home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.iastate.edu!john
- From: john@iastate.edu (John Hascall)
- Subject: Re: Slow writes to Ultrix 4.3 NFS server
- Message-ID: <Bxos0B.GqM@news.iastate.edu>
- Keywords: NFS server performance
- Sender: news@news.iastate.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, IA
- References: <leb.721702653@Hypatia>
- Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1992 03:21:47 GMT
- Lines: 28
-
- leb@Hypatia.gsfc.nasa.gov (Lee E. Brotzman) writes:
- }I manage an SGI 4D/340 running IRIX 4.0.1 and a DECstation 5000/125 running
- }Ultrix 4.3. The user login directories of both machines are NFS mounted to
- }each other. I have found that when the DEC box writes files to the SGI,
- }performance is good, however when the SGI tries to write to the DEC, throughput
- }is just awful.
-
- Is this in the FAQ? If not it should be...
-
- Anyway, several vendors' NFS servers mis-implement the standard (on purpose).
- The NFS standard requires that writes be done "synchronously". Some vendors
- allow you to set an option which makes NFS writes be done "asynchronously"
- which can gain you a massive performance increase -- but if your server has
- a catastrophic crash (and can't flush the disk buffers) you can have data
- integrity problems. *** SGI ships their systems with ASYNCH as the DEFAULT ***
- If you run asynch-writes (and we have modified our DEC servers to do this) and
- you don't have them on a UPS you are running a massive risk.
-
- The "safe" option to make your Ultrix boxes faster is to buy PrestoServe
- for your NFS servers.
-
- John
- (if you have an Ultrix *source* license, I can provide the 1-line patch)
- --
- John Hascall ``An ill-chosen word is the fool's messenger.''
- Systems Software Engineer
- Project Vincent
- Iowa State University Computation Center + Ames, IA 50011 + 515/294-9551
-