home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!ames!ncar!noao!arizona!arizona.edu!cerritos.edu!news.service.uci.edu!beckman.com!dn66!a_rubin
- From: a_rubin@dsg4.dse.beckman.com (Arthur Rubin)
- Newsgroups: sci.math
- Subject: Re: Three-sided coin
- Message-ID: <a_rubin.721587931@dn66>
- Date: 12 Nov 92 17:05:31 GMT
- References: <5413@daily-planet.concordia.ca> <1992Nov10.204733.25206@massey.ac.nz>
- Organization: Beckman Instruments, Inc.
- Lines: 21
- Nntp-Posting-Host: dn66.dse.beckman.com
-
- In <1992Nov10.204733.25206@massey.ac.nz> news@massey.ac.nz (USENET News System) writes:
-
- >I doubt it. Any asymmetrical object will be affected by air resistance
- >in a fairly predictable way, so the probability will depend on how far
- >the coin falls. One can hope that the bounce will be unpredictable, but
- >that depends on the surface the coin falls on and was not specified in
- >the problem. If you want to throw a randomising device, you'd better
- >stick to Platonic solids.
-
- Semi-regular polyhedra should be adequate. Actually, I don't know the term
- but any solid with the property that, for any two faces, there is a
- quasi-Euclidean transformation (rotations + reflections) that maps one to
- the other, is sufficient. (The usual definition of semi-regular requires
- that the faces be regular polygons.) If you want to include non-convex
- solids, you define "face" for the purpose of this requirement to be "face
- of the convex hull".
- --
- Arthur L. Rubin: a_rubin@dsg4.dse.beckman.com (work) Beckman Instruments/Brea
- 216-5888@mcimail.com 70707.453@compuserve.com arthur@pnet01.cts.com (personal)
- My opinions are my own, and do not represent those of my employer.
- My interaction with our news system is unstable; please mail anything important.
-