home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Text File | 1991-12-22 | 254.2 KB | 7,659 lines |
-
-
-
- 5i'
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- FASCICLE IV.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Recommendations M.800 to M.1375
-
-
-
- MAINTENANCE OF INTERNATIONAL TELEGRAPH,
-
-
- PHOTOTELEGRAPH AND LEASED CIRCUITS
-
-
- MAINTENANCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL
-
-
- PUBLIC TELEPHONE NETWORK
-
-
- MAINTENANCE OF MARITIME SATELLITE
-
-
- AND DATA TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS
-
-
-
-
-
-
- MONTAGE: PAGE 2 = PAGE BLANCHE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- SECTION 5
-
- INTERNATIONAL TELEGRAPH SYSTEMS
-
- AND PHOTOTELEGRAPH TRANSMISSION
-
-
- 5.1 Setting up and lining up international voice-frequency
- telegraph links
-
-
-
- Recommendation M.800
-
-
- USE OF CIRCUITS FOR VOICE-FREQUENCY TELEGRAPHY
-
- _________________________
- See also Recommendations R.77 [1] and H.21 [2].
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 1 Composition and nomenclature
-
-
- Figure 1/M.800 illustrates the composition of an international
- voice-frequency telegraph system and the nomenclature used.
-
-
- 1.1 The international voice-frequency telegraph system
-
-
- This is the whole of the assembly of apparatus and lines
- including the terminal voice-frequency telegraph equipment. In
- Figure 1/M.800 the system illustrated provides 24 duplex telegraph
- circuits, but other numbers of telegraph circuits can be provided.
-
-
- 1.2 The international voice-frequency telegraph link (some-
- times referred to as the bearer circuit)
-
-
- 1.2.1 Four-wire telephone-type circuits are used for interna-
- tional voice-frequency telegraph links. The link comprises two uni-
- directional transmission paths, one for each direction of transmis-
- sion, between the terminal voice-frequency telegraph equipments.
-
-
- 1.2.2 The international voice-frequency telegraph link con-
- sists of an international voice-frequency telegraph line together
- with any terminal national sections connecting the international
- telegraph line to the voice-frequency telegraph terminal equipment
- and may be constituted entirely on carrier channels (on symmetric
- pairs, coaxial pairs, radio-relay systems, etc.) or on
- audio-frequency lines or combinations of such lines.
-
- 1.2.3 The nominal links for voice-frequency telegraphy have no
- terminating units, signalling equipment or echo suppressors.
-
-
- 1.3 The international voice-frequency telegraph line
-
-
- 1.3.1 The international voice-frequency telegraph line may be
- constituted by using a channel in a carrier group or channels in
- tandem on a number of groups. National and international sections
- can be interconnected to set up an international voice-frequency
- telegraph line. See Figure 1/M.800, but note that S 1.3.2 below
- details a preferred method.
-
-
- The international voice-frequency telegraph line could equally
- well be set up between, for example, only A and C or between C and
- D, in which case A and C or C and D would be the terminal interna-
- tional centres.
-
-
-
- FIGURE 1/M.800, p. 1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 1.3.2 Wherever possible, an international voice-frequency
- telegraph line should be provided on a channel of a single carrier
- group, thereby avoiding intermediate audio-frequency points. In
- some cases, such a direct group may not exist or, for special rout-
- ing reasons, it may not be possible to set up the international
- telegraph line in the preferred way. In such cases, the interna-
- tional telegraph line will consist of channels in tandem on two or
- more groups with or without audio sections, depending on the line
- available and the routing requirements.
-
-
-
- 1.4 Terminal national sections connected to the interna-
- tional voice-frequency telegraph line
-
-
- In many cases the voice-frequency telegraph terminal equipment
- is remote from the terminal international centre of the interna-
- tional voice-frequency telegraph line (Figure 1/M.800), and such
- cases necessitate the provision of terminal national sections in
- order to establish international voice-frequency telegraph links.
- These sections may be in short-distance local audio cables, ampli-
- fied or unamplified, or may be routed in long-distance carrier
- groups or on amplifier audio plant.
-
-
- 2 Reserve arrangements for international voice-frequency
- telegraph links
-
-
- All necessary action should be taken to enable the duration of
- interruption of international voice-frequency telegraph links to be
- reduced to a minimum and, for this purpose, it is expedient to
- standardize some of the methods to be adopted for replacing defec-
- tive portions in the link.
-
- Although it does not appear necessary for these methods to be
- the same in detail in every country, it would be advisable to reach
- agreement regarding the general directives to be followed.
-
- The make-up of a reserve voice-frequency telegraph link will
- in general be similar to that of the normal voice-frequency tele-
- graph link. However, if the voice-frequency telegraph terminal
- equipment is not located at the terminal international centres, the
- line portion of an international telephone circuit can be used to
- replace only the international voice-frequency telegraph line of
- the voice-frequency telegraph link.
-
-
-
- 2.1 Reserve international lines
-
-
- 2.1.1 Wherever possible, a reserve international line should
- be provided between the two terminal international centres by means
- of the line portion of an international telephone circuit
- (between A and B in Figure 1/M.800).
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 2.1.2 The telephone line used as a reserve should be chosen
- wherever possible so as to follow a different route from that of
- the normal international telegraph line. Where this cannot be done,
- as much as possible of the line or its sections should be alterna-
- tively routed.
-
- 2.1.3 If there is a choice, the use of manually-operated cir-
- cuits as reserve lines for voice-frequency telegraphy is techni-
- cally and operationally preferable to the use of automatic cir-
- cuits.
-
- It should be possible, after prior agreement between the con-
- trolling officers at the international terminal exchanges con-
- cerned, for an operator to break into a call in progress to advise
- the correspondents that the circuit is required elsewhere and that
- the call will have to be transferred to another circuit if it lasts
- longer than six minutes.
-
- 2.1.4 If the telephone circuit used as a reserve is automatic
- or semiautomatic a direct indication should be given at the change-
- over point. If it is not available when needed the reserve circuit
- should be blocked against any further call.
-
-
-
- 2.2 Reserve sections for the sections of the international
- voice-frequency telegraph link
-
-
- Where it is not possible to provide a reserve international
- line or a reserve international voice-frequency telegraph link
- either because there are no suitable telephone circuits or because
- the number of telephone circuits does not permit the release of a
- circuit for reserve purposes, a reserve section should be provided
- wherever possible for each of the component sections. For these
- sections, national or international telephone lines or, where they
- exist, spare channels, circuits, etc., should be used.
-
-
- 2.3 Reserve arrangements for the terminal national sections
- connecting the voice-frequency telegraph terminal equipment to the
- international voice-frequency telegraph line
-
-
- For the terminal national sections of an international
- voice-frequency telegraph link, reserve sections should be consti-
- tuted using national telephone-type circuits or spare channels,
- lines, etc.
-
-
- 2.4 Changeover arrangements from normal to reserve lines
-
-
- 2.4.1 When an international telephone line (i.e. part of an
- international telephone circuit) is used to provide a reserve for
- the international voice-frequency telegraph line (or for one of its
- sections as mentioned in S 2.2 above), there should be changeover
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- arrangements to enable the changeover from the normal line to the
- reserve line to be made as rapidly as possible. The changeover
- arrangements (Figure 2/M.800) should be such that on changeover,
- all signalling equipment, echo suppressors, etc., associated with
- the telephone circuit that is used as a reserve for the interna-
- tional voice-frequency telegraph line are disconnected on the line
- side. When the fault is cleared on the normal line, it should be
- possible to join it to the signalling equipment, echo
- suppressors, etc., of the telephone circuit used, until the agreed
- time for restoration to the normal routing.
-
-
- It is desirable to introduce as little disturbance as possible
- when changing back from reserve to normal. Arrangements of cords
- and parallel jacks can be devised to achieve this.
-
- 2.4.2 The changeover arrangements shown in Figure 2/M.800
- could be applied to sections of the international voice-frequency
- telegraph line mentioned under S 2.2 above when it is not possible
- to obtain an overall reserve for the international voice-frequency
- telegraph line. Normal sections and the corresponding reserve sec-
- tions should be routed via suitable changeover arrangements at the
- stations concerned.
-
-
- 2.4.3 Making manual, automatic or semiautomatic international
- telephone circuits available for reserve purposes for
- voice-frequency telegraphy should be in accordance with the
- instructions issued and the arrangements made by the respective
- Administrations. Should the normal and reserve lines both be
- faulty, the technical services of the Administration concerned
- should take immediate joint action to find a temporary remedy.
-
-
-
- Figure 2/M.800 p.2
-
-
-
- 2.5 Designation and identifying marks
-
-
- Normal and reserve links, etc., should be clearly distinguish-
- able from other circuits both from the point of view of designation
- (see Recommendation M.140 [3]) and identifying marks (see
- Recommendation M.810).
-
-
- References
-
-
- [1] CCITT Recommendation Use of bearer circuits for
- voice-frequency telegraphy , Vol. VII, Rec. R.77.
-
- [2] CCITT Recommendation Composition and terminology of
- international voice-frequency telegraph systems , Vol. III,
- Rec. H.21.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- [3] CCITT Recommendation Designation of international cir-
- cuits, groups, group and line links, digital blocks, digital paths,
- data transmission systems and related information , Vol. IV,
- Rec. M.140.
-
-
- Recommendation M.810
-
- SETTING UP AND LINING UP AN INTERNATIONAL VOICE-FREQUENCY
-
-
- TELEGRAPH LINK FOR PUBLIC TELEGRAPH CIRCUITS
-
- (FOR 50, 100 AND 200 BAUD MODULATION RATES)
-
-
- 1 Designation of control stations
-
-
- 1.1 The designation of the control and sub-control stations
- should follow the principles given in Recommendations M.80 [1]
- and M.90 [2].
-
-
- 1.2 By agreement between Administrations, one of the terminal
- international repeater stations will be designated as the
- voice-frequency telegraph link control station: the other termi-
- nal being the terminal sub-control station for the link.
-
-
- 1.3 In making this choice, the location of the circuit control
- station for any international circuit designated as a reserve for
- the international voice-frequency telegraph line should also be
- taken into account, as it is very desirable that the
- voice-frequency telegraph link control station should be at the
- same terminal station as the circuit control station for the nom-
- inated reserve circuit.
-
-
- 2 Organization
-
-
- 2.1 The maintenance organization arrangements for
- voice-frequency telegraph links should conform to the general prin-
- ciples given in Recommendation M.70 [3] concerning telephone-type
- circuits.
-
-
-
- 3 Setting up and lining up a voice-frequency telegraph link
-
-
- 3.1 In setting up and lining up voice-frequency telegraph
- links, three types of link are concerned, differing mainly in their
- constitution and they are referred to as type I, type II and
- type III links:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- - Type I are those links which contain 4-kHz sec-
- tions;
-
- - Type II are those links which contain one or more
- 3-kHz sections, or contain a mixture of 3-kHz and 4-kHz sections;
-
- - Type III are those links which are routed over
- audio-frequency line plant.
-
- 3.2 The method to be used and the procedure to be followed in
- setting up and lining up a voice-frequency telegraph link are the
- same as those given in Recommendation M.580 [4] for public tele-
- phone circuits as far as it applies.
-
-
- The test signals to be used for these three types of link and
- the limits of the loss/frequency characteristics at intermediate
- sub-control stations are the same as those given in
- Recommendation M.580 [4] for public telephone circuits.
-
- 3.3 The overall loss/frequency characteristics of types I, II
- and III voice-frequency telegraph links are given in
- Tables 1/M.810, 2/M.810 and 3/M.810 respectively.
-
-
- 3.4 The nominal relative power level of the test signals at
- the input and output of the link will be those normally used by the
- Administration concerned.
-
- If the voice-frequency telegraph terminal stations are remote
- from the terminal international centres, the Administration should
- arrange the nominal transmission loss of the national section so
- that the levels at the input and output of the voice-frequency
- telegraph link are respected, and to permit the conventional
- national levels to be used at terminal international centres.
-
- 3.5 For voice-frequency telegraphy the use of the
- edge-channels of a group should be avoided if at all possible since
- these may introduce greater distortion than other channels of the
- group.
-
-
-
- 4 Limits for the overall loss of a voice-frequency telegraph
- link
-
-
-
- 4.1 Nominal overall loss at 1020 Hz
-
-
- The nominal relative power levels at the extremities of the
- voice-frequency telegraph link are those levels normally used in
- the national network of the countries concerned so that it is not
- possible to recommend a particular nominal value for the overall
- loss.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- The nominal relative power level at the input to the link and
- the absolute power level of the telegraph signals at this point
- must be such that the limits concerning the power level per tele-
- graph channel at a zero relative point on carrier systems are
- respected (see Annex A).
-
- Some Administrations have bilateral agreements to reduce the
- total mean power level of frequency-shift voice-frequency telegraph
- systems to -13 dBm0 (50 uW0). The CCITT encourages such reduction
- where feasible. These Administrations have made their own determi-
- nation of the feasibility of operating at the reduced level. As a
- guide, other Administrations may wish to use the line parameters
- suggested in Annex B.
