home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!iWarp.intel.com|eff!news.byu.edu!gatech!hubcap!opusc!usceast!nyikos
- From: nyikos@math.scarolina.edu (Peter Nyikos)
- Subject: Re: Sexual Harassment (was Re: Simon you're no ...
- Message-ID: <nyikos.720825104@milo.math.scarolina.edu>
- Sender: usenet@usceast.cs.scarolina.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: USC Department of Computer Science
- References: <UetODD_00YUoM=OHsx@andrew.cmu.edu> <1992Oct22.120742.24762@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <1992Oct23.203346.4892@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> <nyikos.720058194@milo.math.scarolina.edu> <1992Oct29.172404.10216@galileo.cc.rochester.edu>
- Date: 3 Nov 92 21:11:44 GMT
- Lines: 54
-
- In <1992Oct29.172404.10216@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> mprc@troi.cc.rochester.edu (M. Price) writes:
-
- >In <nyikos.720058194@milo.math.scarolina.edu> nyikos@math.scarolina.edu (Peter Nyikos) writes:
-
- >>In <1992Oct23.203346.4892@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> mprc@troi.cc.rochester.edu (M. Price) writes:
-
- >>>>}If someone has stated specifically, like Peter Nyikos has done, that he
- >>>>}doesn't appreciate being called 'Petey, honey', and a person continues
- >>>>}to do it, then she is guilty of sexual harassment.
-
- >>The above statement was made by Andrea Gansley-Ortiz. M. Price
- >>conveniently edited out the relevant attribution line.
-
- >>>I am stating specifically that if Peter Nyikos posts any
- >>>more articles discussing men's and women's sexuality WRT the abortion debate
- >>>1. I will not appreciate it, and
- >>>2. I will consider it sexual harassment.
-
- >>More sarcasm from the inimitable M. Price.
-
- How did I know M. Price was being sarcastic? Lots of ways, one of which
- was the following exchange on the "...Christian values..." thread:
-
- #> Nyikos
- # Price
-
- #>Get with it, Gordon! Don't you see how Ivan has exposed M. Price's
- #>"castigation" for the hoax that it is?
-
- # Ummmm, well, actually, I don't either. I've had a sensible e-mail
- #conversation with Ivan in which neither of us have mentioned exposing
- #one another, appealing though the idea may be. ;-)
-
- Note the gratuitous introduction of sexual innuendo by the inimitable
- M. Price.
-
- >>1. There are far more explicit things said in talk.abortion about
- >>sexuality than any you have seen from me or will see from me. Look at
- >>the "...lobotomy..." thread, directed at Chaney.
-
- >>2. The things I write on sexuality are not directed at M. Price. [With
- >>the possible exception of the following sentence, after which I will
- >>forever hold my peace:]
-
- >>I do not know whether M. Price is a man or a woman.
-
- > So why do you refer to me as "he"?
-
- If I did so, and offended you thereby, I am sorry. Which personal
- pronoun would you like me to use when referring to you (singular) in
- the third person?
-
- Peter Ny.
-
-