home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.crypt
- Path: sparky!uunet!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!yktnews!admin!aixproj!uri
- From: uri@watson.ibm.com (Uri Blumenthal)
- Subject: Re: Lead Balloons
- Sender: news@watson.ibm.com (NNTP News Poster)
- Message-ID: <1992Nov05.204322.85806@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1992 20:43:22 GMT
- Reply-To: uri@watson.ibm.com
- Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
- References: <1992Nov4.125819.1637@guvax.acc.georgetown.edu>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: aixproj.watson.ibm.com
- Organization: Are you cleared to know?
- Lines: 70
-
- In article <1992Nov4.125819.1637@guvax.acc.georgetown.edu>, denning@guvax.acc.georgetown.edu writes:
- |> While I
- |> have considerable faith in the goodness of humanity, I also recognize
- |> our frailty. This goodness/frailty is not limited to people either
- |> inside or outside the government.
-
- The best way to deal with that "frailty" so far is: DON'T tempt
- a person with power, if it can be avoided. Every record clearly
- shows, that whatever power a government (any government) gets
- over it's subjects, becomes abused.
-
- I don't know about the whole "humanity". But an individual, who
- claims into that nice chair, is likely to get corrupted and do
- bad things. There is no reasons to invite him to do more damage,
- than he can so far.
-
-
- |> How best to deal with human
- |> frailty is no doubt one of the great questions that will not be
- |> solved by me or by cryptography.
-
- That's why I wish you stayed with cryptography, rather than
- try to "save" the government from dangers nobody yet sees.
-
- Sorry for the harshness, but not for the contents.
-
- |> While I recognize that the government has a long list of abuses,
- |> Mr. Eichler's example being one of many, I am unconvinced that the
- |> best way to deal with these abuses or by those performed by people
- |> outside the government is by making it harder for law enforcers.
-
- As several people showed already, that so-much-feared "new ditigal era"
- isn't really going to make it harder for lawenforcer to go after EACH
- PARTICULAR INDIVIDUAL (using "traditional" techniques, as EME
- monitoring, bugging premises/cars/equipment/etc, and so on
- and so forth). What it WILL make harder is LARGE-SCALE
- spying on the masses.
-
- "Vacuum-cleaner" approachreally is likely to die out. Isn't law
- enforcement prohibited to use it anyway? So...?
-
- |> As someone has said, "A society that cannot enforce its laws invites
- |> disrespect for those laws." But regulating crypto may not be a good
- |> solution either unless we can come up with an acceptable means.
-
- How much success did any government show in regulating ANY substance,
- be it illegal information (Nazi and Soviet countries), rum, drugs,
- guns, people smuggling, etc.? What makes you think, that crypto
- case is any different?
-
- |> Someone asked whether John Gotti would have used encryption. I don't
- |> know, but he didn't. Rumor is that these guys started their
- |> conversations with some sort of ritual: "Gee, do you suppose they're
- |> listening? ..."
-
- OK, now rest assured he [or his successors] will (:-).
- [And if not - they'll be easy game, so why bother
- registering all of us good guys? :-]
-
- |> The $45K per wiretap average came from the "Wiretap Report" for 1991.
- |> It lists all wiretaps for the year -- well, at least the court-ordered
- |> ones :-)
-
- The price does looks outrageous. I hope it serves also to limit wiretaps
- to those really needed for the case [and autorized by the court :-].
- --
- Regards,
- Uri. uri@watson.ibm.com
- ------------
- <Disclaimer>
-