home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!know!hri.com!ukma!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!yale.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!linac!uchinews!quads!eeb1
- From: eeb1@quads.uchicago.edu (e elizabeth bartley)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Subject: Re: The life expectancy of mothers
- Message-ID: <1992Nov5.194342.7264@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Date: 5 Nov 92 19:43:42 GMT
- References: <1992Nov3.191615.2699@brandonu.ca> <1d92ahINN1de@horus.ap.mchp.sni.de> <1992Nov5.155200.15975@ncsu.edu>
- Sender: news@uchinews.uchicago.edu (News System)
- Reply-To: eeb1@midway.uchicago.edu
- Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
- Lines: 20
-
- In article <1992Nov5.155200.15975@ncsu.edu>
- jjprice@eos.ncsu.edu (JEFFREY JAMES PRICE) writes:
-
- >I have gotten many replies stating that a child birth and the 9 months
- >of strain on the body while carring a z/e/f (sounds dumb I thought she
- >was carring a baby) shortens her life span.
-
- >I was wondering how come females have a longer lifespan than males.
- >This point seems irrelevant.I do realize that a pregnancy does decrease
- >the life span but it seems as though nature has compensated and given
- >women a longer lifespan.
-
- Does that make it all right to shorten a woman's life span for the
- sake of a one-cell human she doesn't think is morally important?
-
- --
- Pro-Choice Anti-Roe - E. Elizabeth Bartley
- Abortions should be safe, legal, early, and rare.
-
- Cthulhu for President -- when you're tired of voting for the lesser of 2 evils.
-