-
-
-
- 4.2 Overall loss/frequency distortion
-
-
- The variation with frequency of the overall loss of the link
- with respect to the loss at 1020 Hz must not exceed the following
- limits:
-
-
- 4.2.1 Type I - Links with 4-kHz sections throughout
-
- H.T. [T1.810]
- TABLE 1/M.810
-
- _______________________________________________________________
- Frequency range (Hz) {
- Overall loss relative to that at 1020 Hz
- }
- _______________________________________________________________
- Below 300 {
- Not less than -2.2 dB;
- otherwise unspecified
- }
- _______________________________________________________________
- 300- 400 -2.2 to +4.0 dB
- _______________________________________________________________
- 400- 600 -2.2 to +3.0 dB
- _______________________________________________________________
- 600-3000 -2.2 to +2.2 dB
- _______________________________________________________________
- 3000-3200 -2.2 to +3.0 dB
- _______________________________________________________________
- 3200-3400 -2.2 to +7.0 dB
- _______________________________________________________________
- Above 3400 {
- Not less than -2.2 dB;
- otherwise unspecified
- }
- _______________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Table 1/M.810 [T1.810],p.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 4.2.2 Type II - Links with one or more 3-kHz sections or
- with a mixture of 3-kHz and 4-kHz sections
-
- H.T. [T2.810]
- TABLE 2/M.810
-
- _______________________________________________________________
- Frequency range (Hz) {
- Overall loss relative to that at 1020 Hz
- }
- _______________________________________________________________
- Below 300 {
- Not less than -2.2 dB;
- otherwise unspecified
- }
- _______________________________________________________________
- 300- 400 -2.2 to +4.0 dB
- _______________________________________________________________
- 400- 600 -2.2 to +3.0 dB
- _______________________________________________________________
- 600-2700 -2.2 to +2.2 dB
- _______________________________________________________________
- 2700-2900 -2.2 to +3.0 dB
- _______________________________________________________________
- 2900-3050 -2.2 to +6.5 dB
- _______________________________________________________________
- Above 3050 {
- Not less than -2.2 dB;
- otherwise unspecified
- }
- _______________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Table 2/M.810 [T2.810], p.
-
-
-
-
-
- 4.2.3 Type III - Links on audio-frequency line plant
-
- H.T. [T3.810]
- TABLE 3/M.810
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- _______________________________________________________________
- Frequency range (Hz) {
- Overall loss relative to that at 1020 Hz
- }
- _______________________________________________________________
- Below 300 {
- Not less than -1,7 dB;
- otherwise unspecified
- }
- _______________________________________________________________
- 300- 400 -1.7 to +4.3 dB
- _______________________________________________________________
- 400- 600 -1.7 to +2.6 dB
- _______________________________________________________________
- 600-1600 -1.7 to +1.7 dB
- _______________________________________________________________
- 1600-2400 -1.7 to +4.3 dB
- _______________________________________________________________
- 2400-2450 -1.7 to +5.2 dB
- _______________________________________________________________
- 2450-2520 -1.7 to +7.0 dB
- _______________________________________________________________
- Above 2520 {
- Not less than -1.7 dB;
- otherwise unspecified
- }
- _______________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Table 3/M.810 [T3.810], p.
-
-
-
-
- 4.2.4 Application of Recommendations
-
-
- Figure 1/M.810 shows, in respect of loss/frequency distortion,
- the relationship of the Recommendations relating to international
- voice-frequency telegraph links. In practice, in the majority of
- cases, the international line between terminal international cen-
- tres will be well within the limits of Recommendation M.580 [4] and
- no additional equalization will be needed to meet the overall
- requirement of this Recommendation.
-
-
- Figure 1/M.810, p.
-
-
-
-
-
- 4.3 Change of overall loss due to a changeover to the
- reserve line or section
-
-
- 4.3.1 The nominal relative power level at 1020 Hz of the nor-
- mal and reserve lines or sections at the changeover points for a
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- particular direction of transmission should be the same. This level
- will be that normally used in the national network of the country
- concerned.
-
-
-
- 4.3.2 Change in overall loss at 1020 Hz
-
-
- Bearing in mind that the overall loss of the normal line (or
- section) and the reserve line (or section) are both subject to
- variations with time, these variations being, in general, uncorre-
- lated, it is not possible to assign a limit to the change of inser-
- tion loss at 1020 Hz introduced by the changeover procedure.
-
-
- 4.3.3 Values of overall loss over the frequency band, rela-
- tive to the value at 1020 Hz
-
-
- The overall-loss/frequency distortion characteristic of the
- link when established over the normal route should be within 2 dB
- of that of the link when established over the reserve route. This
- limit applies over the frequency bands 300-3400 Hz, 300-3050 Hz or
- 300-2520 Hz as appropriate.
-
- There should ordinarily be no difficulty in achieving the
- limit when only one portion of the link, for example, the interna-
- tional telegraph line, or one section, has a reserve section. How-
- ever, when two or more portions of the link are separately associ-
- ated with reserve portions it becomes administratively difficult to
- ensure that all combinations of normal and reserve portions comply
- with the limit. In these circumstances the best that can be done is
- to ensure that the overall-loss/frequency characteristics of
- corresponding normal and reserve portions are as much alike as pos-
- sible. Careful attention should be paid to the impedance of normal
- and reserve sections at the point where they are connected to the
- changeover apparatus so that errors due to changing mismatch losses
- are minimized. A suitable target would be for all impedances con-
- cerned to have a return loss against 600 ohms, non-reactive, of
- not less than 20 dB over the appropriate band of frequencies.
-
-
- 5 Measurement of noise voltage on a voice-frequency telegraph
- link
-
-
-
- 5.1 Uniform-spectrum random noise
-
-
- The psophometrically weighted noise voltage should be measured
- at the ends of the voice-frequency telegraph link in both direc-
- tions of transmission. The unweighted noise voltage should also be
- measured using a CCITT psophometer without the weighting network.
-
- The mean psophometric noise power referred to a point of zero
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- relative level should not exceed 80 | 00 pW (-41 dBm0p).
-
- Note 1 - If recourse is made to synchronous operation, a
- higher noise level might be tolerated (such as -30 dBm0p for a par-
- ticular telegraph system).
-
- Note 2 - In principle it would be desirable to specify a
- value of unweighted noise power level. However, such a value cannot
- be specified in unqualified terms. If the noise power is uniformly
- distributed over the band 300-3400 Hz and if there is no signifi-
- cant noise power outside this band then the level of the unweighted
- noise power will be approximately 2.5 dB higher than the value of
- the weighted noise power, using the weighting filters specified in
- Recommendation O.41 [5]. However, on a practical telegraph link
- neither of these conditions is likely to be met. The
- overall-loss/frequency distortion will affect the within-band noise
- distribution and, in a telegraph installation, there is likely to
- be significant noise power outside the band, particularly at low
- frequencies.
-
- As a consequence, it is not possible to recommend a limit for
- the unweighted noise power level and the CCITT psophometer with the
- telephone weighting networks should continue to be the instrument
- used for specifying and measuring random noise power levels on
- international voice-frequency telegraph links.
-
-
-
- 5.2 Impulsive noise
-
-
- Impulsive noise should be measured with an instrument comply-
- ing with Recommendation O.71 [6] and H.13 [7]. (See also Recommen-
- dation V.55 [8].)
-
- The number of counts of impulsive noise which exceeds -18 dBm0
- should not exceed 18 in 15 minutes.
-
-
- 6 Crosstalk
-
-
- 6.1 The near-end crosstalk ratio (between the go and return
- telephone channels) of the link should be at least 43 dB.
-
-
- 6.2 The crosstalk ratio between the link and other carrier
- circuits is restricted by the Recommendation cited in [9] to not
- worse than 58 dB.
-
- Crosstalk in any audio cables forming part of the terminal
- national sections should not normally significantly worsen the
- crosstalk ratio.
-
-
- 7 Group-delay/frequency distortion
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Practical experience obtained up to the present shows that it
- is not necessary to recommend limits for group-delay/frequency dis-
- tortion for 50-baud voice-frequency telegraph links even when they
- are composed of several sections each provided on telephone chan-
- nels of carrier systems. There is little practical experience with
- higher-speed telegraph systems.
-
- It may happen that under adverse conditions some telephone
- channels of the link are of insufficient quality to provide
- 24 telegraph channels. In such a case a better combination of tele-
- phone channels must be chosen for the telegraph service.
-
-
- 8 Frequency error
-
-
- The frequency error introduced by the link must not be greater
- than _ | Hz.
-
-
- 9 Interference caused by power supply sources
-
-
- When a sinusoidal test signal is transmitted over the link at
- a level of 0 dBm0 the level of the strongest unwanted side com-
- ponent should not exceed -45 dBm0.
-
- Note - The limit of -45 dBm0 is based on a test-signal level
- of 0 dBm0, and this level should be used when making this test.
-
-
- 10 Variation of overall loss with time
-
-
- 10.1 Before a voice-frequency telegraph link is placed into
- service it is desirable that a test signal in each direction of
- transmission should be monitored at the distant end with a
- level-recording instrument for a minimum of 24 hours. Where possi-
- ble the instrument should be capable of detecting level variations
- of duration as short as 5 ms.
-
-
- 10.1.1 The difference between the mean value and the nominal
- value of the overall transmission loss should not exceed 0.5 dB.
-
- 10.1.2 The standard deviation about the mean value should not
- exceed 1.0 dB.
-
- However in the case of circuits set up wholly or partly on
- older-type equipment, and where the international line consists of
- two or more circuit sections, a standard deviation not exceeding
- 1.5 dB may be accepted.
-
-
- 11 Amplitude hits, short interruptions in transmission and
- phase hits
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Such impairments to voice-frequency telegraph links reduce the
- quality of telegraph transmission. For example, phase hits in
- excess of 110 will cause errors in telegraph transmission. Ampli-
- tude hits, short interruptions in transmission and phase hits
- should be reduced to the minimum possible, bearing in mind the need
- to meet the error rate objectives given in
- Recommendations F.10 [10] and R.54 [11].
-
-
-
- 12 Record of results
-
-
- All measurements made during the lining-up of the link are
- reference measurements and should be carefully recorded and a copy
- sent by the sub-control stations to the control station in accor-
- dance with Recommendation M.570 [12].
-
-
- 13 Information concerning voice-frequency telegraph terminal
- equipment
-
-
- Information concerning international voice-frequency telegra-
- phy is given in Annex A and Annex B.
-
-
- 14 Marking of circuits used for voice-frequency telegraphy
-
-
- Any interruption of a voice-frequency telegraph link, even of
- very short duration, spoils the quality of the telegraph transmis-
- sion. It is therefore desirable to take great care when making
- measurements on circuits used for voice-frequency telegraphy. To
- draw the attention of staff to this, all equipments used for voice
- telegraphy links should bear a special identification mark in the
- terminal exchanges and, where necessary, in repeater stations where
- the circuits are accessible.
- ANNEX A
- (to Recommendation M.810)
-
- Basic characteristics of telegraph equipments used
-
- in international voice-frequency telegraph systems
-
- A.1 Limiting power per channel
-
-
-
- A.1.1 Amplitude-modulated voice-frequency telegraph systems
- at 50 bauds
-
-
- Administrations will be able to provide the telegraph services
- with carrier telephone channels permitting the use of
- 24 voice-frequency telegraph channels (each capable of 50 bauds) on
- condition that the power of the telegraph channel signal on each
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- channel, when a continuous marking signal is transmitted, does not
- exceed 9 microwatts at zero relative level points.
-
- For 18 telegraph channels only, the power so defined may be
- increased to 15 microwatts per telegraph channel, so that even
- telephone channels with a relatively high noise level can then be
- used.
-
- The power per telegraph channel should never exceed
- 35 microwatts, however few channels there may be.
-
- These limits are summarized in Table A-1/M.810.
- H.T. [T4.810]
- TABLE A-1/M.810
- Limiting power per telegraph channel when sending a continuous
-
- marking signal
- in amplitude-modulated voice-frequency telegraph
- systems at 50 bauds
-
- _________________________________________________
- {
-
-
-
-
-
- System
-
- uW0 dBm0
- _________________________________________________
- 12 telegraph channels or less 35 -14.5
- 18 telegraph channels 15 -18.3
- 24 (or 22) telegraph channels 9 -20.5
- _________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Table A-1/M.810 [T4.810], p.
-
-
-
-
-
- A.1.2 Frequency-shift voice-frequency telegraph systems at
- 50 bauds
-
-
- The total average power transmitted to the telephone-type cir-
- cuit is normally dependent on the transmission characteristics and
- length of the circuit as follows:
-
- a) For circuits with characteristics not exceeding
- the limits given in Annex B, the total average power transmitted
- by all channels of a system should preferably be limited to
- 50 microwatts at a point of zero relative level. This sets, for the
- average power of a telegraph channel (at a point of zero relative
- level), the limits given in Table A-2/M.810.
-
- b) For other circuits, the total average power
- transmitted by all channels of a system is limited to
- 135 microwatts at a point of zero relative level. This sets, for
- the average power of a telegraph channel (at a point of zero
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- relative level), the limits given in Table A-3/M.810.
-
- Note - The values in Tables A-2/M.810 and A-3/M.810 assume
- the provision of a pilot channel on the telegraph bearer.
- H.T. [T5.810]
- TABLE A-2/M.810
- Normal limits for the power for telegraph channel in FMVFT systems
-
- for bearer circuits
- with caracteristics not exceeding
- the limits given in Annex B
-
- _______________________________________
-
-
-
-
- {
-
-
-
- in microwatts {
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- {
-
-
-
-
-
- _______________________________________
- 12 or less 4.67 -24.8
- _______________________________________
- 18 or less 2.67 -25.8
- _______________________________________
- 24 or less 2.67 -27.8
- _______________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Table A-2/M.810 [T5.810], p.
-
- H.T. [T6.810]
- TABLE A-3/M.810
- Normal limits for the power per telegraph channel
- in FMVFT systems for other bearer circuits
-
- _______________________________________
-
-
-
-
- {
-
-
-
- in microwatts {
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- {
-
-
-
-
-
- _______________________________________
- 12 or less 10.8 -19.7
- _______________________________________
- 18 or less 7.2 -21.5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- _______________________________________
- 24 or less 5.4 -22.7
- _______________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
-
- |
- |
- |
-
- |
- |
- |
-
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
- Table A-3/M.810 [T6.810], p.
-
-
-
-
-
- A.2 Telegraph channel carrier frequencies
-
-
- For international voice-frequency 24-channel, 50-baud, nonsyn-
- chronous telegraph systems the frequency series consisting of odd
- multiples of 60 Hz has been adopted, the lowest frequency being
- 420 Hz as shown in Table A-4/M.810 below. In the case of
- frequency-shift systems, these frequencies are the mean frequencies
- of the telegraph channels, the frequency of the signal sent to line
- being 30 Hz (or 35 Hz) above or below the mean frequency according
- to whether A or Z space is being sent.
