home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.physics:18199 sci.math:14453
- Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.math
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!rpi!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!mp.cs.niu.edu!rusin
- From: rusin@mp.cs.niu.edu (David Rusin)
- Subject: Re: What's a manifold?
- Message-ID: <1992Nov5.185737.4683@mp.cs.niu.edu>
- Organization: Northern Illinois University
- References: <SMITH.92Nov5101553@gramian.harvard.edu> <1992Nov5.161930.21320@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU> <SMITH.92Nov5132141@gramian.harvard.edu>
- Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 18:57:37 GMT
- Lines: 19
-
- In article <SMITH.92Nov5132141@gramian.harvard.edu> smith@gramian.harvard.edu (Steven Smith) writes:
- >For argument's sake, lets call a locally Euclidean space a manifold,
- >and a locally Euclidean space endowed with a differentiable structure
- >(atlas) a differentiable manifold.
-
- Just for the record, a manifold is a HAUSDORFF locally Euclidean space.
- You want to exclude examples like the real number line with two origins.
- (X= (Rx{0,1})/~ where (a,b)~(c,d) iff a=c and either b=d or a=c <> 0.)
-
- As for the arbitrariness of the atlas, I have seen manifolds defined as
- a pair (M,F) where F is a _maximal_ family of compatible charts. Then
- in any application one selects a collection of charts which covers M
- and is handy for the application, without making the choice of chart
- be an explicit part of the manifold's construction. I don't find this
- to be a very natural perspective, but if you like Bourbaki...
-
- dave rusin@math.niu.edu
-
-
-