home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky misc.activism.progressive:8330 alt.activism:18673 soc.culture.latin-america:4272
- Newsgroups: misc.activism.progressive,alt.activism,soc.culture.latin-america
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!wupost!mont!pencil.cs.missouri.edu!daemon
- From: harelb@math.cornell.edu (misc.activism.progressive co-moderator)
- Subject: POPULAR PARTICIPATION: Was Nicaragua More Democratic than the U.S.?
- Message-ID: <1992Nov12.105949.15804@mont.cs.missouri.edu>
- Followup-To: alt.activism.d
- Originator: daemon@pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Sender: news@mont.cs.missouri.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Organization: misc.activism.progressive on UseNet ; ACTIV-L@UMCVMB
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 10:59:49 GMT
- Approved: map@pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Lines: 60
-
- POPULAR PARTICIPATION: Was Nicaragua More Democratic than the U.S.?
-
- [From:
- ========================================================
- I s N i c a r a g u a M o r e D e m o c r a t i c
- ========================================================
- T h a n t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s ?
- ========================================================
- By Michael Parenti (*)
-
- [From: Covert Action Information Bulletin, Number 26, Summer 1986]]
-
-
- =====================
- Popular Participation
- =====================
-
- One crucial measure of an open political system is the degree of
- popular participation. Most voting studies in the United
- States and elsewhere find that nonvoters show a high degree of
- alienation from the political process; they believe voting is not a
- means of effecting changes, and they often fail to see a meaningful
- choice in the candidates presented to them. (This is the view also of
- a surprisingly large number of persons who vote in the United States.)
- Therefore a comparison of the respective rates of turnouts in the
- Nicaraguan and U.S. election might be worth pondering for a moment.
-
- The turnout in the United States in the 1984 election was little less
- than 53 percent of the eligible voters, one of the lowest of any
-
- [A decades-record high of some 55% in this 1992 election --HB]
-
- western nation. Yet the press took little note of this and instead
- treated Reagan's reelection as a landslide victory and democratic
- mandate. In contrast, voter turnout was nearly 82 percent in Managua
- and 75.4 percent in Nicaragua as a whole. Yet this turnout was
- described in the U.S. press as "disappointing" because the Sandinistas
- had hoped for an 80 percent national turnout. (Left unmentioned was
- the fact that in Nicaragua the voting was voluntary, unlike most Latin
- American countries. [including the U.S. backed terror-state
- "democracies" where the government which runs the "death squads" makes
- it known, loud and clear, that *not* voting makes one highly suspect of
- "subversive"/"terrorist" activities -- which have extremely well-known
- consequences in these countries --HB]
-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- --> [Send the 1-line message GET FAIRNESS NICA-USA ACTIV-L to]
- [LISTSERV@MIZZOU1.BITNET for a copy of this file. ]
-
- --> [Send GET ACTIV-L ARCHIVE ACTIV-L to above address for a ]
- [listing with brief descriptions of other files available]
-
- [To get a file named FILE NAME from the archiver (files are ]
- [two words separated by a space), send the 1-line message: ]
-
- --> GET FILE NAME ACTIV-L
-
- to: LISTSERV@MIZZOU1.BITNET [or: LISTSERV@MIZZOU1.MISSOURI.EDU]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
-