home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
- Path: sparky!uunet!utcsri!torn!watserv2.uwaterloo.ca!watmath!undergrad.math.waterloo.edu!napier.uwaterloo.ca!papresco
- From: papresco@napier.uwaterloo.ca (Paul Prescod)
- Subject: Re: IS UNIX DEAD? (long)
- Message-ID: <BxKn4u.4HA@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu>
- Sender: news@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu
- Organization: University of Waterloo
- References: <gf06ruG00iUzQ7OT8=@andrew.cmu.edu>
- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 21:46:05 GMT
- Lines: 24
-
- > BTW, I do think you all are overestimating the power of the "average
- >user" when it comes to deciding the course of the PC world. The "average
- >user" couldn't afford to buy a machine powerful enough to run GUIs when
- >they first came out, but look where we went... Yeah, Joe Stupid may be a
- >large part of it, but he ain't the only thing determining what the next
- >operating system will be. (We all gotta keep in mind that not every
- >"average user" is stupid to the core, as several of the "common user
- >advocates" have suggested.)
-
- Overestimating the power of the "average user?" Underestimating his/her
- intelligence? Not me!
-
- Look at the most popular operating system today: DOS. A 1970s cpm rehash
- with a 640k memory limit. Guis took off when Joe Average could afford
- to buy a gui based computer. It's not that they are stupid, just poorly
- informed. Many, many people don't know there are opearting systems
- other then DOS. Those that do, usually crinkle their noses if you tell
- them about Unix. "I heard that has a brutal learning curve."
-
- In other words, while "average users" are smart, they are not computer
- literate, they don't know a good OS from a bad one, and they will not
- use something with a reputation for user-unfriendliness.
-
-
-