home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:47479 alt.abortion.inequity:4995
- Path: sparky!uunet!caen!sdd.hp.com!nobody
- From: regard@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com (Adrienne Regard)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.abortion.inequity
- Subject: Re: Male Choice Revisited
- Date: 10 Nov 1992 09:04:53 -0800
- Organization: Hewlett Packard, San Diego Division
- Lines: 13
- Message-ID: <1doq3lINN1ng@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com>
- References: <BxFCx6.B6B@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> <1dm6olINNljt@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com> <BxI4EI.11G@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: hpsdde.sdd.hp.com
-
- In article <BxI4EI.11G@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> kellmeye@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (kellmeyer steven l) writes:
- >I am arguing that abortion should NEVER be paid for by the state or
- >anyone else. It should be made illegal. Similarly, men should NEVER
- >"be let off the hook".
-
- Well, there you are, Don. Here's the guy you are sharing your male-choice
- banner with.
-
- I don't think other posters were entirely incorrect when they said that
- the male-choice argument is simply another take on the make-abortion-
- illegal argument. Not at all.
-
- Adrienne Regard
-