home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!iWarp.intel.com|ichips!hfglobe!chnews!sedona!bhoughto
- From: bhoughto@sedona.intel.com (Blair P. Houghton)
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Subject: Re: Religion & Physics Don't Mix
- Date: 8 Nov 1992 23:00:43 GMT
- Organization: Intel Corp., Chandler, Arizona
- Lines: 81
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <1dk66rINNe8l@chnews.intel.com>
- References: <1dchkqINNt4k@hpsdlss3.sdd.hp.com> <1ded61INNin6@chnews.intel.com> <1deq3jINNu6@hpsdlss3.sdd.hp.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: alfalfa.intel.com
-
- In article <1deq3jINNu6@hpsdlss3.sdd.hp.com> johno@sdd.hp.com (John Ongtooguk) writes:
- >In article <1ded61INNin6@chnews.intel.com>, bhoughto@sedona.intel.com (Blair P. Houghton) writes:
- >>
- >>In article <1dchkqINNt4k@hpsdlss3.sdd.hp.com> johno@sdd.hp.com (John Ongtooguk) writes:
- >>> ........... Science is more of a falsifier than deliverer of truth
- >
- >Falsifier as in proving false, not representing falsely.
-
- I see. (It takes a little of the rhetoricism out of "deliverer
- of truth," too.)
-
- In its relationship with religion, science must be a negative
- seeker of proof, since religion's positions are always
- positive statements of the existence of spirits and the
- action of mystical forces.
-
- In its relationship with the universe and our knowledge
- thereof, however, it is almost always positive, creating
- grand, productive theories of things like electromagnetism,
- quantum avalanche, leverage, evolution, birth control,
- finance, and the unified nature of all forces.
-
- Its negative results towards religion are due only to the
- fact that its positive results towards the physical world
- disprove the mystical world's ability to affect the
- physical world (except perhaps through the action of those
- who maintain faith and expand "holy signs" into action, but
- I have little doubt that the science of psychology would
- explain these episodes, as well).
-
- >>In article <1992Nov6.020049.6292@galois.mit.edu> jbaez@riesz.mit.edu (John C. Baez) writes:
- >>>> If the truth is always changing then what is it after it changes ?
- >>>"Error."
- >
- > Meaning in some cases that the previous statement was wrong and can
- > no longer be regarded as the 'truth'; the nature of the atom, of
- > galaxies, the apparent size of the universe, etc.
-
- In some cases, viz:
-
- >>Science, when presented properly, admits its faults to examination
- >>and discovery; it makes claims only about the logical deductions
- >>calculated and the experiments conducted, and those claims are
- >>only that the results are as they appear.
-
- For example, if I make a measurement with my DMM, and read
- the display upside-down, and I say I read 99 ohms, but I'm
- careful to describe the situation (perhaps it's on video
- tape), then everyone knows what I did and how I did it and
- what result I produced and is able to deduce further
- science correctly from it, using the value 66 ohms as the
- resistance of my apparatus.
-
- Anyone can lie and obfuscate, however, and do you know if
- I myself realized which way the DMM was oriented and whether
- or not I corrected for it before stating my findings?
-
- > Speaking as an agnostic supporter of science a problem that I've
- > seen is that while science has had a lot to say about religious
- > truths and has for a lot of people replaced religion as the means
- > for understanding their place in the world it doesn't offer much
- > in the way of a value system. Have to pray the best I guess %^)
- ^for
-
- Morality is a matter of psychology; desire and temperament
- make a great force for personality, and the availability of
- productive opportunities can forestall selfish tendencies.
- But then, the "value system" of religions have resulted in
- the inquisition and the crusades and any number of lost
- civilizations (making it a force for its own evolution,
- ironically enough). There are probably a number of people
- who can show that even archaeology can link religion to
- economics, wherein a belief in a diety gives rise to an
- enabling ethic that results in improved implementation of
- certain indigenous (or tamed or domesticated or imported or
- enslaved) resources, but I wouldn't touch the delicacy of
- that argument with a five-foot shelf of books.
-
- --Blair
- "I'll knock the fear
- of God right outta ya."
-