home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.autos
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!sun-barr!ames!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!news.acns.nwu.edu!ftpbox!mothost!white!sapphire.rtsg.mot.com!declrckd
- From: declrckd@rtsg.mot.com (Dan J. Declerck)
- Subject: Re: Profits to Japan?
- Message-ID: <1992Nov5.170112.20729@rtsg.mot.com>
- Sender: news@rtsg.mot.com
- Nntp-Posting-Host: marble
- Organization: Motorola Inc., Cellular Infrastructure Group
- References: <1992Nov3.194948.10523@infonode.ingr.com> <1d6vpbINN116@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>
- Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 17:01:12 GMT
- Lines: 115
-
- In article <1d6vpbINN116@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> aas7@po.CWRU.Edu (Andrew A. Spencer) writes:
- >
- >In a previous article, greg@cherokee.b23b.ingr.com (Greg Moritz) says:
- >
- >>In posting subject Re: Cars for tall people
- >>dmarshal@Stars.Reston.Unisys.COM (Dave Marshall) writes:
- >>> (Before you flame me, consider that the '92 Accord is a US car by
- >>> Government definition. My Honda was made in Marysville, OH. For
- >>> the "but the profits go to Japan" crowd, I say "Better there than
- >>> to the UAW.")
- >>
- >>The issue of profits going here or there is not as simple as; 'Buy
- >>a Japanese car - send the profits to Japan.' The Japanese are investing
- >>heavily in the US by building assembly plants and design centers as well
- >>as encouraging their suppliers to do likewise. That money comes from
- >>profits *not* sent back to Japan.
- >
- >the last i read on this, there are many technical difficulties that
- >the government has in classifying a vehicle as US, NA, or other...
- >Honda being one of the hardest..seems..according to the article..that
- >Honda was buying Japanese metals..haveing an American co. work them, thus
- >whenn it comes out shaped, it is considered american(US), then it is
- >partially assembled by Americans in the US, and is shipped elsewhere, duty
- >free(CANADA), to be finished out, with still more parts bought from japanese
- >companies...and then shipped back to US, and thus is sold as an AMERICAN car,
- >despite the fact that only the work(some of) was performed by US workers...
- >i dunno if it's been straightened out since i read these articles..but...i
- >just have a real problem with some of these(seeemingly) unscrupolous(sp)
- >dealings.....almost as if they are lying to both sides of the deal...oh well..
- >DREW
- >
- >
- >
- >>
- >>The Japanese, in order to survive here, will have to become integrated
- >>producers who conceive, design, and build their cars here much like the
- >>European arms of the US automakers.
-
- No, there is no incentive to make the car parts (components) here in America.
- If they (Japanese mfr) do buy parts from a local supplier, it is commonly a
- member of it's own keiretsu, being financed and created by the same conglomeration
- that the manufacturer belongs.
- The Japanese economic structure is not too much unlike the U.S. before the
- Sherman Anti-trust legislation.
-
- >>
- >>Profits obtained from sales of Ford, Chrysler, and GM products (where
- >>applicable) often times end up going overseas to purchase other businesses
- >>and set up factories ...
-
- Yes, the North American Auto manufacturers do set up plants in other countries
- to build cars in other countries. But these cars and a majority of their parts
- never make it to the U.S. The engineering and part content are primarily for the market
- in which they are sold.
- In other words, The U.S. manufacturers like to integrate into the market economy
- in which they sell. The Japanese on the other hand, engineer almost everything
- in Japan, and build a majority of the components in Japan, and might do final
- assembly here (which is a pretty small portion of the total cost of a vehicle).
- IN other words, the Japanese like to dominate their aspect of the economy in which they
- sell.
-
-
- >>
- >>There is also the financial angle: Profits of Mazda are partially
- >>delivered back to Ford - who owns part of Mazda. Profits of Isuzu
- >>likewise come back to GM. Toyota probably owns some GM stock (?).
- >>Individuals can buy shares of Honda, Toyota, and Nisson on the US
- >>stock exchanges. Profits sent to Japan are then sent back here.
- >>Japanese investors probably own large chunks of Ford, etc. If you
- >>buy a Mustang, you are probably sending some profits back to Japan.
- >>
-
- True, the shocks are made by tokiko (I believe). But, I'll bet that my
- mustang has much more North American Content, than any Accord that rolls off
- the Marysville assembly line.
-
- 5.0L V8 - made in Windsor, canada, or Cleveland OH.
- Borg Warner T5 gearbox - Made in Ohio, I believe.
- Rear end - made in the Ford Axle plant, sterling heights, MI (home town)
- Steering Gear - TRW steering and suspension, Sterling heights, MI
- EEC-IV - Made in Franklin Park Illinois by Motorola
- Sheet Metal - various places in the U.S
- Glass - Domestic CarLite
-
- The best thing I like about it... Engineered in Dearborn, MI.
- by Americans, for the American market. The Japanese don't seem to have the "flair"
- in design and engineering that the American companies do. SUV's and minivans are
- an american concept. Some people would probably argue with me, and talk about the
- Miata, the J30, Infiniti Q45, Lexus LS400, Nissan 300ZX, etc..
- You'll notice that these are just reworked designs from the past, brought forward
- with more modern manufacturing techniques.
-
- I bought this car (Mustang LX5.0) because:
- 1) it has the heart and soul of american styling and the performance characteristics
- I like for the price I could afford.
- 2) A lot of the components are made by classmates in high school.
- 3) A majority of the money spent goes back into the U.S. economy, therefore
- raising my standard of living.
-
- If given the choice, I'd buy it again (probably get more options, though).
- I've never owned a car without a V8 motor, and never one with less than 4.3L
- of displacement. I am going to try my best at keeping it that way.
-
- >>Dave bought the best car for his needs. So will I.
- >>
- I wish the best for you...
-
- -Dan
-
-
- --
- => Dan DeClerck | EMAIL: dand%isdgsm@rtsg.mot.com <=
- => Motorola Intl Subscriber Group | <=
- => | Phone: (708) 632-4486 <=
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-