home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!news.tek.com!uw-beaver!cs.ubc.ca!destroyer!caen!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!haven.umd.edu!mimsy!prometheus!media!irscscm!rshwake
- From: rshwake@irscscm.UUCP (Ray Shwake)
- Newsgroups: news.software.nn
- Subject: Re: Why is NN so common?
- Message-ID: <1992Nov7.173207.10291@irscscm.UUCP>
- Date: 7 Nov 92 17:32:07 GMT
- References: <BxAuIy.4qJ@ie.utoronto.ca>
- Reply-To: rshwake@irscscm.UUCP (Ray Shwake)
- Distribution: na
- Organization: R|S|X Technical Services, Washington, DC
- Lines: 24
-
- In article <BxAuIy.4qJ@ie.utoronto.ca> green@ie.utoronto.ca (Marc Green) writes:
- >'ve recent switched to a machine that uses nn and am stunned at what poorly
- >designed piece of software it is. It violates just about every human factors
- >principle in software design (consistency, dialog closure, smooth error
- >handling, etc). And of course, the documentation is a joke.
-
- Compared to what? Having used readnews, rn, and tin, I find NN to
- be *vastly* superior. The ability to tag individual and thread-
- related articles makes it possible to scan the hundreds or thousands
- of articles received daily more efficiently. The built-in help is
- better. It ports well to common platforms. It's quite robust as
- public domain software goes.
-
- Yes, its 80+ page "man" page for nn(1) probably sets a record for
- volume. Yes, some of its command syntax violates getarg standards.
- Yes, a proper user guide is long overdue. It's still the most
- valuable piece of software I've ever pulled off the net, and I'll
- continue to use it until something substantially better comes along.
-
- >The only good thing about it is that it serves as a source of wonderful
- >examples for my software engineering course on how not to design systems.
-
- You and your students are certainly welcome to develop and promote
- a superior alternative.
-