home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!po.CWRU.Edu!cxm7
- From: cxm7@po.CWRU.Edu (Colin Mclarty)
- Newsgroups: sci.logic
- Subject: Re: Types of type theory
- Date: 12 Nov 1992 19:30:25 GMT
- Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
- Lines: 11
- Message-ID: <1dubchINN5gj@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>
- References: <BxIxGz.D7x@access.digex.com>
- Reply-To: cxm7@po.CWRU.Edu (Colin Mclarty)
- NNTP-Posting-Host: slc5.ins.cwru.edu
-
-
- In a previous article, dzik@access.digex.com (Joseph Dzikiewicz) says:
-
- >I have come across two uses of the term "type theory" in logic that seem
- >to be referring to different things.
- >
- Yes, there are two different sense of "type"-- no doubt
- relatable on some level but I don't know of any reason toe relate
- them.
- The name "type theory" always means the first, i.e.
- higher order logics.
-