- H.T. [T7.810]
- TABLE A-4/M.810
- Unable to convert table Table A-4/M.810 [T7.810], p.
-
-
-
- In addition, a pilot channel using a frequency of 300 Hz or
- 3300 Hz can be used. For details of the normal frequencies used in
- other types of voice-telegraph systems, see the numbering scheme
- given in Table 2/R.70 | fIbis [13].
-
-
- BLANC
-
-
- ANNEX B
- (to Recommendation M.810)
-
- Limits required by a bearer circuit for FMVFT application if the
-
- total power transmitted by all channels is set at 50 microwatts
-
- B.1 Loss/frequency distortion
-
-
- The variation with frequency of the overall loss of the link
- with respect to the loss at 1020 Hz must not exceed the limits
- given in Table B-1/M.810.
- H.T. [T8.810]
- TABLE B-1/M.810
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- _______________________________________________________________
- Frequency range (Hz) {
- Overall loss relative to that at 1020 Hz
- }
- _______________________________________________________________
- Below 300 {
- Not less than -2.0 dB;
- otherwise unspecified
- }
- _______________________________________________________________
- 300- 500 -2.0 to +4.0 dB
- _______________________________________________________________
- 500-2800 -1.0 to +3.0 dB
- _______________________________________________________________
- 2800-3000 -2.0 to +3.0 dB
- _______________________________________________________________
- 3000-3250 -2.0 to +4.0 dB
- _______________________________________________________________
- 3250-3350 -2.0 to +7.0 dB
- _______________________________________________________________
- Above 3350 {
- Not less than -2.0 dB;
- otherwise unspecified
- }
- _______________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Table B-1/M.810 [T8.810], p.
-
-
-
-
-
- B.2 Random noise
-
-
- The mean psophometric noise power referred to a point of zero
- relative level should not exceed 32 | 00 pW0p (-45 dBm0p), using a
- psophometer in accordance with Recommendation O.41 [5].
-
-
- B.3 Impulsive noise
-
-
- The number of counts of impulsive noise which exceed -28 dBm0
- should not exceed 18 in 15 minutes, when measured with an impulsive
- noise counter in accordance with Recommendation O.71 [6].
-
-
- B.4 Error rates
-
-
- The telegraph character error rate which may be caused by
- interruptions and noise in the bearer circuit should not exceed the
- limits stated in Recommendations R.54 [11] and F.10 [10].
-
-
- B.5 Bearer length
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Reduction of power levels from 135 microwatts to 50 microwatts
- applies only to bearers of length up to 3000 km (see Note).
-
- Note - The study of reduction of levels on longer bearer
- paths (greater than 3000 km) is continuing.
-
-
-
- References
-
-
- [1] CCITT Recommendation Control stations , Vol. IV,
- Rec. M.80.
-
- [2] CCITT Recommendation Sub-control stations , Vol. IV,
- Rec. M.90.
-
- [3] CCITT Recommendation Guiding principles on the general
- maintenance organization for telephone-type international circuits
- , Vol. IV, Rec. M.70.
-
- [4] CCITT Recommendation Setting up and lining up an inter-
- national circuit for public telephony , Vol. IV, Rec. M.580.
-
- [5] CCITT Recommendation Psophometer for use on
- telephone-type circuits , Table 1/O.41, Vol. IV, Rec. O.41.
-
- [6] CCITT Recommendation Impulsive noise measuring equip-
- ment for telephone-type circuits , Vol. IV, Rec. O.71.
-
- [7] CCITT Recommendation Characteristics of an
- impulsive-noise measuring instrument for telephone-type circuits ,
- Orange Book, Vol. III-2, Rec. H.13, ITU, Geneva, 1977.
-
- [8] CCITT Recommendation Specification for an impulsive
- noise measuring instrument for telephone-type circuits , Green
- Book, Vol. VIII, Rec. V.55, Annex, ITU, Geneva, 1973.
-
- [9] CCITT Recommendation General performance objectives
- applicable to all modern international circuits and national exten-
- sion circuits , Vol. III, Rec. G.151, S 4.1.
-
- [10] CCITT Recommendation Character error rate objective
- for telegraph communication using 5-unit start-stop equipment ,
- Vol. II, Rec. F.10.
-
- [11] CCITT Recommendation Conventional degree of distortion
- tolerable for standardized start-stop 50-baud systems , Vol. VII,
- Rec. R.54.
-
- [12] CCITT Recommendation Constitution of the circuit;
- preliminary exchange of information , Vol. IV, Rec. M.570.
-
- [13] CCITT Recommendation Numbering of international VFT
- channels , Vol. VII, Rec. R.70 bis , Table 2/R.70 bis .
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Recommendation M.820
-
- PERIODICITY OF ROUTINE TESTS ON INTERNATIONAL VOICE-FREQUENCY
-
-
-
- TELEGRAPH LINKS
-
-
- 1 The recommendations concerning the periodicity of routine
- tests on international telephone circuits given in
- Recommendation M.610 [1] are applicable to international
- voice-frequency telegraph links.
-
-
- 2 In certain cases and by agreement between the Administra-
- tions concerned, routine maintenance measurements may be omitted if
- those Administrations so wish. This applies in particular where the
- Administrations concerned consider that the telegraph traffic may
- be seriously disturbed due to the lack of a suitable reserve cir-
- cuit or reserve sections.
-
-
- 3 Routine measurements of level at one frequency (1020 Hz)
- should be made at the intervals recommended for international tele-
- phone circuits (see Table 1/M.610 [2]).
-
-
- Measurements at different frequencies should be made once
- every 12 months. Some Administrations make an annual reline of the
- voice-frequency telegraph link instead of routine measurements.
-
-
- 4 It is desirable that the maintenance measurements on the
- voice-frequency telegraph reserve circuit should be made just
- before the maintenance measurements on the normal circuit, so that
- the reserve circuit can replace the normal circuit while the latter
- is being tested.
-
-
- 5 When several voice-frequency telegraph systems are in use
- between two repeater stations and if the maintenance measurements
- on the telephone circuits between these stations are spread over
- several days, the measurements on the circuits carrying the
- voice-frequency telegraph systems should also be spread over these
- days; this makes it easier to carry out the measurements on the
- voice-frequency telegraph circuits.
-
-
- 6 The periodicity of measurements on telephone circuits used
- as reserve circuits is as given in Table 1/M.610 [2].
-
-
- For circuits providing reserve sections for an international
- voice-frequency telegraph link the periodicity of routine measure-
- ments will be agreed upon between the Administrations concerned.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 7 A check should be made when suitable opportunities occur, to
- see that the limits shown in Tables A-1/M.810, A-2/M.810
- and A-3/M.810 for the permissible power per telegraph channel are
- not exceeded.
-
-
-
- References
-
-
- [1] CCITT Recommendation Periodicity of maintenance meas-
- urements on circuits , Vol. IV, Rec. M.610.
-
- [2] Ibid. , Table 1/M.610.
-
-
-
-
- Recommendation M.830
-
- ROUTINE MEASUREMENTS TO BE MADE ON INTERNATIONAL
-
-
-
- VOICE-FREQUENCY TELEGRAPH LINKS
-
-
- 1 The routine maintenance measurements to be made in the two
- directions of transmission are measurements of level and overall
- loss/frequency distortion using a measurement signal of -10 dBm0
- and noise.
-
-
- The measuring frequencies are as follows:
-
- - circuits providing an 18-channel telegraph sys-
- tem: 300, 400, 600, 800, 1020, 1400, 1900, 2400, 2600 Hz;
-
- - circuits providing a 24-channel telegraph system:
- 300, 400, 600, 800, 1020, 1400, 1900, 2400, 3000, 3200, 3400 Hz.
-
- 2 If the nominal overall loss/frequency distortion exceeds the
- limits given in Recommendation M.810, any faults existing should
- first be removed, and the link should then be readjusted to within
- the limits given in Recommendation M.810.
-
-
- 3 Weighted and unweighted noise measurements should be made on
- the voice-frequency telegraph link at the time of the routine meas-
- urements of level as given in Recommendation M.820.
-
-
-
- 5.2 Setting up and lining up international time division mul-
- tiplex (TDM) telegraph systems
-
-
-
- Recommendation M.850
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- INTERNATIONAL TIME DIVISION MULTIPLEX (TDM)
-
-
-
- TELEGRAPH SYSTEMS
-
-
- 1 General description of an international TDM system
-
-
- 1.1 Figure 1/M.850 illustrates a basic international TDM tele-
- graph system. The system operates via an international TDM tele-
- graph link operated at 2400 bit/s and has a capacity of 46 tele-
- graph channels at 50 bauds. Other modulation rates up to 300 bauds
- can be accommodated (with resulting reduction in channel capacity)
- as shown in Recommendation R.101, Table 1/R.101 [1].
-
-
- 1.2 The international TDM telegraph system may be carried over
- a dedicated voice-frequency link as shown in Figure 1/M.850 or mul-
- tiplexed with other TDM systems or other services onto a higher bit
- rate data transmission system on a voice-frequency or digital data
- transmission link as shown in Figure 2/M.850.
-
- 1.3 International telegraph systems may also be carried on
- high level (e.g. 50, 56 kbit/s) data transmission links utilizing
- analogue group band or on digital (64 kbit/s) paths. Examples of
- such multiplexing arrangements are illustrated in
- Recommendation M.1300.
-
-
- 2 Basic TDM telegraph links (Figure 1/M.850)
-
-
- 2.1 Basic TDM telegraph links may be carried on 4-wire analo-
- gue telephone circuits. The link comprises two unidirectional
- transmission paths, one for each direction of transmission, between
- the terminal TDM telegraph equipments. The TDM telegraph links are
- terminated with data modems , usually (but not necessarily) located
- within the terminal TDM telegraph equipment, which operate at
- 2.4 kbit/s.
-
-
- 2.2 The international TDM telegraph link consists of an inter-
- national TDM telegraph line together with any terminal national
- sections connecting the international line to the terminal TDM
- telegraph equipment. Where the TDM equipment is located in the ter-
- minal international centres, the TDM link consists only of the
- international TDM telegraph line.
-
- 2.3 The international TDM telegraph line (between terminal
- international centres) may be constituted by using a channel in a
- carrier group or channels in tandem on a number of groups. National
- and international sections can be interconnected to set up an
- international TDM telegraph link.
-
- Wherever possible, an international TDM telegraph line should
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- be provided on a channel of a single carrier group, thereby avoid-
- ing intermediate audio-frequency points. However it is recognized
- that in some cases such a direct group may not exist or, for spe-
- cial routing reasons, it may not be possible to set up the interna-
- tional TDM line in this preferred way.
-
-
- 2.4 Terminal national sections connected to the interna-
- tional TDM telegraph line
-
-
- In some cases the TDM telegraph terminal equipment is remote
- from the terminal international centre of the international TDM
- telegraph line (Figure 1/M.850), and such cases necessitate the
- provision of terminal national sections in order to establish
- international TDM telegraph links. These sections may be routed on
- channels of carrier groups or on audio plant (amplified or unampli-
- fied) or on digital streams.
-
-
- 3 TDM telegraph links multiplexed on higher bit rate data
- systems (Figure 2/M.850)
-
-
- 3.1 When TDM telegraph links are multiplexed onto higher bit
- rate data transmission systems , the associated analogue
- voice-frequency data links generally follow the principles outlined
- in S 2, with the exception that these data links are operated at
- higher bit rates (usually 4.8, 7.2 or 9.6 kbit/s).
-
-
- Should a TDM telegraph link be extended from the higher level
- multiplexer, for example, to a remote point such as a third country
- or to renters premises, then it is necessary to use an appropriate
- modem as shown in Figure 2/M.850.
-
-
-
- FIGURE 1/M.850 + Remarque, p. 12
-
-
-
- FIGURE 2/M.850, p. 13
-
-
-
-
- 3.2 TDM telegraph links multiplexed onto voice-frequency data
- transmission systems operated at 4.8, 7.2 or 9.6 kbit/s may be
- further multiplexed onto higher bit rate data transmission systems
- operated at 50, 56, 64 kbit/s etc. Examples of such arrangements
- are shown in Recommendation M.1300.
-
-
-
- 4 Characteristics, line-up, and maintenance of TDM telegraph
- links and systems
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 4.1 Characteristics and line-up
-
-
- Guidance on the transmission characteristics and line-up pro-
- cedures for both analogue and digital TDM telegraph links may be
- found in Recommendation M.1350, SS 2 and 3. In this regard, the TDM
- telegraph link is identical to a 2.4 kbit/s data transmission link.
-
-
- 4.2 Maintenance
-
-
- Maintenance procedures and limits for both analogue and digi-
- tal TDM telegraph links may be found in Recommendation M.1355.
-
- Maintenance procedures and limits for TDM telegraph systems
- are under study. However, guidance on the maintenance of these sys-
- tems may be found in Recommendations R.75 [2] and V.51 to V.53 [3].
-
-
- 5 Reserve arrangements for TDM telegraph links
-
-
-
- 5.1 General requirements
-
-
- All necessary action should be taken to ensure that the number
- of interruptions on TDM telegraph systems be kept to a minimum, and
- further that interruptions, when they do occur, be kept as short as
- possible.
-
-
- 5.2 Basic international telegraph links
-
-
- Reserve arrangements for international TDM telegraph systems
- operated over links at 2.4 kbit/s should be in accordance with the
- principles and procedures specified for international voice fre-
- quency telegraph systems. Refer to Recommendation M.800, S 2. In
- some instances, it may be desirable to establish dual, diversely
- routed international TDM telegraph links and to change over from
- the active link to the reserve link when the international TDM
- telegraph system fails or becomes degraded. The change over may be
- done automatically, semi-automatically, or manually, by agreement
- between Administrations involved. Guidance on changeover arrange-
- ments may be found in Recommendations M.800 and R.150 [4].
