range -14 to -24 dBm0 the receiver may or
- may not operate. It is to be expected therefore that somewhere
- within this range the receiver will cease to operate.
-
- A.5 In practice multi-frequency receivers are set up to
- operate to a minimum signal level in this range of -14 to -24 dBm0.
- Therefore signalling would normally be possible over a circuit with
- a loss greater than that given in S A.3. In those cases where the
- multi-frequency receiver fails to operate the circuit test would
- still be recorded as mentioned in S 6.10.3 of this Recommendation.
-
-
- References
-
-
- [1] CCITT Recommendation Routine maintenance schedule for
- international public telephony circuits , Vol. IV, Rec. M.605.
-
- [2] CCITT Recommendation Echo Cancellers Vol. III,
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Rec. G.165
-
- [3] CCITT Recommendation International telephone circuits -
- principles , definitions and relative transmission levels ,
- Vol. IV, Rec. M.560, S 2.
-
- [4] CCITT Recommendation Error performance of an interna-
- tional digital connection forming part of an integrated services
- digital network , Vol. III, Rec. G.821.
-
- [5] CCITT Recommendation Stability and echo , Vol. III,
- Rec. G.131, S 2.1.
-
- [6] CCITT Recommendation Access points for International
- Telephone Circuits Vol. IV, Rec. M.565.
-
- [7] CCITT Recommendation Multifrequency signal sender ,
- Vol. VI, Rec. Q.153.
-
- [8] CCITT Recommendation Multifrequency signal receiver ,
- Vol. VI, Rec. Q.154.
-
-
-
-
- MONTAGE: RECOMMANDATION O.25 SUR LE RESTE DE CETTE PAGE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-