home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:47710 alt.abortion.inequity:5043
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!att-out!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!amdcad!weitek!nadja
- From: nadja@jetsun.weitek.COM (Nadja Adolf)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.abortion.inequity
- Subject: Re: Male Choice Revisited
- Message-ID: <1992Nov12.030525.27776@jetsun.weitek.COM>
- Date: 12 Nov 92 03:05:25 GMT
- References: <BxJ5Hw.GLu@cs.psu.edu> <1draroINN4q7@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com> <BxKF1J.Asq@cs.psu.edu>
- Organization: WEITEK Corporation, Sunnyvale CA
- Lines: 20
-
- In article <BxKF1J.Asq@cs.psu.edu> beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver) writes:
- >In article <1draroINN4q7@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com> regard@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com (Adrienne Regard) writes:
- >
- >>You aren't really interested in the
- >>outcome of male-choice, you merely want to restrict women.
-
- >You are right in *exactly* one sense:
-
- >I want to restrict women from restricting men unfairly.
-
- I get it. Allowing women to make decisions restricts men unfairly.
-
- What a lovely insight.
-
-
- --
- The Earth Pig Bourne....
-
- nadja@node.com (prefered email address)
- nadja@weitek.com
-