home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
- Path: sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!emory!wupost!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!sgiblab!munnari.oz.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!brolga!ggm
- From: ggm@brolga.cc.uq.oz.au (George Michaelson)
- Subject: Re: 3 peeves re: Ultrix 4.3
- Message-ID: <ggm.721119360@brolga>
- Sender: news@bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au (USENET News System)
- Organization: Prentice Centre, University of Queensland
- References: <ggm.720916451@brolga> <AJC.92Nov5075136@thendara.pa.dec.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1992 06:56:00 GMT
- Lines: 22
-
- ajc@pa.dec.com (AJ Casamento) writes:
-
- > The basic issue around CAM has to do with people wanting to acheive what they
- >thought they were originally getting with SCSI, compatibility. The difficulty
-
- > SCSI CAM is worth it.
- >I hope that clears it up for you.
- > Thanx,
- > AJ
-
- Thanks for a good response! I applaud compatibility as a goal fully. I'm
- still interested in the other two issues however:
-
- Does it go faster or slower?
- Does it make the kernel bigger or smaller?
-
- -George
- --
- George Michaelson
- G.Michaelson@cc.uq.oz.au The Prentice Centre | There's no market for
- University of Queensland | hippos in Philadelphia
- Phone: +61 7 365 4079 QLD Australia 4072 | -Bertold Brecht
-