-
-
- 5.3 TDM telegraph links multiplexed on higher level data
- transmission systems
-
-
- When international TDM telegraph links are multiplexed onto
- higher bit rate data transmission systems, reserve arrangements
- will normally depend upon the principles and procedures adopted for
- the higher level data transmission link. Reserve arrangements for
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- these data transmission links require further study.
-
-
- 6 TDM telegraph link designation
-
-
- The form of designation for the TDM telegraph link and its
- reserve is given in Recommenda tion M.140, S 1.2.2 [5].
-
-
- 7 Marking of equipment associated with TDM telegraph links
-
-
- It is recommended that all equipment associated with the TDM
- telegraph link and nominated reserve circuits (channel translating
- equipment, distribution frames, etc.) be positively marked to make
- them readily identifiable to the maintenance staff.
-
-
- 8 TDM telegraph link control and sub-control stations
-
-
- 8.1 One control station should be agreed bilaterally between
- the Administrations involved for each TDM telegraph link prior to
- setting up the link. Principles concerning the definition, respon-
- sibilities, functions, and appointment of control stations may be
- found in Recommendation M.1012.
-
-
-
- 8.2 One sub-control station should be agreed bilaterally
- between Administrations involved for each TDM telegraph link prior
- to setting up the link. Principles concerning the definition,
- responsibilities, functions, and appointment of sub-control sta-
- tions may be found in Recommendation M.1013.
-
-
- References
-
-
- [1] CCITT Recommendation Code and speed dependent TDM sys-
- tem for anisochronous telegraph and data transmission using bit
- interleaving , Vol. VII, Rec. R.101.
-
- [2] CCITT Recommendation Maintenance measurements on code
- independent international sections of international telegraph cir-
- cuits , Vol. VII, Rec. R.75.
-
- [3] CCITT Recommendations on the Maintenance of interna-
- tional telephone - Type circuits used for data transmissions ,
- Vol. VIII, Recs. V.51 to V.53.
-
- [4] CCITT Recommendation Automatic protection switching of
- dual diversity bearers , Vol. VII, Rec. R.150.
-
- [5] CCITT Recommendation Designation of international cir-
- cuits, groups, group and line links, digital blocks, digital paths,
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- data transmission systems and related information , Vol. IV,
- Rec. M.140.
-
- 5.3 Lining up and maintenance of international phototelegraph
- links
-
-
-
- Recommendation M.880
-
-
- INTERNATIONAL PHOTOTELEGRAPH TRANSMISSION
-
-
-
-
- 1 Types of circuits
-
-
- 1.1 Permanent circuits used between phototelegraph stations
- should be set up and lined up as 4-wire circuits between these sta-
- tions.
-
-
- 1.2 Circuits used normally (and preferentially) will be nom-
- inated international telephone circuits, the international line of
- which is normally extended to the phototelegraph station on a
- 4-wire basis, it being ensured that the terminal equipment (line
- relay sets, terminating sets, echo suppressors, etc.) is discon-
- nected.
-
-
- 2 Line-up
-
-
- 2.1 The same conditions apply to the overall transmission loss
- of 4-wire circuits used for phototelegraphy as apply in general for
- telephony.
-
-
- 2.2 If an international telephone circuit is used to provide a
- phototelegraph circuit and if the international line is extended to
- the phototelegraph station the levels of the circuit so established
- should be such as to maintain the levels found on the level diagram
- of the telephone circuit.
-
-
- 3 Relative levels
-
-
- If phototelegraph transmissions take place simultaneously from
- a transmitting station to several receiving stations, arrangements
- shall be made at the junction point so that, on the circuits fol-
- lowing the junction point, the same power levels are maintained as
- those prescribed for individual transmissions.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 4 Loss/frequency distortion
-
-
- 4.1 For phototelegraph transmission using frequency modula-
- tion, the use of a telephone circuit having a loss/frequency
- characteristic as given in Recommendation M.580 [1] will generally
- make it unnecessary to equalize the loss/frequency distortion of
- the lines joining the phototelegraph stations to the terminal
- international repeater stations. Such lines will have characteris-
- tics that follow national practice.
-
-
-
- 4.2 When amplitude modulation is used, the loss/frequency dis-
- tortion between phototelegraph stations should not exceed 8.7 dB at
- any frequency in the band of frequencies transmitted. Since the
- band of frequencies required is less than the full bandwidth of the
- telephone-type circuit used for the phototelegraph transmission and
- the loss/frequency distortion over the bandwidth of the
- telephone-type circuit (see Recommendation M.580 [1]) is nominally
- much less than 8.7 dB, it will not in general be necessary to com-
- pensate for the loss/frequency distortion of the lines joining the
- phototelegraph stations to the international terminal repeater sta-
- tions.
-
- 4.3 Figure 1/M.880 shows, in respect of loss/frequency distor-
- tion, the relationship of the Recommendations relating to interna-
- tional phototelegraph links.
-
-
- 5 Variation of overall loss with time
-
-
- The overall loss should remain as constant as possible during
- picture transmissions.
-
- 5.1 The difference between the mean value and the nominal
- value of the transmission loss should not exceed 0.5 dB.
-
-
- 5.2 The standard deviation about the mean value should not
- exceed 1.0 dB. However, in the case of circuits wholly or partly on
- older-type equipment, and where the international line consists of
- two or more circuit sections, a standard deviation not exceeding
- 1.5 dB may be accepted.
-
-
- Figure 1/M.880, p.
-
-
-
- 6 Phase/frequency distortion
-
-
- Phase/frequency distortion limits the range of satisfactory
- phototelegraph transmission the phototelegraph transmission range,
- should not exceed:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- __
- t
- [Unable to Convert Formula]
-
-
-
- where fp is the maximum modulating frequency for the definition and
- scanning speed concerned.
-
- (See Recommendation T.12 [2].)
-
-
- 7 Sent signal power
-
-
- The conditions applying to the transmitted power in phototele-
- graph transmission are as follows:
-
- The sent voltage of the phototelegraph signal at maximum
- amplitude should be so adjusted that the absolute power of the sig-
- nal, at a zero relative level point found from the level diagram of
- the telephone circuit , is for a double sideband
- amplitude-modulated phototelegraph transmission -3 dBm referred to
- 1 mW and for a frequency-modulated transmission -13 dBm. With
- amplitude modulation, the black level is usually 30 dB below the
- white level.
-
-
- In order to avoid the risk that phototelegraph signals be dis-
- turbed, for example by dial pulses transmitted over adjacent chan-
- nels or by noise, it is important that the sending level should be
- as high as permissible; however, it shall not exceed -13 dBm0 on
- the multichannel system and the power at the output of the sending
- apparatus shall not exceed 1 mW.
-
- This value of -13 dBm0 is in accordance with
- Recommendation V.2 [3], since in all cases the phototelegraph
- transmissions are operated in simplex. This value may have to be
- revised if the percentage of circuits used for applications other
- than telephony should go beyond the assumptions indicated in
- Recommendation V.2 [3].
-
-
- 8 Marking of equipment
-
-
- When a telephone circuit is specially allocated for phototele-
- graph transmission (circuit identified by the letter F), the asso-
- ciated equipment should be specially marked to alert staff. All
- interruptions in a phototelegraph transmission, no matter how
- short, and all variations of level due to maintenance work should
- be avoided.
-
-
- 9 Organization of maintenance
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- The maintenance organization arrangements for international
- phototelegraph links should conform to the general principles given
- in Recommendation M.70 [4] concerning telephone-type circuits.
-
- The designation of control and sub-control stations should
- follow the principles given in Recommendations M.1012 and M.1013.
-
-
- 10 Routine tests
-
-
- The recommendations for 4-wire telephone circuits concerning
- the periodicity of measurements are also applicable to phototele-
- graph circuits.
-
- Routine measurements should be made at the intervals recom-
- mended for international telephone circuits (see
- Table 1/M.610 [5]).
-
-
- 11 Information concerning frequencies transmitted by phototelegraph
- equipment
-
-
-
- 11.1 Amplitude modulation
-
-
- For audio circuits the recommended carrier frequency is about
- 1300 Hz.
-
- For circuits routed on carrier systems and effectively
- transmitting the band of frequencies 300-3400 Hz the recommended
- carrier frequency is about 1900 Hz.
-
-
- 11.2 Frequency modulation
-
-
-
- Mean frequency 1900 Hz
-
-
- White frequency 1500 Hz
-
- Black frequency 2300 Hz
-
- Phasing signal frequency 1500 Hz
-
- 12 Information about the characteristics to be taken into
- account when choosing the circuit used for phototelegraph transmis-
- sions is given in Recommendation T.12 [2].
-
-
-
- References
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- [1] CCITT Recommendation Setting up and lining up an inter-
- national circuit for public telephony , Vol. IV, Rec. M.580.
-
- [2] CCITT Recommendation Range of phototelegraph transmis-
- sions on a telephone-type circuit , Vol. VII, Rec. T.12.
-
- [3] CCITT Recommendation Power levels for data transmission
- over telephone lines , Vol. VIII, Rec. V.2.
-
- [4] CCITT Recommendation Guiding principles on the general
- maintenance organization for telephone-type international circuits
- , Vol. IV, Rec. M.70.
-
- [5] CCITT Recommendation Periodicity of maintenance meas-
- urements on circuits , Vol. IV, Rec. M.610, Table 1/M.610.
-
-
-
- MONTAGE: PAGE PAIRE = PAGE BLANCHE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- SECTION 6
-
- INTERNATIONAL LEASED GROUP AND SUPERGROUP LINKS
-
-
-
-
- Recommendation M.900
-
- USE OF LEASED GROUP AND SUPERGROUP LINKS FOR
-
-
-
- WIDE-SPECTRUM SIGNAL TRANSMISSION (DATA, FACSIMILE, ETC.)
-
- NOMENCLATURE AND COMPOSITION
-
-
- This Recommendation assumes that the constitution is such that
- the terminal national sections are provided by means of plant which
- is suitable for the transmission of wide-spectrum signals in the
- frequency band 60-108 kHz and 312-552 kHz respectively and the
- link is defined as given in S 1.1 below (see also
- Recommendations H.14 [1] and H.15 [2]).
-
-
- In the case where the terminal national section uses plant not
- specifically destined for operation in the basic group or super-
- group band, it will be necessary to provide the terminal national
- centre concerned with equipment to translate such a band of fre-
- quencies, i.e. the data base band signals, into the 60-108 kHz or
- 312-552 kHz band and vice versa.
-
- Where this is done, the link should be regarded as being
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- between defined access points at the two terminal national centres
- at points as close as possible to such translating equipment.
-
-
- 1 Nomenclature
-
-
-
- 1.1 international leased group or supergroup link
-
-
- The whole of the transmission path - as defined in
- Recommendation M.300 [3] - provided between defined test access
- points at an interface at the renter's premises. The renter's ter-
- minal equipment is therefore not included in the link (see
- Figure 1/M.900).
-
-
- 1.2 terminal national section
-
-
- The lines and apparatus between the defined test access points
- at the interface in the renter's premises and corresponding defined
- test access points at the terminal national centre.
-
-
- 1.3 national main section
-
-
- The whole of the assembly of national group or supergroup sec-
- tions connecting the defined test access points at the terminal
- national centre and defined test access points at the terminal
- international centre.
-
-
-
- 1.4 international main section
-
-
- The whole of the assembly of national and international group
- or supergroup sections, between the defined test access points at
- the two terminal international centres (see
- Recommendation M.460 [4]). These access points should be the same
- points as those for the ends of the national main sections involved
- in the leased link.
-
-
- 1.5 terminal national centre
-
-
- The nearest national installation (for example, a repeater
- station) to which the renter's equipment is connected by the termi-
- nal national section. This centre will normally be staffed and
- equipped to make transmission measurements.
-
-
- 1.6 terminal international centre
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- The international centre (for example, an international
- repeater station) serving the renter in the country in which the
- renter's installation is situated. There will be two terminal
- international centres in an international leased group or super-
- group link or more in the case of a multiterminal link.
-
-
- 2 Composition
-
-
- 2.1 International leased group or supergroup links will be set
- up on plant that is similar to that used for providing national and
- international groups or supergroups for public services, that is on
- symmetric pair, coaxial cable, radio-relay, etc., systems and will
- follow similar routes.
-
-
-
- 2.2 The leased group or supergroup link
-
-
- 2.2.1 Figure 1/M.900 gives an example of the basic composition
- of a leased group or supergroup link and of the nomenclature used.
-
-
- In general such a link will consist of a number of national
- and international sections interconnected by through-connection
- equipment, but it should be noted that in order to achieve particu-
- lar transmission characteristics some restriction is placed on the
- degree of complexity of the routing of the link.
-
-
- Figure 1/M.900, p.
-
-
-
-
- 2.2.2 Two basic types of centre are shown in Figure 1/M.900.
- These are:
-
-
- a) the terminal international centre, and
-
- b) the terminal national centre.
-
- These define the limits of the national and international main
- sections and feature in the overall line-up and subsequent mainte-
- nance of the link.
-
-
- 2.3 National and international main sections
-
-
- 2.3.1 When establishing the constitution of national and
- international main sections the number of group sections within
- each main section should be kept to a minimum. This is necessary
- to:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- - minimize the amount of group-delay distortion
- correction required;
-
- - to simplify the effort necessary for the satis-
- factory maintenance of the link.
-
- 2.3.2 Where possible, it is desirable that each national and
- international main section be provided on a single group or super-
- group section.
-
-
- In practice, however, it may not always be possible to satisfy
- this requirement. Two group or supergroup sections per main section
- should be considered as the normal limit, to be exceeded in excep-
- tional circumstances only.
