home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: misc.writing
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!iggy.GW.Vitalink.COM!cs.widener.edu!hela.iti.org!usc!cs.utexas.edu!torn!watserv2.uwaterloo.ca!watmath!thinkage!jim
- From: jim@thinkage.on.ca (James Alan Gardner)
- Subject: Re: Moral Context? (was Re: Theme ~ Moral)
- Message-ID: <1992Nov13.220821.11453@thinkage.on.ca>
- Organization: Thinkage Ltd.
- References: <92314.140929KVJLC@ASUACAD.BITNET> <1992Nov10.210236.10527@thinkage.on.ca> <YAMAUCHI.92Nov10233951@yuggoth.ces.cwru.edu>
- Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 22:08:21 GMT
- Lines: 65
-
- In article <YAMAUCHI.92Nov10233951@yuggoth.ces.cwru.edu> yamauchi@ces.cwru.edu (Brian Yamauchi) writes:
- >On the other hand, not all authors try to "convert" readers to their
- >own views of right and wrong. To take three very different examples,
- >consider Camus' _The_Stranger_, William Gibson's _Neuromancer_, and
- >Dave Sim's _Cerebus_. Would you say that these works project a "moral
- >stance", and if so, what?
-
- A writer may or may not intend to convert readers, but the fall-out
- still occurs. I blush to say I haven't read "The Stranger", but a
- number of my friends have and it affected them powerfully. It seems
- to have left them feeling bleak and depressed, and the phrase
- "existential despair" comes naturally to mind. On the other hand,
- I have read "The Myth of Sisyphus" by Camus, and the essay unquestionably
- deals with a clear moral outlook. Camus implies that the world is
- hell and all of us damned, but we can find a sort of peace of mind
- and even a kind of triumph if we are strong enough to face our
- damnation. That is a moral stance, and I would expect to see it
- reflected in his fiction.
-
- Neuromancer also has a moral context: we're all pawns. Many people
- also take the message (whether Gibson intended this or not) that
- because we're all pawns of the system, there's justice in kicking
- back. Gibson certainly didn't invent the hacking/cracking
- mentality, but Neuromancer certainly helped to popularize it and
- give it concrete expression. A lot of hackers have cheered the
- book as a validation of their lifestyle. I doubt if Gibson
- intended such a thing to happen, but that's part of the fall-out.
- People saw it as glamorizing the Computer Cowboy -- yes, I know
- that no one's life was glamorous in Neuromancer, and certainly
- not the hacker's, but many readers still got off on the image and
- a few tried to emulate it.
-
- As for Cerebus...one of the most widely remembered scenes is, of
- course, Most Holy giving a moral lesson to the people. At a parent's
- request, he blesses a baby then smashes it against a wall. Says
- Most Holy, "That was a free lesson. You can get what you want and
- still not be very happy. You're welcome." This is a good
- illustration of the difference between explicit "morals" and
- underlying moral stance. Sim probably expected us to laugh at
- the scene. Many people did. I did myself. But look at the
- underlying moral assumptions of that scene. Cerebus comes across
- as the coolest guy in Iest because he has no compunction about
- killing babies if it persuades people to give him gold. Yeah,
- yeah, we know Cerebus isn't "heroic" and he can be a real little
- prick; but Sim's presentation of Most Holy suggests that Cerebus
- is stronger and more admirable on many levels than the schmucks
- around him. Who are the admirable characters in Cerebus? Cerebus
- himself. Maybe Astoria (a Machiavellian schemer). Maybe Lord
- Julius (a lunatic schemer, an Erisian). Maybe the elf (an airhead,
- but innocent). Jaka certainly (a woman who maintains her strength
- no matter how often she's victimized). Is there a pattern? Maybe.
- But the point is, Sim clearly presents some people as admirable
- and presents others as wimps or butchers. We can't help but
- get the impression that behaving in some ways makes you admirable,
- while behaving in others makes you detestable.
-
- And that's one of the major factors making up a book's moral stance.
- What are we led to believe about various actions in the book?
- If X tricks Y, does the book suggest that X is scum to do it?
- Does it suggest that Y is stupid and deserves whatever happens?
- Is X clever or treacherous? Naturally, there can be a lot of
- shades of grey between black and white, but even depicting everything
- as a shade of grey is a choice that reflects a moral outlook.
-
- Jim Gardner, Thinkage Ltd.
-