home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!ferkel.ucsb.edu!ucsbcsl!engrhub!harley
- From: harley@engrhub.ucsb.edu (Hahn)
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
- Subject: IS UNIX DEAD?
- Message-ID: <6550@ucsbcsl.ucsb.edu>
- Date: 6 Nov 92 05:01:48 GMT
- Sender: news@ucsbcsl.ucsb.edu
- Lines: 47
-
- This is number 8 in a series of 22 responses to the question:
-
- What do you think about the Byte magazine cover that asked:
- IS UNIX DEAD?
-
- (moderated by Harley Hahn)
-
- ----------
- From: Ken Kress, Glenside, PA * dsinc!phent!kkress
-
- I took the cover of Byte as a compliment. Remember when Time (or
- Newsweek) put the question "Is God dead?" on the cover. I think
- both questions are very much in the same spirit. :>)
-
- I also thought it was the biggest splash Byte has (ever?) given
- to Unix.
-
- Look at the alternatives:
-
- Today:
- DOS, Windows, OS2, the Mac OS, the Unixes
- Someday:
- Pink, Windows NT
-
- DOS and the Mac are arguably on the downside of the curve; if
- Windows weren't so "gee-whizzy" and new, it -- like the Mac --
- would be fading.
-
- Look at Pink and NT. Both are going for a microkernel. Pink is
- even rumored to be looking at Mach. Both want to be the
- foundation for more than one OS layer. Pink's kernel is intended
- to support the old Mac OS, OS2 and --- AIX !
-
- NT is going to have some POSIX compliance and at the lower levels
- will be multiuser/multi-processor/multitasking. When it arrives,
- its neatest features will be analyzed by the gurus and we'll see
- some tweaking to SVR4, Solaris, etc.
-
- In the end, I think it will be less a question of "Is Unix Dead"
- and more a question of "Is Everything Unix at Heart."
-
- One final word, if Microsoft can pull off NT from the beginning
- I'll be flabbergasted. More likely it will limp along a few years
- -- before the masses flock to it.
-
- ==========
-
-