home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:47619 alt.abortion.inequity:5023
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.abortion.inequity
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!psuvax1!castor.cs.psu.edu!beaver
- From: beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver)
- Subject: Re: Male Choice Revisited
- Message-ID: <BxJ5Hw.GLu@cs.psu.edu>
- Sender: news@cs.psu.edu (Usenet)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: castor.cs.psu.edu
- References: <1dm6olINNljt@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com> <BxI4EI.11G@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> <1doq3lINN1ng@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 02:27:32 GMT
- Lines: 27
-
- In article <1doq3lINN1ng@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com> regard@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com (Adrienne Regard) writes:
- >In article <BxI4EI.11G@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> kellmeye@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (kellmeyer steven l) writes:
- >>I am arguing that abortion should NEVER be paid for by the state or
- >>anyone else. It should be made illegal. Similarly, men should NEVER
- >>"be let off the hook".
- >
- >Well, there you are, Don. Here's the guy you are sharing your male-choice
- >banner with.
-
- Well, there you go again, Adrienne. When you can't deal with content,
- you resort to trivia.
-
- Letting nobody off the hook sounds like a consistent position to me.
- It says that everybody's choice should be the same. It's not what
- people typically call "male-choice" -- it's closer to "no-choice."
- ("Choice" usually refers to *second*-chance choice.)
-
-
- >I don't think other posters were entirely incorrect when they said that
- >the male-choice argument is simply another take on the make-abortion-
- >illegal argument. Not at all.
-
- You don't think? Not at all?
-
- Don
- --
- beaver@cs.psu.edu Opinions from the PC-challenged
-