home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.logic:2007 sci.philosophy.meta:2540 sci.math:14828
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!rpi!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!psinntp!psinntp!kepler1!andrew
- From: andrew@rentec.com (Andrew Mullhaupt)
- Newsgroups: sci.logic,sci.philosophy.meta,sci.math
- Subject: Re: Will a mathematician locked up in a little room be happy?
- Message-ID: <1326@kepler1.rentec.com>
- Date: 11 Nov 92 18:28:54 GMT
- References: <1992Nov5.171453.22237@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU> <Bx998I.KpK@unx.sas.com> <1992Nov6.024607.6831@galois.mit.edu>
- Followup-To: sci.logic
- Organization: Renaissance Technologies Corp., Setauket, NY.
- Lines: 21
-
- In article <1992Nov6.024607.6831@galois.mit.edu> jbaez@riesz.mit.edu (John C. Baez) writes:
- >Gary Merrill writes:
- >
- >>You can take a mathematician and lock him in his little office with just
- >>some writing materials and he will (a) be pretty happy, and (b) be able
- >>and willing to do anything of a mathematical nature. Even a committed
- >>*theoretical* physicist will be very distressed under such circumstances
- >>since he has not way to determining whether his theories (however abstract)
- >>are *good* ones.
-
- Actually, even the most rarefied pure mathematician is not likely to be
- happy with this arrangement, although it might be closer to his idea of
- nirvana than what he presently occupies. History shows that communication
- is essential for the bulk of good mathematics, (as far as I know no other
- field is as addicted to its literature as mathematics). Hardy's criteria,
- (good mathematics is _new_ _true_ and _interesting_), are not likely to be
- much use in isolation. (_New_ and _Interesting_ seem obvious, but you have
- to think a little about _true_...)
-
- Later,
- Andrew Mullhaupt
-