home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #26 / NN_1992_26.iso / spool / rec / audio / 14801 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-11-09  |  897 b   |  28 lines
  1. Newsgroups: rec.audio
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!usc!hela.iti.org!cs.widener.edu!eff!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!rsd
  3. From: rsd@sei.cmu.edu (Richard S D'Ippolito)
  4. Subject: Re: PNP vs NPN Output Stages
  5. Message-ID: <1992Nov9.214606.3791@sei.cmu.edu>
  6. Keywords: Lock
  7. Sender: netnews@sei.cmu.edu (Netnews)
  8. Organization: The Software Engineering Institute
  9. References:  <1992Nov9.113458.16272@EE.Surrey.Ac.UK>
  10. Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 21:46:06 GMT
  11. Lines: 15
  12.  
  13.  
  14. In article <1992Nov9.113458.16272@EE.Surrey.Ac.UK>, Rob Bish writes:
  15.  
  16. > ***** if you like Bach use NPN *****
  17. > ***** if you like Chopin use PNP ***
  18. > 
  19. > ...Has anyone else observed this effect, and can they shed any light on the
  20. > cause?
  21. > 
  22. > Rob Bish.
  23.  
  24. I've noticed the same thing, and furthermore, I get better depth perception
  25. when listening to baseball and football broadcasts through FETs.
  26.  
  27. Rich
  28.