home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!agate!ames!news.hawaii.edu!uhunix.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu!lady
- From: lady@uhunix.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu (Lee Lady)
- Newsgroups: sci.math
- Subject: Re: Problem in Category Theory (elementary)
- Summary: Epimorphisms which are not surjections.
- Keywords: Category theory epimorphism
- Message-ID: <1992Nov8.235226.11497@news.Hawaii.Edu>
- Date: 8 Nov 92 23:52:26 GMT
- References: <BxDJ8v.DCw@world.std.com>
- Sender: root@news.Hawaii.Edu (News Service)
- Followup-To: sci.math
- Organization: University of Hawaii (Mathematics Dept)
- Lines: 34
- Nntp-Posting-Host: uhunix.uhcc.hawaii.edu
-
- In article <BxDJ8v.DCw@world.std.com> rjk@world.std.com (robert j kolker) writes:
- >Find a category with an arrow (morph) that is epic and monic but not an
- >isomorphism.
-
- At the very least, one should stick to concrete categories to make the
- problem at all interesting. Even so, there are lots and lots of concrete
- categories with epimorphisms which are not surjections, thus providing
- easy examples for the question.
-
- 1) Let X be a set which is not a singleton. Give X the discrete
- topology. Let Y be the same set with the indiscrete topology and let
- f:X --> Y be the identity map, considered as a morphism in the category
- of topological spaces. (Unlike the rest of the examples, f is not only
- an epimorphism but is in fact surjective.)
-
- 2) Let f:Q --> R be the inclusion map from the rationals into the
- reals. This is an epimorphism in the category of Hausdorff spaces
- since Q is dense in R. (Two continuous maps from R into a Hausdorff
- space which agree on Q have to be the same.)
-
- 3) In the category of rings with identity, let f:Z --> Q be the
- inclusion map from the integers into the rationals. This is an
- epimorphism in the category of rings.
-
- 4) In the category of *torsion free* abelian groups let f:Z --> Q be
- the inclusion map. This is an epimorphism since if two homomorphisms
- from Q into a torsion free group agree on the element 1 they must be
- the same.
-
- --
- It is a poor sort of skepticism which merely delights in challenging
- those claims which conflict with one's own belief system.
- --Bogus quote
- lady@uhunix.uhcc.hawaii.edu lady@uhunix.bitnet
-