home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.theory
- Path: sparky!uunet!sun-barr!ames!ads.com!marcel
- From: marcel@ADS.COM (Marcel Schoppers)
- Subject: asymptotic value
- Message-ID: <1992Nov12.082550.18486@ads.com>
- Sender: Marcel Schoppers
- Organization: Advanced Decision Systems, Mtn. View, CA (415)960-7300
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 08:25:50 GMT
- Lines: 37
-
- All,
- I need some help figuring out an asymptotically correct value.
- Given the equation
-
- b^s = s + b^(s-2)
-
- set b=1+c and find c in terms of s as s becomes large. Empirically, c -> 0
- from above, but how fast? I can tell you that b^s >> s, but one has to be
- very careful about using this fact. For example, if you use it in the above
- equation you get b=1 and immediately wipe out your chances of finding the
- error term. Rearranging the original equation one can get to
-
- b^s = s b^2 / (b^2 - 1)
- : s/2c
-
- where ":" means "approximately equal".
-
- At this point if you substitute b=1+c on the left and expand, you get 1+sc
- which is nowhere near right: at s = 900, b=1.01, c=.01, b^s=9000 and the
- erstwhile approximation to 9000 is 1+sc=10. So instead, raise both sides
- to the power 1/s to get
-
- By defn, b = 1+c
- From above, : (s/2c)^(1/s)
- Taking logs, c : (1/s) ln (s/2c)
- c*s : ln (s/2c)
-
- Now at least we've got an equation in c and s only, but from here I'm stumped
- how to get an asymptotic expression for c. If we do
-
- c*s : ln s - ln 2c
-
- we find that at s=900, the terms are all of comparable magnitude, so we can't
- just drop one (they are, 9.0 : 6.8 - -3.9). So now what? Can anyone help?
-
- Marcel
-
-