-
-
- 2.4 Terminal national sections
-
-
- Terminal national sections will usually be provided on plant
- which differs from that normally used for national or international
- groups or supergroups.
-
- In most cases, such terminal sections may be provided on:
-
- - symmetric pair cable specially provided between
- the terminal national centre (repeater station) and the renter's
- premises;
-
- - existing local line plant possibly involving
- intermediate installations (for example, telephone exchanges) in
- the local network;
-
- - combinations of the above.
-
- The particular routing arrangements and the constitution of
- such sections are determined by the national practice of the coun-
- try concerned.
-
-
- 2.5 Choice of the group position within a supergroup
-
-
- It is very desirable, when choosing the routing of a group, to
- avoid the use of groups 1 and 5 as far as possible because of the
- difficulties which may be experienced in equalizing for group-delay
- distortion due to the edge characteristics of such group sections.
-
-
- 3 Provision of group or supergroup reference pilots and
- automatic regulators
-
-
-
- 3.1 Pilots
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 3.1.1 A group or supergroup reference pilot frequency as
- recommended by the CCITT (Recommendation M.460 [4]) should be
- transmitted on all international leased links for maintenance and
- regulation purposes.
-
-
- Following national practice, the pilot may be injected either
- at the sending modem (as provided for in the Recommendation cited
- in [5], for example), or at the first repeater station (terminal
- national centre). When a pilot is injected at a renter's premises,
- it is recommended that the frequency of the pilot shall be one of
- those mentioned in Recommendation M.460 [4] (preferably
- 104.080 kHz and 547.920 kHz respectively), and that the pilot sig-
- nal shall conform in all respects to the requirements in that
- Recommendation.
-
-
- 3.2 Group and supergroup link regulation
-
-
- An automatic regulator should be provided on an international
- group or supergroup leased link in order to ensure the necessary
- overall stability of the link.
-
- The point of insertion of such a regulator may be at the
- renter's premises or at the terminal national centre depending upon
- the particular arrangement of the Administration concerned.
-
-
-
- References
-
-
- [1] CCITT Recommendation Characteristics of group links for
- the transmission of wide-spectrum signals , Vol. III, Rec. H.14.
-
- [2] CCITT Recommendation Characteristics of supergroup
- links for the transmission of wide-spectrum signals , Vol. III,
- Rec. H.15.
-
- [3] CCITT Recommendation Definitions concerning interna-
- tional transmission systems , Vol. IV, Rec. M.300.
-
- [4] CCITT Recommendation Bringing international group,
- supergroup, etc., links into service , Vol. IV, Rec. M.460.
-
- [5] CCITT Recommendation Data transmission at 48 kilobits
- per second using 60-108 kHz group band circuits , Vol. VIII,
- Rec. V.35, S 7.
-
-
- Recommendation M.910
-
- SETTING UP AND LINING UP AN INTERNATIONAL LEASED GROUP LINK
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- FOR WIDE-SPECTRUM SIGNAL TRANSMISSION
-
-
- 1 General
-
-
- 1.1 The international leased group links in this Recommenda-
- tion relate to corrected group links in the Recommendation cited
- in [1].
-
-
- 1.2 The composition of a leased group link and the terminology
- used for maintenance purposes is given in Recommendation M.900.
-
- 1.3 The procedure for setting up an international leased group
- link should as far as possible follow the principles given in
- Recommendation M.460 [2].
-
- 1.4 For the purpose of this Recommendation, the constitution
- and subsequent line-up and maintenance practice assumes that the
- group link between renters' premises is operated throughout in the
- frequency range 60-108 kHz.
-
- 1.5 Where, as in some cases, modems are fitted at the terminal
- national centres the group link is defined as existing between
- defined access points at these centres.
-
- In such cases the terminal national section is treated for
- lining-up and maintenance purposes as a separate section and not
- part of the group link as defined in Recommendation M.900.
-
- 1.6 In some cases, where the wide-spectrum transmission equip-
- ment located at the renter's premises is not frequency band res-
- tricted, it may be found necessary to include a through-group
- filter at the terminal national centre in the transmitting direc-
- tion of transmission, in order to prevent interference by the
- wide-spectrum signals into adjacent groups in the carrier systems,
- over which the group is routed.
-
-
- Also, when measuring at the terminal national centre in the
- receiving direction of transmission, a through-group filter may be
- necessary in the measuring circuit, in order to prevent signals
- from adjacent groups affecting the measurement results.
-
-
- 2 Setting-up of an international leased group link
-
-
-
- 2.1 National and international main section
-
-
- With the exception of the terminal national section, the pro-
- visions of Recommendation M.460 [2] shall apply to the setting-up
- and the interconnection of the group sections constituting the
- national and international main section.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 2.2 Terminal national sections
-
-
- Because of the particular arrangements adopted for providing
- these sections within the country concerned, the setting-up of such
- sections will follow the practice determined within the country
- concerned.
-
-
-
- 2.3 Application of the group reference pilot
-
-
- The application of a group reference pilot (preferably
- 104.08 kHz), whether injected into the group path at the renter's
- premises or whether it is injected at the terminal national centre,
- should conform to the requirements of Recommendation M.460 [2].
-
-
- 3 Lining up an international leased group link
-
-
-
- 3.1 Lining up the national and international main sections
-
-
- 3.1.1 The reference test frequency to be used should be
- 84 kHz.
-
-
- 3.1.2 The lining-up of these sections should follow the pro-
- cedure and method given in the Recommendation cited in [3].
-
- 3.1.3 The national main sections may be lined up separately
- from the international main sections since no international
- cooperation is needed.
-
- 3.1.4 The limits given in Table 2/M.460 [4] should apply to
- these main sections. In addition, the group-delay distortion of the
- national and international sections should be measured and the
- results recorded.
-
-
- 3.2 Terminal national sections
-
-
- The lining-up of these sections will follow the national prac-
- tice of the country concerned.
-
-
- 3.3 Interconnection of terminal national sections and
- national main section
-
-
- The levels and impedances in the frequency band concerned of
- the terminal national sections and the national main section at the
- terminal national centre should be made compatible with the levels
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- and impedances specified for the access point at this centre.
-
-
- 3.4 Overall line-up of the link
-
-
- When the national and international main sections have been
- lined up and interconnected using the necessary through-group
- equipment, measurements should be made between the terminal access
- points, either at the renter's premises or in exceptional cases at
- the terminal national centres.
-
- In addition to level measurements the group-delay distortion
- within the frequency band 68-100 kHz should be measured and the
- values relative to the minimum group-delay distortion within the
- band should be recorded for subsequent maintenance use. If neces-
- sary, group-delay equalizers have to be inserted into the link
- where appropriate.
-
- The procedure and method to be used for the line-up should
- follow that given in Recommendation M.460 [2], but the limits to be
- achieved are those given below.
-
-
- 3.4.1 Overall loss at the reference frequency
-
-
- The overall loss at the reference frequency between the
- renters' premises cannot normally be specified because of the free-
- dom accorded to Administrations to adopt nominal relative levels
- which is their national or agency practice.
-
- If, however, it is necessary to specify a particular value of
- overall loss as a result of a request by a renter this may be done
- only after prior consultation and agreement between the Administra-
- tions concerned.
-
-
- 3.4.2 Loss/frequency distortion
-
-
- The loss/frequency distortion of the overall link is shown in
- Figure 1/M.910. It should be measured over the frequency range
- 60-108 kHz and equalized with a group link equalizer as necessary
- to meet the limits with respect to the loss at 84 kHz.
-
- Note 1 - If the service channel is provided, additional
- equalization may be needed and there will be no possibility of
- employing simplified through-group filters
-
- Note 2 - 84 kHz is the reference frequency for the purposes
- of specifying and measuring attenuation distortion. The group
- reference pilot at 104.08 kHz may still be used as the regulating
- pilot, however, as required.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Figure 1/M.910, p.
-
-
-
- 3.4.3 Group-delay distortion
-
-
- 3.4.3.1 The group-delay distortion of the link should not
- exceed 45 us relative to the minimum value within the band of fre-
- quencies 68-100 kHz.
-
-
- 3.4.3.2 If the group-delay distortion exceeds the value given
- in S 3.4.3.1 above, equalization should be provided as agreed by
- the two terminal Administrations concerned to bring the group-delay
- distortion of the link within this value and the results recorded.
-
- 3.4.3.3 Where the group link terminates at the two terminal
- national centres, the value of the group-delay distortion given in
- S 3.4.3.1 above should apply between these two centres.
-
-
- 3.4.4 Level variations
-
-
- Irrespective of whether the group link terminates at the two
- renters' premises concerned, or at the two terminal national cen-
- tres the link should be checked in accordance with the Recommenda-
- tion cited in [5] in order to ensure that no faults exist. The
- following limits should not be exceeded:
-
- - short-term variations: _ | dB,
-
- - long-term variations: _ | dB, relative to the
- nominal value.
-
-
-
-
-
- 3.4.5 Carrier leak
-
-
- The group link should be subjected to measurement of each car-
- rier leak individually at the receiving terminal in both directions
- of transmission.
-
- The objective for the level of any carrier leak, appearing in
- the frequency band 60-108 kHz is -40 dBm0.
-
- In some cases, however, because of the composition of the
- _________________________
- This limit can normally be met without overall link
- equalization for group links consisting of three group
- sections in tandem using corrected through-group con-
- nection equipment.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- link, which will generally involve the use of both old and new
- types of equipment it may not be possible to achieve this value.
-
- At all events, no carrier leak in the band 60-108 kHz should
- exceed -35 dBm0.
-
- Note - The attention of users is drawn to the fact that
- failure to reach the value -40 dBm0 might cause difficulties in
- cases where links are used for data transmission.
-
-
- 3.4.6 Impulsive noise
-
-
- For the specification of an impulsive-noise measuring instru-
- ment for wideband data transmissions, see Recommendation H.16
- (O.72) [6]. No limit value can be given at the present time.
-
-
- 3.4.7 Frequency error
-
-
- The frequency error over the group link should not exceed
- 5 Hz. When this measurement is necessary, it should be made
- according to bilateral agreement between Administrations.
-
-
- 3.4.8 Background noise
-
-
- At the present time it is not possible to specify a limit
- value for background noise for this class of group link. However, a
- check of the background noise should be made and recorded at every
- line-up.
-
-
- References
-
-
- [1] CCITT Recommendation Characteristics of group links for
- the transmission of wide-spectrum signals , Vol. III, Rec. H.14,
- S 2.
-
- [2] CCITT Recommendation Bringing international group,
- supergroup, etc., links into service , Vol. IV, Rec. M.460.
-
- [3] Ibid. , S 7.2.
-
- [4] Ibid. , Table 2/M.460.
-
- [5] Ibid. , S 8.
-
- [6] CCITT Recommendation Characteristics of an
- impulsive-noise measuring instrument for wideband data transmission
- , Vol. III, Rec. H.16.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- BLANC
-
-
-
-
- MONTAGE: PAGE PAIRE = PAGE BLANCHE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- SECTION 7
-
- INTERNATIONAL LEASED CIRCUITS
-
-
- 7.1 General
-
-
- Preface
-
-
- International leased circuits will in most cases be provided
- over the same sort of transmission lines, cables, systems, etc., as
- figure in an international telephone connection established over
- the public switched telephone network. Hence the overall charac-
- teristics of international leased circuits from renter to renter
- can be expected to be similar to those of international telephone
- connections from subscriber to subscriber (except in so far as
- there are not intermediate telephone exchanges).
-
- The guiding principle in lining up an international leased
- circuit (and which is the same that has been adopted for public
- switched telephony) uses the notion given in Section 1 of the
- Series G Recommendations, Volume III, of an interface between the
- national and the international portions of the circuit.
-
- In the case of leased circuits, every Administration has esta-
- blished rules with which a renter's installation must comply before
- it may be connected to the circuit (for example, the maximum value
- of the absolute power level of the sent signal is defined). Furth-
- ermore, the Administration normally gives some indication of the
- minimum level it will deliver to the renter in the receive direc-
- tion of transmission.
-
- The following Recommendations have been drawn up in a way that
- ensures that in principle the nominal characteristics of an inter-
- national leased circuit, from the point of view of the renter, are
- similar to those of any analogous national leased circuit he may
- operate. In particular, the international leased circuit accepts
- and delivers nominally the same signal level as that accepted and
- delivered by an analogous national leased circuit. Hence in princi-
- ple the renter can use the same type of apparatus for both sorts of
- leased circuits and the need for special arrangements is minimized.
-
- A necessary consequence is that the nominal transmission loss
- between renters' premises cannot be specified by the CCITT. (It
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- can, however, in principle, be specified by the pair of terminal
- Administrations concerned.)
-
-
- Recommendation M.1010
-
- CONSTITUTION AND NOMENCLATURE OF INTERNATIONAL
-
-
-
- LEASED CIRCUITS
-
-
- 1 Some features of the constitution of international leased
- circuits are:
-
-
-
- a) the number of locations connected may be two or
- more;
-
-
- b) the circuit may be available either 2-wire or
- 4-wire at a renter's installation ;
-
- c) the transmission paths may be provided with a
- combination of unloaded (or loaded) subscribers line plant (in the
- local network), unloaded or loaded cable pairs (in the junction
- network) channels in frequency division multiplex carrier systems
- (in the national long-distance network and in the international
- network), and channels in time division multiplex transmission sys-
- tems (in the national or international network).
-
-
- Figure 1/M.1010 illustrates two types of circuits: those which
- connect two points and those connecting more than two points. These
- are referred to as point-to-point circuits and multiterminal cir-
- cuits respectively.
-
-
- Figure 1/M.1010 p.
