home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.crypt:4380 comp.org.eff.talk:6799 alt.privacy:2106 talk.politics.guns:23584
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!newsfeed.rice.edu!uw-beaver!cs.ubc.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!unruh
- From: unruh@physics.ubc.ca (William Unruh)
- Newsgroups: sci.crypt,comp.org.eff.talk,alt.privacy,talk.politics.guns
- Subject: Re: Registering "Assault Keys"
- Date: 5 Nov 1992 23:32:33 GMT
- Organization: The University of British Columbia
- Lines: 8
- Distribution: inet
- Message-ID: <1dcauhINNaf5@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca>
- References: <1cs7qlINN29t@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca> <1992Nov2.104157.21010@genie.slhs.udel.edu> <1d4d6uINNq7s@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca> <1992Nov5.085732.1183@genie.slhs.udel.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: physics.ubc.ca
-
- starr@genie.slhs.udel.edu (Tim Starr) writes:
-
- >Not really. Consent and coercion are opposites; if Switzerland has a high
- >degree of consent compared to other countries, then it has a low level of
- >coercion by the same standard.
-
- Not necessarily, a government can have a high degree of consent by a
- large majority, and still be increadibly coercive to a minority.
-