home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.models.rc
- Path: sparky!uunet!panther!mothost!white!rtsg.mot.com!svoboda
- From: svoboda@rtsg.mot.com (David Svoboda)
- Subject: Re: National Sailplane Symposium - Trip report
- Message-ID: <1992Nov6.202050.5443@rtsg.mot.com>
- Sender: news@rtsg.mot.com
- Nntp-Posting-Host: guppie44
- Organization: Motorola Inc., Cellular Infrastructure Group
- References: <1992Nov3.181415.15932@nntpd.lkg.dec.com> <1992Nov5.004627.1837@rtsg.mot.com> <Bx9KMy.Ht3@cantua.canterbury.ac.nz>
- Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 20:20:50 GMT
- Lines: 43
-
- In article <Bx9KMy.Ht3@cantua.canterbury.ac.nz> kaiser@elec.canterbury.ac.nz (Chris Kaiser) writes:
- |In article <1992Nov5.004627.1837@rtsg.mot.com>, svoboda@rtsg.mot.com (David Svoboda) writes:
- |> | He currently holds the worlds records for altitude = 26,990 feet.
- |> | 33.3 hours duration (the subject of this talk).
- |> | 150 MPH speed record. I don't know what class this is or if was
- |> | an old sailplane record that is no longer standing?
- |>
- |> I don't think it can be right. The current record is well over 250mph, with
- |> a glider (that's faster than the powered record--model props don't work too well
- |> at those sort of speeds).
- |
- |Wasn't that the record set in Austria, where they thermalled/mountain-soared a
- |F3B styled brick (called a "Dassel" or something?) to several thousand feet and
- |then put it into a vertical dive before levelling out through the speed course...
- |I think the reg's have been changed since then, and it is now required to fly a
- |closed course, or do a return run within a time limit, or something like that.
- |Perhaps this guy holds the record under the current rules.
-
- Y'know, I'm not too sure of the current record holder's methods, except that
- it was with an engineless aircraft. I can tell you one thing, though; I was
- peripherally involved in some speed record attempts in the `70s and, what these
- guys used were thin metal-reinforced airplanes with huge servos mounted in
- rigid foam, and OPS engines with homemade props. In order to nullify any
- help from the wind, they record attempts had to fly through the traps twice,
- once in each direction. The usual method was to vertically climb until just
- about out of sight, scream back down vertically, gradually pull back to level
- and fly through the entry trap. (They mounted the servos in rigid foam because
- they kept breaking servo mounting flanges with the flight loads; in foam all
- they had to do was be sure to correct with rudder, as the elevator loading
- moved the servos around in the foam.) The aircraft then SCREAMED downfield
- through the other trap, then back to vertical, almost out of sight, roll over
- in a split-S, vertical dive, big pullout, and scream back through the other
- way. From what the guys said, the engines were used pretty much only for the
- climb and start of dive, and the props were just big flat sticks out there for
- the actual speed run. They had thought about an adjustable-pitch prop, but
- couldn't figure out a way to make one stay together at that sort of revs.
-
- Anyway, my point is that the rules back then required a double-pass, so I bet
- the glider did a double pass. Maybe the rules don't say you have to do the
- other pass *immediately*, so they did one pass, worked their way back up the
- slope lift, and did another pass the other way.
-
- Dave Svoboda, Palatine, IL
-