home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!know!cass.ma02.bull.com!mips2!news.bbn.com!noc.near.net!chpc.chpc.org!rboudrie
- From: rboudrie@chpc.org (Rob Boudrie)
- Newsgroups: misc.consumers
- Subject: Re: Doctor ripoff, or just reality?
- Message-ID: <1992Nov13.204427.3086@chpc.org>
- Date: 13 Nov 92 20:44:27 GMT
- References: <1992Nov12.202654.25647@cpqhou.compaq.com> <1992Nov13.061347.4826@cbnewsc.cb.att.com> <Nov.13.10.54.15.1992.2592@net.bio.net>
- Distribution: na
- Organization: Center For High Perf. Computing of WPI; Marlboro Ma
- Lines: 27
-
- >Know something? In this part of the country, at least, some
- >unspecified number of physicians charge insured patients more than
- >private-pay patients for the same services.
- It sometimes works the other way around.
-
- Case (a) [ my dcotor ]
-
- Private pay office visits are $60, but HMO Blue (of which he
- is a participant) reimburses at the rate of (I think) $48.xx (+ a $3
- co-pay from me). They make this "take it or leave it offer"
- (with a condition that they not increase the patient copay) to
- area physicians, and many accept this lower rate. I don't know
- how he would react to an offer of cash payment at the HMO Blue
- rate from a private pay patient.
-
- Case (b) [ many hospitals ]
-
- You go the the hospital and get a bill for $10K. If it's private
- pay, that's the amount you fork over or get sued for. It it's
- insured, the insurance company may have a discount reducing their
- charge to (f'rinstance) $8K. Of course, if you have a 20%
- co-pay, this is based on the $10K bill you see, not the reduced
- insurance bill (covertly increasing your co-pay from 10% to 25%).
-
-
- Rob Boudrie
- rboudrie@chpc.org
-