home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!ames!olivea!sgigate!rutgers!igor.rutgers.edu!planchet.rutgers.edu!nanotech
- From: mckendre@chaph.usc.edu (Thomas Mc Kendree)
- Newsgroups: sci.nanotech
- Subject: Re: Breakthrough Timeline
- Message-ID: <Nov.5.23.34.21.1992.16069@planchet.rutgers.edu>
- Date: 6 Nov 92 04:34:23 GMT
- Sender: nanotech@planchet.rutgers.edu
- Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
- Lines: 28
- Approved: nanotech@aramis.rutgers.edu
-
- In article <Nov.3.01.15.25.1992.27077@planchet.rutgers.edu> nagle@netcom.com
- (John Nagle) writes:
-
- > Early applications will probably 1) not involve self-replication
- >2) not involve breaking tough bonds 3) not be based on mobile nanounits
- >4) not involve manipulating macroscopic amounts of matter (grams).
-
- > Under that set of assumptions, a DNA reader is a possibility.
- >Any other ideas?
-
- On idea that I gave to Eric Drexler in 1991 was sort of a "universal
- disassembler." The idea was for a proximal probe system with a fairly
- sophisticated set of tool changeout. You disasseble one thing that you
- are really interested in (e.g. an HIV virus), learning what you can about
- its structure. The requirement "2) not involve breaking tough bonds" may
- well mean that for some disassemblies, you have to live with occasionally
- taking off parts that cohere too strongly to be fully disassembled, and
- some things just won't be disassemblable.
- Obviously, one should image the whole area around each disassembly step,
- both to get as much information as possible, and to better plan the next
- disassembly step.
-
- Tom McKendree mckendre@chaph.usc.edu
- 12171 Amethyst Cir.
- Garden Grove, CA 92645
-
- 714-896-5901
- 714-896-1313:fax
-