home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- A week ago, Joe Faletti mentioned that one problem with cmacros is that if
- you redefine a function, the cmacro property stays around and thus the
- redefinition of the function isn't communicate to the compiler.
- He suggested that whenever a function is defined (via 'def' or when fasl'ed
- in) any cmacro properties should be remprop'ed. I've been trying to think
- of an alternative to this, but I can't think of one. Unless someone
- has a better idea, I'll implement his suggestion.
- This means that if you want to define the function 'foo' and a cmacro for
- 'foo', the cmacro definition must appear later in the file than 'foo's
- definition.
-
-
-
-
-