home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!leland.Stanford.EDU!dkeisen
- From: dkeisen@leland.Stanford.EDU (Dave Eisen)
- Subject: Re: IS UNIX DEAD?
- Message-ID: <1992Nov7.175137.12355@leland.Stanford.EDU>
- Sender: news@leland.Stanford.EDU (Mr News)
- Organization: Sequoia Peripherals, Inc.
- References: <BwxvEx.8Mn@unix.amherst.edu> <Bx577E.AIy@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu> <BxA67v.G3y@unix.amherst.edu>
- Date: Sat, 7 Nov 92 17:51:37 GMT
- Lines: 23
-
- In article <BxA67v.G3y@unix.amherst.edu> pfcouvar@unix.amherst.edu (Peter F. Couvares) writes:
- >papresco@undergrad.math.waterloo.edu (Paul Prescod) writes:
- >>[...]
- >>Some things that have to be change about unix before it reaches that place:
- >
- >>2. It should have a powerful command line.
- >
- > Are you really an idiot or do you just play one on Usenet?
-
- Now be fair.
-
- I assume the original poster knows what kind of command line Unix
- has. This requirement must be taken in tandem with requirement
- number 1: an easy to learn GUI. What he was saying is that Unix
- has to improve by including a good GUI without losing the powerful
- command line it currently has.
-
-
- --
- Dave Eisen Sequoia Peripherals: (415) 967-5644
- dkeisen@leland.Stanford.EDU Home: (415) 321-5154
- There's something in my library to offend everybody.
- --- Washington Coalition Against Censorship
-