home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
- Path: sparky!uunet!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!paperboy.osf.org!think.com!unixland!bill
- From: bill@unixland.natick.ma.us (Bill Heiser)
- Subject: Re: Seeking recommendations( or NOT...) on ESIX
- Message-ID: <1992Nov6.015326.1476@unixland.natick.ma.us>
- Organization: Unixland Public Access Unix (508) 655-3848
- References: <Bx3KIF.n1L@engx25.trt.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 01:53:26 GMT
- Lines: 19
-
- eb@engx25.trt.com (Erico Bueno) writes:
-
- >We are leaning towards ESIX based upon the price and the advertised features.
- >I does seems a little to good to be true. Is there a catch????
-
- Well, those running ESIX 4.0 say it works .. and they say 4.0.4 (recently
- released) is MUCH better than 4.0.3.
-
- >We want to have about 8 users at a time editing, compiling and
- >linking tasks. Is this to heavy a load for a 486-33Mhz ???
-
- That will be a heavy load for a 4.0.3. Hey, that would be a heavy load
- on my Sun SPARC/IPX (28 mips) at work! :-)
-
-
- --
- bill@unixland.natick.ma.us ESIX Mailing List Moderator
- Public Access UNIX/USENET/E-MAIL! UUCP Accounts Available! (508) 655-3848
- 5 High-Speed Lines V.32bis/V.32/PEP/V.42bis, etc. Located in Natick, MA USA
-