home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!uniwa!DIALix!Gilsys!gil
- From: gil@Gilsys.DIALix.oz.au (Gil Hardwick)
- Newsgroups: sci.environment
- Subject: The Criterion for Ecocentrism
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <-1364877828snx@Gilsys.DIALix.oz.au>
- References: <STEINLY.92Nov3112214@topaz.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 06 Nov 92 01:44:28 GMT
- Organization: STAFF STRATEGIES - Anthropologists & Training Agents
- Lines: 26
-
-
- In article <STEINLY.92Nov3112214@topaz.ucsc.edu> steinly@topaz.ucsc.edu writes:
-
- > I claim that taxonomists are intrinsically incapable
- > of correctly estimating the speciation rate. The inferred
- > equilibrium rate can be estimated to be of the order of
- > one per year, but any new species discovered will either
- > be classified as a sub-species or as a old but previously
- > undiscovered species; that biodiversity is poorly represented
- > by species counts anyway; that biodiversity has plateaued since
- > the last major extinction and the current extinction pressure
- > and habitat fragmentation may lead to a new burst of speciation,
- > increased biodiversity and more robust ecosystems; and that the
- > resilience of current ecosystems has been grossly underestimated
- > in the first place...
-
- Yes indeed. A major catastrophe may well bring a new burst of
- speciation, and so on. Whether it will favour any new or existing
- primate species as perhaps represented by humans I believe is the
- source of concern among the humans here, isn't it?
-
- --
- Gil Hardwick gil@Gilsys.DIALix.oz.au
- Independent Consulting Ethnologist 3:690/660.6
- PERTH, Western Australia (+61 9) 399 2401
- * * Sustainable Community Development & Environmental Education * *
-