home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!ames!agate!garnet.berkeley.edu!lmk2
- From: lmk2@garnet.berkeley.edu ()
- Newsgroups: sci.edu
- Subject: Re: Question: Abstract Subjects & General academic performance.
- Date: 11 Nov 1992 23:10:25 GMT
- Organization: University of California, Berkeley
- Lines: 22
- Message-ID: <1ds3t1INNbtm@agate.berkeley.edu>
- References: <spurrett.34.721489185@superbowl.und.ac.za>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: garnet.berkeley.edu
-
- In article <spurrett.34.721489185@superbowl.und.ac.za> spurrett@superbowl.und.ac.za (David Spurrett) writes:
- >I am interested to hear from anyone who knows of research into the
- >relationship (empirical, not necessarily causal) between the study of highly
- >abstract subjects like philosophy and mathematics, and the general academic
- >performance of the student/s in question. I know of one study which found a
- >close link between study of phil or math, and dramatically above average
- >performance in all other areas. This study did not have any control groups
-
- Well, I'm not sure of a study, but I attended St. John's College for my
- undergraduate education, and it seemed, across the board, that even
- students who had performed poorly in many subjects in high school or
- previous college experiences, did exceptionally improved work when studying
- very difficult mathematical and philosophical texts and that all of
- their work improved. I can't speak for myself, because I always did
- quite well in school, but I know that the general feeling at the
- school was that delving deeply into these questions in mathematics
- and philosophy made learning more interesting and just plain fun.
- No control groups here, though, just a lot of hard-working kids reading
- great books.
-
- Leslie Kay
-
-