-
-
-
- 2 Access points
-
-
- 2.1 It is recommended that Administrations establish access
- points on the various circuit sections analogous to the access
- points recommended for international telephony circuits in the pub-
- lic service at which the nominal relative levels are fixed and
- determined by the Administration. At the international centre it
- would be advantageous if the same relative level as that adopted
- _________________________
- Some Administrations do not provide the 2-wire facility
- for special quality international based circuits.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- for public circuits is used for leased circuits. Within the
- national networks there are very often access points of defined
- relative level and impedance provided in accordance with national
- practices and these points, together with the international access
- points, serve to divide the circuit into circuit sections.
-
-
- 2.2 In principle, an access point is also available at the
- renter's premises but it is not always convenient to test from
- there. Accordingly, the procedures recommended in this Section
- involve also the access points provided by Administrations in
- repeater stations or telephone exchanges near to the renter's
- installation for transmission measurements on international leased
- circuits.
-
- These are points between which it might be expected that meas-
- urements could be made, though the staff at such stations concerned
- do not always have experience in international maintenance pro-
- cedures. Measurements made by Administrations between renters'
- installations could encounter particular problems.
-
-
-
- 3 Definitions and nomenclature
-
-
- The definitions below are illustrated in Figure 2/M.1010.
-
-
- Figure 2/M.1010 p.
-
-
-
- 3.1 international leased circuit
-
-
- The whole of the assembly of lines and apparatus connecting
- the renter's terminal equipment (e.g. data modem) in one country to
- the renter's terminal equipment in another. The interfaces between
- the circuit and the renter's terminal equipment will be defined by
- the respective Administrations.
-
-
- 3.2 international link
-
-
- The whole of the assembly of international and national cir-
- cuit sections between terminal national centres.
-
-
- 3.3 international line
-
-
- The whole of the assembly of international and national cir-
- cuit sections between terminal international centres.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 3.4 national line
-
-
- The whole of the assembly of national circuit sections con-
- necting the terminal national centre to the terminal international
- centre. When a distinction is needed to indicate the transmission
- direction in one country the expressions national sending line ,
- that is, outgoing from the renter, and national receiving line ,
- that is, incoming to the renter, may be used.
-
-
- 3.5 terminal international centre
-
-
- The terminal international centre (TIC) for leased and special
- circuits is the international centre serving the renter in the
- country in which the renter's installation is situated. It marks
- the interface of the international and national lines and is nor-
- mally located in association with a terminal international centre
- for international public telephony circuits.
-
- Some Administrations may wish to locate the TIC for interna-
- tional leased and special circuits independently of that for public
- telephony circuits.
-
- In all cases there will be a transmission maintenance
- point (international line) (TMP-IL) (see Recommendation M.1014)
- located at each TIC for leased and special circuits.
-
- There will be two TICs in a point-to-point international cir-
- cuit. There may be more in a multiterminal circuit.
-
-
-
- 3.6 terminal national centre
-
-
- The national centre (e.g. repeater station, telephone
- exchange) that is:
-
- - nearest to the renter's installation,
-
- - provided with a circuit test point, so that
- transmission measurements can be made by appropriate staff.
-
-
- 3.7 terminal national section
-
-
- The lines and apparatus connecting the renter's installation
- with the terminal national centre concerned. There may be inter-
- mediate installations (e.g. telephone exchanges) in the terminal
- national section but they are assumed to have no testing facilities
- normally available.
-
-
- Recommendation M.1012
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- CIRCUIT CONTROL STATION FOR LEASED AND SPECIAL CIRCUITS
-
-
-
-
- 1 Definition of circuit control station
-
-
- The circuit control station is that point within the general
- maintenance organization which fulfils the control responsibilities
- for leased and special circuits, for example circuits used for
- voice-frequency telegraphy, facsimile and phototelegraphy.
-
-
- 2 Responsibilities
-
-
- The circuit control station is responsible for ensuring that
- the circuit assigned to it is set up and maintained to the required
- end-to-end standards in both directions of transmission and that,
- if the circuit fails, the outage time is kept to a minimum. The
- circuit control station carries out this responsibility by direct-
- ing, and/or coordinating other stations as necessary to ensure that
- satisfactory service is provided for which it has been assigned
- control.
-
-
- 3 Functions
-
-
- 3.1 Arranging for the setting up of the circuit and of the
- signalling equipment associated directly with the circuit and the
- related adjustments.
-
-
- 3.2 Controlling transmission measurements for the setting up
- and lining up of international circuits to within the recommended
- limits and keeping records of reference measurements (initial meas-
- urements).
-
- 3.3 Receiving fault reports from the:
-
- - circuit user or his representative, either
- directly or via nominated fault report points;
-
- - staff at the maintenance entities;
-
- - transmission maintenance point (international
- line) (TMP-IL) (see Recommendation M.1014);
-
- - sub-control station either directly or via the
- TMP-II.
-
- When the circuit control station receives a fault report from
- the circuit sub-control station a unique reference number should be
- issued and given to the sub-control station. (If national practices
- already involve the issue of a unique reference number this may be
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- used.) The reference number is recorded with the fault report by
- both the circuit control and sub-control stations.
-
- 3.4 Controlling routine maintenance measurements and tests on
- the due dates if scheduled, using the specified methods and in such
- a way that interruptions to service are limited to the shortest
- possible durations.
-
-
- 3.5 Obtaining cooperation from the circuit sub-control sta-
- tion, either directly or via the TMP-IL.
-
-
- 3.6 Directing the location of faults to the national line or
- the terminal national section in its own country, or beyond the
- national line to the international line, or to a foreign country.
-
- 3.7 Controlling the withdrawal of circuits from service.
-
- 3.8 Controlling the return of circuits to service, for exam-
- ple, after fault clearance , routine measurements, etc.
-
- 3.9 Arranging for withdrawal of circuits from service with the
- customer.
-
- 3.10 Keeping records of the routing of the leased and special
- circuits.
-
- 3.11 Knowing the possibilities of rerouting any circuit under
- its control.
-
- 3.12 Advising the customer (or ensuring that this be done) of
- the progress of fault clearance if appropriate, for example in the
- case of lengthy outages, and ensuring that the customer is advised
- when the fault has been corrected.
-
- 3.13 Keeping accurate records of circuit outages. The informa-
- tion recorded should be agreed with the circuit sub-control station
- and should include:
-
- - the reference number mentioned in S 3.3;
-
- - the circuit outage time;
-
- - the location of the fault that is, in a national
- or international circuit section or in the renter's equipment;
-
- - the general nature of the fault.
-
-
- 4 Appointment of control stations
- _________________________
- Where no such unique reference number exists, Adminis-
- trations may wish to consider a format containing the
- following elements: serial number/day of month/time
- (e.g. 47/03/1400G).
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- For each international leased or special circuit, a circuit
- control station is nominated by common agreement between the techn-
- ical services of the Administrations concerned. For making the
- choice, special consideration will be given to the location of the
- principal user and the length of the circuit within the territory
- of each terminal country.
-
- For unidirectional constituted circuits the circuit control
- station should be located in the receiving country.
-
- The circuit control station may be located at or near the ter-
- minal repeater station serving the user or at the terminal interna-
- tional centre which defines the terminal of the international line
- in the control country.
-
- The considerations involved in locating the circuit control
- station in a given country include the following:
-
- - availability of staff;
-
- - availability of adequate staff expertise;
-
- - availability of communication with user and other
- pertinent locations;
-
- - ability to fulfil the functions indicated in this
- Recommendation.
-
-
- Recommendation M.1013
-
-
- SUB-CONTROL STATION FOR LEASED AND SPECIAL CIRCUITS
-
-
-
-
- 1 Definition of circuit sub-control station
-
-
- The circuit sub-control station is a point within the general
- maintenance organization that assists the circuit control station
- for international leased and special circuits with which it is con-
- cerned and fulfils the control responsibilities for one or more
- circuit sections assigned to it.
-
-
- 2 Responsibilities
-
-
- It is the responsibility of the circuit sub-control station to
- inform the circuit control station about all noted events likely to
- affect the circuit under their control. If circuit sections are
- assigned to the circuit sub-control station for the purpose of con-
- trolling them, the circuit sub-control station is responsible for
- these circuit sections in the same way as the circuit control sta-
- tion is for the complete circuit.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 3 Functions
-
-
- 3.1 Performing the control functions for circuit sections,
- especially national sections, as given for the circuit control sta-
- tion.
-
-
- 3.2 Cooperating with the circuit control station and other
- circuit sub-control stations either directly or via the TMP-IL (see
- Recommendation M.1014) in ensuring that routine maintenance, fault
- location and clearance are carried out by the responsible testing
- points and/or maintenance units in a proper manner.
-
- When cooperation is requested by the circuit control station
- to locate and clear a fault the circuit sub-control station issues
- a unique reference. (If national practices already involve the
- issue of a unique reference number, this may be used) reference
- number is recorded with the fault report by both the circuit con-
- trol and sub-control stations.
-
- 3.3 Arranging that all relevant details concerning the loca-
- tion and subsequent clearance of faults are reported to the cir-
- cuit control station either directly or via the TMP-IL.
-
-
- 3.4 Keeping accurate records of any circuit outages with which
- it becomes involved. The information recorded should be agreed with
- the circuit control station and should include:
-
- - the reference number mentioned in S 3.2;
-
- - the circuit outage time;
-
- - the location of the fault, that is, in a national
- or international circuit section or in the renter's equipment;
-
- - the general nature of the fault.
-
-
- 4 Appointment of sub-control stations
-
-
- For each international leased or special circuit a terminal
- circuit sub-control station is appointed. This is as close as prac-
- tical to the end of the circuit remote from the circuit control
- station.
-
- In transit countries in which a circuit is brought to audio
- frequencies or 64 kbit/s etc., an intermediate circuit sub-control
- station is appointed at a suitable point for each direction of
- _________________________
- Where no such unique reference number exists, Adminis-
- trations may wish to consider a format containing the
- following elements: serial number/day of month/time
- (e.g. 47/03/1400G).
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- transmission. It is left to the Administration concerned to choose:
-
- - where this point shall be,
-
- - whether the sub-control functions for the two
- directions of transmission are vested in one station or two sta-
- tions,
-
- - whether, as may be desirable in the case of a
- large country, each direction of transmission has more than one
- circuit sub-control station per transit country.
-
- The technical service of the Administration concerned indi-
- cates its choice to the Administration responsible for the control
- station.
-
-
- Recommendation M.1014
-
-
- TRANSMISSION MAINTENANCE POINT (INTERNATIONAL LINE) (TMP-IL)
-
-
-
-
- 1 Definition of transmission maintenance point (international
- line)
-
-
- The transmission maintenance points (international line) are
- elements within the general maintenance organization located at the
- terminals of that part of a leased or special circuit known as the
- international line. An international line is defined in
- Recommendation M.1010. The class of circuits considered here are
- also referred to in Recommendations M.1012 and M.1013 concerning
- circuit control and sub-control functions for international leased
- and special circuits.
-
-
-
- 2 Responsibilities and functions
-
-
- The transmission maintenance point (international line) is
- responsible for the following set of functions:
-
- 2.1 Carrying out transmission measurements on the interna-
- tional line as appropriate for line-up and subsequent maintenance
- purposes.
-
-
- 2.2 Carrying out transmission measurements and tests in con-
- junction with TMP-IL points in other countries to localize faults
- to the international line, or beyond, and taking subsequent fault
- clearance action, as appropriate.
-
- 2.3 Carrying out those functions in accordance with national
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- procedures that will result in the isolation and clearance of any
- fault located in its country on behalf of the transmission mainte-
- nance point (international line) of the country with circuit con-
- trol. Such functions should also be carried out where the circuit
- control station is located in its own country.
-
- 2.4 Acting as liaison point with other countries in mainte-
- nance matters of mutual concern, as required.
-
-
- 3 Facilities
-
-
- The TMP-IL should be provided with the following facilities:
-
- 3.1 Access to the line access point directly or indirectly.
-
-
- 3.2 Association of test equipment to the line access points
- directly or indirectly to permit specified line parameters to be
- measured and fault localization to be made.
-
- 3.3 Communication with circuit control and sub-control sta-
- tions in its own country.
-
- 3.4 Communication with TMP-ILs in other countries to which
- circuits are routed to enable cooperation and information to be
- obtained and given.
-
-
- Recommendation M.1015
-
-
- TYPES OF TRANSMISSION ON LEASED CIRCUITS
-
-
-
-
- 1 A leased point-to-point or multiterminal circuit can be pro-
- vided in some instances for one type of service only, such as:
-
-
- - telephony (that is, speech transmission),
-
- - voice-frequency telegraphy,
-
- - data transmission,
-
- - facsimile.
-
- (The list is not complete but it includes the most common
- types of service.)
-
- 2 In other instances leased circuits are used for different
- transmission purposes at different times, in which case the circuit
- characteristics should in principle be determined by the require-
- ments of the more exacting form of transmission (when there is a
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- difference in requirements).
-
-
- Note - The North American expression for this type of opera-
- tion is alternate-use .
-
- 3 Although special quality leased circuits are not provided
- for normal telephony, it is recognized that they will be used for
- voice communication for service coordination purposes and for the
- alternate-use type of operation envisaged in S 2 above. The
- prescribed circuit limits in Recommendations M.1020 and M.1025 are
- not intended to define a circuit to be used to carry normal
- telephony, although a circuit which meets these limits will be ade-
- quate for voice communication purposes.
-
-
- 4 In some instances the bandwidth provided by the circuit is
- divided into two or more bands thus providing two or more circuits
- which may be used for different types of transmission.
-
-
- If the band is divided among two or more classes of transmis-
- sion by means of equipment under the control of the Administration,
- then band-dividing filters should wherever possible be used in
- preference to hybrid transformers because their use affords the
- possibility, in some circumstances, of carrying out maintenance
- operations on one circuit (obtained by frequency division) without
- affecting another.
-
-
- In those cases in which the frequency division is effected by
- the renter's apparatus in the renter's premises the Administrations
- should make it clear that even though the renter's apparatus must
- be approved by the Administration, this latter is not responsible
- for faults or the wrong operation of equipment attributable to the
- arrangement adopted by the renter.
