home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!nec-gw!netkeeper!vivaldi!aslws01!aslws01!terry
- From: terry@asl.dl.nec.com
- Subject: Bollinger Generalization of the Missouri Manure Grinder
- Message-ID: <1992Nov7.021150.3210@asl.dl.nec.com>
- Originator: terry@aslws01
- Sender: news@asl.dl.nec.com
- Nntp-Posting-Host: aslws01
- Organization: NEC America, Inc Irving TX
- Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 02:11:50 GMT
- Lines: 73
-
-
- Hi folks,
-
- A Missouri Manure Grinder looks something like this:
-
- +--------------+ -- +--------------+
- | | || | |
- | | |*\| |
- | | ||\\ |
- | | -- \\ |
- | | |\\ |
- +--------------+ +-\\-----------+
- |===*===|
- +--------------+ +---\\---------+
- | | | \\ |
- | | | \\ |
- | | | (*) |
- | | | |
- | | | |
- +--------------+ +--------------+
-
- They are quite cute. You grab the handle (the (*) part) and move it left
- or right, and the next thing you know the two pistons are traveling back
- and forth in the two tracks in curious reciprocating fashion. Just the
- right sort of thing for a transplanted Ozark Missourian such as myself
- as I chaw on a piece of wheat and stroll through a Texas cow pasture!
-
- ASSERTION: There exists a broad constructive generalization of the
- Missour Manure Grinder in two dimensions. The generalization is such
- that an arbitrarily large number of related devices can be defined
- simply by using a compass and straight edge.
-
- PROBLEM: (Primarily for physicists.) See if you can recreate the Bollinger
- Generalization of the Missouri Manure Grinder, and express the problem in
- as clear and abstract a form as possible. Describe key properties of the
- overall class of Bollinger Generalizations of Mo. Manure Grinders (BGMMGs).
-
- EXTRA PROBLEM: Can the 2D BGMMG be generalized further to 3 dimensions?
- To n arbitrary dimensions?
-
- WHY I'M ASKING: While I'm no physicist and thus don't count, I've noticed
- that a persistent trait of many of the more famous and innovative physicists
- is the ability to mentally manipulate and generalize curious geometrical
- problems. I am curious how some of you might do on this one.
-
- APPLICATIONS: Here's a tough one. If you find the generalization, can you
- go on to figure out how and whether it applies, oh, say, to particle physics
- or Standard Theory? Or perhaps Hilbert spaces? Please note that in no way
- am I saying that it has any relevance whatsoever. On the other hand, I've
- also noticed that it can be very risky to say that *any* kind of mathematical
- formalization is irrelevant to physics. The linkages are often subtle, but
- can be profound. Is there one for BGMMG? I certainly don't know. Do you?
-
- BACKGROUND: This is my unpublished work of my own, so I doubt you can look
- it up anywhere (barring similar work by someone else, of course -- I have
- not done any serious literature search on this one). If someone wants to
- act as the "holder" of my generalization to verify that I do indeed have
- one and am not just setting up a little wild goose chase, I'd be glad to
- do so (say with Dr. Baez or Dr. Chase, for example).
-
- (If you disdain puzzles such as this as being irrelevant to physics, you might
- read the rather interesting section in Gleick's book "Genius" origin of Martin
- Gardner's Scientific American column.)
-
- Cheers,
- Terry Bollinger
-
- +--------------------------------------------+-------------------------------+
- | Terry Bollinger | Phone: 214-518-3538 |
- | Advanced Switching Laboratory, NEC America | Fax: 214-518-3499 |
- | 1525 Walnut Hill Lane, Irving, Texas 75038 | Email: terry@asl.dl.nec.com |
- +--------------------------------------------+-------------------------------+
-
-