home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.bizarre
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!spdcc!jfwhome!jfw
- From: jfw@jfwhome.FUNHOUSE.COM (John F. Woods)
- Subject: Re: Clinton won; maybe (was Gloat)
- Message-ID: <BxF1G7.7L@jfwhome.FUNHOUSE.COM>
- Organization: Misanthropes-R-Us
- References: <1992Nov5.160816.17514@news.acns.nwu.edu> <1992Nov5.181512.5296@dsd.es.com> <1992Nov6.213556.8901@b30.ingr.com> <1992Nov8.175707.13087@athena.cs.uga.edu>
- Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 21:09:40 GMT
- Lines: 17
-
- In <1992Nov8.175707.13087@athena.cs.uga.edu> heath@athena.cs.uga.edu (Terrance Heath) writes:
- >In article <1992Nov6.213556.8901@b30.ingr.com> rick@seminole.b30.ingr.com writes:
- >>I'm not sure of the numbers but these may be close,
- >>Clinton 43%
- >>Bush 36%
- >>Perot 19%
- >>So 57% of the people who voted, voted against Clinton. So perhaps the will
- >>of the people have spoken but the end result may not have been what the
- >>majority of the people wanted. In other words the majority of the people did
- >>not want Clinton.
- > The figures are right. I've been hearing the republicans go on
- >about the 57% that voted against Cliton.
-
- No, they have a point. 57% DID vote against Clinton. 64% DID vote against
- Bush. And a stunning 81% voted against Perot. The CLEAR and LOGICAL answer
- is that the American people want NO ONE to be President.
-
-