-
- 5 Figures 1/M.1015 to 3/M.1015 illustrate some typical
- arrangements.
-
-
-
- FIGURE 1/M.1015 p.
-
-
-
- FIGURE 2/M.1015 p.
-
-
-
-
-
- FIGURE 3/M.1015 p.
-
-
-
- Recommendation M.1016
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- ASSESSMENT OF THE SERVICE AVAILABILITY PERFORMANCE
-
-
-
- OF INTERNATIONAL LEASED CIRCUITS
-
-
- 1 General
-
-
- The attention of Administrations is drawn to the benefits
- which can be derived from basing assessments of the service availa-
- bility performance of international leased circuits on internation-
- ally agreed practices. Adoption of common practices assists inter-
- national cooperation in identifying and clearing service difficul-
- ties, allows Administrations to compare performance results, and
- enables Administrations to present a common approach in discussions
- with customers.
-
- To this end, this Recommendation offers guidance to Adminis-
- trations on assessing the service availability of international
- leased circuits on the performance figures which may be used in
- such assessments and the method of deriving such performance fig-
- ures.
-
- Where appropriate, the terms and definitions given in
- Recommendation E.800 [1] and in Supplement No. 6 to
- Fascicle II.3[2] have been used in this Recommendation.
-
-
- 2 Basis of assessments of service availability performance
-
-
- In establishing a common method to assess the service availa-
- bility performance of international leased circuits, the CCITT has
- been concerned to ensure that the basic information for such an
- assessment is readily available to all Administrations. To this
- end, the assessment procedure in this Recommendation is based on a
- "service orientated" approach. This approach implies that fault
- reports made by customers and planned interruptions which unaccept-
- ably disrupt the customer's service, will play a major role.
-
-
- The adoption of the service orientated approach recognizes
- that in order to determine the true service availability perfor-
- mance with accuracy it would be necessary, for example, to continu-
- ously observe the circuits in some way, and to record the number
- and duration of all events which affect their performance. This
- _________________________
- In this Recommendation only full-time, point-to-point
- international leased circuits (as defined in
- Recommendation M.1010 and specified in
- Recommendations M.1020, M.1025 and M.1040) are con-
- sidered. The service availability performance of
- part-time, wide-band, multi-terminal, etc. interna-
- tional leased circuits requires further study.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- requirement cannot reasonably be met by most Administrations, and
- the best that can be achieved in practice is an approximation of
- the true performance.
-
- Another basic factor in the assessment procedure is that, for
- international leased circuits, no differentiation should be made on
- the basis of, for example, circuit length, circuit quality (Recom-
- mendations M.1020, M.1025 and M.1040), type of routing, etc. Such
- differentiation may be carried out by an Administration for inter-
- nal purposes if it so desires.
-
-
- 3 Purpose of the assessment procedure
-
-
-
- 3.1 General
-
-
- The assessment procedure specified in this Recommendation may
- be used for two purposes:
-
- - international purposes;
-
- - national purposes.
-
-
- 3.2 International purposes
-
-
- The assessment procedure is used for international purposes
- when two Administrations wish to assess together the performance of
- individual international leased circuits (or a group of circuits)
- as a whole for special investigations, for dealing with customers'
- complaints or similar situations.
-
- For such assessments it is necessary, as far as practicable,
- to gather simultaneously all available information on the perfor-
- mance of the circuit(s) from the Administrations involved. Thus,
- the stations with control responsibilities (Recommendations M.1012
- and M.1013) play an essential role.
-
- Note - This approach should be followed when investigations
- of the service availability performance of international leased
- circuits is undertaken by CCITT, as may be required from
- time-to-time.
-
-
- 3.3 National purposes
-
-
- The assessment procedure is used for national purposes when an
- individual Administration wishes to provide itself with information
- for its own internal purposes on the performance of the interna-
- tional leased circuits it operates, for example, to identify
- adverse trends in performance, or to check the effectiveness of its
- maintenance procedures. Such evaluations of international leased
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- circuit performance may be based on information already available
- to the Administration (without the need to gather information from
- other Administrations), and may be carried out for all circuits
- whether or not the Administration provides the control station
-
- Note - Assessments of the type mentioned in SS 3.1 and 3.2
- above in no way change the intent that control stations be informed
- of all faults detected by a sub-control station - see
- Recommendation M.1013.
-
-
- 4 Description of the assessment procedure
-
-
-
- 4.1 Collection of basic data
-
-
- Three fundamental conditions must be taken into account when
- collecting basic data for assessing the service availability per-
- formance of international leased circuits:
-
- a) faults, as reported by the customer and con-
- firmed by tests and investigations carried out by the Administra-
- tions;
-
- b) impairments to normal service, as reported by
- the customer, where the customer chooses to continue to use the
- circuit in a degraded condition;
-
- c) planned interruptions to service to enable, for
- example, permanent repair work to be carried out, maintenance rou-
- tines to be performed, etc. (see Recommendation M.490 [3])
-
- In determining if and how downtime is to be included in the
- assessment procedure, the following principles should be applied:
-
- - if tests or investigations reveal that a fault
- or impairment exists (or has existed), downtime will be taken into
- account;
-
- - if no fault or impairment is ever observed by the
- Administration, no downtime will be taken into account;
-
-
- - the time the Administration returns service to
- the customer (or the first attempt to do so) is taken as the end of
- downtime;
-
- - only those planned interruptions which unaccept-
- ably disrupt the customers service will be taken into account.
-
- Note - Where the bandwidth of the circuit is divided to pro-
- vide for simultaneous multiple transmission of different services
- (for example, simultaneous speech plus data), only those faults
- which affect the entire circuit and partial faults which require
- the entire circuit to be taken out of service for fault finding and
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- repair should be taken into account in the assessment procedure.
-
- These principles are embodied in Tables A-1/M.1016 and
- A-2/M.1016, which define those conditions where downtime should be
- taken into account, and the start and end of downtime, for customer
- reported faults and planned interruptions of service respectively.
-
- In certain circumstances the assistance of the customer or
- access to his premises is necessary to locate/clear a fault or an
- impairment to service. Where the customer denies such assistance,
- or denies access to his premises, the extra downtime which may
- result should be excluded from the assessment of performance.
-
-
- 4.2 Basic data
-
-
- The basic data required in connection with the assessment pro-
- cedure are:
-
- - the number of international leased circuits
- involved. Guidance on how to determine this number is given in
- Annex B;
-
- - the designation of each circuit involved, as
- agreed between Administrations in accordance with
- Recommendation M.140 [4];
-
- - for each involved circuit, the number of faults
- and unacceptable planned interruptions of service within the obser-
- vation period (refer to Annex A);
-
- - for each fault and planned interruption of ser-
- vice:
-
- i) the start of downtime (in UTC)
-
- ii) the end of downtime (in UTC)
-
- iii) the duration of downtime;
-
- - the address(es) of involved Administrations and,
- ideally, the name and telephone number of an appropriate contact
- person within each Administration.
-
- The additional information specified in S 5 below is also con-
- sidered as basic data for the assessment procedure.
-
-
- 4.3 Observation period
-
-
- For the purpose envisaged in S 3.2 above, the observation
- _________________________
- UTC = Coordinated universal time (UTC is equal to GMT,
- but replaces it; see Recommendation B.11 [5]).
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- period should be three calendar months. For practical reasons it is
- advisable that the observation period start at 00.00 UTC on the
- first day of a quarter of the year, and end at 24.00 UTC on the
- last day of that quarter.
-
- For the purpose envisaged in S 3.3 above, Administrations are
- free to select an observation period which suits their needs.
-
-
- 4.4 Exchange of information between terminal Administra-
- tions
-
-
- At the end of the observation period, the basic data is
- recorded on forms, examples of which are shown in Appendices I
- and II to this Recommendation. Examples of completed forms are
- given in Appendices III and IV to this Recommendation. Appendices I
- and III relate to information supplied by the control station,
- while Appendices II and IV relate to the sub-control station.
- Forms, completed with information from the sub-control station
- should be sent to the Administration which has control station
- responsibility.
-
-
- 4.5 Elaboration of results
-
-
- It is the responsibility of the Administration providing the
- control station to combine the information supplied by the control
- and sub-control stations. In practice it is found that this infor-
- mation is often different, and the following rules should be used
- to handle such differences:
-
- a) if a fault (or unacceptable planned interrup-
- tion) is reported by both control and sub-control stations, then
- the start of downtime is the earliest time indicated by the control
- or sub-control station and the end of downtime is that recorded by
- the control station;
-
-
- b) if a fault (or unacceptable planned interrup-
- tion) is reported by only one of the stations, then such a fault is
- deemed to have occurred and the corresponding downtime is taken
- into account.
-
- For rules used for combining the additional information speci-
- fied in S 5 below, reference is made to Annex C.
-
-
- 4.6 Presentation of service availability performance infor-
- mation
-
-
- The methods of calculating and presenting service availability
- performance information for international leased circuits are given
- in detail in Annex B.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- When service availability performance information is to be
- supplied to other Administrations, and when making international
- comparisons, the following parameters should be presented:
-
- a) number of circuits involved in the assessment.
- (Where this is less than the total number of circuits in service,
- the number of circuits in service should also be supplied),
-
- b) mean downtime per circuit,
-
- c) mean number of faults per circuit,
-
- d) mean time to failure (MTTF),
-
- e) percentage of circuits for which no downtime was
- recorded,
-
- f ) mean time to restore service (MTRS).
-
- In addition, and at the discretion of Administrations, the
- following parameters may also be presented:
-
- g) long-term mean downtime per circuit (over at
- least four consecutive observation periods),
-
- h) percentage of circuits with downtime less than
- the mean,
-
- i) downtime per circuit not exceeded by 95% of the
- circuits.
-
- For items a) to i) above, reference is made to Annex B.
-
-
- 4.7 Treatment of events which distort service availability
- performance figures
-
-
- Service availability performance figures for international
- leased circuits can be significantly influenced (or their meaning-
- fulness destroyed) by catastrophic events, for example, destruction
- of facilities by hurricane or earthquake. In view of this, the fol-
- lowing procedure should be adopted:
-
- Events which, based on previous experience, have noticeably
- influenced the performance figures should not be excluded. However,
- in this case, a second calculation should be made to present the
- performance figures with the catastrophic event(s) excluded.
-
- This procedure attempts to maximize the possibility of all
- events being included in the performance figures in some manner.
-
-
- 5 Considerations for comparing service availability perfor-
- mance information internationally
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 5.1 Administrations are encouraged to exchange service availa-
- bility performance information on international leased circuits on
- a regular basis.
-
-
- 5.2 In order to assist the interpretation of service availa-
- bility performance information, particularly when exchanged between
- Administrations, relevant additional information should also be
- supplied. Such additional information should cover the following
- aspects:
-
-
- a) priority maintenance attention to international
- leased circuits;
-
- b) duplicated circuit sections;
-
- c) fault clearance service;
-
- d) transmission limits which define whether or not
- a fault exists;
-
- e) information to customers about planned interrup-
- tions to service.
-
- Annex C specifies the above information in greater detail,
- while Appendices III and IV show how the information is to be
- exchanged between Administrations.
-
- 5.3 Detailed maintenance procedures and the methods by which
- Administrations confirm the existence of faults on international
- leased circuits are different. Such differences may lead to differ-
- ences in the service availability performance results obtained by
- Administrations.
-
-
- ANNEX A
- (to Recommendation M.1016)
-
- Rules for determining the number of faults and the downtime
-
- to be taken into account in assessments of the service
- availability performance of international leased circuits
-
- A.1 Detailed principles for the determination of the number of
- faults and impairments affecting service availability performance,
- and their resulting downtime, are given in Table A-1/M.1016.
-
-
-
- TABLE A-1/M.1016 (a traiter comme figure MEP), p.
-
-
-
-
- A.2 Principles to determine the downtime due to planned
- interruptions of service are given in Table A-2/M.1016.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- TABLE A-2/M.1016 (a traiter comme figure MEP), p.
-
-
- A.3 If a circuit is in a downstate at the beginning of the
- observation period, the fault or planned interruption of service
- causing the downstate is not taken into consideration. However,
- downtime is deemed to start at the beginning of the observation
- period.
-
- A.4 If a circuit is in a downstate at the end of the observa-
- tion period, the fault or planned interruption of service causing
- the downstate is taken into consideration. The downstate is deemed
- to end at the end of the observation period.
- ANNEX B
- (to Recommendation M.1016)
-
- Presentation of
- service availability performance
-
- information for international leased circuits
-
- Note - This annex contains additional explanations and rules
- of calculation for the performance parameters specified in S 4.6.
- SS B.1 to B.9 below relate to items a) to i) in S 4.6 respectively.
-
-
-
- B.1 Determination of the number of circuits involved in the
- assessment
-
-
- The calculation of service availability performance figures
- for international leased circuits requires that the exact number of
- circuits, n involved in the assessment be determined.
-
-
- For the assessment purposes envisaged in S 3.1, only those
- circuits existing throughout the observation period should be con-
- sidered. Thus, circuits provided or ceased within an observation
- period should be ignored.
-
- For the purpose envisaged in S 3.2, the number of circuits
- existing at the end of the observation period can be used in the
- calculation of service availability performance figures.
-
- For both the purposes mentioned above, all full-time,
- point-to-point international leased circuits should be included in
- the assessment. However, should the effort and cost of this
- approach be too great, Administrations may use a randomly selected
- sample of circuits of suitable size.
-
-
- B.2 Mean downtime per circuit
-
-
- Mean downtime per circuit should be calculated using the
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- following formula:
-
- Mean downtime per circuit (u DT ) = [Unable to Convert
- Formula]
- i
- ~
- fBi
- Downtime in -v'8p' observation period
-
-
-
- where
-
- n is the number of circuits involved (cf. S B.1)
-
- downtime is in hours
-
- uD\dT is in hours.
