home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!doc.ic.ac.uk!agate!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!concert!rock!taco!csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu!dsholtsi
- From: dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Subject: Re: Pro-Choice Criteria for Personhood
- Message-ID: <1992Nov8.171415.8182@ncsu.edu>
- Date: 8 Nov 92 17:14:15 GMT
- References: <1992Nov4.214842.15573@ncsu.edu> <1dapngINN53t@horus.ap.mchp.sni.de> <1992Nov7.205603.13423@ncsu.edu> <1992Nov8.033559.13432@netcom.com>
- Sender: news@ncsu.edu (USENET News System)
- Reply-To: dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger)
- Organization: North Carolina State University
- Lines: 22
-
- In article <1992Nov8.033559.13432@netcom.com>
- bskendig@netcom.com (Brian Kendig) writes:
-
- >dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
-
- >> But a child is killed during an abortion, the child is not
- >> just 'left to die'. You can't escape the fact that during
- >> the vast majority of abortions, the child is intentionally
- >> killed by the abortionist.
-
- > ... instead of being left to die a slow death of oxygen deprivation.
- > Is this more 'humane' to you?
-
- I'm simply pointing out that an unrestricted abortion right does not
- follow from the right to bodily autonomy. That says nothing about
- a 'humane' death. I'm not defending killing and leaving persons
- to die; that's the job of the pro-choicers.
-
- >Brian Kendig
-
-
- Doug Holtsinger
-