home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.crypt:4706 alt.privacy:2231
- Newsgroups: sci.crypt,alt.privacy,talk.politics.gun
- Path: sparky!uunet!walter!att-out!pacbell.com!iggy.GW.Vitalink.COM!cs.widener.edu!hela.iti.org!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!convex!convex!gardner
- From: gardner@convex.com (Steve Gardner)
- Subject: Re: Limits on the Use of Cryptography?
- Sender: usenet@news.eng.convex.com (news access account)
- Message-ID: <1992Nov12.221616.18578@news.eng.convex.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 22:16:16 GMT
- References: <1992Nov11.061210.9933@cactus.org> <1992Nov12.121422.49@nsrvan.vanc.wa.us>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: imagine.convex.com
- Organization: Engineering, CONVEX Computer Corp., Richardson, Tx., USA
- X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
- Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
- not necessarily those of CONVEX.
- Lines: 23
-
- In article <1992Nov12.121422.49@nsrvan.vanc.wa.us> sysevm@nsrvan.vanc.wa.us writes:
- >What would you do to a monster who takes YOUR son/daughter and rapes
- >them and beats them and kills them over 3 days. Would you go a buy a gun and
- >wait for them to be released 120 days into their cypher charge then BLOW them
- >away?
- Is there a point here? I'm lost. Are you for or against the
- government forcing the registration of PKC keys?
-
-
- >Sorry for rambling, This stupid argument just struck too close to home.
- >But really, next time you read about some heinous act see your kids as the
- >victim then let me know if registering keys is at all important compaired to
- >early detection and real jail time for the monsters.
- "Struck too close to home". Isn't that just another way of saying:
- "I am too emotionally involved here to give a rational answer.
- Disregard what I am about to say." ?
-
-
-
- smg
-
-
-
-