-
-
- B.3 Mean number of faults per circuit
-
-
- The mean number of faults per circuit should be calculated
- using the following formula:
-
- Mean number of faults per circuit =
- [Unable to Convert Formula]
-
- i
- ~
- fBi
-
- Faults
-
-
-
-
- where
-
- n is the number of circuits involved (cf. S B.1).
-
-
- B.4 Mean time to failure
-
-
- Mean time to failure (MTTF) should be calculated using the
- following formula:
-
- MTTF =
-
-
-
- vents that contribute downtime
-
-
- n x observation period)-(
- i
- ~
- fBi
- Downtime)
- _____________________________________
-
-
-
-
-
- where
-
- n is the number of circuits involved (cf. S B.1)
-
- MTTF is in days
-
- Observation period is in days
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Downtime is in days
-
- Note - The right hand side of the equation above is sometimes
- called mean time between failures (MTBF).
-
-
- B.5 Percentage of circuits for which no downtime was
- recorded
-
- Percentage of circuits for which no downtime was
- recorded =
-
- fIn
- __________________________________ x 100
-
-
-
-
- where
-
- n is the number of circuits involved (cf. S B.1)
-
- This percentage corresponds to the point marked "y1" in
- Figure B-1/M.1016.
-
-
-
- B.6 Mean time to restore service
-
-
- Mean time to restore service (MTRS) should be calculated using
- the following formula:
-
- MTRS =
-
-
-
-
- i
- ~
- fBi
- Events that contribute downtime
-
- i
- ~
- fBi
- Downtime
- ____________________________________
-
-
-
-
-
-
- where
-
- Downtime is in hours
-
- MTRS is in hours
-
-
- B.7 Long-term mean downtime per circuit
-
-
- Long-term mean downtime per circuit should be calculated on
- the basis of the results of at least four consecutive observation
- periods, weighted for the number of circuits involved, from the
- following formula:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- (In the case of 4 observation periods)
-
- Long-term mean downtime per circuit
- (u
- DT
- ~"
- ) =
- $$4o
- [Unable to Convert Formula]
- |
- |n ifR x u DT i fR |
- |
- $$4u
- [Unable to Convert Formula]
- n
- i $$4e
-
-
-
-
- where
-
- niand u DT i are the values corresponding to each
- observation period
-
- u DT i is in hours
-
- u DT ~" is in hours
-
-
-
- B.8 Percentage of circuits with downtime less than the mean
- value (uD\dT)
-
-
- The percentage of circuits with a total downtime less than the
- mean downtime per circuit (uD\dT) should be determined, for exam-
- ple, by preparing a cumulative frequency distribution graph as
- shown in Figure B-1/M.1016. (The required percentage of circuits is
- shown by point "y2" of Figure B-1/M.1016).
-
-
- FIGURE B-1/M.1016, p.
-
-
-
-
-
- B.9 Downtime per circuit not exceeded by 95% of circuits
-
-
- The downtime not exceeded by 95% of circuits is shown by the
- point marked "x (95%)" in Figure B-1/M.1016.
- ANNEX C
- (to Recommendation M.1016)
-
- Additional information to be exchanged between
-
- Administrations concerning
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- service availability performance
-
- C.1 Types of information
-
-
- Where service availability performance information is
- exchanged between Administrations, it should be supported by the
- following additional information:
-
- a) International leased circuits are given prior-
- ity maintenance attention over public circuits:
-
- i) YES
-
- ii) NO
-
- b) Duplicated circuit sections (circuit level
- only):
-
- i) SUBSCRIBER LINE (TERMINAL NATIONAL SECTION)
- AND/OR NATIONAL LINE (WHOLLY OR PARTLY) AND/OR INTERNATIONAL LINE
-
- ii) NO DUPLICATION
-
- c) Fault clearance service:
-
- i) OFFICE HOURS ONLY
-
- ii) 24 HOURS / 7 DAYS PER WEEK
-
- d) Limits applied to determine if a fault exists:
-
- i) Recommendation M.1040
-
- ii) Recommendation M.1040 type, but with more
- stringent limits/additional parameters
-
- iii) Recommendation M.1040 type, but with less
- stringent limits/fewer parameters
-
- iv) Recommendation M.1020
-
- v) Recommendation M.1020 type, but with more
- stringent limits/additional parameters
-
- vi) Recommendation M.1020 type, but with less
- stringent limits/fewer parameters
-
- vii) Recommendation M.1025
-
- viii) Recommendation M.1025 type, but with more
- stringent limits/additional parameters
-
- ix) Recommendation M.1025 type, but with less
- stringent limits/fewer parameters
-
- e) Customer informed about planned interruptions of
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- service:
-
- i) IN PRINCIPLE ALWAYS
-
- ii) IN PRINCIPLE NEVER
-
- iii) SOMETIMES
-
- This additional information should be recorded on the forms
- shown in Appendices I and II of this Recommendation.
- Appendices III and IV of this Recommendation show examples of these
- forms filled out by the control and sub-control stations respec-
- tively.
-
-
- C.2 Rules for the combination of additional information
- coming from the control and sub-control stations
-
-
-
- C.2.1 Rule for priority maintenance [S C.1a) above]
-
-
- Where a circuit gets priority maintenance attention by one
- terminal Administration and not the other, "priority maintenance
- attention" shall be deemed to exist on the circuit as a whole.
-
-
-
- C.2.2 Rule for duplicated circuit sections [S C.1b) above]
-
-
- Where at least one Administration states that the circuit is
- (partly) duplicated, the circuit is considered to be (partly)
- duplicated. Otherwise, the circuit is "not duplicated".
-
-
- C.2.3 Rule for fault clearance service [S C.1c) above]
-
-
- Where one terminal Administration provides "office hours only"
- fault clearance services while the other provides "24 hours/day"
- service, the circuit shall be deemed to have "office hours only"
- service.
-
-
- C.2.4 Rule for limits/parameters [S C.1d) above]
-
-
- Where different limits/parameters are applied by the terminal
- Administrations, the information from the control station Adminis-
- tration will prevail.
-
-
- C.2.5 Rule for planned interruptions [S C.1e) above]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- The rules for combining information on whether or not custo-
- mers are advised about planned interruptions of service are shown
- in Table C-1/M.1016.
- H.T. [T1.1016]
- TABLE C-1/M.1016
- Rules for combining information on planned
- interruptions of service
-
- ___________________________________________________________________________________
- {
- Control station
- Administration indicates:
- } {
- Sub-control station
- Administration indicates:
- } {
- Situation for the circuit
- is deemed to be:
- }
- ___________________________________________________________________________________
- Customer always informed Never Sometimes Always Customer is always informed
- ___________________________________________________________________________________
-
-
- Never Sometimes {
-
-
-
-
- {
-
- Always Customer is always informed
- ___________________________________________________________________________________
- Never Never
- Customer is never informed Sometimes Sometimes
- ___________________________________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Tableau C-1/M.1016 [T1.1016], p. 25
-
-
-
- BLANC
-
-
-
- APPENDIX I
-
- (to Recommendation M.1016)
-
-
- H.T. [T2.1016]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- ___________________________________________________________
- {
- INVESTIGATION OF INTERNATIONAL LEASED CIRCUIT PERFORMANCE
- DATA FROM THE ADMINISTRATION WITH CONTROL STATION
- RESPONSIBILITY
- }
- {
- (
- Observation period:
- )
- }
- {
- Circuits between
- (Control ADMIN)
- and
- (Sub-control ADMIN)
- }
- ___________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Start of downtime End of downtime
- Circuit designation Date Time (UTC) Date Time (UTC) Duration (min) Additional information (7)
- _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
- __________________________________________________________________________________________
- (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) a b c d e
- __________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- __________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- __________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- __________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- __________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- __________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- __________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- __________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- __________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- __________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- __________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- __________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- __________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- __________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- __________________________________________________________________________________________
- Contact person for this data
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- __________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- TABLE A-I/M.1016 [T2.1016], p. (a l'italienne)
-
-
-
-
- APPENDIX II
-
- (to Recommendation M.1016)
-
-
- H.T. [T3.1016]
-
- ___________________________________________________________
- {
- INVESTIGATION OF INTERNATIONAL LEASED CIRCUIT PERFORMANCE
- DATA FROM THE ADMINISTRATION WITH SUB-CONTROL STATION
- RESPONSIBILITY
- }
- {
- (
- Observation period:
- )
- }
- {
- Circuits between
- (Sub-control
- ADMIN)
- and
- (Control ADMIN)
- }
- ___________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Start of downtime End of downtime
- Circuit designation Date Time (UTC) Date Time (UTC) Duration (min) Additional information (7)
- _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- __________________________________________________________________________________________
- (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) a b c d e
- __________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- __________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- __________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- __________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- __________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- __________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- __________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- __________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- __________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- __________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- __________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- __________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- __________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- __________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- __________________________________________________________________________________________
- Contact person for this data
- __________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- TABLE A-II/M.1016 [T3.1016], p. (a l'italienne)
-
-
-
-
- APPENDIX III
-
- (to Recommendation M.1016)
-
-
- H.T. [T4.1016]
-
- ___________________________________________________________
- {
- INVESTIGATION OF INTERNATIONAL LEASED CIRCUIT PERFORMANCE
- DATA FROM THE ADMINISTRATION WITH CONTROL STATION
- RESPONSIBILITY
- }
- ___________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- {
- (
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Observation period: 1 Jan 1982 - 31 March 1982
- )
- } Example only
-
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
- {
- Circuits between United Kingdom (Control ADMIN) and Federal Republic of
- Germany (Sub-control ADMIN)
- }
-
-
- Start of downtime End of downtime
- Circuit designation Date Time (UTC) Date Time (UTC) Duration (min) Additional information (7)
- _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
- ____________________________________________________________________________________________________
- (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) a b c d e
- ____________________________________________________________________________________________________
- London-Frankfurt DP7 3 Jan 0810 3 Jan 1100 170 i i ii iv i
- ____________________________________________________________________________________________________
- 7 Feb 1600 7 Feb 1610 10
- ____________________________________________________________________________________________________
- 16 Feb 0930 16 Feb 1030 60
- ____________________________________________________________________________________________________
- 3 March 1700 4 March 0810 1050
- ____________________________________________________________________________________________________
- London-Dusseldorf DP3 17 Jan 1200 17 Jan 1410 130 i ii ii iv i
- ____________________________________________________________________________________________________
- London-Dusseldorf DP6 1 March 0825 1 March 0910 45 i ii ii iv i
- ____________________________________________________________________________________________________
- 3 March 0830 3 March 1000 90
- ____________________________________________________________________________________________________
- London-Hamburg XP7 21 Feb 1600 21 Feb 1815 135 i ii ii iv i
- ____________________________________________________________________________________________________
- 23 Feb 1105 23 Feb 1120 15 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- ____________________________________________________________________________________________________
- London-Frankfurt DP2 No Faults i ii ii iv i
- ____________________________________________________________________________________________________
- London-Frankfurt DP9 No Faults i ii ii iv i
- ____________________________________________________________________________________________________
- London-Frankfurt XP2 No Faults i ii ii iv i
- ____________________________________________________________________________________________________
- London-Hamburg DP1 No Faults i ii ii iv i
- ____________________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- ____________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Contact person for this data
- ____________________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- TABLE A-III/M.1016 [T4.1016], p. (a l'italienne)
-
-
-
-
- APPENDIX IV
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- (to Recommendation M.1016)
-
-
- H.T. [T5.1016]
-
- ___________________________________________________________
- {
- INVESTIGATION OF INTERNATIONAL LEASED CIRCUIT PERFORMANCE
- DATA FROM THE ADMINISTRATION WITH SUB-CONTROL STATION
- RESPONSIBILITY
- }
- ___________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- {
- (
- Observation period: 1 Jan 1982 - 31 March 1982
- )
- } Example only
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
- {
- Circuits between Federal Republic of Germany (Sub-control ADMIN)
- and United Kingdom (Control ADMIN)
- }
-
-
- Start of downtime End of downtime
- Circuit designation Date Time (UTC) Date Time (UTC) Duration (min) Additional information (7)
- _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
- ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
- (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) a b c d e
- ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Frankfurt-London DP7 3 Jan 0900 3 Jan 1030 90 ii ii i iv iii
- ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
- 21 March 1100 21 March 1110 10
- ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Dusseldorf-London DP3 7 Feb 0900 7 Feb 0915 15 ii ii i iv iii
- ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Hamburg-London XP7 21 Feb 1625 21 Feb 1800 95 ii |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- ii |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- i |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- iv|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- iii
-
-
- ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Dusseldorf-London DP6 No Faults ii ii i iv iii
- ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Frankfurt-London DP2 No Faults ii ii i iv iii
- ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Frankfurt-London DP9 No Faults ii ii ii iv iii
- ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Frankfurt-London XP2 No Faults ii i i iv iii
- ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Hamburg-London DP1 No Faults ii i i iv iii
- ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Contact person for this data
- ______________________________________________________________________________________________________
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- TABLE A-IV/M.1016 [T5.1016], p. (a l'italienne)
-
-
-
-
-
- References
-
-
- [1] CCITT Recommendation Quality of service and dependabil-
- ity vocabulary , Vol. II, Rec. E.800.
-
- [2] CCITT Supplement Terms and definitions for quality of
- service, network performance, dependability and trafficability stu-
- dies , Vol. II, Fascicle II.3, Supplement No. 6.
-
- [3] CCITT Recommendation Exchange of information for
- planned outages of transmission systems , Vol. IV. Rec. M.490.
-
- [4] CCITT Recommendation Designation of international cir-
- cuits, groups, group and line links, digital blocks, digital paths,
- data transmission systems and related information , Vol. IV,
- Rec. M.140.
-
- [5] CCITT Recommendation Legal time; use of the term UTC ,
- Vol. I, Rec. B.11.
-
-
- BLANC
-
- MONTAGE: Rec. M 1020 sur le reste de cette page
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-