home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!nuscc!ntuix!eoahmad
- From: eoahmad@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg (Othman Ahmad)
- Subject: Re: [BSD4.3reno] /bin/sh problem?
- Message-ID: <1992Nov6.011147.6839@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg>
- Organization: Nanyang Technological University - Singapore
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
- References: <1992Nov5.135149.14437@osf.org>
- Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 01:11:47 GMT
- Lines: 13
-
- John Robert LoVerso (loverso@coltsfoot.osf.org) wrote:
- :
- : Another approach is to use GNU's bash.
- A much better one indeed. Why don't they adopt bash as the staandard shell?
- 200Kbyte extra disk space is nothing nowadays especially when we need csh
- as well. With bash, csh is redundant.
-
- --
- Othman bin Ahmad, School of EEE,
- Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 2263.
- Internet Email: eoahmad@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg
- Bitnet Email: eoahmad@ntuvax.bitnet
-
-